Surprise: unfolding of facial expressions

References

• Abelson, R. P., Aronson, E., McGuire, W., Newcomb, T., Rosenberg, M., & Tannenbaum, P. (1968). Theories of cognitive consistency: A sourcebook. Chicago: Rand McNally.
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J. T., Petty, R. E., Losch, M. E., & Kim, H. S. (1986). Electromyographic activity over facial muscle regions can differentiate the valence and intensity of affective reactions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 50, 260–268. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.260
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Camras, L. A., Meng, Z., Ujiie, T., Dharamsi, S., Miyake, K., Oster, H., … Campos, J. (2002). Observing emotion in infants: Facial expression, body behavior, and rater judgments of responses to an expectancy violating event. Emotion, 2, 179–193. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.2.2.179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chentsova-Dutton, Y. E., & Tsai, J. L. (2010). Self-focused attention and emotional reactivity: The role of culture. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 507–519. doi: 10.1037/a0018534
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Darwin, C. (1872/1999). The expression of the emotions in man and animals (P. Ekman, Ed.). London: Fontana Press.
   Google Scholar
• Den Uyl, M., & Van Kuilenburg, H. (2005). The FaceReader: Online facial expression recognition. In L. P. J. J. Noldus, F. Grieco, L. W. S. Loijens, & P. H. Zimmerman (Eds.), Proceedings of measuring behavior 2005, 5th international conference on methods and techniques in behavioral research (pp. 589–590). Wageningen: Noldus Information Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Dukes, D., Clément, F., Audrin, C., & Mortillaro, M. (2017). Looking beyond the static face in emotion recognition: The informative case of interest. Visual Cognition, 25, 575–588. doi: 10.1080/13506285.2017.1341441
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (2003). Emotions revealed. Understanding faces and feelings. London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson.
   Google Scholar
• Ekman, P., Friesen, W. V., & Hager, J. C. (Eds.). (2002). Facial action coding system. Salt Lake City, UT: Research Nexus, Network Research Information.
   Google Scholar
• Elkins-Brown, N., Saunders, B., & Inzlicht, M. (2016). Error-related electromyographic activity over the corrugator supercilii is associated with neural performance monitoring. Psychophysiology, 53, 159–170. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12556
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fernández-Dols, J.-M., & Crivelli, C. (2013). Emotion and expression: Naturalistic studies. Emotion Review, 5, 24–29. doi: 10.1177/1754073912457229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fontaine, J. R. J., Scherer, K. R., Roesch, E. B., & Ellsworth, P. C. (2007). The world of emotions is not two-dimensional. Psychological Science, 18, 1050–1057. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.02024.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fridlund, A. J. (1991). Sociality of solitary smiling: Potentiation by an implicit audience. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60, 229–240. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.60.2.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garcia-Burgos, D., & Zamora, M. C. (2013). Facial affective reactions to bitter-tasting foods and body mass index in adults. Appetite, 71, 178–186. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2013.08.013
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Strack, F. (Eds.). (2012). Cognitive consistency: A fundamental principle in social cognition. New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Horstmann, G. (2006). Latency and duration of the action interruption in surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 20, 242–273. doi: 10.1080/02699930500262878
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobs, E., Manstead, A. S. R., & Fischer, A. H. (1999). Social motives and emotional feelings as determinants of facial displays: The case of smiling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25, 424–435. doi: 10.1177/0146167299025004003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jakobs, E., Manstead, A. S. R., & Fischer, A. H. (2001). Social context effects on facial activity in a negative emotional setting. Emotion, 1, 51–69. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.1.1.51
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kay, A. C., Whitson, J. A., Gaucher, D., & Galinsky, A. D. (2009). Compensatory control: Achieving order through the mind, our institutions, and the heavens. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18, 264–268. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01649.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H. J., Hawk, S. T., & van Knippenberg, A. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud faces database. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1377–1388. doi: 10.1080/02699930903485076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lench, H. C., Flores, S. A., & Bench, S. W. (2011). Discrete emotions predict changes in cognition, judgment, experience, behavior, and physiology: A meta-analysis of experimental emotion elicitations. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 834–855. doi: 10.1037/a0024244
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lewinski, P., den Uyl, T. M., & Butler, C. (2014). Automated facial coding: Validation of basic emotions and FACS AUs in FaceReader. Journal of Neuroscience, Psychology, and Economics, 7, 227–236. doi: 10.1037/npe0000028
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lindquist, K. A., Siegel, E. H., Quigley, K. S., & Feldman Barrett, L. (2013). The hundred-year emotion war: Are emotions natural kinds of psychological constructions? Comment on Lench, Flores, and Bench (2011). Psychological Bulletin, 139, 255–263. doi: 10.1037/a0029038
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellers, B., Fincher, K., Drummond, C., & Bigony, M. (2013). Surprise: A belief or an emotion? Progress in Brain Research, 202, 3–19. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-444-62604-2.00001-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mellers, B. A., Schwartz, A., Ho, K., & Ritov, I. (1997). Decision affect theory: Emotional reactions to the outcomes of risky options. Psychological Science, 8, 423–429. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00455.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mendes, W. B., Blascovich, J., Hunter, S. B., Lickel, B., & Jost, J. T. (2007). Threatened by the unexpected: Physiological responses during social interactions with expectancy-violation partners. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 92, 698–716. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.92.4.698
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, W. U., Niepel, M., Rudolph, U., & Schützwohl, A. (1991). An experimental analysis of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 5, 295–311. doi: 10.1080/02699939108411042
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, W. U., Reisenzein, R., & Schützwohl, A. (1997). Towards a process analysis of emotions: The case of surprise. Motivation and Emotion, 21, 251–274. doi: 10.1023/A:1024422330338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miceli, M., & Castelfranchi, C. (2015). Expectancy and emotion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Nohlen, H. U., Van Harreveld, F., Rotteveel, M., Barends, A. J., & Larsen, J. T. (2016). Affective responses to ambivalence are context-dependent: A facial EMG study on the role of inconsistency and evaluative context in shaping affective responses to ambivalence. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 65, 42–51. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.02.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noldus. (2012). Facereader: Tool for automatic analysis of facial expression: Version 5.0. Wageningen: Noldus Information Technology B.V.
   Google Scholar
• Noordewier, M. K., & Breugelmans, S. M. (2013). On the valence of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 27, 1326–1334. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2013.777660
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Noordewier, M. K., Topolinski, S., & Van Dijk, E. (2016). The temporal dynamics of surprise. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 136–149. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12242
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proulx, T., Inzlicht, M., & Harmon-Jones, E. (2012). Understanding all inconsistency compensation as a palliative response to violated expectations. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 285–291. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2012.04.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Proulx, T., Sleegers, W., & Tritt, S. M. (2017). The expectancy bias: Expectancy-violating faces evoke earlier pupillary dilation than neutral or negative faces. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 70, 69–79. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2000a). Exploring the strength of association between the components of emotion syndromes: The case of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 14, 1–38. doi: 10.1080/026999300378978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2000b). The subjective experience of surprise. In H. Bless & J. P. Forgas (Eds.), The message within: The role of subjective experience in social cognition and behaviour (pp. 262–279). Philadelphia, PA: Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Bördgen, S., Holtbernd, T., & Matz, D. (2006). Evidence for strong dissociation between emotion and facial displays: The case of surprise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 295–315. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Horstmann, G., & Schützwohl, A. (2017). The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise: A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science. Advance online publication. doi: 10.1111/tops.12292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., & Meyer, W. U. (2009). Surprise. In D. Sander & K. R. Scherer (Eds.), Oxford companion to the affective sciences (pp. 386–387). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Meyer, W.-U., & Niepel, M. (2012). Surprise. In V. S. Ramachandran (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Human Behavior (2nd ed, pp. 564–570). New York City: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Studtmann, M., & Horstmann, G. (2013). Coherence between emotion and facial expression: Evidence form laboratory experiments. Emotion Review, 5, 16–23. doi: 10.1177/1754073912457228
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roelofs, K., Hagenaars, M. A., & Stins, J. (2010). Facing freeze: Social threat induces bodily freeze in humans. Psychological Science, 21, 1575–1581. doi: 10.1177/0956797610384746
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39, 1161–1178. doi: 10.1037/h0077714
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rutjens, B. T., van Harreveld, F., van der Pligt, J., Kreemers, L. M., & Noordewier, M. K. (2013). Steps, stages, and structure: Finding compensatory order in scientific theories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 142, 313–318. doi: 10.1037/a0028716
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (2001). Appraisal considered as a process of multilevel sequential checking. In K. R. Scherer, A. Schorr, & T. Johnstone (Eds.), Appraisal processes in emotion: Theory, methods, research (pp. 92–120). New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R., Zentner, M. R., & Stern, D. (2004). Beyond surprise: The puzzle of infants’ expressive reactions to expectancy violation. Emotion, 4, 389–402. doi: 10.1037/1528-3542.4.4.389
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schützwohl, A., & Reisenzein, R. (2012). Facial expressions in response to a highly surprising event exceeding the field of vision: A test of Darwin’s theory of surprise. Evolution and Human Behavior, 33, 657–664. doi: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2012.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Seery, M. D., Leo, R. J., Lupien, S. P., Kondrak, C. L., & Almonte, J. L. (2013). An upside to adversity? Moderate cumulative lifetime adversity is associated with resilient responses in the face of controlled stressors. Psychological Science, 24, 1181–1189. doi: 10.1177/0956797612469210
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simmons, J. P., Nelson, L. D., & Simonsohn, U. (2013). Life after p-hacking. Paper presented at the fourteenth annual meeting of the society for personality and social psychology, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Soussignan, R., Chadwick, M., Léonor, P., Conty, L., Dezecache, G., & Grèzes, J. (2013). Self-relevance appraisal of gaze direction and dynamic facial expressions: Effects of facial electromyographic and autonomic reactions. Emotion, 13, 330–337. doi: 10.1037/a0029892
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomkins, S. S. (1984). Affect theory. In K. R. Scherer & P. Ekman (Eds.), Approaches to emotion (pp. 163–196). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., Likowski, K. U., Wyers, P., & Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition and Emotion, 23, 260–271. doi: 10.1080/02699930801994112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., & Strack, F. (2015). Corrugator activity confirms immediate negative affect in surprise. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1–8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valenzuela, A., Strebel, J., & Mellers, B. (2010). Pleasurable surprises: A cross-cultural study of consumer responses to unexpected incentives. Journal of Consumer Research, 36, 792–805. doi: 10.1086/605592
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Boxtel, A., & Jessurun, M. (1993). Amplitude and bilateral coherency of facial and jaw-elevator EMG activity as an index of effort during a two-choice serial reaction task. Psychophysiology, 30, 589–604. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1993.tb02085.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dillen, L. F., Harris, L., Van Dijk, W. W., & Rotteveel, M. (2015). Looking with different eyes: The psychological meaning of categorisation goals moderates facial reactivity to facial expressions. Cognition and Emotion, 29, 1382–1400. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2014.982514
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Kuilenburg, H., Wiering, M., & Den Uyl, M. (2005). A model-based method for facial expression recognition. In J. Gama, R. Camacho, P. Brazdil, A. Jorge, & L. Torgo (Eds.), Lectures notes in computer science: Vol. 3720. Machine learning: ECML 2005 (pp. 194–205). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Yartz, A. R., & Hawk, L. W. (2002). Addressing the specificity of affective startle modulation: Fear versus disgust. Biological Psychology, 59, 55–68. doi: 10.1016/S0301-0511(01)00121-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar