Age-related variance in decisions under ambiguity is explained by changes in reasoning, executive functions, and decision-making under risk

References

• Bagneux, V., Thomassin, N., Gonthier, C., & Roulin, J.-L. (2013). Working memory in the processing of the Iowa Gambling Task: An individual differences approach. PloS One, 8, e81498–e81498. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0081498
   Google Scholar
• Bechara, A. (2005). Decision making, impulse control and loss of willpower to resist drugs: A neurocognitive perspective. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1458–1463. doi:10.1038/nn1584
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., & Damasio, A. R. (2005). The somatic marker hypothesis: A neural theory of economic decision. Games and Economic Behavior, 52, 336–372. doi:10.1016/j.geb.2004.06.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., Damasio, A. R., Damasio, H., & Anderson, S. W. (1994). Insensitivity to future consequences following damage to human prefrontal cortex. Cognition, 50, 7–15. doi:10.1016/0010-0277(94)90018-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., Damasio, H., Tranel, D., & Damasio, A. R. (1997). Deciding advantageously before knowing the advantageous strategy. Science, 275, 1293–1295. doi:10.1126/science.275.5304.1293
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bechara, A., & Martin, E. M. (2004). Impaired decision making related to working memory deficits in individuals with substance addictions. Neuropsychology, 18, 152–162. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.152
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, M., Fujiwara, E., Borsutzky, S., Kalbe, E., Kessler, J., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2005). Decision-making deficits of Korsakoff patients in a new gambling task with explicit rules: Associations with executive functions. Neuropsychology, 19, 267–277. doi:10.1037/0894-4105.19.3.267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, M., Labudda, K., & Markowitsch, H. J. (2006). Neuropsychological correlates of decision-making in ambiguous and risky situations. Neural Networks, 19, 1266–1276. doi:10.1016/j.neunet.2006.03.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, M., Recknor, E. C., Grabenhorst, F., & Bechara, A. (2007). Decisions under ambiguity and decisions under risk: Correlations with executive functions and comparisons of two different gambling tasks with implicit and explicit rules. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 29, 86–99. doi:10.1080/13803390500507196
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand, M., & Schiebener, J. (2013). Interactions of age and cognitive functions in predicting decision making under risky conditions over the life span. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 35, 9–23. doi:10.1080/13803395.2012.740000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craik, F. I. M., & Salthouse, T. A. (2011). The Handbook of aging and cognition (3rd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Denburg, N. L., Cole, C. A., Hernandez, M., Yamada, T. H., Tranel, D., Bechara, A., & Wallace, R. B. (2007). The orbitofrontal cortex, real-world decision making, and normal aging. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1121, 480–498. doi:10.1196/annals.1401.031
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Denburg, N. L., Tranel, D., & Bechara, A. (2005). The ability to decide advantageously declines prematurely in some normal older persons. Neuropsychologia, 43, 1099–1106. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2004.09.012
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, B. D., Dalgleish, T., & Lawrence, A. D. (2006). The somatic marker hypothesis: A critical evaluation. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 30, 239–271. doi:10.1016/j.neubiorev.2005.07.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eppinger, B., Hämmerer, D., & Li, S.-C. (2011). Neuromodulation of reward-based learning and decision making in human aging. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06230.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gansler, D. A., Jerram, M. W., Vannorsdall, T. D., & Schretlen, D. J. (2011). Does the Iowa Gambling Task measure executive function? Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 20, 1–12. doi:10.1093/arclin/acr082
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Horn, W. (1983). Leistungsprüfsystem [German intelligence test battery] . Göttingen: Hogrefe.
   Google Scholar
• Labudda, K., Woermann, F. G., Mertens, M., Pohlmann-Eden, B., Markowitsch, H. J., & Brand, M. (2008). Neural correlates of decision making with explicit information about probabilities and incentives in elderly healthy subjects. Experimental Brain Research, 187, 641–650. doi: 10.1007/s00221-008-1332-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindenberger, U., von Oertzen, T., Ghisletta, P., & Hertzog, C. (2011). Cross-sectional age variance extraction: What's change got to do with it? Psychology and Aging, 26, 34–47. doi:10.1037/a0020525
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mata, R., Josef, A. K., Samanez-Larkin, G. R., & Hertwig, R. (2011). Age differences in risky choice: A meta-analysis. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1235, 18–29. doi:10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06200.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mu, Q., Xie, J., Wen, Z., Weng, Y., & Shuyun, Z. (1999). A quantitative MR study of the hippocampal formation, the amygdala, and the temporal horn of the lateral ventricle in healthy subjects 40 to 90 years of age. American Journal of Neuroradiology, 20, 207–211.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, H. E. (1976). A modified card sorting test sensitive to frontal lobe defects. Cortex, 12, 313–324. doi:10.1016/s0010-9452(76)80035-4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebener, J., & Brand, M. (2015). Decision making under objective risk conditions-a review of cognitive and emotional correlates, strategies, feedback processing, and external influences. Neuropsychology Review, 25, 171–198. doi:10.1007/s11065-015-9285-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiebener, J., Wegmann, E., Gathmann, B., Laier, C., Pawlikowski, M., & Brand, M. (2014). Among three different executive functions, general executive control ability is a key predictor of decision making under objective risk. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 871. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01386
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stocco, A., Fum, D., & Napoli, A. (2009). Dissociable processes underlying decisions in the Iowa Gambling Task: A new integrative framework. Behavioral and Brain Functions, 5, 1. doi:10.1186/1744-9081-5-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Toplak, M. E., Sorge, G. B., Benoit, A., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2010). Decision-making and cognitive abilities: A review of associations between Iowa Gambling Task performance, executive functions, and intelligence. Clinical Psychology Review, 30, 562–581. doi:10.1016/j.cpr.2010.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weller, J. A., Levin, I. P., & Bechara, A. (2009). Do individual differences in Iowa Gambling Task performance predict adaptive decision making for risky gains and losses? Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 32, 141–150. doi:10.1080/13803390902881926
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar