Emotions, social coordination, and the danger of affective polarisation

References

• Brady, H. E., & Kent, T. B. (2022). Fifty years of declining confidence & increasing polarization in trust in American institutions. Dædalus, 151(4), 43–66. https://doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_01943
   Google Scholar
• Ciuk, D. J., & Rottman, J. (2021). Moral conviction, emotion, and the influence of episodic versus thematic frames. Political Communication, 38(5), 519–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/10584609.2020.1793847
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013a). Whatever next? Predictive brains, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36(3), 181–204. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X12000477
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, A. (2013b). The many faces of precision (Replies to commentaries on “Whatever next? Neural prediction, situated agents, and the future of cognitive science”). Frontiers in Psychology, 4, 270. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00270.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cuadros, Z., Hurtado, E., & Cornejo, C. (2020). Infant-adult synchrony in spontaneous and nonspontaneous interactions. PLoS ONE, 15(12), e0244138. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244138
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ellsworth, P. C., & Scherer, K. R. (2003). Appraisal processes in emotion. In R. J. Davidson, K. R. Scherer, & H. Goldsmith (Eds.), Handbook of the Affective Sciences (pp. 572–595). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H., & Mesquita, B. (2000). Beliefs through emotions. In N. H. Frijda, A. S. R. Manstead, & S. Bem (Eds.), Emotions and beliefs: How feelings influence thoughts (pp. 45–78). Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gill, H. (2022). Testing the effect of cross-cutting exposure to cable TV news on affective polarization: Evidence from the 2020 U.S. presidential election. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 66(2), 320–339. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2022.2087653
   Google Scholar
• Hoehl, S., Fairhurst, M., & Schirmer, A. (2021). Interactional synchrony: Signals, mechanisms and benefits. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1-2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa024
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Lelkes, Y., Levendusky, M., Malhotra, N., & Westwood, S. J. (2019). The origins and consequences of affective polarization in the United States. Annual Review of Political Science, 22(1), 129–146. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051117-073034
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kawakatsu, M., Lelkes, Y., Levin, S. A., & Tarnita, C. E. (2021). Interindividual cooperation mediated by partisanship complicates Madison’s cure for “mischiefs of faction”. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(50), e2102148118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2102148118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leventhal, H., & Scherer, K. R. (1987). The relationship of emotion to cognition: A functional approach to a semantic controversy. Cognition and Emotion, 1(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699938708408361
   Google Scholar
• Levin, S. A., Milner, H. V., & Perrings, C. (2021). The dynamics of political polarization. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 118(50), e2116950118. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2116950118
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., Ross, L., & Lepper, M. R. (1979). Biased assimilation and attitude polarization: The effects of prior theories on subsequently considered evidence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(11), 2098–2109. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.11.2098
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lord, C. G., & Taylor, C. A. (2009). Biased assimilation: Effects of assumptions and expectations on the interpretation of new evidence. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(5), 827–841. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2009.00203.x
   Google Scholar
• Lu, Y., & Lee, J. K. (2019). Partisan information sources and affective polarization: Panel analysis of the mediating role of anger and fear. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 96(3), 767–783. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077699018811295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCoy, J., Rahman, T., & Somer, M. (2018). Polarization and the Global Crisis of Democracy: Common Patterns, Dynamics, and Pernicious Consequences for Democratic Polities. American Behavioral Scientist, 62(1), 16–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0002764218759576
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scherer, K. R. (2009). The dynamic architecture of emotion: Evidence for the component process model. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1307–1351. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902928969
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schirmer, A., Fairhurst, M., & Hoehl, S. (2021). Being ‘in sync’—is interactional synchrony the key to understanding the social brain? Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 16(1-2), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1093/scan/nsaa148
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Skitka, L. J., Hanson, B. E., Morgan, G. S., & Wisneski, D. C. (2021). The psychology of moral conviction. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 347–366. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-063020-030612
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sterzer, P., Adams, R. A., Fletcher, P., Frith, C., Lawrie, S. M., Muckli, L., Petrovic, P., Uhlhaas, P., Voss, M., & Corlett, P. R. (2018). The predictive coding account of psychosis. Biological Psychiatry, 84(9), 634–643. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2018.05.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhay, E. (2015). Explaining group influence: the role of identity and emotion in political conformity and polarization. Political Behavior, 37(1), 221–251. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-014-9269-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Suhay, E., & Erisen, C. (2018). The role of anger in the biased assimilation of political information. Political Psychology, 39(4), 793–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12463
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van Reekum, C. M., & Scherer, K. R. (1997). Levels of processing for emotion-antecedent appraisal. In G. Matthews (Ed.), Cognitive Science Perspectives on Personality and Emotion (pp. 259–300). Elsevier Science.
   Google Scholar
• Webster, S. W., & Albertson, B. (2022). Emotion and politics: Noncognitive psychological biases in public opinion. Annual Review of Political Science, 25(1), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-polisci-051120-105353
   Google Scholar
• Wheeler, N. E., Allidina, S., Long, E. U., Schneider, S. P., Haas, I. J., & Cunningham, W. A. (2020). Ideology and predictive processing: Coordination, bias, and polarization in socially constrained error minimization. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 34, 192–198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.002
   Google Scholar