Emotion may predict susceptibility to fake news but emotion regulation does not seem to help

References

• Arechar, A. A., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Turking in the time of COVID. Behavior Research Methods, 53(6), 2591–2595.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bago, B., Rand, D. G., & Pennycook, G. (2020). Fake news, fast and slow: Deliberation reduces belief in false (but not true) news headlines. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 149(8), 1608–1613. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000729.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barr, R. A. (2019). Fake news grabs our attention, produces false memories and appeals to our emotions. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/fake-news-grabs-our-attention-produces-false-memories-and-appeals-to-our-emotions-124842
   Google Scholar
• Berinsky, A. J. (2017). Rumors and health care reform: Experiments in political misinformation. British Journal of Political Science, 47(2), 241–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0007123415000186
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brady, W. J., Wills, J. A., Jost, J. T., Tucker, J. A., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2017). Emotion shapes the diffusion of moralized content in social networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(28), 7313–7318. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1618923114
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brashier, N. M., & Marsh, E. J. (2020). Judging truth. Annual Review of Psychology, 71(1), 499–515.
   Google Scholar
• Ehring, T., Tuschen-Caffier, B., Schnülle, J., Fischer, S., & Gross, J. J. (2010). Emotion regulation and vulnerability to depression: Spontaneous versus instructed use of emotion suppression and reappraisal. Emotion, 10(4), 563. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019010
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ekman, P. (1992). An argument for basic emotions. Cognition and Emotion, 6(3–4), 169–200. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699939208411068
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elfenbein, H. A., & Ambady, N. (2002). On the universality and cultural specificity of emotion recognition: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 128(2), 203. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.128.2.203
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B. (2012). Spot the difference: Distinguishing between two kinds of processing. Mind & Society, 11(1), 121–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11299-012-0104-2
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. S. B., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinberg, M., Willer, R., Antonenko, O., & John, O. P. (2012). Liberating reason from the passions: Overriding intuitionist moral judgments through emotion reappraisal. Psychological Science, 23(7), 788–795. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797611434747
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (2013). Don’t worry, be sad! On the cognitive, motivational, and interpersonal benefits of negative mood. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 22(3), 225–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721412474458
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (2019a). Happy believers and sad skeptics? Affective influences on gullibility. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 28(3), 306–313. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419834543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P. (2019b). On the role of affect in gullibility: Can positive mood increase, and negative mood reduce credulity? In Joseph P. Forgas & Roy F. Baumeister (Eds.), The social psychology of gullibility (pp. 179–197). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Forgas, J. P., & East, R. (2008). On being happy and gullible: Mood effects on skepticism and the detection of deception. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(5), 1362–1367. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2008.04.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frank, M. G., & Stennett, J. (2001). The forced-choice paradigm and the perception of facial expressions of emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 75. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.75
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Green, P., & MacLeod, C. J. (2016). SIMR: An R package for power analysis of generalized linear mixed models by simulation. Methods in Ecology and Evolution, 7(4), 493–498. https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210X.12504
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grinberg, N., Joseph, K., Friedland, L., Swire-Thompson, B., & Lazer, D. (2019). Fake news on twitter during the 2016 US Presidential election. Science, 363(6425), 374–378. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aau2706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J. J. (1998). Antecedent-and response-focused emotion regulation: Divergent consequences for experience, expression, and physiology. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(1), 224. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.1.224
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J. J. (2002). Emotion regulation: Affective, cognitive, and social consequences. Psychophysiology, 39(3), 281–291. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0048577201393198
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gross, J. J., & John, O. P. (2003). Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: Implications for affect, relationships, and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 348. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.348
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gutierrez, R., & Giner-Sorolla, R. (2007). Anger, disgust, and presumption of harm as reactions to taboo-breaking behaviors. Emotion, 7(4), 853. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.7.4.853
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Han, J., Cha, M., & Lee, W. (2020). Anger contributes to the spread of COVID-19 misinformation. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-39.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Holland, R. W., Vries, M. d., Hermsen, B., & Knippenberg, A. v. (2012). Mood and the attitude–behavior link: The happy act on impulse, the sad think twice. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(3), 356–364. https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550611421635
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langner, O., Dotsch, R., Bijlstra, G., Wigboldus, D. H., Hawk, S. T., & Van Knippenberg, A. D. (2010). Presentation and validation of the Radboud Faces Database. Cognition and Emotion, 24(8), 1377–1388. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930903485076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lazer, D. M., Baum, M. A., Benkler, Y., Berinsky, A. J., Greenhill, K. M., Menczer, F., Metzger, M. J., Nyhan, B., Pennycook, G., & Rothschild, D. (2018). The science of fake news. Science, 359(6380), 1094–1096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aao2998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lee, J. J., Sohn, Y., & Fowler, J. H. (2013). Emotion regulation as the foundation of political attitudes: Does reappraisal decrease support for conservative policies? PloS One, 8(12), e83143. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0083143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2000). Beyond valence: Toward a model of emotion-specific influences on judgement and choice. Cognition & Emotion, 14(4), 473–493. https://doi.org/10.1080/026999300402763
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., Li, Y., Valdesolo, P., & Kassam, K. S. (2015). Emotion and decision making. Annual Review of Psychology, 66(1), 799–823. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-010213-115043
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Tiedens, L. Z. (2006). Portrait of the angry decision maker: How appraisal tendencies shape anger’s influence on cognition. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 19(2), 115–137. https://doi.org/10.1002/bdm.515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lynch, M. P. (2019). Do we really understand “Fake News”? The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/09/23/opinion/fake-news.html
   Google Scholar
• Martel, C., Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. (2020). Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 5(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McLaughlin, T. (2018, December). How WhatsApp fuels fake news and violence in India. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/how-whatsapp-fuels-fake-news-and-violence-in-india/
   Google Scholar
• Mesquita, B., & Frijda, N. H. (1992). Cultural variations in emotions: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 179. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.112.2.179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, P. R. (2011). The emotional citizen: Emotion as a function of political sophistication. Political Psychology, 32(4), 575–600. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2011.00824.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moons, W. G., & Mackie, D. M. (2007). Thinking straight while seeing red: The influence of anger on information processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 33(5), 706–720. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167206298566
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nabi, R. L., & Green, M. C. (2015). The role of a narrative’s emotional flow in promoting persuasive outcomes. Media Psychology, 18(2), 137–162. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2014.912585
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nook, E. C., Schleider, J. L., & Somerville, L. H. (2017). A linguistic signature of psychological distancing in emotion regulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 146(3), 337. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000263
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Binnendyk, J., Newton, C., & Rand, D. (2021a). A practical guide to doing behavioural research on fake news and misinformation Collabra: Psychology, 7(1), 25293. https://doi.org/10.1525/collabra.25293
   Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., Epstein, Z., Mosleh, M., Arechar, A. A., Eckles, D., & Rand, D. G. (2021b). Shifting attention to accuracy can reduce misinformation online. Nature 592, 590–595. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-021-03344-2.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2019). Lazy, not biased: Susceptibility to partisan fake news is better explained by lack of reasoning than by motivated reasoning. Cognition, 188, 39–50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2018.06.011
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., & Rand, D. G. (2021). The psychology of fake news. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 25(5), 388–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2021.02.007.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., & Briñol, P. (2015). Emotion and persuasion: Cognitive and meta-cognitive processes impact attitudes. Cognition and Emotion, 29(1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.967183
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenzweig, L. R., Bago, B., Berinsky, A. J., & Rand, D. G. (2021). Happiness and surprise are associated with worse truth discernment of COVID-19 headlines among social media users in Nigeria. Harvard Kennedy School Misinformation Review. https://doi.org/10.37016/mr-2020-75.
   Google Scholar
• Sangalang, A., Ophir, Y., & Cappella, J. N. (2019). The potential for narrative correctives to combat misinformation. Journal of Communication, 69(3), 298–319. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqz014
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slovic, P., Finucane, M. L., Peters, E., & MacGregor, D. G. (2007). The affect heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 177(3), 1333–1352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2005.04.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomson, K. S., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2016). Investigating an alternate form of the cognitive reflection test. Judgment and Decision Making, 11(1), 99–113. https://doi.org/10.1037/t49856-000
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiedens, L. Z., & Linton, S. (2001). Judgment under emotional certainty and uncertainty: The effects of specific emotions on information processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 973–988. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.973
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Hutchings, V. L., Banks, A. J., & Davis, A. K. (2008). Is a worried citizen a good citizen? Emotions, political information seeking, and learning via the internet. Political Psychology, 29(2), 247–273. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9221.2008.00625.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van’t Wout, M., Chang, L. J., & Sanfey, A. G. (2010). The influence of emotion regulation on social interactive decision-making. Emotion, 10(6), 815. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0020069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The spread of true and false news online. Science, 359(6380), 1146–1151. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aap9559
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wegener, D. T., Petty, R. E., & Smith, S. M. (1995). Positive mood can increase or decrease message scrutiny: The hedonic contingency view of mood and message processing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(1), 5. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.69.1.5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yeo, S. K., & McKasy, M. (2021). Emotion and humor as misinformation antidotes. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(15). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2002484118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ziegler, R., Schlett, C., & Aydinli, A. (2013). Mood and threat to attitudinal freedom: Delineating the role of mood congruency and hedonic contingency in counterattitudinal message processing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(8), 1083–1096. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167213490808
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar