Predicting vs. guessing: the role of confidence for pupillometric markers of curiosity and surprise

References

• Alexander, W. H., & Brown, J. W. (2019). The role of the anterior cingulate cortex in prediction error and signaling surprise. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12307
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aston-Jones, G., & Cohen, J. D. (2005). An integrative theory of locus coeruleus-norepinephrine function: Adaptive gain and optimal performance. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28(1), 403–450. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.neuro.28.061604.135709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beatty, J. (1982). Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources. Psychological Bulletin, 91(2), 276–292. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.91.2.276
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Breitwieser, J., & Brod, G. (2021). Cognitive prerequisites for generative learning: Why some learning strategies are more effective than others. Child Development, 92(1), 258–272. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13393
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brod, G. (2021). Predicting as a learning strategy. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 28, 1839–1847. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01904-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brod, G., & Breitwieser, J. (2019). Lighting the wick in the candle of learning: Generating a prediction stimulates curiosity. Npj Science of Learning, 4(1), 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41539-019-0056-y
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Brod, G., Hasselhorn, M., & Bunge, S. A. (2018). When generating a prediction boosts learning: The element of surprise. Learning and Instruction, 55, 22–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2018.01.013
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butterfield, B., & Metcalfe, J. (2006). The correction of errors committed with high confidence. Metacognition and Learning, 1(1), 69–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11409-006-6894-z
   Google Scholar
• Ebitz, R. B., & Platt, M. L. (2015). Neuronal activity in primate dorsal anterior cingulate cortex signals task conflict and predicts adjustments in pupil-linked arousal. Neuron, 85(3), 628–640. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.12.053
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gruber, M. J., Gelman, B. D., & Ranganath, C. (2014). States of curiosity modulate hippocampus-dependent learning via the dopaminergic circuit. Neuron, 84(2), 486–496. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2014.08.060
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Itti, L., & Baldi, P. (2009). Bayesian surprise attracts human attention. Vision Research, 49(10), 1295–1306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.visres.2008.09.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Joshi, S., Li, Y., Kalwani, R. M., & Gold, J. I. (2016). Relationships between pupil diameter and neuronal activity in the locus coeruleus, colliculi, and cingulate cortex. Neuron, 89(1), 221–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2015.11.028
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kang, M. J., Hsu, M., Krajbich, I. M., Loewenstein, G., McClure, S. M., Wang, J. T., & Camerer, C. F. (2009). The wick in the candle of learning. Psychological Science, 20(8), 963–973. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02402.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krüger, M., Bartels, W., & Krist, H. (2019). Illuminating the dark ages: Pupil dilation as a measure of expectancy violation across the life spanilluminating the dark ages: Pupil dilation as a measure of expectancy violation across the life span. Child Development. Advance on, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13354
   Google Scholar
• Lawson, R. P., Bisby, J., Nord, C. L., Burgess, N., & Rees, G. (2021). The computational, pharmacological, and physiological determinants of sensory learning under uncertainty. Current Biology, 31, 163–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2020.10.043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (1994). The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. Psychological Bulletin, 116(1), 75–98. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.116.1.75
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Bloom, P. A. (2017). The tip-of-the-tongue state and curiosity. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 2(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-017-0065-4
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Metcalfe, J., Schwartz, B. L., & Eich, T. S. (2020). Epistemic curiosity and the region of proximal learning. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.06.007
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, T. O., & Narens, L. (1990). Metamemory: A theoretical framework and new findings. In The psychology of learning and motivation, Vol. 26(Issue C), 125–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0079-7421(08)60053-5
   Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R. (2000). Exploring the strength of association between the components of emotion syndromes: The case of surprise. Cognition and Emotion, 14(1), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300378978
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Bördgen, S., Holtbernd, T., & Matz, D. (2006). Evidence for strong dissociation between emotion and facial displays: The case of surprise. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(2), 295–315. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.91.2.295
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reisenzein, R., Horstmann, G., & Schützwohl, A. (2019). The cognitive-evolutionary model of surprise: A review of the evidence. Topics in Cognitive Science, 11(1), 50–74. https://doi.org/10.1111/tops.12292
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, M., Leuchs, L., Czisch, M., Sämann, P. G., & Spoormaker, V. I. (2018). Disentangling reward anticipation with simultaneous pupillometry / fMRI. NeuroImage, 178, 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.078
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Theobald, M., & Brod, G. (2021). Tackling scientific misconceptions: The element of surprise. Child Development, 00, cdev.13582. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13582
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogl, E., Pekrun, R., Murayama, K., Loderer, K., & Schubert, S. (2019, November). Surprise, curiosity, and confusion promote knowledge exploration: Evidence for robust effects of epistemic emotions. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 2474. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02474
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar