403
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

Anticipatory affect during action preparation: evidence from backward compatibility in dual-task performance

ORCID Icon, , &
Pages 1211-1224 | Received 24 Feb 2016, Accepted 26 Jun 2016, Published online: 14 Jul 2016

References

  • Baeyens, F., Eelen, P., Van den Bergh, O., & Crombez, G. (1992). The content of learning in human evaluative conditioning: Acquired valence is sensitive to US-revaluation. Learning and Motivation, 23, 200–224. doi: 10.1016/0023-9690(92)90018-H
  • Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., DeWall, C. N., & Zhang, L. (2007). How emotion shapes behavior: Feedback, anticipation, and reflection, rather than direct causation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 11, 167–203. doi: 10.1177/1088868307301033
  • Beckers, T., De Houwer, J., & Eelen, P. (2002). Automatic integration of non-perceptual action effect features: The case of the associative affective Simon effect. Psychological Research, 66, 166–173. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0090-9
  • Blanchard, D. C., Hynd, A. L., Minke, K. A., Minemoto, T., & Blanchard, R. J. (2001). Human defensive behaviors to threat scenarios show parallels to fear- and anxiety-related defense patterns of non-human mammals. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 25, 761–770. doi: 10.1016/S0149-7634(01)00056-2
  • Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of Behavior Therapy and Experimental Psychiatry, 25, 49–59. doi: 10.1016/0005-7916(94)90063-9
  • Coombes, S. A., Tandonnet, C., Fujiyama, H., Janelle, C. M., Cauraugh, J. H., & Summers, J. J. (2009). Emotion and motor preparation: A transcranial magnetic stimulation study of corticospinal motor tract excitability. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 9, 380–388. doi: 10.3758/CABN.9.4.380
  • Damasio, A. (1998). The somatic marker hypothesis and the possible functions of the prefrontal cortex. In A. C. Roberts, T. W. Robbins, & L. Weiskrantz (Eds.), The prefrontal cortex: Executive and cognitive functions (pp. 36–50). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • De Houwer, J., Thomas, S., & Baeyens, F. (2001). Association learning of likes and dislikes: A review of 25 years of research on human evaluative conditioning. Psychological Bulletin, 127, 853–869. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.127.6.853
  • Duncan, S., & Barrett, L. F. (2007). Affect is a form of cognition: A neurobiological analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 21(6), 1184–1211. doi: 10.1080/02699930701437931
  • Eder, A. B., & Hommel, B. (2013). Anticipatory control of approach and avoidance: An ideomotor approach. Emotion Review, 5, 275–279. doi: 10.1177/1754073913477505
  • Eder, A. B., & Klauer, K. C. (2009). A common-coding account of the bidirectional evaluation–behavior link. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138, 218–235. doi: 10.1037/a0015220
  • Eder, A. B., Müsseler, J., & Hommel, B. (2012). The structure of affective action representations: Temporal binding of affective response codes. Psychological Research, 76(1), 111–118. doi: 10.1007/s00426-011-0327-6
  • Eder, A. B., & Rothermund, K. (2013). Emotional action: An ideomotor model. In C. Mohiyeddini & M. Eysenck (Eds.), Handbook of psychology of emotions: Recent theoretical perspectives and novel empirical findings (Vol. 1, pp. 11–38). Hauppauge, NY: Nova Science.
  • Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., De Houwer, J., & Hommel, B. (2015). Directive and incentive functions of affective action consequences: An ideomotor approach. Psychological Research, 79, 630–649. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0590-4
  • Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., & Hommel, B. (2016). Commentary: Contrasting motivational orientation and evaluative coding accounts: On the need to differentiate the effectors of approach/avoidance responses. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article 163.
  • Eder, A. B., Rothermund, K., & Proctor, R. W. (2010). The prepared emotional reflex: Intentional preparation of automatic approach and avoidance tendencies as a means to regulate emotional responding. Emotion, 10, 593–598. doi: 10.1037/a0019009
  • Ellenbogen, R., & Meiran, N. (2008). Working memory involvement in dual-task performance: Evidence from the backward compatibility effect. Memory & Cognition, 36, 968–978. doi: 10.3758/MC.36.5.968
  • Ellenbogen, R., & Meiran, N. (2011). Objects and events as determinants of parallel processing in dual tasks: Evidence from the backward compatibility effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 37, 152–167.
  • Elsner, B., & Hommel, B. (2001). Effect anticipation and action control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27(1), 229–240.
  • Frijda, N. H. (2004). Emotions and action. In A. S. R. Manstead, N. Frijda, & A. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium. (pp. 158–173). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gast, A., & Rothermund, K. (2011). I like it because I said that I like it: Evaluative conditioning effects can be based on stimulus-response learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 37(4), 466–476.
  • Hommel, B. (1994). Spontaneous decay of response-code activation. Psychological Research, 56(4), 261–268. doi: 10.1007/BF00419656
  • Hommel, B. (1998). Automatic stimulus–response translation in dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 24, 1368–1384.
  • Hommel, B. (2004). Event files: Feature binding in and across perception and action. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8, 494–500. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2004.08.007
  • Hommel, B., & Eglau, B. (2002). Control of stimulus-response translation in dual-task performance. Psychological Research, 66, 260–273. doi: 10.1007/s00426-002-0100-y
  • Hommel, B., Müsseler, J., Aschersleben, G., & Prinz, W. (2001). The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 24, 849–878. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X01000103
  • Janczyk, M., Nolden, S., & Jolicoeur, P. (2015). No differences in dual-task costs between forced- and free-choice tasks. Psychological Research, 79, 463–477. doi: 10.1007/s00426-014-0580-6
  • Janczyk, M., Pfister, R., Hommel, B., & Kunde, W. (2014). Who is talking in backward crosstalk? Disentangling response- from goal-conflict in dual-task performance. Cognition, 132, 30–43. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.03.001
  • Knutson, B., & Greer, S. M. (2008). Anticipatory affect: Neural correlates and consequences for choice. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 363, 3771–3786. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2008.0155
  • Ko, Y.-T., & Miller, J. (2014). Locus of backward crosstalk effects on Task 1 in a psychological refractory period task. Experimental Psychology, 61, 30–37. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000224
  • Krämer, U. M., Büttner, S., Roth, G., & Münte, T. F. (2008). Trait aggressiveness modulates neurophysiological correlates of laboratory-induced reactive aggression in humans. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 20, 1464–1477. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20103
  • Kunde, W. (2001). Response–effect compatibility in manual choice reaction tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 387–394.
  • Kunde, W., Koch, I., & Hoffmann, J. (2004). Anticipated action effects affect the selection, initiation, and execution of actions. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology Section A, 57(1), 87–106. doi: 10.1080/02724980343000143
  • Laird, J. D., & Lacasse, K. (2014). Bodily influences on emotional feelings: Accumulating evidence and extensions of William James’s theory of emotion. Emotion Review, 6, 27–34. doi: 10.1177/1754073913494899
  • Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2005). International Affective Picture System (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual ( Technical Report A-6).
  • Lavender, T., & Hommel, B. (2007). Affect and action: Towards an event-coding account. Cognition and Emotion, 21, 1270–1296. doi: 10.1080/02699930701438152
  • Lench, H. C., Flores, S. A., & Bench, S. W. (2011). Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: A meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 834–855. doi: 10.1037/a0024244
  • Levey, A. B., & Martin, I. (1975). Classical conditioning of human “evaluative” responses. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 13(4), 221–226. doi: 10.1016/0005-7967(75)90026-1
  • Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2000). Multiple spatial correspondence effects on dual-task performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1260–1280.
  • Lien, M.-C., & Proctor, R. W. (2002). Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: Implications for response selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 212–238. doi: 10.3758/BF03196277
  • Lindquist, K. A., Siegel, E. H., Quigley, K. S., & Barrett, L. F. (2013). The hundred-year emotion war: Are emotions natural kinds or psychological constructions? Comment on Lench, Flores, and Bench (2011). Psychological Bulletin, 139, 255–263. doi: 10.1037/a0029038
  • Loewenstein, G., & Lerner, J. S. (2003). The role of affect in decision making. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 619–642). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  • Logan, G. D., & Schulkind, M. D. (2000). Parallel memory retrieval in dual-task situations: I. Semantic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 26, 1072–1090.
  • Marien, H., Aarts, H., & Custers, R. (2013). Adaptive control of human action: The role of outcome representations and reward signals. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, Article 602.
  • McCann, R. S., & Johnston, J. C. (1992). Locus of the single-channel bottleneck in dual-task interference. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 18, 471–484.
  • McNaughton, N., & Corr, P. J. (2004). A two-dimensional neuropsychology of defense: Fear/anxiety and defensive distance. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 28, 285–305. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2004.03.005
  • Mellers, B. A., & McGraw, A. P. (2001). Anticipated emotions as guides to choice. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10, 210–214. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00151
  • Miller, J. (2006). Backward crosstalk effects in psychological refractory period paradigms: Effects of second-task response types on first-task response latencies. Psychological Research, 70, 484–493. doi: 10.1007/s00426-005-0011-9
  • Miller, J., & Alderton, M. (2006). Backward response-level crosstalk in the psychological refractory period paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 32, 149–165.
  • Moseley, R., Carota, F., Hauk, O., Mohr, B., & Pulvermüller, F. (2012). A role for the motor system in binding abstract emotional meaning. Cerebral Cortex, 22, 1634–1647. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhr238
  • Pashler, H. (1984). Processing stages in overlapping tasks: Evidence for a central bottleneck. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 358–377.
  • Pashler, H. (1994). Dual-task interference in simple tasks: Data and theory. Psychological Bulletin, 116, 220–244. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.116.2.220
  • Pfister, R., Janczyk, M., Wirth, R., Dignath, D., & Kunde, W. (2014). Thinking with portals: Revisiting kinematic cues to intention. Cognition, 133, 464–473. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2014.07.012
  • Pfister, R., & Kunde, W. (2013). Dissecting the response in response-effect compatibility. Experimental Brain Research, 224, 647–655. doi: 10.1007/s00221-012-3343-x
  • Rescorla, R. A., & Solomon, R. L. (1967). Two-process learning theory: Relationships between Pavlovian conditioning and instrumental learning. Psychological Review, 74, 151–182. doi: 10.1037/h0024475
  • Robinson, M. D., Storbeck, J., Meier, B. P., & Kirkeby, B. S. (2004). Watch Out! That could be dangerous: Valence-arousal interactions in evaluative processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 1472–1484. doi: 10.1177/0146167204266647
  • Sanders, A. F. (1980). Stage analysis of reaction processes. In G. E. Stelmach & J. Requin (Eds.), Tutorials in motor science. Advances in psychology (Vol. 1, pp. 331–354). North-Holland: Elsevier Academic Press.
  • Schmidt, L., Cléry-Melin, M.-L., Lafargue, G., Valabrègue, R., Fossati, P., Dubois, B., & Pessiglione, M. (2009). Get aroused and be stronger: Emotional facilitation of physical effort in the human brain. The Journal of Neuroscience, 29, 9450–9457. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1951-09.2009
  • Simon-Thomas, E. R., Keltner, D. J., Sauter, D., Sinicropi-Yao, L., & Abramson, A. (2009). The voice conveys specific emotions: Evidence from vocal burst displays. Emotion, 9, 838–846. doi: 10.1037/a0017810
  • Thomson, S. J., Watter, S., & Finkelshtein, A. (2010). Parallel response selection in dual-task situations via automatic category-to-response translation. Attention, Perception, & Psychophysics, 72, 1791–1802. doi: 10.3758/APP.72.7.1791
  • Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory data analysis. Reading, MA: Addison Wesley.
  • Watson, P., Wiers, R. W., Hommel, B., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & de Wit, S. (2016). An associative account of how the obesogenic environment biases adolescents’ food choices. Appetite, 96, 560–571. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.10.008
  • Welford, A. T. (1952). The “psychological refractory period” and the timing of high-speed performance – a review and a theory. British Journal of Psychology, 43, 2–19.
  • Wiens, S. (2005). Interoception in emotional experience. Current Opinion in Neurology, 18, 442–447. doi: 10.1097/01.wco.0000168079.92106.99
  • Wilkowski, B. M., & Robinson, M. D. (2006). Stopping dead in one’s tracks: Motor inhibition following incidental evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 42, 479–490. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2005.08.007

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.