References
- Anderson, B. A. (2013). A value-driven mechanism of attentional selection. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 7, 1–16.
- Anderson, B. A. (in press-a). Social reward shapes attentional biases. Cognitive Neuroscience. doi:10.1080/17588928.2015.1047823
- Anderson, B. A. (in press-b). The attention habit: How reward learning shapes attentional selection. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. doi:10.1111/nyas.12957
- Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2011). Value-driven attentional capture. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 10367–10371. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1104047108
- Anderson, B. A., Laurent, P. A., & Yantis, S. (2014). Value-driven attentional priority signals in human basal ganglia and visual cortex. Brain Research, 1587, 88–96. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2014.08.062
- Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2012). Value-driven attentional and oculomotor capture during goal-directed, unconstrained viewing. Attention, Perception, and Psychophysics, 74, 1644–1653. doi: 10.3758/s13414-012-0348-2
- Bandura, A. (1977). Social learning theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Brainard, D. H. (1997). The psychophysics toolbox. Spatial Vision. 10, 433–436.
- Bucker, B., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2015). Distractors that signal reward attract the eyes. Visual Cognition, 23, 1–24. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2014.980483
- Chelazzi, L., Perlato, A., Santandrea, E., & Della Libera, C. (2013). Rewards teach visual selective attention. Vision Research, 85, 58–72. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2012.12.005
- Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2006). Visual selective attention and the effects of monetary reward. Psychological Science, 17, 222–227. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01689.x
- Della Libera, C., & Chelazzi, L. (2009). Learning to attend and to ignore is a matter of gains and losses. Psychological Science, 20, 778–784. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02360.x
- French, J. R., & Raven, B. (1959). The basis of social power. In D. Cartwright (Ed.), Studies in social power (pp. 150–167). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute of Social Research.
- Frischen, A., Bayliss, A., & Tipper, S. P. (2007). Gaze cueing of attention: Visual attention, social cognition, and individual differences. Psychological Bulletin, 133, 694–724. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.133.4.694
- Harris, C. R., Pashler, H. E., & Coburn, N. (2004). Moray revisited: High-priority affective stimuli and visual search. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57, 1–31. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000107
- Hickey, C., Chelazzi, L., & Theeuwes, J. (2010). Reward changes salience in human vision via the anterior cingulate. Journal of Neuroscience, 30, 11096–11103. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1026-10.2010
- Hickey, C., & Peelen, M. V. (2015). Neural mechanisms of incentive salience in naturalistic human vision. Neuron, 85, 512–518. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.049
- Hikosaka, O., Yamamoto, S., Yasuda, M., & Kim, H. F. (2013). Why skill matters. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17, 434–441. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2013.07.001
- Izuma, K., Saito, D. N., & Sadato, N. (2008). Processing of social and monetary rewards in the human striatum. Neuron, 58, 284–294. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.03.020
- Klucharev, V., Hytonen, K., Rijpkema, M., Smidts, A., & Fernandez, G. (2009). Reinforcement learning signals predict social conformity. Neuron, 61, 140–151. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2008.11.027
- Le Pelley, M. E., Pearson, D., Griffiths, O., & Beesley, T. (2015). When goals conflict with values: Counterproductive attentional and oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 144, 158–171. doi: 10.1037/xge0000037
- MacLean, M. H., & Giesbrecht, B. (2015). Neural evidence reveals the rapid effects of reward history on selective attention. Brain Research, 1606, 86–94. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2015.02.016
- Martinez, A. M., & Benavente, R. (1998). The AR face database (CVC Technical Report #24).
- Moray, N. (1959). Attention in dichotic listening: Affective cues and the influence of instructions. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 11, 56–60.
- Pearson, D., Donkin, C., Tran, S. C., Most, S. B., & Le Pelley, M. E. (2015). Cognitive control and counterproductive oculomotor capture by reward-related stimuli. Visual Cognition, 23, 41–66. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2014.994252
- Pool, E., Brosch, T., Delplanque, S., & Sander, D. (2014). Where is the chocolate? Rapid spatial orienting toward stimuli associated with primary reward. Cognition, 130, 348–359. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2013.12.002
- Qi, S., Zeng, Q., Ding, C., & Li, H. (2013). Neural correlates of reward-driven attentional capture in visual search. Brain Research, 1532, 32–43. doi: 10.1016/j.brainres.2013.07.044
- Raymond, J. E., & O'Brien, J. L. (2009). Selective visual attention and motivation: The consequences of value learning in an attentional blink task. Psychological Science, 20, 981–988. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02391.x
- Sali, A. W., Anderson, B. A., & Yantis, S. (2014). The role of reward prediction in the control of attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 40, 1654–1664.
- Schmidt, L. J., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2015a). Attentional capture by signals of threat. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 687–694. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.924484
- Schmidt, L. J., Belopolsky, A. V., & Theeuwes, J. (2015b). Potential threat attracts attention and interferes with voluntary saccades. Emotion, 15, 329–338. doi: 10.1037/emo0000041
- Sigurjonsdottir, O., Bjornsson, A. S., Ludvigsdottir, S. J., & Kristjansson, A. (2015). Money talks in attention bias modification: Reward in a dot-probe task affects attentional biases. Visual Cognition, 23, 118–132. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2014.984797
- Sui, J., Chechlacz, M., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Dividing the self: Distinct neural substrates of task-based and automatic self-prioritization after brain damage. Cognition, 122, 150–162. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2011.10.008
- Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38, 1105–1117.
- Townsend, J. T., & Ashby, F. G. (1978). Methods of modeling capacity in simple processing systems. In J. Castellan & F. Restle (Eds.), Cognitive theory (Vol. 3. pp. 200–239). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
- Wang, L., Yu, H., & Zhou, X. (2013). Interaction between value and perceptual salience in value-driven attentional capture. Journal of Vision, 13(3), 5, 1–13. doi: 10.1167/13.3.5