Voter emotional responses and voting behaviour in the 2020 US presidential election

References

• Ansolabehere, S., & Iyengar, S. (1995). Going negative: How political advertising shrinks and polarizes the electorate. Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barry, D., McIntire, M., & Rosenberg, M. (2021, January 9). ‘Our president wants us here’: The mob that stormed the capitol. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2021/01/09/us/capitol-rioters.html
   Google Scholar
• Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Finkenauer, C., & Vohs, K. D. (2001). Bad is stronger than good. Review of General Psychology, 5(4), 323–370. https://doi.org/10.1037/1089-2680.5.4.323
   Google Scholar
• Biden, J. (2019, April 25). Joe Biden for president: America is an idea [Video]. YouTube. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VbOU2fTg6cI
   Google Scholar
• Carlson, S. J., Levine, L. J., Lench, H. C., Flynn, E., Winks, K. M., & Winckler, B. E. (2023). Using emotion to guide decisions: The accuracy and perceived value of emotional intensity forecasts. Motivation and Emotion, 47, 1–19.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daoust, J. F., Plescia, C., & Blais, A. (2023). Are people more satisfied with democracy when they feel they won the election? No Political Studies Review, 21(1), 162–171. https://doi.org/10.1177/14789299211058390
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Doré, B. P., Meksin, R., Mather, M., Hirst, W., & Ochsner, K. N. (2016). Highly accurate prediction of emotions surrounding the attacks of September 11, 2001 over 1-, 2-, and 7-year prediction intervals. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 145(6), 788–795. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000168
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frijda, N. H. (2007). The laws of emotion. Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Garrett, K. N., & Bankert, A. (2018). The moral roots of partisan division: How moral conviction heightens affective polarization. British Journal of Political Science, 50(2), 621–640. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000712341700059X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., Lieberman, M. D., Morewedge, C. K., & Wilson, T. D. (2004). The peculiar longevity of things not so bad. Psychological Science, 15(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2004.01501003.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., Pinel, E. C., Wilson, T. D., Blumberg, S. J., & Wheatley, T. P. (1998). Immune neglect: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(3), 617–638. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.75.3.617
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilbert, D. T., & Wilson, T. D. (2007). Prospection: Experiencing the future. Science, 317(5843), 1351–1354. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1144161
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Groenendyk, E. W., & Banks, A. J. (2014). Emotional rescue: How affect helps partisans overcome collective action problems. Political Psychology, 35(3), 359–378. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12045
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grossman, M., & Thaler, D. (2018). Mass-elite divides in aversion to social change and support for Donald Trump. American Politics Research, 46(5), 753–784. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X18772280
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harmon-Jones, E., & Allen, J. J. B. (1998). Anger and frontal brain activity: EEG asymmetry consistent with approach motivation despite negative affective valence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1310–1316. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.74.5.1310
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes, A. F. (2018). Introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach (2nd ed.). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L. (2015). Group identity and political cohesion. Emerging Trends in the Social and Behavioral Sciences: An Interdisciplinary, Searchable, and Linkable Resource, 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118900772.etrds0155
   Google Scholar
• Huddy, L., Feldman, S., & Cassese, E. (2008). On the distinct political effects of anxiety and anger. In W. R. Neuman, G. E. Marcus, A. N. Crigler, & M. MacKuen (Eds.), The affect effect: Dynamics of emotion in political thinking and behaviour (pp. 202–230). The University of Chicago Press.
   Google Scholar
• Isaacowitz, D. M., Wadlinger, H. A., Goren, D., & Wilson, H. R. (2006). Is there an age-related positivity effect in visual attention? A comparison of two methodologies. Emotion, 6(3), 511–516. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.3.511
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405–431. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfs038
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision making under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. https://doi.org/10.2307/1914185
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lench, H. C., Bench, S. W., Darbor, K. E., & Moore, M. (2015). A functionalist manifesto: Goal-related emotions from an evolutionary perspective. Emotion Review, 7(1), 90–98. https://doi.org/10.1177/1754073914553001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lench, H. C., Levine, L. J., Perez, K., Carpenter, Z. K., Carlson, S. J., Bench, S. W., & Wan, Y. (2019). When and why people misestimate future feelings: Identifying strengths and weaknesses in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 116(5), 724–742. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000143
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lench, H. C., Reed, N. T., George, T., Kaiser, K. A., & North, S. G.. (2023). Anger has benefits for attaining goals. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000350
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lench, H. C., Safer, M. A., & Levine, L. J. (2011). Focalism and the underestimation of future emotions: When it’s worse than imagined. Emotion, 11(2), 278–285. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0022792
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lench, H. C., Tibbett, T. P., & Bench, S. W. (2016). Exploring the toolkit of emotion: What do sadness and anger do for us? Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 10(1), 11–25. https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lerner, J. S., & Keltner, D. (2001). Fear, anger, and risk. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(1), 146–159. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.81.1.146
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. (2007). Affect regulation and affective forecasting. In J. J. Gross (Ed.), Handbook of emotion regulation (pp. 180–203). Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127(2), 267–286. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.127.2.267
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacKuen, M., Wolak, J., Keele, L., & Marcus, G. E. (2010). Civic engagements: Resolute partisanship or reflective deliberation. American Journal of Political Science, 54(2), 440–458. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2010.00440.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L. (2015). “I disrespectfully agree”: The differential effects of partisan sorting on social and issue polarization. American Journal of Political Science, 59(1), 128–145. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nolen-Hoeksema, S. (1991). Responses to depression and their effects on the duration of depressive episodes. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 100(4), 569–582. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.100.4.569
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peñaloza, M. (2021, January 6). Trump supporters storm U.S. capitol, clash with police. NPR. https://www.npr.org/sections/congress-electoral-college-tally-live-updates/2021/01/06/953616207/diehard-trump-supporters-gather-in-the-nations-capital-to-protest-election-resul
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2016). Partisanship and political animosity in 2016. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2016/06/22/partisanship-and-political-animosity-in-2016/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2020). Amid campaign turmoil Biden holds wide leads on coronavirus unifying the country. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2020/10/09/voters-feelings-about-the-election-and-possible-outcomes/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2021a). Biden begins presidency with positive ratings; Trump departs with lowest-ever job mark. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2021/01/15/voters-reflections-on-the-2020-election/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2021b). How America changed during Donald Trumps’ presidency. https://www.pewresearch.org/2021/01/29/how-america-changed-during-donald-trumps-presidency/
   Google Scholar
• Pew Research Center. (2022). Two years after election turmoil, GOP voters remain skeptical on election, vote counts. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2022/10/31/two-years-after-election-turmoil-gop-voters-remain-skeptical-on-elections-vote-counts/
   Google Scholar
• Pharr, S. J., & Putnam, R. D. (2000). Disaffected democracies: What’s troubling the trilateral countries? Princeton University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Quoidbach, J., Berry, E. V., Hansenne, M., & Mikolajczak, M. (2010). Positive emotion regulation and well-being: Comparing the impact of eight savoring and dampening strategies. Personality and Individual Differences, 49(5), 368–373. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2010.03.048
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachman, S. (1994). The overprediction of fear: A review. Behaviour Research and Therapy, 32(7), 683–690. https://doi.org/10.1016/0005-7967(94)90025-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rachman, S., & Arntz, A. (1991). The overprediction and underprediction of pain. Clinical Psychology Review, 11(4), 339–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/0272-7358(91)90112-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roseman, I. J. (2018). Functions of anger in the emotion system. In H. C. Lench (Ed.), The function of emotions (pp. 141–173). Springer International Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rozin, P., & Royzman, E. B. (2001). Negativity bias, negativity dominance, and contagion. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 5(4), 296–320. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327957PSPR0504_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, M. B., Hepler, J., Zimmerman, R. S., Saul, L., Jacobs, S., Wilson, K., & Albarracín, D. (2015). Appealing to fear: A meta-analysis of fear appeal effectiveness and theories. Psychological Bulletin, 141(6), 1178–1204. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0039729
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torcal, M., & Montero, J. R. (2006). Political disaffection in contemporary democracies: Social capital, institutions and politics. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Tully, S., & Meyvis, T. (2017). Forgetting to remember our experiences: People overestimate how much they will retrospect about personal events. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113(6), 878–891. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspa0000094
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentino, N. A., Brader, T., Groenendyk, E. W., Gregorowicz, K., & Hutchings, V. L. (2011). Election night’s alright for fighting: The role of emotions in political participation. The Journal of Politics, 73(1), 156–170. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0022381610000939
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verduyn, P., Van Mechelen, I., & Tuerlinckx, F. (2011). The relation between event processing and the duration of emotional experience. Emotion, 11(1), 20–28. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021239
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verduyn, P., Van Mechelen, I., Tuerlinckx, F., Meers, K., & Van Coillie, H. (2009). Intensity profiles of emotional experience over time. Cognition and Emotion, 23(7), 1427–1443. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699930902949031
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward, G., De Neve, J.-E., Ungar, L. H., & Eichstaedt, J. C. (2021). (Un)happiness and voting in U.S. presidential elections. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(2), 370–383. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000249
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Widjaya, R. (2020). Love reaction steadily overcomes anger as response to lawmakers’ posts on Facebook. Pew Research Center. https://www.pewresearch.org/short-reads/2020/09/11/love-reaction-steadily-overcomes-anger-as-response-to-lawmakers-posts-on-facebook/
   Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., & Gilbert, D. T. (2005). Affective forecasting: Knowing what to want. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(3), 131–134. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00355.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilson, T. D., Wheatley, T., Meyers, J. M., Gilbert, D. T., & Axsom, D. (2000). Focalism: A source of durability bias in affective forecasting. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(5), 821–836. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.78.5.821
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar