340
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Stimulus valence moderates self-learning

ORCID Icon, , , &
Received 05 Dec 2022, Accepted 11 Mar 2024, Published online: 05 Apr 2024

References

  • Alexopoulos, T., Muller, D., Ric, F., & Marendaz, C. (2012). I, me, mine: Automatic attentional capture by self-related stimuli. European Journal of Social Psychology, 42(6), 770–779. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.1882
  • Baars, B. J. (1988). A cognitive theory of consciousness. Cambridge University Press.
  • Bargh, J. A., & Pratto, F. (1986). Individual construct accessibility and perceptual selection. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 22(4), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1031(86)90016-8
  • Baumeister, R. F. (1998). The self. In D. T. Gilbert, S. T. Fiske, & G. Lindzey (Eds.), Handbook of social psychology (4th ed., pp. 680–740). McGraw-Hill.
  • Beggan, J. K. (1992). On the social nature of nonsocial perception: The mere ownership effect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62(2), 229–237. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.62.2.229
  • Blanchard, T. C., & Gershman, S. J. (2018). Pure correlates of exploration and exploitation in the human brain. Cognitive, Affective, & Behavioral Neuroscience, 18(1), 117–126. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13415-017-0556-2
  • Carstensen, L. L., & Mikels, J. A. (2005). At the intersection of emotion and cognition: Aging and the positivity effect. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 117–121. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00348.x
  • Carstensen, L. L., & Turk-Charles, S. (1994). The salience of emotion across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 9(2), 259–264. https://doi.org/10.1037/0882-7974.9.2.259
  • Caughey, S., Falbén, J. K., Tsamadi, D., Persson, L. M., Golubickis, M., & Macrae, C. N. (2021). Self-prioritization during stimulus processing is not obligatory. Psychological Research, 85(2), 503–508. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01283-2
  • Cohen, J. D., McClure, S. M., & Yu, A. J. (2007). Should I stay or should I go? How the human brain manages the trade-off between exploitation and exploration. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 362(1481), 933–942. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2007.2098
  • Constable, M. D., Becker, M. L., Oh, Y.-I., & Knoblich, G. (2021). Affective compatability with the self modulates the self-prioritization effect. Cognition and Emotion, 35(2), 291–304. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2020.1839383
  • Constable, M. D., Welsh, T. N., Huffman, G., & Pratt, J. (2019). I before U: Temporal order judgements reveal bias for self-owned objects. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(3), 589–598. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021818762010
  • Conway, M. A. (2005). Memory and the self. Journal of Memory and Language, 53(4), 594–628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jml.2005.08.005
  • Conway, M. A., & Pleydell-Pearce, C. W. (2000). The construction of autobiographical memories in the self-memory system. Psychological Review, 107(2), 261–288. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.107.2.261
  • Correll, J., Wittenbrink, B., Crawford, M. T., & Sadler, M. S. (2015). Stereotypic vision: How stereotypes disambiguate visual stimuli. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(2), 219–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000015
  • Cvencek, D., Greenwald, A. G., & Meltzoff, A. N. (2012). Balanced identity theory: Evidence for implicit consistency in social cognition. In B. Gawronski & F. Strack (Eds.), Cognitive consistency: A unifying concept in social psychology (pp. 157–177). Guilford Press.
  • Daw, N. D., O’Doherty, J. P., Dayan, P., Seymour, B., & Dolan, R. J. (2006). Cortical substrates for exploratory decisions in humans. Nature, 441(7095), 876–879. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04766
  • Dayan, P., & Balleine, B. W. (2002). Reward, motivation, and reinforcement learning. Neuron, 36(2), 285–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0896-6273(02)00963-7
  • Domenech, P., Rheims, S., & Koechlin, E. (2020). Neural mechanisms resolving exploitation-exploration dilemmas in the medial prefrontal cortex. Science, 369(6507), eabb0184. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.abb0184
  • Donoso, M., Collins, A. G., & Koechlin, E. (2014). Foundations of human reasoning in the prefrontal cortex. Science, 344(6191), 1481–1486. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1252254
  • Falbén, J. K., Golubickis, M., Balseryte, R., Persson, L. M., Tsamadi, D., Caughey, S., & Macrae, C. N. (2019). How prioritized is self-prioritization during stimulus processing? Visual Cognition, 27(1), 46–51. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2019.1583708
  • Falbén, J. K., Golubickis, M., Tamulaitis, S., Caughey, S., Tsamadi, D., Persson, D., Svensson, L. M., Sahraie, S. L., & Macrae, C. N. (2020). Self-relevance enhances evidence gathering during decision-making. Acta Psychologica, 209, 103122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2020.103122
  • Falbén, J. K., Golubickis, M., Wischerath, D., Tsamadi, D., Persson, L. M., Caughey, S., Svensson, S., & Macrae, C. N. (2020). It’s not always about me: The effects of prior beliefs and stimulus prevalence on self-other prioritization. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(9), 1466–1480. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820913016
  • Fontanesi, L., Gluth, S., Spektor, M. S., & Rieskamp, J. (2019). A reinforcement learning diffusion decision model for value-based decisions. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 26(4), 1099–1121. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-018-1554-2
  • Frank, M. J., Moustafa, A. A., Haughey, H. M., Curran, T., & Hutchinson, K. E. (2007). Genetic triple dissociation reveals multiple roles for dopamine in reinforcement learning. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 104(41), 16311–16316. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0706111104
  • Frank, M. J., Seeberger, L. C., & O’Reilly, R. C. (2004). By carrot or by stick: Cognitive reinforcement learning in Parkinsonism. Science, 306(5703), 1940–1943. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1102941
  • Gallagher, S. (2000). Philosophical conceptions of the self: Implications for cognitive science. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(1), 14–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1364-6613(99)01417-5
  • Gawronski, B., Bodenhausen, G. V., & Becker, A. P. (2007). I like it, because I like myself: Associative self-anchoring and post-decisional change of implicit evaluations. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 43(2), 221–232. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2006.04.001
  • Gelman, A., & Rubin, D. B. (1992). Inference from iterative simulation using multiple sequences. Statistical Science, 7, 457–472.
  • Gershman, S. J., & Daw, N. D. (2017). Reinforcement learning and episodic memory in humans and animals: An integrative framework. Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 101–128. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-122414-033625
  • Golubickis, M., Falbén, J. K., Cunningham, W. A., & Macrae, C. N. (2018). Exploring the self-ownership effect: Separating stimulus and response biases. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(2), 295–306. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000455
  • Golubickis, M., Falbén, J. K., Ho, N. S., Sui, J., Cunningham, W. A., & Macrae, C. N. (2020). Parts of me: Identity-relevance moderates self-prioritization. Consciousness and Cognition, 77, 102848. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.concog.2019.102848
  • Golubickis, M., Falbén, J. K., Sahraie, A., Visokomogilski, A., Cunningham, W. A., Sui, J., & Macrae, C. N. (2017). Self-prioritization and perceptual matching: The effects of temporal construal. Memory & Cognition, 45(7), 1223–1239. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13421-017-0722-3
  • Golubickis, M., Ho, N. S. P., Falbén, J. K., Schwertel, C. L., Maiuri, A., Dublas, D., Cunningham, W. A., & Macrae, C. N. (2021). Valence and ownership: Object desirability influences self-prioritization. Psychological Research, 85(1), 91–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-019-01235-w
  • Golubickis, M., & Macrae, C. N. (2021). That’s me in the spotlight: Self-relevance modulates attentional breadth. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 28(6), 1915–1922. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-021-01964-3
  • Golubickis, M., & Macrae, C. N. (2022). Sticky me: Self-relevance slows reinforcement learning. Cognition, 227, 105207. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105207
  • Golubickis, M., & Macrae, C. N. (2023). Self-prioritization reconsidered: Scrutinizing three claims. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 18(4), 876–886. https://doi.org/10.1177/17456916221131273
  • Gray, H. M., Ambady, N., Lowenthal, W. T., & Deldin, P. (2004). P300 as an index of attention to self-relevant stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 40(2), 216–224. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1031(03)00092-1
  • Greenwald, A. G. (1980). The totalitarian ego: Fabrication and revision of personal identity. American Psychologist, 35(7), 603–618. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.35.7.603
  • Greenwald, A. G., Banaji, M. R., Dudman, L. A., Farnham, S. D., Nosek, B. A., & Mellot, D. S. (2002). A unified theory of implicit attitudes, stereotypes, self-esteem, and self-concept. Psychological Review, 109(1), 3–25. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.109.1.3
  • Gutchess, A., & Kensinger, E. A. (2018). Shared mechanisms may support mnemonic benefits from self-referencing and emotion. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(8), 712–724. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.05.001
  • Hackel, L. M., & Amodio, D. M. (2018). Computational neuroscience approaches to social cognition. Current Opinion in Psychology, 24, 92–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.09.001
  • Humphreys, G. W., & Sui, J. (2016). Attentional control and the self: The self-attention network (SAN). Cognitive Neuroscience, 7(1-4), 5–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/17588928.2015.1044427
  • James, W. (1890). The principles of psychology. Henry-Holt & Co.
  • Johnson, D. J., Cesario, J., & Pleskac, T. J. (2018). How prior information and police experience impact decisions to shoot. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 115(4), 601–623. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000130
  • Kelley, W. M., Macrae, C. N., Wyland, C. L., Caglar, S., Inati, S., & Heatherton, T. F. (2002). Finding the self? An event-related fMRI study. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 14(5), 785–794. https://doi.org/10.1162/08989290260138672
  • Krompinger, J. W., & Simons, R. F. (2009). Electrophysiological indicators of emotional processing biases in depressed undergraduates. Biological Psychology, 81(3), 153–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.03.007
  • Kuiper, N. A., & Derry, P. A. (1982). Depressed and nondepressed content self-references in mild depressives. Journal of Personality, 50, 67–80. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1982.tb00746.x
  • Kuiper, N. A., & Rogers, T. B. (1979). Encoding of personal information: Self-other differences. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(4), 499–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.37.4.499
  • Kurdi, B., Lozano, S., & Banaji, M. R. (2017). Introducing the open affective standardized image set (OASIS). Behavior Research Methods, 49(2), 457–470. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-016-0715-3
  • Liao, Z., Huang, L., & Luo, S. (2021). Intranasal oxytocin decreases self-oriented learning. Psychopharmacology, 238(2), 461–474. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00213-020-05694-7
  • Lockwood, P. L., Wittmann, M. K., Apps, M. A., Klein-Flügge, M. C., Crockett, M. J., Humphreys, G. W., & Rushworth, M. F. (2018). Neural mechanisms for learning self and other ownership. Nature Communications, 9(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-07231-9
  • Macrae, C. N., Visokomogilski, A., Golubickis, M., Cunningham, W. A., & Sahraie, A. (2017). Self-relevance prioritizes access to visual awareness. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 43(3), 438–443. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000361
  • Macrae, C. N., Visokomogilski, A., Golubickis, M., & Sahraie, A. (2018). Self-relevance enhances the benefits of attention on perception. Visual Cognition, 26(7), 475–481. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2018.1498421
  • Markus, H. (1977). Self-schemata and processing information about the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(2), 63–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.2.63
  • Markus, H., & Wurf, E. (1987). The dynamic self-concept: A social psychological perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 38(1), 299–337. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.38.020187.001503
  • Markus, H. R., & Nurius, P. (1986). Possible selves. American Psychologist, 41(9), 954–969. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.41.9.954
  • Mather, M., & Carstensen, L. L. (2005). Aging and motivated cognition: The positivity effect in attention and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 9, 469–502.
  • McCabe, S. B., & Gotlib, I. H. (1995). Selective attention and clinical depression: Performance on a deployment-of-attention task. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(1), 241–245. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.241
  • Mezulis, A. H., Abramson, L. Y., Hyde, J. S., & Hankin, B. L. (2004). Is there a universal positivity bias in attributions? A meta-analytic review of individual, developmental, and cultural differences in the self-serving attributional bias. Psychological Bulletin, 130(5), 711–747. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.130.5.711
  • Miletić, S., Boag, R. J., & Forstmann, B. U. (2020). Mutual benefits: Combining reinforcement learning with sequential sampling models. Neuropsychologia, 136, 107261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2019.107261
  • Mitchell, J. P., Heatherton, T. F., & Macrae, C. N. (2002). Distinct neural systems subserve person and object knowledge. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 99(23), 15238–15243. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.232395699
  • Mitchell, J. P., Macrae, C. N., & Banaji, M. R. (2006). Dissociable medial prefrontal contributions to judgments of similar and dissimilar others. Neuron, 50(4), 655–663. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuron.2006.03.040
  • Northoff, G., & Hayes, D. J. (2011). Is our self nothing but reward? Biological Psychiatry, 69(11), 1019–1025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.12.014
  • Oakley, D. A., & Halligan, P. W. (2017). Chasing the rainbow: The non-conscious nature of being. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1924. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01924
  • Oppenheimer, D. M., Meyvis, T., & Davidenko, N. (2009). Instructional manipulation checks: Detecting satisficing to increase statistical power. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 45(4), 867–872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2009.03.009
  • Pedersen, M. L., & Frank, M. J. (2020). Simultaneous hierarchical Bayesian parameter estimation for reinforcement learning and drift diffusion models: A tutorial and links to neural data. Computational Brain & Behavior, 3(4), 458–471. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42113-020-00084-w
  • Pedersen, M. L., Frank, M. J., & Biele, G. (2017). The drift diffusion model as the choice rule in reinforcement learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(4), 1234–1251. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-016-1199-y
  • Persson, L., Golubickis, M., Dublas, D., Mastnak, N., Falbén, J. K., Tsamadi, D., Caughey, S., Svensson, S., & Macrae, C. N. (2021). Comparing person and people perception: Multiple group members do not increase stereotype priming. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 74(8), 1418–1431. https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218211012852
  • Ratcliff, R., Smith, P. L., Brown, S. D., & McKoon, G. (2016). Diffusion decision model: Current issues and history. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 20(4), 260–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2016.01.007
  • Ratcliff, R., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2002). Estimating parameters of the diffusion model: Approaches dealing with contaminant reaction times and parameter variability. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9(3), 438–481. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196302
  • Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64–99). Appleton- Century-Crofts.
  • Reuther, J., & Chakravarthi, R. (2017). Does self-prioritization affect perceptual processes? Visual Cognition, 25(1–3), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2017.1323813
  • Schäfer, S., Frings, C., & Wentura, D. (2016). About the composition of self-relevance: Conjunctions not features are bound to the self. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(3), 887–892. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0953-x
  • Schäfer, S., Wentura, D., & Frings, C. (2015). Self-prioritization beyond perception. Experimental Psychology, 62(6), 415–425. https://doi.org/10.1027/1618-3169/a000307
  • Schultz, W. (1998). Predictive reward signal of dopamine neurons. Journal of Neurophysiology, 80(1), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1152/jn.1998.80.1.1
  • Sedikides, C., & Alicke, M. D. (2012). Self-enhancement and self-protection motives. In R. M. Ryan (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of human motivation (pp. 303–322). Oxford University Press.
  • Sedikides, C., Gaertner, L., & Cai, H. (2015). On the panculturality of self-enhancement and self-protection motivation: The case for the universality of self-esteem. Advances in Motivation Science, 2, 184–241.
  • Sedikides, C., & Strube, M. J. (1997). Self-evaluation: To thine own self be good, to thine own self be sure, to thine own self be true, and to thine own self be better. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 29, 209–269. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60018-0
  • Segal, Z. V., Gemar, M., Truchon, C., Guirguis, M., & Horowitz, L. M. (1995). A priming methodology for studying self-representation in major depressive disorder. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 104(1), 205–213. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.104.1.205
  • Shapiro, K. L., Caldwell, J., & Sorensen, R. E. (1997). Personal names and the attentional blink: A visual “cocktail party” effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 23(2), 504–514. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-1523.23.2.504
  • Siebold, A., Weaver, M. D., Donk, M., & van Zoest, W. (2015). Social salience does not transfer to oculomotor visual search. Visual Cognition, 23(8), 989–1019. https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2015.1121946
  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (1998). Bayesian deviance, the effective number of parameters, and the comparison of arbitrarily complex models. Research Report, 98-1009.
  • Spiegelhalter, D. J., Best, N. G., Carlin, B. P., & van der Linde, A. (2002). Bayesian measures of model complexity and fit. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series B, 64, 583–639. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9868.00353
  • Stein, T., Siebold, A., & van Zoest, W. (2016). Testing the idea of privileged awareness of self-relevant information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(3), 303–307. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000197
  • Sui, J., He, X., & Humphreys, G. W. (2012). Perceptual effects of social salience: Evidence from self-prioritization effects on perceptual matching. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 38(5), 1105–1117. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029792
  • Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2015). The integrative self: How self-reference integrates perception and memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 19(12), 719–728. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2015.08.015
  • Sui, J., & Humphreys, G. W. (2017). The ubiquitous self: What the properties of self-bias tell us about the self. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1396(1), 222–235. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13197
  • Sui, J., & Rotshtein, P. (2019). Self-prioritization and the attentional systems. Current Opinion in Psychology, 29, 148–152. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.02.010
  • Sui, J., Rotshtein, P., & Humphreys, G. W. (2013). Coupling social attention to the self forms a network for personal significance. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(19), 7607–7612. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1221862110
  • Sutton, R. S., & Barto, A. G. (1998). Reinforcement learning: An introduction (Vol. 135). MIT Press.
  • Svensson, S. L., Golubickis, M., Maclean, H., Falbén, J. K., Persson, L. M., Tsamadi, D., Caughey, S., Sahraie, A., & Neil Macrae, C. (2022). More or less of me and you: Self-relevance augments the effects of item probability on stimulus prioritization. Psychological Research, 86(4), 1145–1164. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01562-x
  • Symons, C. S., & Johnson, B. T. (1997). The self-reference effect in memory: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 121(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.121.3.371
  • Taylor, S. E., & Brown, J. D. (1988). Illusion and well-being: A social psychological perspective on mental health. Psychological Bulletin, 103(2), 193–210. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.103.2.193
  • Tsamadi, D., Falbén, J. K., Persson, L. M., Golubickis, M., Caughey, S., Sahin, B., & macrae, C. N. (2020). Stereotype-based priming without stereotype activation: A tale of two priming tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 73(11), 1939–1948. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021820925396
  • Unkelbach, C., Alves, H., & Koch, A. (2020). Negativity bias, positivity bias, and valence asymmetries: Explaining the differential processing of positive and negative information. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 62, 115–187. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2020.04.005
  • Vicovaro, M., Delmaso, M., & Bertamini, M. (2022). Towards the boundaries of self-prioritization: Associating the self with asymmetric shapes disrupts the self-prioritization effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 48(9), 972–986. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0001036
  • Wang, H., Humphreys, G., & Sui, J. (2016). Expanding and retracting from the self: Gains and costs in switching self-associations. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 42(2), 247–256. https://doi.org/10.1037/xhp0000125
  • Watkins, C., & Dayan, P. (1992). Q-learning. Machine Learning, 8, 279–292.
  • Wiecki, T. V., Sofer, I., & Frank, M. J. (2013). HDDM: Hierarchical Bayesian estimation of the drift-diffusion model in Python. Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, 7, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fninf.2013.00014
  • Woźniak, M., & Knoblich, G. (2021). Self-prioritization depends on assumed task-relevance of self-association. Psychological Research, 86(5), 1599–1614. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-021-01584-5
  • Woźniak, M., & Knoblich, G. (2019). Self-prioritization of fully unfamiliar stimuli. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 72(8), 2110–2120. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747021819832981
  • Yankouskaya, A., Bührle, R., Lugt, E., Stolte, M., & Sui, J. (2020). Intertwining personal and reward relevance: Evidence from the drift-diffusion model. Psychological Research, 84(1), 32–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00426-018-0979-6
  • Yankouskaya, A., & Sui, J. (2022). Self-prioritization is supported by interactions between large- scale brain networks. European Journal of Neuroscience, 55(5), 1244–1261. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejn.15612
  • Ye, Y., & Gawronski, B. (2016). When possessions become part of the self: Ownership and implicit self-object liking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 64, 72–87. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2016.01.012
  • Yin, S., Sui, J., Chiu, Y.-C., Chen, A., & Egner, T. (2019). Automatic prioritization of self-referential stimuli in working memory. Psychological Science, 30(3), 415–423. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797618818483
  • Ziegler, S., Pedersen, M. L., Mowinckel, A. M., & Biele, G. (2016). Modelling ADHD: A review of ADHD theories through their predictions for computational models of decision-making and reinforcement learning. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 71, 633–656. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2016.09.002