106
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
S.I: The interplay between language and emotion

Are valence and arousal related to the development of amodal representations of words? A computational study

, , , &
Received 27 Jul 2023, Accepted 07 Nov 2023, Published online: 21 Nov 2023

References

  • Fraga, I., Guasch, M., Haro, J., Padrón, I., & Ferré, P. (2018). EmoFinder: The meeting point for Spanish emotional words. Behavior Research Methods, 50(1), 84–93. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-017-1006-3
  • Günther, F., Rinaldi, L., & Marelli, M. (2019). Vector-space models of semantic representation from a cognitive perspective: A discussion of common misconceptions. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(6), 1006–1033. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691619861372
  • Hoemann, K., & Feldman-Barrett, L. (2019). Concepts dissolve artificial boundaries in the study of emotion and cognition, uniting body, brain, and mind. Cognition and Emotion, 33(1), 67–76. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2018.1535428
  • Hoffman, P., Lambon-Ralph, M. A., & Rogers, T. T. (2013). Semantic diversity: A measure of semantic ambiguity based on variability in the contextual usage of words. Behavior Research Methods, 45(3), 718–730. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0278-x
  • Hoffman, P., McClelland, J. L., & Lambon Ralph, M. A. (2018). Concepts, control, and context: A connectionist account of normal and disordered semantic cognition. Psychological Review, 125(3), 293–328. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000094
  • Ivens, S. H., & Koslin, B. L. (1991). Demands for reading literacy require new accountability methods. Touchstone Applied Science Associates.
  • Jorge-Botana, G., Olmos, R., & Barroso, A. (2013, July). Gallito 2.0: A natural language processing tool to support research on discourse. Proceedings of the Twenty-third Annual Meeting of the Society for Text and Discourse, Valencia.
  • Jorge-Botana, G., Olmos, R., & Luzón, J. M. (2018). Word maturity indices with latent semantic analysis: Why, when, and where is Procrustes rotation applied? WIREs Cognitive Science, 9(1), e1457. https://doi.org/10.1002/wcs.1457
  • Jorge-Botana, G., Olmos, R., & Luzón, J. M. (2020). Bridging the theoretical gap between semantic representation models without the pressure of a ranking: Some lessons learnt from LSA. Cognitive Processing, 21(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10339-019-00934-x
  • Jorge-Botana, G., Olmos, R., & Sanjosé, V. (2017). Predicting word maturity from frequency and semantic diversity: A computational study. Discourse Processes, 54(8), 682–694. https://doi.org/10.1080/0163853X.2016.1155876
  • Kireyev, K., & Landauer, T. K. (2011, June). Word maturity: Computational modeling of word knowledge. Proceedings of the 49th annual meeting of the association for computational linguistics: Human language technologies.
  • Landauer, T. K., & Dumais, S. (1997). A solution to Plato’s problem: The Latent Semantic Analysis theory of the acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104(2), 211–240. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.211
  • Landauer, T. K., Foltz, P. W., & Laham, D. (1998). An introduction to latent semantic analysis. Discourse Processes, 25(2/3), 259–284. https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539809545028
  • Landauer, T. K., Kireyev, K., & Panaccione, C. (2011). Word maturity: A new metric for word knowledge. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(1), 92–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2011.536130
  • Martínez-Huertas, J. A., & Ferrer, E. (2023). Mixed-effects models with crossed random effects for multivariate longitudinal data. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 30(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1080/10705511.2022.2108430
  • Martínez-Huertas, J. A., Jorge-Botana, G., Luzón, J. M., & Olmos, R. (2021). Redundancy, isomorphism and propagative mechanisms between emotional and amodal representations of words: A computational study. Memory & Cognition, 49(2), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-020-01086-6
  • Martínez-Huertas, J. A., Jorge-Botana, G., & Olmos, R. (2021). Emotional valence precedes semantic maturation of words: A longitudinal computational study of early verbal emotional anchoring. Cognitive Science, 45(7), e13026. https://doi.org/10.1111/cogs.13026
  • Martínez-Huertas, J. A., Olmos, R., & Ferrer, E. (2022). Model selection and model averaging for mixed-effects models with crossed random effects for subjects and items. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 57(4), 603–619. https://doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2021.1889946
  • Muraki, E. J., Reggin, L. D., Feddema, C. Y., & Pexman, P. M. (2023). The development of abstract word meanings. Journal of Child Language, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305000923000569
  • Nook, E. C., Sasse, S. F., Lambert, H. K., McLaughlin, K. A., & Somerville, L. H. (2017). Increasing verbal knowledge mediates development of multidimensional emotion representations. Nature Human Behaviour, 1(12), 881–889. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-017-0238-7
  • Panksepp, J. (2015). Primal emotions and cultural evolution of language: Primal affects empower words. In U. M. Lüdtke (Ed.), Emotion in language: theory – research – application (pp. 27–48). https://doi.org/10.1075/ceb.10.02pan
  • Pexman, P. M. (2019). The role of embodiment in conceptual development. Language, Cognition and Neuroscience, 34(10), 1274–1283. https://doi.org/10.1080/23273798.2017.1303522
  • Russell, J. A. (1980). A circumplex model of affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 39(6), 1161–1178. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0077714
  • Sebastián, N., Martí, M. A., Carreiras, M. F., & Cuetos, F. (2000). Lexesp: Léxico Informatizado del Español [LEXESP: Computerized Lexicon of Spanish]. Edicions Universitat Barcelona.
  • Shablack, H., & Lindquist, K. A. (2019). The role of language in emotional development. In V. LoBue, K. Pérez-Edgar, & K. A. Buss (Eds.), Handbook of emotional development (pp. 451–478). Springer.
  • Stadthagen-Gonzalez, H., Imbault, C., Pérez-Sánchez, M. A., & Brysbaert, M. (2017). Norms of valence and arousal for 14,031 Spanish words. Behavior Research Methods, 49(1), 111–123. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-015-0700-2
  • Warriner, A. B., Kuperman, V., & Brysbaert, M. (2013). Norms of valence, arousal, and dominance for 13,915 English lemmas. Behavior Research Methods, 45(4), 1191–1207. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-012-0314-x

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.