The semantic structure of emotion words across languages is consistent with componential appraisal models of emotion

References

• Austin, J. L. (1957). A plea for excuses. Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society, 57, 1–30. doi: 10.1093/aristotelian/57.1.1
   Google Scholar
• Bollen, K. A., & Pearl, J. (2013). Eight myths about causality and structural equation models. In S. L. Morgan (Ed.), Handbook of causal analysis for social research (pp. 301–328). Dordrecht: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1943). The description of personality: Basic traits resolved into clusters. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 38, 476–506. doi: 10.1037/h0054116
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112, 155–159. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., & Friesen, W. V. (1969). The repertoire of nonverbal behavior: Categories, origins, usage, and coding. Semiotica, 1, 49–98. doi: 10.1515/semi.1969.1.1.49
   Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of the affective sciences (pp. 572–595). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., Roesch, E. B., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2007). The world of emotions is not two-dimensional. Psychological Science, 18, 1050–1057. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., & Soriano, C. (Eds.). (2013). Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H., Kuipers, P., & ter Schure, E. (1989). Relations among emotion, appraisal, and emotional action readiness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57, 212–228. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.57.2.212
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goddard, C. (2010). Universals and variation in the lexicon of mental state concepts. In B. C. Malt & P. Wolff (Eds.), Words and the mind: How words capture human experience (pp. 72–92). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• John, O. P., Angleitner, A., & Ostendorf, F. (1988). The lexical approach to personality: A historical review of trait taxonomic research. European Journal of Personality, 2, 171–203. doi: 10.1002/per.2410020302
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2012). Assumptions in structural equation modeling. In R. H. Hoyle (Ed.), Handbook of structural equation modeling (pp. 111–125). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Manstead, A. S. R., & Fischer, A. H. (2001). Social appraisal: The social world as object of and influence on appraisal processes. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 221–232). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Matsumoto, D., & Ekman, P. (2009). Basic emotions. In D. Sander & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), The Oxford companion to emotion and the affective sciences (pp. 69–72). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mehrabian, A. (1976). The three dimensions of emotional reaction. Psychology Today, 10, 57–61.
   Google Scholar
• Moors, A. (2009). Theories of emotion causation: A review. Cognition & Emotion, 23, 625–662. doi: 10.1080/02699930802645739
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moors, A., & Scherer, K. R. (2013). The role of appraisal in emotion. In M. D. Robinson, E. R. Watkins, & E. Harmon-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of cognition and emotion (pp. 135–155). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Osgood, C. (1957). The nature and measurement of meaning. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reips, U. D. (2002). Standards for Internet-based experimenting. Experimental Psychology, 49, 243–256. doi: 10.1026//1618-3169.49.4.243
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178. doi: 10.1037/h0077714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (2003). Core affect and the psychological construction of emotion. Psychological Review, 110, 145–172. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.110.1.145
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (2009). Emotion, core affect, and psychological construction. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1259–1283. doi: 10.1080/02699930902809375
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (1984). On the nature and function of emotion: A component process approach. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 293–317). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multi-level sequential checking. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92–120). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (2004). Feelings integrate the central representation of appraisal-driven response organization in emotion. In A. S. R. Manstead, N. H. Frijda, & A. H. Fischer (Eds.), Feelings and emotions: The Amsterdam symposium (pp. 136–157). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (2005). What are emotions? And how can they be measured? Social Science Information, 44, 695–729. doi: 10.1177/0539018405058216
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 1307–1351. doi: 10.1080/02699930902928969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (2013). The nature and dynamics of relevance and valence appraisals: Theoretical advances and recent evidence. Emotion Review, 5, 150–162. doi: 10.1177/1754073912468166
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R., Mortillaro, M., & Mehu, M. (2017). Facial expression is driven by appraisal and generates appraisal inference. In J.-M. Fernández-Dols & J. A. Russell (Eds.), The science of facial expression (pp. 353–373). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R., Schorr, A., & Johnstone, T. (Eds.). (2001). Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R., Wranik, T., Sangsue, J., Tran, V., & Scherer, U. (2004). Emotions in everyday life: Probability of occurrence, risk factors, appraisal and reaction patterns. Social Science Information, 43, 499–570. doi: 10.1177/0539018404047701
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schlosberg, H. (1952). The description of facial expressions in terms of two dimensions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 44, 229–237. doi: 10.1037/h0055778
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Shuman, V., Sander, D., & Scherer, K. R. (2013). Levels of valence. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 261. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00261
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, C., & Lazarus, R. S. (1993). Appraisal components, core relational themes, and the emotions. Cognition & Emotion, 7, 233–269. doi: 10.1080/02699939308409189
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stemmler, G. (2003). Methodological considerations in the psychophysiological study of emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of affective sciences (pp. 225–255). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Thayer, R. E. (1989). The biopsychology of mood and arousal. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wierzbicka, A. (1999). Emotions across languages and cultures: Diversity and universals. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wundt, W. (1896). Grundriss der Psychologie [ Principles of psychology]. Leipzig: Engelmann ( 15th ed., 1922; English editions: London 1894).
   Google Scholar
• Ye, Z. (2013). Comparing the natural semantic metalanguage (NSM) approach to emotion and the GRID paradigm. In R. R. J. Fontaine, K. R. Scherer, & C. Soriano (Eds.), Components of emotional meaning: A sourcebook (pp. 399–409). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yik, M. S. M., Russell, J. A., & Barrett, L. F. (1999). Structure of self-reported current affect: Integration and beyond. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 77, 600–619. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.77.3.600
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar