Self-generated cognitive fluency: consequences on evaluative judgments

References

• Acuna, B. D., Eliassen, J. C., Donoghue, J. P., & Sanes, J. N. (2002). Frontal and parietal lobe activation during transitive inference in humans. Cerebral Cortex, 12(12), 1312–1321. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/12.12.1312
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2008). Easy on the mind, easy on the wallet: The roles of familiarity and processing fluency in valuation judgments. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 15(5), 985–990. https://doi.org/10.3758/PBR.15.5.985
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alter, A. L., & Oppenheimer, D. M. (2009). Uniting the tribes of fluency to form a metacognitive nation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 13(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868309341564
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. H. (1981). Foundation of information integration theory. Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, T. M., & Hahn, U. (2001). Determinants of wordlikeness: Phonotactics or lexical neighborhoods? Journal of Memory and Language, 44(4), 568–591. https://doi.org/10.1006/jmla.2000.2756
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baranski, J. V., & Petrusic, W. M. (1992). The discriminability of remembered magnitudes. Memory & Cognition, 20(3), 254–270. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03199662
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Borenstein, M., Hedges, L. V., Higgins, J. P. T., & Rothstein, H. (2009). Introduction to meta-analysis. John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F. (1989). Exposure and affect: Overview and meta-analysis of research, 1968–1987. Psychological Bulletin, 106(2), 265–289. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.106.2.265
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bornstein, R. F., & D’Agostino, P. R. (1992). Stimulus recognition and the mere exposure effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(4), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.63.4.545
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Casasanto, D. (2009). Embodiment of abstract concepts: Good and bad in right- and left-handers. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 138(3), 351–367. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0015854
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christoff, K., Prabhakaran, V., Dorfman, J., Zhao, Z., Kroger, J. K., & Holyoak, K. J. (2001). Rostrolateral prefrontal cortex involvement in relational integration during reasoning. Neuroimage, 14(5), 1136–1149. https://doi.org/10.1006/nimg.2001.0922
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clore, G. L. (1992). Cognitive phenomenology: Feelings and the construction of judgment. In L. L. Martin, & A. Tesser (Eds.), Handbook of social cognition (pp. 323–417). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Coulson, S., & Oakley, T. (2005). Blending and coded meaning: Literal and figurative meaning in cognitive semantics. Journal of Pragmatics, 37(10), 1510–1536. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2004.09.010
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Desimone, R., Miller, E. K., Chelazzi, L., & Lueschow, A. (1995). Multiple memory systems in the visual cortex. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The cognitive neurosciences (pp. 475–490). MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks. Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133–187. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog2202_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fazendeiro, T., Winkielman, P., Luo, C., & Lorah, C. (2005). False recognition across meaning, language, and stimulus format: Conceptual relatedness and the feeling of familiarity. Memory and Cognition, 33(2), 249–260. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03195314
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gevers, W., Reynvoet, B., & Fias, W. (2003). The mental representation of ordinal sequences is spatially organized. Cognition, 87(3), B87–B89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0010-0277(02)00234-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graf, L. K. M., Mayer, S., & Landwehr, J. R. (2018). Measuring processing fluency: One versus five items. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(3), 393–411. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greeno, J. G. (1989). Situations, mental models, and generative knowledge. In D. Klahr, & K. Kotovsky (Eds.), Complex information processing (pp. 285–318). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Hahn, U., & Bailey, T. (2005). What makes words sound similar? Cognition, 97(3), 227–267. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2004.09.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hamilton, H. W., & Deese, J. (1971). Does linguistic marking have a psychological correlate? Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 10(6), 707–714. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(71)80079-8
   Google Scholar
• Hegarty, M. (2004). Mechanical reasoning by mental simulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 8(6), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2004.04.001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hinton, E. C., Dymond, S., von Hecker, U., & Evans, C. J. (2010). Neural correlates of relational reasoning and the symbolic distance effect: Involvement of parietal cortex. Neuroscience, 168(1), 138–148. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroscience.2010.03.052
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hintzman, D. L. (1986). Schema abstraction” in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93(4), 411. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.93.4.411
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holyoak, K. J., & Patterson, K. K. (1981). A positional discriminability model of linear-order judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(6), 1283–1302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.7.6.1283
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Husaim, J., & Cohen, L. (1981). Infant learning of ill-defined categories. Merrill–Palmer Quarterly, 27(4), 443–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huttenlocher, J. (1968). Constructing spatial images: A strategy in reasoning. Psychological Review, 75(6), 550–560. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0026748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jost, J. T., Kruglanski, A. W., & Nelson, T. O. (1998). Social metacognition: An expansionist review. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 137–154. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_6
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kaminska, O. K., Magnuski, M., Olszanowski, M., Gola, M., Brzezicka, A., & Winkielman, P. (2020). Ambiguous at the second sight: Mixed facial expressions trigger late electrophysiological responses linked to lower social impressions. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 20(2), 441–454. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-020-00778-5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Knauff, M. (2013). Space to reason. A spatial theory of human thought. MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kruschke, J. K. (1992). ALCOVE: An exemplar-based connectionist model of category learning. Psychological Review, 99(1), 22–44. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.99.1.22
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leth-Steensen, C., & Marley, A. A. J. (2000). A model of response timeeffects in symbolic comparison. Psychological Review, 107, 62–100.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lumley, T. (2015). Package “rmeta”. Version 2.16. cran.r-project.org/web/packages/rmeta/rmeta.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Pohl, R., & Schumacher, S. (1991). Handlungssequenzen und Wortlisten als hierarchische lineare Ordnungen: Einflüsse auf den Distanzeffekt [Action sequences and word lists as hierarchical linear orderings: Influences on the distance effect]. Zeitschrift für experimentelle und angewandte Psychologie, 38(1), 43–62.
   Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(3, Pt.1), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025953.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Potts, G. R. (1972). Information processes used in the encoding of linear orderings. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 11(6), 727–740. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(72)80007-0
   Google Scholar
• Potts, G. R. (1974). Storing and retrieving information about ordered relationships. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 103(3), 431–439. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0037408
   Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (1998). Effects of perceptual fluency on affective judgments. Psychological Science, 9(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, R., Wurtz, P., & Zimmermann, T. D. (2004). Exploring “fringe” consciousness: The subjective experience of perceptual fluency and its objective bases. Consciousness and Cognition, 13(1), 47–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-8100(03)00049-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1978). Principles of categorization. In E. Rosch (Ed.), Cognition and categorization (pp. 27–48). Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Ryali, C. K., Goffin, S., Winkielman, P., & Yu, A. J. (2020). From likely to likable: The role of statistical typicality in human social assessment of faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(47), 29371–29380. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912343117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, J. A., & De Houwer, J. (2012). Contingency learning with evaluative stimuli. Testing the generality of contingency learning in a performance paradigm. Experimental Psychology, 59(4), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000141
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (1998). Accessible content and accessibility experiences: The interplay of declarative and experiential information in judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 2(2), 87–99. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0202_2
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Schwarz, N., Bless, H., Strack, F., Klumpp, G., Rittenauer-Schatka, H., & Simons, A. (1991). Ease of retrieval as information: Another look at the availability heuristic. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61(2), 195–202. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N., & Clore, G. L. (1996). Feelings and phenomenal experiences. In E. T. Higgins, & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 385–407). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sedek, G., & von Hecker, U. (2004). Effects of subclinical depression and aging on generative reasoning about linear orders: Same or different processing limitations? Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(2), 237–260. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.133.2.237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shepard, R. N., & Metzler, J. (1971). Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science, 171(3972), 701–703. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.171.3972.701
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shoben, E. J., Cech, C. G., Schwanenflugel, P. J., & Sailor, K. M. (1989). Serial position effects in comparative judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 15(2), 273–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.15.2.273
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, K. H., & Foos, P. W. (1975). Effect of presentation order on the construction of linear orders. Memory and Cognition, 3(6), 614–618. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03198226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strack, F., Martin, L. L., & Stepper, S. (1988). Inhibiting and facilitating condition of facial expressions: A non-obtrusive test of the facial feedback hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(5), 768–777. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.5.768
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Topolinski, S., Likowski, K. U., Weyers, P., & Strack, F. (2009). The face of fluency: Semantic coherence automatically elicits a specific pattern of facial muscle reactions. Cognition and Emotion, 23(2), 260–271. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930801994112
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unkelbach, C. (2006). The learned interpretation of cognitive fluency. Psychological Science, 17(4), 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01708.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Unkelbach, C., & Fiedler, K. (2016). Contrastive CS-US relations reverse evaluative conditioning effects. Social Cognition, 34(5), 413–434. https://doi.org/10.1521/soco.2016.34.5.413
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Opstal, F., Fias, W., Peigneux, P., & Verguts, T. (2009). The neural representation of extensively trained ordered sequences. Neuroimage, 47(1), 367–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.04.035
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, T., Carr, E. W., Davis, T., & Winkielman, P. (2018). Category structure determines the relative attractiveness of global versus local averages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(2), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, T., Ingendahl, M., & Winkielman, P. (2021). The architecture of prototype preferences: Typicality, fluency, and valence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hecker, U., & Conway, M. (2010). Magnitude of negative priming varies with conceptual task difficulty: Attentional resources are involved in episodic retrieval processes. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(4), 666–678. https://doi.org/10.1080/17470210903080711
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hecker, U., & Klauer, K. C. (2021). Are rank orders mentally represented by spatial arrays? Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 1–14. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.613186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hecker, U., Klauer, K. C., & Aßfalg, A. (2019). A robust anchoring effect in linear ordering. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(11), 2680–2689. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819855234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• von Hecker, U., Klauer, K. C., Wolf, L., & Fazilat-Pour, M. (2016). Spatial processes in linear ordering. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 42(7), 1003–1033. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000220
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wänke, M. (2013). Almost everything you always wanted to know about ease-of-retrieval effects. In R. Greifeneder, & C. Unkelbach (Eds.), The experience of thinking: How the fluency of mental processes influences cognition and behavior (pp. 151–169). Psychology Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wänke, M., Bless, H., & Biller, B. (1996). Subjective experience versus content of information in the construction of attitude judgments. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 22(11), 1105–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672962211002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wänke, M., & Hansen, J. (2015). Relative processing fluency. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 24(3), 195–199. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721414561766
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Whittlesea, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19(6), 1235–1253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.19.6.1235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., & Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17(9), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Olszanowski, M., & Gola, M. (2015). Faces in-between: Evaluations reflect the interplay of facial features and task-dependent fluency. Emotion, 15(2), 232–242. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000036
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., & Schwarz, N. (2001). How pleasant was your childhood? Beliefs about memory shape inferences from experienced difficulty of recall. Psychological Science, 12(2), 176–179. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00330
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Schwarz, N., Fazendeiro, T., & Reber, R. (2003). The hedonic marking of processing fluency: Implications for evaluative judgment. In J. Musch, & K. C. Klauer (Eds.), The psychology of evaluation: Affective processes in cognition and emotion (pp. 189–217). Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Witherspoon, D., & Allan, L. G. (1985). The effects of a prior presentation on temporal judgments in a perceptual identification task. Memory and Cognition, 13(2), 103–111. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03197003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Younger, B. (1990). Infant categorization: Memory for category-level and specific item information. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50(1), 131–155. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-0965(90)90036-8
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (1968). Attitudinal effects of mere exposure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology: Monograph Supplement, 9(2, Pt.2), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025848
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zalesak, M., & Heckers, S. (2009). The role of the hippocampus in transitive inference. Psychiatry Research, 172(1), 24–30. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pscychresns.2008.09.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar