46
Views
0
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Research Article

Why do people engage with the suffering of strangers? Exploring epistemic, eudaimonic, social, and affective motives

ORCID Icon, ORCID Icon & ORCID Icon
Received 14 Feb 2024, Accepted 22 Jul 2024, Published online: 05 Aug 2024

References

  • Abir, Y., Marvin, C. B., van Geen, C., Leshkowitz, M., Hassin, R. R., & Shohamy, D. (2022). An energizing role for motivation in information-seeking during the early phase of the COVID-19 pandemic. Nature Communications, 13(1), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-022-30011-5
  • Andersen, M. M., Schjoedt, U., Price, H., Rosas, F. E., Scrivner, C., & Clasen, M. (2020). Playing with fear: A field study in recreational horror. Psychological Science, 31(12), 1497–1510. https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797620972116
  • Andrade, E. B., & Cohen, J. B. (2007). On the consumption of negative feelings. Journal of Consumer Research, 34(3), 283–300. https://doi.org/10.1086/519498
  • Anthis, J. R., & Paez, E. (2021). Moral circle expansion: A promising strategy to impact the far future. Futures, 130, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2021.102756
  • Ballentyne, S., Drury, J., Barrett, E., & Marsden, S. (2021). Lost in transition: What refugee post-migration experiences tell us about processes of social identity change. Journal of Community and Applied Social Psychology, 31(5), 501–514. https://doi.org/10.1002/casp.2532
  • Bartsch, A., Kalch, A., & Oliver, M. B. (2014). Moved to think: The role of emotional media experiences in stimulating reflective thoughts. Journal of Media Psychology, 26(3), 125–140. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000118
  • Batson, C. D., Duncan, B. D., Ackerman, P., Buckley, T., & Birch, K. (1981). Is empathic emotion a source of altruistic motivation? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40(2), 290–302.
  • Bodenhausen, G. V., & Kang, S. K. (2012). Social categorization and the perception of social groups. In S. T. Fiske & C. N. Macrae (Eds.), The Sage handbook of social cognition (pp. 318–336). Sage Publications Ltd.
  • Bourdieu, P., Accardo, A., Balazs, G., Beaud, S., Bonvin, F., & Bourdieu, E. (1999). The weight of the world: social suffering in contemporary society (Polity Pre).
  • Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. https://doi.org/10.1191/1478088706qp063oa
  • Braun, V., Clarke, V., Boulton, E., Davey, L., & McEvoy, C. (2021). The online survey as a qualitative research tool. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 24(6), 641–654. https://doi.org/10.1080/13645579.2020.1805550
  • Cameron, C. D. (2018). Motivating empathy: Three methodological recommendations for mapping empathy. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 12(11), e12418.
  • Cameron, C. D., Hutcherson, C. A., Ferguson, A. M., Scheffer, J. A., Hadjiandreou, E., & Inzlicht, M. (2019). Empathy is hard work: People choose to avoid empathy because of its cognitive costs. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 148(6), 962–976. https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0000595.supp
  • Cameron, C. D., Scheffer, J. A., Hadjiandreou, E., & Anderson, S. (2022). Motivated empathic choices. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 1(66), 191–279. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2022.04.005
  • Cialdini, R. B., & Kenrick, D. T. (1976). Altruism as hedonism: A social development perspective on the relationship of negative mood state and helping. Journal Personality and Social Psychology, 34(5), 907–914. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.34.5.907
  • Cohen, E. L., Myrick, J. G., & Hoffner, C. A. (2021). The effects of celebrity silence breakers: Liking and parasocial relationship strength interact to predict the social influence of celebrities’ sexual harassment allegations. Mass Communication and Society, 24(2), 288–313. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205436.2020.1839102
  • Dibble, J. L., Hartmann, T., & Rosaen, S. F. (2016). Parasocial interaction and parasocial relationship: Conceptual clarification and a critical assessment of measures. Human Communication Research, 42(1), 21–44. https://doi.org/10.1111/hcre.12063
  • Dubey, R., Griffiths, T. L., & Lombrozo, T. (2022). If it’s important, then I’m curious: Increasing perceived usefulness stimulates curiosity. Cognition, 226, 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cognition.2022.105193
  • Eyal, P., David, R., Andrew, G., Zak, E., & Ekaterina, D. (2021). Data quality of platforms and panels for online behavioral research. Behavior Research Methods, 54, 1643–1662. https://doi.org/10.3758/s13428-021-01694-3
  • Field, A. (2018). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics.
  • FitzGibbon, L., Lau, J. K. L., & Murayama, K. (2020). The seductive lure of curiosity: Information as a motivationally salient reward. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 21–27. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.05.014
  • Gentzler, A. L., DeLong, K. L., Palmer, C. A., & Huta, V. (2021). Hedonic and eudaimonic motives to pursue well-being in three samples of youth. Motivation and Emotion, 45(3), 312–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11031-021-09882-6
  • Greenaway, K. H., Alexander Haslam, S., Cruwys, T., Branscombe, N. R., Ysseldyk, R., & Heldreth, C. (2015). From “we” to “me”: group identification enhances perceived personal control with consequences for health and well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 109(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1037/pspi0000019
  • Greenaway, K. H., Cruwys, T., Haslam, S. A., & Jetten, J. (2016). Social identities promote well-being because they satisfy global psychological needs. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(3), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2169
  • Groth, M., Bindl, U. K., Wang, K., & van Kleef, G. A. (2023). How social roles shape interpersonal affect regulation at work. Organizational Psychology Review, 14(1), 25–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/20413866231208048
  • Grühn, D., Rebucal, K., Diehl, M., Lumley, M., & Labouvie-Vief, G. (2008). Empathy across the adult lifespan: Longitudinal and experience-sampling findings. Emotion, 8(6), 753–765. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0014123
  • Hanich, J., Wagner, V., Shah, M., Jacobsen, T., & Menninghaus, W. (2014). Why We like to watch sad films. The pleasure of being moved in aesthetic experiences. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8(2), 130–143. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0035690.supp
  • Harrison, M. A., & Frederick, E. J. (2022). Interested in serial killers? Morbid curiosity in college students. Current Psychology, 41(6), 3768–3777. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-020-00896-w
  • Haslam, C., Haslam, S. A., Jetten, J., Cruwys, T., & Steffens, N. K. (2021). Life change, social identity, and health. Annual Review of Psychology, 72(1), 635–661. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-psych-060120-111721
  • Henrich, J., Heine, S. J., & Norenzayan, A. (2010). The weirdest people in the world? Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 33(2–3), 61–83. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X0999152X
  • Hoemann, K., Gendron, M., & Barrett, L. F. (2017). Mixed emotions in the predictive brain. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 15, 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2017.05.013
  • Hofer, M., Hüsser, A., & Prabhu, S. (2017). The effect of an avatar’s emotional expressions on players’ fear reactions: The mediating role of embodiment. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 883–890. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.06.024
  • Hoffner, C. A., & Bond, B. J. (2022). Parasocial relationships, social media, & well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101306. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101306
  • Hoffner, C. A., Fujioka, Y., Ye, J., & Ibrahim, A. G. S. (2009). Why we watch: Factors affecting exposure to tragic television news. Mass Communication and Society, 12(2), 193–216. https://doi.org/10.1080/15205430802095042
  • Kalokerinos, E. K., Tamir, M., & Kuppens, P. (2017). Instrumental motives in negative emotion regulation in daily life: Frequency, consistency, and predictors. Emotion, 17(4), 648–657. https://doi.org/10.1037/emo0000269
  • Kelle, U. (2006). Combining qualitative and quantitative methods in research practice: Purposes and advantages. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(4), 293–311. https://doi.org/10.1177/1478088706070839
  • Kelly, C. A., & Sharot, T. (2021). Individual differences in information-seeking. Nature Communications, 12(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-27046-5
  • Koopman, E. M. E. (2015). Why do we read sad books? Eudaimonic motives and meta-emotions. Poetics, 52, 18–31. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.poetic.2015.06.004
  • Landmann, H., Gaschler, R., & Rohmann, A. (2019). What is threatening about refugees? Identifying different types of threat and their association with emotional responses and attitudes towards refugee migration. European Journal of Social Psychology, 49(7), 1401–1420. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2593
  • Linneberg, M., & Korsgaard, S. (2019). Coding qualitative data: A synthesis guiding the novice. Qualitative Research Journal, 19(3), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1108/QRJ-12-2018-0012
  • Lydon-Staley, D. M., Zhou, D., Blevins, A. S., Zurn, P., & Bassett, D. S. (2021). Hunters, busybodies and the knowledge network building associated with deprivation curiosity. Nature Human Behaviour, 5(3), 327–336. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-020-00985-7
  • Magano, J., Fraiz-Brea, J. A., & Leite, Â. (2022). Dark tourists: Profile, practices, motivations and wellbeing. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(19), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph191912100
  • Menninghaus, W., Wagner, V., Hanich, J., Wassiliwizky, E., Jacobsen, T., & Koelsch, S. (2017). The distancing-embracing model of the enjoyment of negative emotions in art reception. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 40, 1–63. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0140525X17000309
  • Murayama, K. (2022). A reward-learning framework of knowledge acquisition: An integrated account of curiosity, interest, and intrinsic–extrinsic rewards. Psychological Review, 129(1), 175–198. https://doi.org/10.1037/rev0000349
  • Murayama, K., FitzGibbon, L., & Sakaki, M. (2019). Process account of curiosity and interest: A reward-learning perspective. Educational Psychology Review, 31(4), 875–895. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09499-9
  • Niehoff, E., Mittenbühler, M., & Oosterwijk, S. (2023). To read or not to read? Motives for Reading negative COVID-19 news. American Psychologist, 79(2), 254–267. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001178
  • Niehoff, E., & Oosterwijk, S. (2020). To know, to feel, to share? Exploring the motives that drive curiosity for negative content. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 56–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.07.012
  • Oliver, M. B. (2022). Social media use and eudaimonic well-being. Current Opinion in Psychology, 45, 101307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2022.101307
  • Oosterwijk, S. (2017). Choosing the negative: A behavioral demonstration of morbid curiosity. PLoS One, 12(7), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0178399
  • Ouwerkerk, J. W., van Dijk, W. W., Vonkeman, C. C., & Spears, R. (2018). When we enjoy bad news about other groups: A social identity approach to out-group schadenfreude. Group Processes and Intergroup Relations, 21(1), 214–232. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430216663018
  • Philpot, R., Liebst, L. S., Levine, M., Bernasco, W., & Lindegaard, M. R. (2019). Would I be helped? Cross-national CCTV footage shows that intervention is the norm in public conflicts. American Psychologist, 75(1), 66–75. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000469
  • Poth, C. N., & Shannon-Baker, P. (2022). State of the methods: Leveraging design possibilities of qualitatively oriented mixed methods research. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 21, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1177/16094069221115302
  • Raney, A. A., Ai, A. L., & Oliver, M. B. (2022). Exploring the impact of media use on wellbeing following a natural disaster. Frontiers in Communication, 7, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2022.967383
  • Raney, A. A., Oliver, M. B., & Bartsch, A. (2020). Eudaimonia as media effect. In M. B. Oliver, A. A. Raney & J. Bryant (Eds.), Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research (pp. 258–274). Routledge.
  • Redmond, S., Jones, N. M., Holman, A., & Cohen Silver, R. (2019). Who watches an ISIS beheading – and why. American Psychologist, 74(5), 555–568. https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0000438.supp
  • Renault, E. (2010). A critical theory of social suffering. Critical Horizons, 11(2), 221–241. https://doi.org/10.1558/crit.v11i2.221
  • Robertson, C. E., Pröllochs, N., Schwarzenegger, K., Pärnamets, P., Van Bavel, J. J., & Feuerriegel, S. (2023). Negativity drives online news consumption. Nature Human Behaviour, 7(5), 812–822. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01538-4
  • Rozin, P., Guillot, L., Fincher, K., Rozin, A., & Tsukayama, E. (2013). Glad to be sad, and other examples of benign masochism. Judgment and Decision Making, 8(4), 439–447. doi:10.1017/S1930297500005295
  • Scheel, A. M., Tiokhin, L., Isager, P. M., & Lakens, D. (2021). Why hypothesis testers should spend less time testing hypotheses. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(4), 744–755. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691620966795
  • Scrivner, C., Andersen, M. M., Schjødt, U., & Clasen, M. (2022). The psychological benefits of scary play in three types of horror fans. Journal of Media Psychology, 35(2), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1027/1864-1105/a000354
  • Shabahang, R., Kim, S., Hosseinkhanzadeh, A. A., Aruguete, M. S., & Kakabaraee, K. (2023). “Give your thumb a break” from surfing tragic posts: Potential corrosive consequences of social media users’ doomscrolling. Media Psychology, 26(4), 460–479. https://doi.org/10.1080/15213269.2022.2157287
  • Sharma, B., Lee, S. S., & Johnson, B. K. (2022). The dark at the End of the tunnel: Doomscrolling on social media newsfeeds. Technology, Mind, and Behavior, 3(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1037/tmb0000059
  • Sharot, T., & Sunstein, C. R. (2020). How people decide what they want to know. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(1), 14–19. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0793-1
  • Tajfel, H., & Turner, J. C. (1979). An integrative theory of intergroup conflict. In M. J. Hatch & M. Schultz (Eds.), Organizational Identity: A Reader (pp. 56–65). Oxford University Press.
  • Tamir, M. (2016). Why do people regulate their emotions? A taxonomy of motives in emotion regulation. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(3), 199–222. https://doi.org/10.1177/1088868315586325
  • Tamir, M., & Ford, B. Q. (2012). When feeling bad is expected to be good: Emotion regulation and outcome expectancies in social conflicts. Emotion, 12(4), 807–816. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024443
  • Tamir, M., & Millgram, Y. (2017). Motivated emotion regulation: Principles, lessons, and implications of a motivational analysis of emotion regulation. Advances in Motivation Science, 4, 207–247. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.adms.2016.12.001
  • Turner, S. A., & Silvia, P. J. (2006). Must interesting things be pleasant? A test of competing appraisal structures. Emotion, 6(4), 670–674. https://doi.org/10.1037/1528-3542.6.4.670
  • Twali, M. S., Hameiri, B., Vollhardt, J. R., & Nadler, A. (2020). Experiencing acknowledgment versus denial of the ingroup’s collective victimization. In J. R. Vollhardt (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 297–318). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190875190.003.0014
  • van Kleef, G. A. (2009). How emotions regulate social life: The emotions as social information (EASI) model. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 18(3), 184–188. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8721.2009.01633.x
  • Van Kleef, G. A., Oveis, C., van der Löwe, I., LuoKogan, A., Goetz, J., & Keltner, D. (2008). Power, distress, and compassion: Turning a blind eye to the suffering of others. Psychological Science, 19(12), 1315–1322. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02241.x
  • van Lieshout, L. L., de Lange, F. P., & Cools, R. (2020). Why so curious? Quantifying mechanisms of information seeking. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 35, 112–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cobeha.2020.08.005
  • Vollhardt, J. R. (2020). Introduction to “The social psychology of collective victimhood”: Examining context, power, and diversity in experiences of collective victimization. In J. R. Vollhardt (Ed.), The social psychology of collective victimhood (pp. 1–34). Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejsp.2300
  • Waytz, A., Iyer, R., Young, L., Haidt, J., & Graham, J. (2019). Ideological differences in the expanse of the moral circle. Nature Communications, 10(1), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-019-12227-0
  • Weisz, E., & Cikara, M. (2021). Strategic regulation of empathy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 25(3), 213–227. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2020.12.002
  • Westgate, E. C. (2020). Why boredom is interesting. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 29(1), 33–40. https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721419884309
  • Wilkinson, I., & Kleinman, A. (2016). A passion for society. The origins of social suffering. 24–54.
  • Zaki, J. (2014). Empathy: A motivated account. Psychological Bulletin, 140(6), 1608–1647. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037679
  • Zembylas, M. (2021). Encouraging moral outrage in education: A pedagogical goal for social justice or not? Ethics and Education, 16(4), 424–439. https://doi.org/10.1080/17449642.2021.1970906
  • Zuckerman, M., & Litle, P. (1986). Personality and curiosity about morbid and sexual events. Personality and Individual Differences, 7(1), 49–56. https://doi.org/10.1016/0191-8869(86)90107-8