924
Views
8
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

Affective theory of mind inferences contextually influence the recognition of emotional facial expressions

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon, & ORCID Icon
Pages 272-287 | Received 19 Jul 2016, Accepted 02 Mar 2018, Published online: 14 Mar 2018

References

  • Aviezer, H., Hassin, R. R., Ryan, J., Grady, C., Susskind, J., Anderson, A., … Bentin, S. (2008). Angry, disgusted, or afraid? Studies on the malleability of emotion perception. Psychological Science, 19, 724–732. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02148.x
  • Aviezer, H., Trope, Y., & Todorov, A. (2012). Body cues, not facial expressions, discriminate between intense positive and negative emotions. Science, 338, 1225–1229. doi: 10.1126/science.1224313
  • Baayen, R. H., Davidson, D. J., & Bates, D. M. (2008). Mixed-effects modeling with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Journal of Memory and Language, 59, 390–412. doi: 10.1016/j.jml.2007.12.005
  • Baron-Cohen, S., Wheelwright, S., Hill, J., Raste, Y., & Plumb, I. (2001). “Reading the mind in the eyes” test revised version: A study with normal adults, and adults with Asperger syndrome or high-functioning autism. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 42, 241–251. doi: 10.1111/1469-7610.00715
  • Barrett, L. F., & Kensinger, E. A. (2010). Context is routinely encoded during emotion perception. Psychological Science, 21, 595–599. doi: 10.1177/0956797610363547
  • Barrett, L. F., Lindquist, K. A., & Gendron, M. (2007). Language as context for the perception of emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11, 327–332. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.003
  • Bates, D., Maechler, M., Bolker, B., & Walker, S. (2015). Fitting linear mixed-effects models using lme4. Journal of Statistical Software, 67, 1–48. doi: 10.18637/jss.v067.i01
  • Carroll, J. M., & Russell, J. A. (1996). Do facial expressions signal specific emotions? Judging emotion from the face in context. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 70, 205–218. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.70.2.205
  • Clark, H. H. (1973). The language-as-fixed-effect fallacy: A critique of language statistics in psychological research. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 335–359. doi: 10.1016/S0022-5371(73)80014-3
  • Ferstl, E. C., Rinck, M., & von Cramon, D. Y. (2005). Emotional and temporal aspects of situation model processing during text comprehension: An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 724–739. doi: 10.1162/0898929053747658
  • Gendron, M., Lindquist, K. A., Barsalou, L., & Barrett, L. F. (2012). Emotion words shape perception. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 12, 314–325. doi: 10.1037/a0026007
  • Gernsbacher, M. A., Goldsmith, H. H., & Robertson, R. R. W. (1992). Do readers mental represent characters’ emotional states? Cognition and Emotion, 6, 89–111. doi: 10.1080/02699939208411061
  • Goeleven, E., De Raedt, R., Leyman, L., & Verschuere, B. (2008). The Karolinska directed emotional faces: A validation study. Cognition and Emotion, 22, 1094–1118. doi: 10.1080/02699930701626582
  • Gygax, P., Oakhill, J., & Garnham, A. (2003). Emotion in text comprehension: Do readers infer specific emotions? Cognition and Emotion, 17, 413–428. doi: 10.1080/02699930244000048
  • Haigh, M., & Bonnefon, J.-F. (2015). Eye movements reveal how readers infer intentions from the beliefs and desires of others. Experimental Psychology, 62, 206–213. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000290
  • Hassin, R. R., Aviezer, H., & Bentin, S. (2013). Inherently ambiguous: Facial expressions of emotions, in context. Emotion Review, 5, 60–65. doi: 10.1177/1754073912451331
  • Kayyal, M., Widen, S., & Russell, J. A. (2015). Context is more powerful than we think: Contextual cues override facial cues even for valence. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 15, 287–291. doi: 10.1037/emo0000032
  • Kim, H., Somerville, L. H., Johnstone, T., Polis, S., Alexander, A. L., Shin, L. M., & Whalen, P. J. (2004). Contextual modulation of amygdala responsivity to surprised faces. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 1730–1745. doi: 10.1162/0898929042947865
  • Lenth, R. V. (2006–9). Java applets for power and sample size [Computer software]. Retrieved from http://www.stat.uiowa.edu/~rlenth/Power
  • Lenth, R., Love, J., & Hervé, M. (2018). Package emmeans. Retrieved from https://cran.r-project.org/web/packages/emmeans/emmeans.pdf
  • Leppänen, J. M., & Hietanen, J. K. (2004). Positive facial expressions are recognized faster than negative facial expressions, but why? Psychological Research Psychologische Forschung, 69, 22–29. doi: 10.1007/s00426-003-0157-2
  • Lindquist, K. A., Barrett, L. F., Bliss-Moreau, E., & Russell, J. A. (2006). Language and the perception of emotion. Emotion (Washington, D.C.), 6, 125–138. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.6.1.125
  • Lundqvist, D., Flykt, A., & Ohman, A. (1998). The Karolinska Directed Emotional Faces – KDEF, CD ROM from Department of Clinical Neurscience, Psychology section, Karolinska Institutet, ISBN 91-630-7164-9.
  • Nakamura, M., Buck, R., & Kenny, D. A. (1990). Relative contributions of expressive behavior and contextual information to the judgment of the emotional state of another. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 1032–1039. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.59.5.1032
  • Premack, D., & Woodruff, G. (1978). Does the chimpanzee have a theory of mind? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 1, 515–526. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X00076512
  • Psychology Software Tools, Inc. [E-Prime 2.0]. (2012). Retrieved from http://www.pstnet.com.
  • R Development Core Team. (2017). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Retrieved from https://www.R-project.org
  • Raftery, A. E. (1995). Bayesian model selection in social research. Sociological Methodology, 25, 111–163. doi: 10.2307/271063
  • Righart, R., & de Gelder, B. (2008). Recognition of facial expressions is influenced by emotional scene gist. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 8, 264–272. doi: 10.3758/CABN.8.3.264
  • Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods research (pp. 92–120). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1307–1351. doi: 10.1080/02699930902928969
  • Schwarz, K. A., Wieser, M. J., Gerdes, A. B. M., Mühlberger, A., & Pauli, P. (2013). Why are you looking like that? How the context influences evaluation and processing of human faces. Social Cognitive & Affective Neuroscience, 8, 438–445. doi: 10.1093/scan/nss013
  • Shamay-Tsoory, S. G., Tomer, R., Berger, B. D., Goldsher, D., & Aharaon-Peretz, J. (2005). Impaired “affective theory of mind” is associated with right ventromedial prefrontal damage. Cognitive and Behavioral Neurology, 18, 55–67. doi: 10.1097/01.wnn.0000152228.90129.99
  • Stewart, A. J., Holler, J., & Kidd, E. (2007). Shallow processing of ambiguous pronouns: Evidence for delay. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 60, 1680–1696. doi: 10.1080/17470210601160807
  • Trope, Y. (1986). Identification and inferential processes in dispositional attribution. Psychological Review, 93, 239–257. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.3.239
  • Wagenmakers, E.-J. (2007). A practical solution to the pervasive problems of p values. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 14, 779–804. doi: 10.3758/BF03194105
  • Wieser, M. J., & Brosch, T. (2012). Faces in context: A review and systematization of contextual influences on affective face processing. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, Article 471. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00471
  • Zwaan, R. A. (1999). Five dimensions of narrative comprehension: The event-indexing model. In S. R. Goldman, A. C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 93–110). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • Zwaan, R. A., & Radvansky, G. A. (1998). Situation models in language comprehension and memory. Psychological Bulletin, 123, 162–185. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.123.2.162
  • Zwaan, R. A., Stanfield, R. A., & Yaxley, R. H. (2002). Language comprehenders mentally represent the shapes of objects. Psychological Science, 13, 168–171. doi: 10.1111/1467-9280.00430

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.