Evaluative conditioning effects are modulated by the nature of contextual pairings

References

• Bohner, G., Erb, H. P., & Siebler, F. (2008). Information processing approaches to persuasion. Integrating assumptions from the dual-and single-processing perspectives. In W. D. Crano, & R. Prislin (Eds.), Attitudes and attitude change (pp. 161–188). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Briñol, P., Petty, R. E., & McCaslin, M. J. (2009). Changing attitudes on implicit versus explicit measures. In R. E. Petty, R. H. Fazio, & P. Briñol (Eds.), Attitudes. Insights from the new implicit measures (pp. 285–326). New York: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., Liberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman, & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212–252). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Corneille, O., Yzerbyt, V. Y., Pleyers, G., & Mussweiler, T. (2009). Beyond awareness and resources: Evaluative conditioning may be sensitive to processing goals. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(1), 279–282. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2008.08.020
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Craske, M. G., Hermans, D., & Vansteenwegen, D. (Eds.). (2006). Fear and learning: From basic processes to clinical implications. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
   Google Scholar
• Deacon, T. W. (1997). The symbolic species. New York: Norton.
   Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Moors, A. (2013). What is learning? On the nature and merits of a functional definition of learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20(4), 631–642. doi: 10.3758/s13423-013-0386-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., & Hughes, S. (2016). Evaluative conditioning as a symbolic phenomenon: On the relation between evaluative conditioning, evaluative conditioning via instructions, and persuasion. Social Cognition, 34(5), 480–494. doi: 10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.480
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J., Teige-Mocigemba, S., Spruyt, A., & Moors, A. (2009). Implicit measures: A normative analysis and review. Psychological Bulletin, 135(3), 347–368. doi: 10.1037/a0014211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fiedler, K., & Unkelbach, C. (2011). Evaluative conditioning depends on higher order encoding processes. Cognition & Emotion, 25(4), 639–656. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2010.513497
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Förderer, S., & Unkelbach, C. (2012). Hating the cute kitten or loving the aggressive pit-bull: EC effects depend on CS–US relations. Cognition & Emotion, 26(3), 534–540. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2011.588687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, A. P., Seibt, B., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Easier done than undone: Asymmetry in the malleability of implicit preferences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.90.1.1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, S. C., Barnes-Holmes, D., & Roche, B. (Eds.). (2001). Relational frame theory: A post-skinnerian account of human language and cognition. New York: Plenum Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hofmann, W., De Houwer, J., Perugini, M., Baeyens, F., & Crombez, G. (2010). Evaluative conditioning in humans: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136(3), 390–421. doi: 10.1037/a0018916
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hu, X., Gawronski, B., & Balas, R. (2017). Propositional versus dual-process accounts of evaluative conditioning: I. The effects of co-occurrence and relational information on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(1), 17–32. doi: 10.1177/0146167216673351
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S., De Houwer, J., & Barnes-Holmes, D. (2016). The moderating impact of distal regularities on the effect of stimulus pairings. Experimental Psychology, 63, 20–44. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes, S. J., Ye, Y., Van Dessel, P., & De Houwer, J. (in press). When people co-occur with good or bad events: Graded effects of relational qualifiers on evaluative conditioning. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kruglanski, A. W., & Thompson, E. P. (1999). Persuasion by a single route: A view from the unimodel. Psychological Inquiry, 10(2), 83–109. doi: 10.1207/S15327965PL100201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., & Bar-Anan, Y. (2013). The effect of object–valence relations on automatic evaluation. Cognition & Emotion, 27(4), 743–752. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.732040
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2015). Processing goals moderate the effect of co -occurrence on automatic evaluation. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 60, 157–162. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.05.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2016). The assimilative effect of co-occurrence on evaluation above and beyond the effect of relational qualifiers. Social Cognition, 34(5), 435–461. doi: 10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.435
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moran, T., Bar-Anan, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2017). The effect of the validity of Co -occurrence on automatic and deliberate evaluation. European Journal of Social Psychology, 47(6), 708–723. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.2266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peters, K. R., & Gawronski, B. (2011). Are we puppets on a string? Comparing the impact of contingency and validity on implicit and explicit evaluations. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37(4), 557–569. doi: 10.1177/0146167211400423
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2014). The elaboration likelihood and meta-cognitive models of attitudes: Implications for prejudice, the self, and beyond. In J. Sherman, B. Gawronski, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories of the social mind (pp. 172–187). New York, NY: Guildford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). The elaboration likelihood model of persuasion. In Communication and persuasion (pp. 1–24). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, C. T., De Houwer, J., & Nosek, B. A. (2013). Consider the source: Persuasion of implicit evaluations is moderated by source credibility. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(2), 193–205. doi: 10.1177/0146167212472374
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unkelbach, C., & Fiedler, K. (2016). Contrastive CS-US relations reverse evaluative conditioning effects. Social Cognition, 34(5), 413–434. doi: 10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Waldmann, M. R. (Ed.). (2017). The Oxford handbook of causal reasoning. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Zanon, R., De Houwer, J., Gast, A., & Smith, C. T. (2014). When does relational information influence evaluative conditioning? The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 67(11), 2105–2122. doi: 10.1080/17470218.2014.907324
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar