Cognitive control of emotional distraction – valence-specific or general?

References

• Anderson, A. K. (2005). Affective influences on the attentional dynamics supporting awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134(2), 258–281. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.134.2.258
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barrett, L. F., & Russell, J. A. (1999). The structure of current affect: Controversies and emerging consensus. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 10–14. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvinick, M. M. (2007). Conflict monitoring and decision making: Reconciling two perspectives on anterior cingulate function. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 7, 356–366. doi: 10.3758/CABN.7.4.356
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Botvinick, M. M., Braver, T. S., Barch, D. M., Carter, C. S., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). Conflict monitoring and cognitive control. Psychological Review, 108(3), 624–652. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.624
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braem, S., Abrahamse, E. L., Duthoo, W., & Notebaert, W. (2014). What determines the specificity of conflict adaptation? A review, critical analysis, and proposed synthesis. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 1134. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01134
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braem, S., King, J. A., Korb, F. M., Krebs, R. M., Notebaert, W., & Egner, T. (2017). The role of anterior cingulate cortex in the affective evaluation of conflict. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 29(1), 137–149. doi: 10.1162/jocn_a_01023
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braver, T. S. (2012). The variable nature of cognitive control: A dual mechanisms framework. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16(2), 106–113. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2011.12.010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiew, K. S., & Braver, T. S. (2014). Dissociable influences of reward motivation and positive emotion on cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 509–529. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0280-0
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., Henik, A., & Mor, N. (2011). Can emotion modulate attention? Evidence for reciprocal links in the attentional network test. Experimental Psychology, 58(3), 171–179. doi: 10.1027/1618-3169/a000083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., Henik, A., & Moyal, N. (2012). Executive control attenuates emotional effects—For high reappraisers only? Emotion, 12(5), 970–979. doi: 10.1037/a0026890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., Mor, N., & Henik, A. (2015). Linking executive control and emotional response: A training procedure to reduce rumination. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(1), 15–25. doi: 10.1177/2167702614530114
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, N., Moyal, N., & Henik, A. (2015). Executive control suppresses pupillary responses to aversive stimuli. Biological Psychology, 112, 1–11. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignath, D., & Eder, A. B. (2015). Stimulus conflict triggers behavioral avoidance. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(4), 822–836. doi: 10.3758/s13415-015-0355-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignath, D., Kiesel, A., & Eder, A. (2015). Flexible conflict management: Conflict avoidance and conflict adjustment in reactive cognitive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41(4), 975–988.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dignath, D., Wirth, R., Kühnhausen, J., Gawrilow, C., Kunde, W., & Kiesel, A. (in press). Motivation drives conflict adaptation. Motivation Science.
   Google Scholar
• Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2012). Conflicts as aversive signals. Brain and Cognition, 78(2), 94–98. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2011.12.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreisbach, G., & Fischer, R. (2015). Conflicts as aversive signals for control adaptation. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(4), 255–260. doi: 10.1177/0963721415569569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreisbach, G., Fröber, K., Berger, A., & Fischer, R. (2018). Unexpected conflict signals loom larger in a positive context: Evidence from context specific control adjustments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 45(8), 1398–1409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dreisbach, G., & Goschke, T. (2004). How positive affect modulates cognitive control: Reduced perseveration at the cost of increased distractibility. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 343–353.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eder, A. B., & Dignath, D. (2014). I like to get nothing: Implicit and explicit evaluation of avoided negative outcomes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Learning and Cognition, 40(1), 55–62.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. doi: 10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fischer, R., Ventura-Bort, C., Hamm, A., & Weymar, M. (2018). Transcutaneous vagus nerve stimulation (tVNS) enhances conflict-triggered adjustment of cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(4), 680–693. doi: 10.3758/s13415-018-0596-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fröber, K., & Dreisbach, G. (2014). The differential influences of positive affect, random reward, and performance-contingent reward on cognitive control. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 14(2), 530–547. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0259-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fröber, K., Stürmer, B., Frömer, R., & Dreisbach, G. (2017). The role of affective evaluation in conflict adaptation: An LRP study. Brain and Cognition, 116, 9–16. doi: 10.1016/j.bandc.2017.05.003
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goschke, T., & Bolte, A. (2014). Emotional modulation of control dilemmas: The role of positive affect, reward, and dopamine in cognitive stability and flexibility. Neuropsychologia, 62, 403–423. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2014.07.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gratton, G., Coles, M., & Donchin, E. (1992). Optimizing the use of information: Strategic control of activation of responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 121(4), 480–506. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.121.4.480
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gupta, R., Hur, Y.-J., & Lavie, N. (2016). Distracted by pleasure: Effects of positive versus negative valence on emotional capture under load. Emotion, 16(3), 328–337. doi: 10.1037/emo0000112
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Inzlicht, M., Bartholow, B. D., & Hirsh, J. B. (2015). Emotional foundations of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(3), 126–132. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2015.01.004
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarosz, A. F., & Wiley, J. (2014). What are the odds? A practical guide to computing and reporting bayes factors. The Journal of Problem Solving, 7(1), 2–9. doi: 10.7771/1932-6246.1167
   Google Scholar
• Jimura, K., Locke, H. S., & Braver, T. S. (2010). Prefrontal cortex mediation of cognitive enhancement in rewarding motivational contexts. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 107(19), 8871–8876. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1002007107
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesel, A., Kunde, W., & Hoffmann, J. (2006). Evidence for task-specific resolution of response conflict. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13(5), 800–806. doi: 10.3758/BF03194000
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kiesel, A., Steinhauser, M., Wendt, M., Falkenstein, M., Jost, K., Philipp, A. M., & Koch, I. (2010). Control and interference in task switching—A review. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 849–874. doi: 10.1037/a0019842
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koch, I., Poljac, E., Müller, H., & Kiesel, A. (2018). Cognitive structure, flexibility, and plasticity in human multitasking – An integrative review of dual-task and task-switching research. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 557–583. doi: 10.1037/bul0000144
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kunde, W., & Wühr, P. (2006). Sequential modulations of correspondence effects across spatial dimensions and tasks. Memory & Cognition, 34(2), 356–367. doi: 10.3758/BF03193413
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J. (2005). International affective picture system (IAPS): Affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. Technical Report.
   Google Scholar
• Larsen, J. T., Norris, C. J., McGraw, A. P., Hawkley, L. C., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2009). The evaluative space grid: A single-item measure of positivity and negativity. Cognition and Emotion, 23(3), 453–480. doi: 10.1080/02699930801994054
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, L., & Xu, B. (2016). The effect of low versus high approach-motivated positive affect on the balance between maintenance and flexibility. Neuroscience Letters, 622, 55–60. doi: 10.1016/j.neulet.2016.04.042
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Y., & Wang, Z. (2014). Positive affect and cognitive control: Approach-motivation intensity influences the balance between cognitive flexibility and stability. Psychological Science, 25(5), 1116–1123. doi: 10.1177/0956797614525213
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lykins, A. D., Meana, M., & Strauss, G. P. (2008). Sex differences in visual attention to erotic and non-erotic stimuli. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37(2), 219–228. doi: 10.1007/s10508-007-9208-x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marchewka, A., Żurawski, Ł, Jednoróg, K., & Grabowska, A. (2014). The Nencki affective picture system (NAPS): Introduction to a novel, standardized, wide-range, high-quality, realistic picture database. Behavior Research Methods, 46(2), 596–610. doi: 10.3758/s13428-013-0379-1
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, E. K., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 24(1), 167–202. doi: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41(1), 49–100. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1999.0734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Most, S. B., Smith, S. D., Cooter, A. B., Levy, B. N., & Zald, D. H. (2007). The naked truth: Positive, arousing distractors impair rapid target perception. Cognition & Emotion, 21(5), 964–981. doi: 10.1080/02699930600959340
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Notebaert, W., & Verguts, T. (2008). Cognitive control acts locally. Cognition, 106(2), 1071–1080. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2007.04.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Öhman, A., Flykt, A., & Esteves, F. (2001). Emotion drives attention: Detecting the snake in the grass. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 130(3), 466–478. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pessoa, L., McKenna, M., Gutierrez, E., & Ungerleider, L. G. (2002). Neural processing of emotional faces requires attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(17), 11458–11463. doi: 10.1073/pnas.172403899
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Savine, A. C., Beck, S. M., Edwards, B. G., Chiew, K. S., & Braver, T. S. (2010). Enhancement of cognitive control by approach and avoidance motivational states. Cognition and Emotion, 24(2), 338–356. doi: 10.1080/02699930903381564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherbaum, S., Fischer, R., Dshemuchadse, M., & Goschke, T. (2011). The dynamics of cognitive control: Evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG. Psychophysiology, 48(5), 591–600. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01137.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, W., Eschman, A., & Zuccolotto, A. (2002). E-prime (version 2.0) [Computer software and manual]. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
   Google Scholar
• Schouppe, N., Braem, S., De Houwer, J., Silvetti, M., Verguts, T., Ridderinkhof, K. R., & Notebaert, W. (2015). No pain, no gain: The affective valence of congruency conditions changes following a successful response. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 15(1), 251–261. doi: 10.3758/s13415-014-0318-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schuch, S., Dignath, D., Steinhauser, M., & Janczyk, M. (2019). Monitoring and control in multitasking. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(1), 222–240. doi: 10.3758/s13423-018-1512-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schupp, H., Cuthbert, B., Bradley, M., Hillman, C., Hamm, A., & Lang, P. (2004). Brain processes in emotional perception: Motivated attention. Cognition and Emotion, 18(5), 593–611. doi: 10.1080/02699930341000239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verbruggen, F., & De Houwer, J. (2007). Do emotional stimuli interfere with response inhibition? Evidence from the stop signal paradigm. Cognition and Emotion, 21(2), 391–403. doi: 10.1080/02699930600625081
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verguts, T., & Notebaert, W. (2009). Adaptation by binding: A learning account of cognitive control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(6), 252–257. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2009.02.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vuilleumier, P., Armony, J. L., Driver, J., & Dolan, R. J. (2001). Effects of attention and emotion on face processing in the human brain: An event-related fMRI study. Neuron, 30(3), 829–841. doi: 10.1016/S0896-6273(01)00328-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walsh, A. T., Carmel, D., Harper, D., & Grimshaw, G. M. (2018). Motivation enhances control of positive and negative emotional distractions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 25(4), 1556–1562. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1414-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar