617
Views
12
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Articles

What is normal? Dimensions of action-inaction normality and their impact on regret in the action-effect

ORCID Icon
Pages 728-742 | Received 09 Aug 2018, Accepted 29 Sep 2019, Published online: 04 Dec 2019

References

  • Anderson, C. J. (2003). The psychology of doing nothing: Forms of decision avoidance result from reason and emotion. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 139–167. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.129.1.139
  • Anderson, J. E., & Dunning, D. (2014). Behavioral norms: Variants and their identification. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8, 721–738. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12146
  • Bar-Eli, M., Azar, O. H., Ritov, I., Keidar-Levin, Y., & Schein, G. (2007). Action bias among elite soccer goalkeepers: The case of penalty kicks. Journal of Economic Psychology, 28, 606–621. doi: 10.1016/j.joep.2006.12.001
  • Bostyn, D. H., & Roets, A. (2016). The morality of action: The asymmetry between judgments of praise and blame in the action–omission effect. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 63, 19–25. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2015.11.005
  • Chen, J., Chiu, C. Y., Roese, N. J., Tam, K. P., & Lau, I. Y. M. (2006). Culture and counterfactuals on the importance of life domains. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 37, 75–84. doi: 10.1177/0022022105282296
  • Cialdini, R. B. (2003). Crafting normative messages to protect the environment. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12, 105–109. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01242
  • Connolly, T., Ordonez, L. D., & Coughlan, R. (1997). Regret and responsibility in the evaluation of decision outcomes. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 70(1), 73–85. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1997.2695
  • Connolly, T., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in decision making. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 11, 212–216. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.00203
  • Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x
  • Feldman, G., & Albarracín, D. (2017). Norm theory and the action-effect: The role of social norms in regret following action and inaction. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 111–120. doi: 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.07.009
  • Feldman, G., Kutscher, L., & Yay, T. (2020). Omission and commission in judgment and decision making: Linking action-inaction effects using the concept of normality. Social and Personality Psychology Compass. Manuscript conditionally accepted for publication.
  • Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1994). The temporal pattern to the experience of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67, 357–365. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.67.3.357
  • Gilovich, T., & Medvec, V. H. (1995). The experience of regret: What, when, and why. Psychological Review, 102, 379–395. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.379
  • Gilovich, T., Medvec, V. H., & Chen, S. (1995). Commission, omission, and dissonance reduction: Coping with regret in the "Monty Hall" problem. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(2), 182–190. doi: 10.1177/0146167295212008
  • Gilovich, T., Wang, R. F., Regan, D., & Nishina, S. (2003). Regrets of action and inaction across cultures. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 34, 61–71. doi: 10.1177/0022022102239155
  • Goh, J. X., Hall, J. A., & Rosenthal, R. (2016). Mini meta-analysis of your own studies: Some arguments on why and a primer on how. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10, 535–549. doi: 10.1111/spc3.12267
  • Hamilton. (2017). MAVIS: Meta Analysis via Shiny. Retrieved from http://kylehamilton.net/shiny/MAVIS/; Github: https://github.com/kylehamilton/MAVIS
  • Hur, T., Roese, N. J., & Namkoong, J. E. (2009). Regrets in the East and West: Role of intrapersonal versus interpersonal norms. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 12, 151–156. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-839X.2009.01275.x
  • Inman, J. J., & Zeelenberg, M. (2002). Regret in repeat purchase versus switching decisions: The attenuating role of decision justifiability. Journal of Consumer Research, 29, 116–128. doi: 10.1086/339925
  • Kahneman, D., & Miller, D. T. (1986). Norm theory: Comparing reality to its alternatives. Psychological Review, 93, 136–153. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.93.2.136
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982a). The psychology of preferences. Scientific American, 246, 160–173. doi: 10.1038/scientificamerican0182-160
  • Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1982b). The simulation heuristic. In D. Kahneman, P. Slovic, & A. Tversky (Eds.), Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases (pp. 201–208). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511809477.015
  • Komiya, A., Watabe, M., Miyamoto, Y., & Kusumi, T. (2013). Cultural differences in the action effect. Social Cognition, 31, 562–577. doi: 10.1521/soco.2013.31.5.562
  • Lakens, D., & Etz, A. J. (2017). Too true to be bad: When sets of studies with significant and non-significant findings are probably true. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(8), 875–881. doi: 10.1177/1948550617693058
  • Landman, J. (1987). Regret and elation following action and inaction: Affective responses to positive versus negative outcomes. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 13, 524–536. doi: 10.1177/0146167287134009
  • Litman, L., Robinson, J., & Abberbock, T. (2016). Turkprime.com: A versatile crowdsourcing data acquisition platform for the behavioral sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 1–10.
  • McElroy, T., & Dowd, K. (2007). Action orientation, consistency and feelings of regret. Judgment and Decision Making, 2, 333.
  • McShane, B. B., & Böckenholt, U. (2017). Single paper meta-analysis: Benefits for study summary, theory-testing, and replicability. Journal of Consumer Research, 43, 1048–1063.
  • Miller, D. T., Turnbull, W., & McFarland, C. (1990). Counterfactual thinking and social perception: Thinking about what might have been. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 23, 305–331.
  • Morris, M. W., Hong, Y. Y., Chiu, C. Y., & Liu, Z. (2015). Normology: Integrating insights about social norms to understand cultural dynamics. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 129, 1–13. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2015.03.001
  • N’gbala, A., & Branscombe, N. R. (1997). When does action elicit more regret than inaction and is counterfactual mutation the mediator of this effect? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 33, 324–343. doi: 10.1006/jesp.1996.1322
  • Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2005). On bad decisions and deciding badly: When intention–behavior inconsistency is regrettable. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 97, 18–30. doi: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2005.01.003
  • Reb, J., & Connolly, T. (2010). The effects of action, normality, and decision carefulness on anticipated regret: Evidence for a broad mediating role of decision justifiability. Cognition and Emotion, 24, 1405–1420. doi: 10.1080/02699930903512168
  • Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1990). Reluctance to vaccinate: Omission bias and ambiguity. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 3, 263–277. doi: 10.1002/bdm.3960030404
  • Ritov, I., & Baron, J. (1995). Outcome knowledge, regret, and omission bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 64, 119–127. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1995.1094
  • Roese, N. J. (1997). Counterfactual thinking. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 133–148. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.121.1.133
  • Seta, J. J., McElroy, T., & Seta, C. E. (2001). To do or not to do: Desirability and consistency mediate judgments of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 861–870. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.80.6.861
  • Seta, C. E., & Seta, J. J. (2013). Regret in pursuit of change and maintenance goals. Motivation and Emotion, 37, 177–184. doi: 10.1007/s11031-012-9283-8
  • Zeelenberg, M., Van den Bos, K., Van Dijk, E., & Pieters, R. (2002). The inaction effect in the psychology of regret. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 314–327. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.82.3.314
  • Zeelenberg, M., Van Dijk, W. W., & Manstead, A. S. (1998). Reconsidering the relation between regret and responsibility. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 74, 254–272. doi: 10.1006/obhd.1998.2780

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.