References
- Antoniou, R., Romero-Kornblum, H., Young, J. C., You, M., Kramer, J., & Chiong, W. (2020). No Utilitarians in a pandemic? Shifts in moral reasoning during the COVID-19 global health crisis. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31234/osf.io/yjn3u
- Aronson, E., Wilson, T. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1998). Experimentation in social psychology. In G. Lindsay & E. Aronson (Eds.), The handbook of social psychology (4th ed., Vol. 1, pp. 99–142). McGraw-Hill.
- Arora, C., Savulescu, J., Maslen, H., Selgelid, M., & Wilkinson, D. (2016). The intensive care lifeboat: A survey of lay attitudes to rationing dilemmas in neonatal intensive care. BMC Medical Ethics, 17(1), 69. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12910-016-0152-y
- The Atlantic. (2020). The Extraordinary Decisions Facing Italian Doctors. https://www.theatlantic.com/ideas/archive/2020/03/who-gets-hospital-bed/607807/
- Awad, E., Dsouza, S., Shariff, A., Rahwan, I., & Bonnefon, J. F. (2020). Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(5), 2332–2337. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1911517117
- Bartels, D. M., & Pizarro, D. A. (2011). The mismeasure of morals: Antisocial personality traits predict utilitarian responses to moral dilemmas. Cognition, 121(1), 154–161. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2011.05.010
- Bauman, C. W., McGraw, A. P., Bartels, D. M., & Warren, C. (2014). Revisiting external validity: Concerns about trolley problems and other sacrificial dilemmas in moral psychology. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 8(9), 536–554. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12131
- Bostyn, D. H., Sevenhant, S., & Roets, A. (2018). Of mice, men, and trolleys: Hypothetical judgment versus real-life behavior in trolley-style moral dilemmas. Psychological Science, 29(7), 1084–1093. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797617752640
- Brotherton, R., French, C. C., & Pickering, A. D. (2013). Measuring belief in conspiracy theories: The generic conspiracist beliefs scale. Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00279
- Buckwalter, W., & Peterson, A. (2020). Public attitudes toward allocating scarce resources in the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE, 15(11), e0240651. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0240651
- Campbell, D. T. (1957). Factors relevant to validity of experiments in social settings. Psychological Bulletin, 54(4), 297–312. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0040950
- Chandler, J., Rosenzweig, C., Moss, A. J., Robinson, J., & Litman, L. (2019). Online panels in social science research: Expanding sampling methods beyond Mechanical Turk. Behavior Research Methods, 51(5), 2022–2038. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-019-01273-7
- Christensen, J. F., & Gomila, A. (2012). Moral dilemmas in cognitive neuroscience of moral decision-making: A principled review. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 36(4), 1249–1264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2012.02.008
- Cole Wright, J., Cullum, J., & Schwab, N. (2008). The cognitive and affective dimensions of moral conviction: Implications for attitudinal and behavioral measures of interpersonal tolerance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(11), 1461–1476. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208322557
- Converse, P. E. (2006). The nature of belief systems in mass publics (1964). Critical Review, 18(1-3), 1–74. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/08913810608443650
- Conway, P., & Gawronski, B. (2013). Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: A process dissociation approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104(2), 216–235. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0031021
- Conway, P., Goldstein-Greenwood, J., Polacek, D., & Greene, J. D. (2018). Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers. Cognition, 179, 241–265. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.04.018
- Cushman, F., Young, L., & Hauser, M. (2006). The role of conscious reasoning and intuition in moral judgment: Testing three principles of harm. Psychological Science, 17(12), 1082–1089. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01834.x
- Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113
- Emanuel, E. J., Persad, G., Upshur, R., Thome, B., Parker, M., Glickman, A., Zhang, C., Boyle, C., Smith, M., & Phillips, J. P. (2020). Fair allocation of scarce medical resources in the time of Covid-19. New England Journal of Medicine, 382(21), 2049–2055. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMsb2005114
- Everett, J. A. C. (2013). The 12 item social and economic conservatism scale (SECS). PLoS ONE, 8(12), e82131. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082131
- Foot, P. (1967). The problem of abortion and the doctrine of the double effect in virtues and vices. Oxford Review, 5, 5–15.
- Fox, J., & Weisberg, S. (2019). An R companion to applied regression (3rd ed.). Sage.
- Francis, K. B., Howard, C., Howard, I. S., Gummerum, M., Ganis, G., Anderson, G., & Terbeck, S. (2016). Virtual morality: Transitioning from moral judgment to moral action? PLoS ONE, 11(10), e0164374. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164374
- Francis, K., & McNabb, C. B. (2021). Moral Decision-Making during COVID-19: Moral judgments, moralisation, and everyday behaviour. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/jvfds
- Francis, K. B., Terbeck, S., Briazu, R. A., Haines, A., Gummerum, M., Ganis, G., & Howard, I. S. (2017). Simulating moral actions: An investigation of personal force in virtual moral dilemmas. Scientific Reports, 7(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-017-13909-9
- Gleichgerrcht, E., & Young, L. (2013). Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment. PLoS ONE, 8(4), e60418. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0060418
- Gollwitzer, A., Martel, C., Brady, W. J., Pärnamets, P., Freedman, I. G., Knowles, E. D., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2020). Partisan differences in physical distancing are linked to health outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(11), 1186–1197. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00977-7
- Greene, J. D. (2007). The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In W. Sinnott-Armstrong (Ed.), Moral psychology, Vol. 3: The neuroscience of morality: Emotion, disease, and development (pp. 35–117). MIT Press.
- Greene, J. D., Cushman, F. A., Stewart, L. E., Lowenberg, K., Nystrom, L. E., & Cohen, J. D. (2009). Pushing moral buttons: The interaction between personal force and intention in moral judgment. Cognition, 111(3), 364–371. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.001
- Greene, J. D., Sommerville, R. B., Nystrom, L. E., Darley, J. M., & Cohen, J. D. (2001). An fMRI investigation of emotional engagement in moral judgment. Science, 293(5537), 2105–2108. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1062872
- Hannikainen, I. R., Machery, E., & Cushman, F. A. (2018). Is utilitarian sacrifice becoming more morally permissible? Cognition, 170, 95–101. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2017.09.013
- Hannikainen, I. R., Miller, R. M., & Cushman, F. A. (2017). Act versus impact: Conservatives and liberals exhibit different structural emphases in moral judgment. Ratio, 30(4), 462–493. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/rati.12162
- Hunter, J. D. (1991). Culture wars: The struggle to define america. Basic Books.
- Kahane, G., Everett, J. A., Earp, B. D., Caviola, L., Faber, N. S., Crockett, M. J., & Savulescu, J. (2018). Beyond sacrificial harm: A two-dimensional model of utilitarian psychology. Psychological Review, 125(2), 131–164. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000093
- Kahane, G., Everett, J. A. C., Earp, B. D., Farias, M., & Savulescu, J. (2015). ‘Utilitarian’ judgments in sacrificial moral dilemmas do not reflect impartial concern for the greater good. Cognition, 134, 193–209. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2014.10.005
- Koenigs, M., Kruepke, M., Zeier, J., & Newman, J. P. (2012). Utilitarian moral judgment in psychopathy. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 7(6), 708–714. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsr048
- Koenigs, M., Young, L., Adolphs, R., Tranel, D., Cushman, F., Hauser, M., & Damasio, A. (2007). Damage to the prefrontal cortex increases utilitarian moral judgements. Nature, 446(7138), 908–911. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05631
- Lenth, R. (2019). emmeans: Estimated marginal means, aka least-squares means. R package version 1.4.3.01. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=emmeans
- Luke, D. M., & Gawronski, B. (2021). Political ideology and moral dilemma judgments: An analysis using the CNI model. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167220987990
- Mikhail, J. (2007). Universal moral grammar: Theory, evidence, and the future. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(4), 143–152. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2006.12.007
- Mikhail, J. (2009). Moral grammar and intuitive jurisprudence: A formal model of unconscious moral and legal knowledge. In D. M. Bartels, C. W. Bauman, L. J. Skitka, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), Moral judgment and decision making: The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 50, pp. 27–100). Elsevier.
- Miller, R. M., Hannikainen, I., & Cushman, F. A. (2014). Bad actions or bad outcomes? Differentiating affective contributions to the moral condemnation of harm. Emotion, 14(3), 573–587. https://psycnet.apa.org/doi/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035361
- Morey, R. D., & Rouder, J. N. (2018). BayesFactor: Computation of Bayes factors for common designs. R package version 0.9.12-4.2. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=BayesFactor
- The New York Times. (2020). Coronavirus (Covid-19) Data in the United States. https://github.com/nytimes/covid-19-data
- Patil, I. (2015). Trait psychopathy and utilitarian moral judgement: The mediating role of action aversion. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 27(3), 349–366. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/20445911.2015.1004334
- Patil, I., Cogoni, C., Zangrando, N., Chittaro, L., & Silani, G. (2014). Affective basis of judgment-behavior discrepancy in virtual experiences of moral dilemmas. Social Neuroscience, 9(1), 94–107. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/17470919.2013.870091
- Patil, I., & Silani, G. (2014). Reduced empathic concern leads to utilitarian moral judgments in trait alexithymia. Frontiers in Psychology, 5, 501. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00501
- Pew Research Center. (2020a, June). Three months in, many americans see exaggeration, conspiracy theories and partisanship in COVID-19 news.
- Pew Research Center. (2020b, June). Republicans, democrats move even further apart in coronavirus concerns.
- Pew Research Center. (2020c, July). Republicans remain far less likely than Democrats to view COVID-19 as a major threat to public health.
- Reeskens, T., Roosma, F., & Wanders, E. (2021). The perceived deservingness of COVID-19 healthcare in the Netherlands: A conjoint experiment on priority access to intensive care and vaccination. BMC Public Health, 21(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1186/s12889-021-10488-3
- Romero-Rivas, C., & Rodriguez-Cuadrado, S. (2021). The psychological impact of the COVID-19 pandemic affected decision-making processes. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/SJP.2021.14
- Rosenbaum, P. R., & Rubin, D. B. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70(1), 41–55. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2335942
- Rozin, P., Lowery, L., Imada, S., & Haidt, J. (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574–586. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.4.574
- Skitka, L. J., Bauman, C. W., & Sargis, E. G. (2005). Moral conviction: Another contributor to attitude strength or something more? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 88(6), 895–917. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.88.6.895
- Sulmasy, D. P., & Sugarman, J. (1994). Are withholding and withdrawing therapy always morally equivalent?. Journal of Medical Ethics, 20(4), 218–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.20.4.218
- Tenbrunsel, A. E., & Messick, D. M. (1999). Sanctioning systems, decision frames, and cooperation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 684–707. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/2667052
- Thomson, J. J. (1976). Killing, letting die, and the trolley problem. The Monist, 59(2), 204–217. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.5840/monist197659224
- Thomson, J. J. (1985). The trolley problem. The Yale Law Journal, 94(6), 1395–1415. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.2307/796133
- Wilkinson, W. (2019). The density divide: Urbanization, polarization, and populist backlash. Niskanen Center Research Paper.
- Wilkinson, D., Zohny, H., Kappes, A., Sinnott-Armstrong, W., & Savulescu, J. (2020). Which factors should be included in triage? An online survey of the attitudes of the UK general public to pandemic triage dilemmas. BMJ Open, 10(12), e045593. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045593