The role of category valence in prototype preference

References

• Albrecht, S., & Carbon, C.-C. (2014). The Fluency Amplification Model: Fluent stimuli show more intense but not evidently more positive evaluations. Acta Psychologica, 148, 195–203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2014.02.002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alves, H., Uğurlar, P., & Unkelbach, C. (2022). Typical is trustworthy – evidence for a generalized heuristic. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 13(2), 446–455. https://doi.org/10.1177/19485506211031722
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr, E. W., Huber, D. E., Pecher, D., Zeelenberg, R., Halberstadt, J., & Winkielman, P. (2017). The ugliness-in-averageness effect: Tempering the warm glow of familiarity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 112(6), 787–812. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000083
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chopik, W. J., & Johnson, D. J. (2021). Modeling dating decisions in a mock swiping paradigm: An examination of participant and target characteristics. Journal of Research in Personality, 92, 104076. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrp.2021.104076
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Houwer, J. (2007). A conceptual and theoretical analysis of evaluative conditioning. The Spanish Journal of Psychology, 10(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1138741600006491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Faul, F., Erdfelder, E., Lang, A.-G., & Buchner, A. (2007). G*Power 3: A flexible statistical power analysis program for the social, behavioral, and biomedical sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 39(2), 175–191. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glaser, T., & Kuchenbrandt, D. (2017). Generalization effects in evaluative conditioning: Evidence for attitude transfer effects from single exemplars to social categories. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 103. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2017.00103
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstadt, J. (2006). The generality and ultimate origins of the attractiveness of prototypes. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 10(2), 166–183. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr1002_5
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halberstadt, J., & Rhodes, G. (2003). It’s not just average faces that are attractive: Computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 10(1), 149–156. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03196479
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hütter, M., Kutzner, F., & Fiedler, K. (2014). What is learned from repeated pairings? On the scope and generalizability of evaluative conditioning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 631–643. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033409
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hütter, M., & Tigges, D. (2019). On the external validity of evaluative conditioning: Evaluative responses generalize to modified instances of conditioned stimuli. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 84, 103824. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2019.103824
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ingendahl, M., Maschmann, I. T., Embs, N. M., Maulbetsch, A., Vogel, T., & Wänke, M. (2023). Articulation dynamics and evaluative conditioning: Investigating the boundary conditions, mental representation, and origin of the in-out effect. Cognition and Emotion, 37(6), 1074–1089. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2023.2228538
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landwehr, J. R., & Eckmann, L. (2020). The nature of processing fluency: Amplification versus hedonic marking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 90, 103997. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jesp.2020.103997
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landwehr, J. R., Labroo, A. A., & Herrmann, A. (2011). Gut liking for the ordinary: Incorporating design fluency improves automobile sales forecasts. Marketing Science, 30(3), 416–429. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.1110.0633
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (2008). International affective picture system (IAPS): affective ratings of pictures and instruction manual. University of Florida. Tech Rep A-8.
   Google Scholar
• Langlois, J. H., Roggman, L. A., & Musselman, L. (1994). What is average and what is not average about attractive faces? Psychological Science, 5(4), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1994.tb00503.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mathôt, S., Schreij, D., & Theeuwes, J. (2012). Opensesame: An open-source, graphical experiment builder for the social sciences. Behavior Research Methods, 44(2), 314–324. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-011-0168-7
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mervis, C. B., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Posner, M. I., & Keele, S. W. (1968). On the genesis of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77(3, Pt.1), 353–363. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0025953
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Reber, R., Schwarz, N., & Winkielman, P. (2004). Processing fluency and aesthetic pleasure: Is beauty in the perceiver’s processing experience? Personality and Social Psychology Review, 8(4), 364–382. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327957pspr0804_3
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryali, C. K., Goffin, S., Winkielman, P., & Yu, A. J. (2020). From likely to likable: The role of statistical typicality in human social assessment of faces. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(47), 29371–29380. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1912343117
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, I. K., Veenstra, L., van Harreveld, F., Schwarz, N., & Koole, S. L. (2016). Let’s not be indifferent about neutrality: Neutral ratings in the International Affective Picture System (IAPS) mask mixed affective responses. Emotion, 16(4), 426–430. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000164
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schwarz, N. (2004). Metacognitive experiences in consumer judgment and decision making. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 14(4), 332–348. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327663jcp1404_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, T., Carr, E. W., Davis, T., & Winkielman, P. (2018). Category structure determines the relative attractiveness of global versus local averages. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 44(2), 250–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/xlm0000446
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vogel, T., Ingendahl, M., & Winkielman, P. (2021). The architecture of prototype preferences: Typicality, fluency, and valence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 150(1), 187–194. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000798
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., & Cacioppo, J. T. (2001). Mind at ease puts a smile on the face: Psychophysiological evidence that processing facilitation elicits positive affect. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(6), 989–1000. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.6.989
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Winkielman, P., Halberstadt, J., Fazendeiro, T., & Catty, S. (2006). Prototypes are attractive because they are easy on the mind. Psychological Science, 17(9), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01785.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zajonc, R. B. (2001). Mere exposure: A gateway to the subliminal. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 10(6), 224–228. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8721.00154
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar