More than meets the gut: a prototype analysis of the lay conceptions of intuition and analysis

References

• Aiken, L., & West, S. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions (pp. xi, 212). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Allinson, C., & Hayes, J. (1996). The cognitive style index: A measure of intuition-analysis for organizational research. Journal of Management Studies, 33(1), 119–135. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1996.tb00801.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Amit, A., Mentser, S., Arieli, S., & Porzycki, N. (2021). Distinguishing deliberate from systematic thinking. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 120(3), 765–788. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspp0000284
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andersen, J. (2000). Intuition in managers: Are intuitive managers more effective? Journal of Managerial Psychology, 15(1), 46–63. https://doi.org/10.1108/02683940010305298
   Google Scholar
• Andow, J. (2015). How “intuition” exploded. Metaphilosophy, 46(2), 189–212. https://doi.org/10.1111/meta.12127
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Appelt, K., Milch, K., Handgraaf, M., & Weber, E. (2011). The decision making individual differences inventory and guidelines for the study of individual differences in judgment and decision-making research. Judgment and Decision Making, 6(3), 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1930297500001455
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bargh, J. (1996). Automaticity in social psychology. In E. T. Higgins & A. W. Kruglanski (Eds.), Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles (pp. 169–183). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bargh, J., & Chartrand, T. (1999). The unbearable automaticity of being. American Psychologist, 54(7), 462–479. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.462
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Betsch, C. (2004). Präferenz für Intuition und Deliberation (PID): Inventar zur Erfassung von affekt-und kognitionsbasiertem Entscheiden. Zeitschrift Für Differentielle Und Diagnostische Psychologie, 25(4), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1024/0170-1789.25.4.179
   Google Scholar
• Bharara, G., Duncan, S., Jarden, A., & Hinckson, E. (2019). A prototype analysis of New Zealand adolescents’ conceptualizations of wellbeing. International Journal of Wellbeing, 9(4), 1–25. Article 4. https://doi.org/10.5502/ijw.v9i4.975
   Google Scholar
• Bolte, A., & Goschke, T. (2005). On the speed of intuition: Intuitive judgments of semantic coherence under different response deadlines. Memory & Cognition, 33(7), 1248–1255. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03193226
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burke, L., & Miller, M. (1999). Taking the mystery out of intuitive decision making. Academy of Management Perspectives, 13(4), 91–99. https://doi.org/10.5465/ame.1999.2570557
   Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J., & Petty, R. (1982). The need for cognition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 42(1), 116–131. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.42.1.116
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J., Petty, R., Feinstein, J., & Jarvis, W. (1996). Dispositional differences in cognitive motivation: The life and times of individuals varying in need for cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 197–253. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.119.2.197
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cacioppo, J., Petty, R., & Kao, C. (1984). The efficient assessment of need for cognition. Journal of Personality Assessment, 48(3), 306–307. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327752jpa4803_13
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cantor, N., & Mischel, W. (1977). Traits as prototypes: Effects on recognition memory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 35(1), 38–48. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.35.1.38
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S., & Trope, Y. (1999). Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. xiii, 657). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chan, W., Ho, R., Leung, K., Chan, D., & Yung, Y.-F. (1999). An alternative method for evaluating congruence coefficients with Procrustes rotation: A bootstrap procedure. Psychological Methods, 4(4), 378–402. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.4.378
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, P., Cohen, P., West, S., & Aiken, L. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlation analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). L. Erlbaum Associates. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410606266
   Google Scholar
• Dane, E. (2010). Paying attention to mindfulness and its effects on task performance in the workplace. Journal of Management, 37(4), 997–1018. https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310367948
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dane, E., & Pratt, M. (2007). Exploring intuition and its role in managerial decision making. Academy of Management Review, 32(1), 33–54. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.23463682
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dane, E., & Pratt, M. (2009). Conceptualizing and measuring intuition: A review of recent trends. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470745267.ch1
   Google Scholar
• De Neys, W. (2023). Advancing theorizing about fast-and-slow thinking. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 46, 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X2200142X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, B., Galton, H., Morgan, R., Evans, D., Oliver, C., Meyer, M., Cusack, R., Lawrence, A., & Dalgleish, T. (2010). Listening to your heart: How interoception shapes emotion experience and intuitive decision making. Psychological Science, 21(12), 1835–1844. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797610389191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dweck, C., Chiu, C., & Hong, Y. (1995). Implicit theories and their role in judgments and reactions: A word from two perspectives. Psychological Inquiry, 6(4), 267–285. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327965pli0604_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (1994). Integration of the cognitive and the psychodynamic unconscious. American Psychologist, 49(8), 709–724. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066x.49.8.709
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Epstein, S. (2008). Intuition from the perspective of cognitive-experiential self-theory. In H. Plessner, C. Betsch, & T. Betsch (Eds.), Intuition in judgment and decision making (pp. 23–37). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Epstein, S., Pacini, R., Denes-Raj, V., & Heier, H. (1996). Individual differences in intuitive–experiential and analytical–rational thinking styles. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71(2), 390–405. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.390
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2009). How many dual-process theories do we need? One, two, or many? In In two minds: Dual processes and beyond (pp. 33–54). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199230167.003.0002
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2011). Dual-process theories of reasoning: Contemporary issues and developmental applications. Developmental Review, 31(2), 86–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Evans, J. (2017). Dual process theory: Perspectives and problems. In W. De Neys (Ed.), Dual process theory 2.0 (pp. 145–164). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Evans, J., & Stanovich, K. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fabrigar, L., & Wegener, D. (2012). Exploratory factor analysis: Understanding statistics. Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, B. (2006). A prototype approach to studying love. In R. J. Sternberg & K. Weis (Eds.), The new psychology of love (pp. 225–246). Yale University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fehr, B., & Russell, J. (1984). Concept of emotion viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 113(3), 464–486. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.113.3.464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fehr, B., Russell, J., & Ward, L. (1982). Prototypicality of emotions: A reaction time study. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 20(5), 253–254. https://doi.org/10.3758/BF03334831
   Google Scholar
• Fleischhauer, M., Enge, S., Brocke, B., Ullrich, J., Strobel, A., & Strobel, A. (2010). Same or different? Clarifying the relationship of need for cognition to personality and intelligence. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 36(1), 82–96. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209351886
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frederick, S. (2005). Cognitive reflection and decision making. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 19(4), 25–42. https://doi.org/10.1257/089533005775196732
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Friedman, R., & Kohn, S. (1990). Impaired activation of the phonological lexicon: Effects upon oral reading. Brain and Language, 38(2), 278–297. https://doi.org/10.1016/0093-934X(90)90115-W
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gawronski, B., & Creighton, L. A. (2013). Dual process theories. In D. E. Carlston (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of social cognition (pp. 282–312). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G. (2004). Fast and frugal heuristics: The tools of bounded rationality. In D. J. Koehler & N. Harvey (Eds.), Blackwell handbook of judgment and decision making (pp. 62–88). Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Gigerenzer, G., & Goldstein, D. (1996). Reasoning the fast and frugal way: Models of bounded rationality. Psychological Review, 103(4), 650–669. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.103.4.650
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16(1), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546780903395748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Glöckner, A., & Witteman, C. (2010). Beyond dual-process models: A categorisation of processes underlying intuitive judgement and decision making. Thinking & Reasoning, 16(1), 1–25. http://doi.org/10.1080/13546780903395748
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Greenwald, A., Nosek, B., & Banaji, M. (2003). Understanding and using the implicit association test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(2), 197–216. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.85.2.197
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, A., Hart, C., Sedikides, C., & Kumashiro, M. (2008). Everyday conceptions of modesty: A prototype analysis. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(7), 978–992. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208316734
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffin, D. W., Gonzalez, R., Koehler, D. J., & Gilovich, T. (2012). Judgmental heuristics: A historical overview. In K. J. Holyoak & R. G. Morrison (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of thinking and reasoning (pp. 322–345). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hammond, K. (1996). Coping with uncertainty: The rivalry between intuition and analysis. In K. Hammond (Ed.), Human judgment and social policy: Irreducible uncertainty, inevitable error, unavoidable injustice (pp. 60–93). Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hassebrauck, M. (1997). Cognitions of relationship quality: A prototype analysis of their structure and consequences. Personal Relationships, 4(2), 163–185. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6811.1997.tb00137.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hepper, E., Ritchie, T., Sedikides, C., & Wildschut, T. (2012). Odyssey’s end: Lay conceptions of nostalgia reflect its original Homeric meaning. Emotion, 12(1), 102–119. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025167
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoffrage, U., & Marewski, J. (2015). Unveiling the Lady in Black: Modeling and aiding intuition. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 4(3), 145–163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jarmac.2015.08.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jarvis, B. (2008). DirectRT (version 2008). Empirisoft Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Joffe, H., & Yardley, L. (2003). Content and thematic analysis. In D. Marks & L. Yardley (Eds.), Research methods for clinical and health psychology (pp. 56–68). Sage. https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/54799/
   Google Scholar
• Kay, J., & Ellis, A. (1987). A cognitive neuropsychological case study of anomia. Brain, 110(Pt 3), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1093/brain/110.3.613
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Kearns, J., & Fincham, F. (2004). A prototype analysis of forgiveness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167204264237
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kinsella, E., Ritchie, T., & Igou, E. (2015). Zeroing in on heroes: A prototype analysis of hero features. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 108(1), 114–127. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038463
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klaczynski, P., Gordon, D., & Fauth, J. (1997). Goal-oriented critical reasoning and individual differences in critical reasoning biases. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(3), 470–485. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.470
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, N., Fincham, F., & Graham, S. (2011). Understanding the layperson’s perception of prayer: A prototype analysis of prayer. Psychology of Religion and Spirituality, 3(1), 55–65. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0021596
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lambert, N., Graham, S., & Fincham, F. (2009). A prototype analysis of gratitude: Varieties of gratitude experiences. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(9), 1193–1207. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167209338071
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Levin, I., Huneke, M., & Jasper, J. (2000). Information processing at successive stages of decision making: Need for cognition and inclusion–exclusion effects. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 82(2), 171–193. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.2000.2881
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. (2000). Intuition: A social cognitive neuroscience approach. Psychological Bulletin, 126(1), 109–137. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.126.1.109
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lieberman, M. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58(1), 259–289. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.58.110405.085654
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenzo-Seva, U., & ten Berge, J. (2006). Tucker’s congruence coefficient as a meaningful index of factor similarity. Methodology, 2(2), 57–64. https://doi.org/10.1027/1614-2241.2.2.57
   Google Scholar
• Loureiro, F., & Garcia-Marques, T. (2018). I know the rule, but i’ll just go with my gut: Is there a rational use of intuition? Thinking & Reasoning, 24(4), 469–497. https://doi.org/10.1080/13546783.2018.1448300
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maher, P., Igou, E., & Tilburg, W. (2020). Disillusionment: A prototype analysis. Cognition and Emotion, 34(5), 947–959. https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2019.1705764
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• May, R., & Fincham, F. (2018). Deity representation: A prototype approach. Archive for the Psychology of Religion, 40(2–3), 258–286. https://doi.org/10.1163/15736121-12341361
   Google Scholar
• Mervis, C., & Rosch, E. (1981). Categorization of natural objects. Annual Review of Psychology, 32(1), 89–115. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.ps.32.020181.000513
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mintzberg, H., Lampel, J., & Ahlstrand, B. (1998). Strategy safari: A guided tour through the wilds of strategic management (60000th ed.). Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Neto, F., & Mullet, E. (2014). A prototype analysis of the Portuguese concept of saudade. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 45(4), 660–670. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022022113518370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nisbett, R., & Wilson, T. (1977). Telling more than we can know: Verbal reports on mental processes. Psychological Review, 84(3), 231–259. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.3.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nygren, T., & White, R. (2002). Assessing individual differences in decision making styles: Analytical vs. intuitive. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting, 46(12), 953–957. https://doi.org/10.1177/154193120204601204
   Google Scholar
• Pacini, R., & Epstein, S. (1999). The relation of rational and experiential information processing styles to personality, basic beliefs, and the ratio-bias phenomenon. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(6), 972–987. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.6.972
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pennycook, G., De Neys, W., Evans, J. S. B., Stanovich, K. E., & Thompson, V. A. (2018). The mythical dual-process typology. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 22(8), 667–668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2018.04.008
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petty, R. E., Brinol, P., Loersch, C., & McCaslin, M. (2009). The need for cognition. In M. R. Leary & R. H. Hoyle (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in social behavior (pp. 318–329). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pretz, J., & Totz, K. (2007). Measuring individual differences in affective, heuristic, and holistic intuition. Personality and Individual Differences, 43(5), 1247–1257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2007.03.015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, A. (1989). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118(3), 219–235. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.118.3.219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, P., & Wiseman, R. (2005). Self-perceived high intuitiveness: An initial exploration. Imagination, Cognition and Personality, 25(2), 161–177. https://doi.org/10.2190/5UV1-738E-E67G-J4JH
   Google Scholar
• Rosch, E. (1975). Cognitive representations of semantic categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 104(3), 192–233. https://doi.org/10.1037/0096-3445.104.3.192
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ross, M. (1989). Relation of implicit theories to the construction of personal histories. Psychological Review, 96(2), 341–357. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.96.2.341
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J., & Fehr, B. (1994). Fuzzy concepts in a fuzzy hierarchy: Varieties of anger. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(2), 186–205. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.186
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Russell, J. A. (1991). In defense of a prototype approach to emotion concepts. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(1), 37–47. http://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.37
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sadler-Smith, E. (2016). The role of intuition in entrepreneurship and business venturing decisions. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 25(2), 212–225. https://doi.org/10.1080/1359432X.2015.1029046
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider, D. (1973). Implicit personality theory: A review. Psychological Bulletin, 79(5), 294–309. https://doi.org/10.1037/h0034496
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scott, S., & Bruce, R. (1995). Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 55(5), 818–831. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164495055005017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, S., & Spence, M. (1997). Managerial intuition: A conceptual and operational framework. Business Horizons, 40(1), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0007-6813(97)90027-6
   Google Scholar
• Shaver, P., Schwartz, J., Kirson, D., & O’Connor, C. (1987). Emotion knowledge: Further exploration of a prototype approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1061–1086. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.52.6.1061
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Simon, H., & Chase, W. (1973). Skill in chess. American Scientist, 61(4), 394–403.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M. (2013). Handbook of intuition research (Reprint ed.). Edward Elgar Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Sinclair, M. (2014). Handbook of research methods on intuition. Edward Elgar Pub.
   Google Scholar
• Tucker, L. (1951). A method for synthesis of factor analysis studies. Educational Testing Service.
   Google Scholar
• Tversky, A., & Kahneman, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185(4157), 1124–1131. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.185.4157.1124
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughan, F. (1979). Awakening intuition (1st Anchor Books Ed ed.). Anchor.
   Google Scholar
• Vijver, F., & Leung, K. (1997). Methods and data analysis for cross-cultural research (1st ed.). Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Weigel, D. (2008). The concept of family: An analysis of laypeople’s views of family. Journal of Family Issues, 29(11), 1426–1447. https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X08318488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wrigley, C., & Neuhaus, J. E. (1955). The matching of two sets of factors. American Psychologist, 10(1), 418–419.
   Google Scholar