Top 10 Research Questions Related to Teaching Games for Understanding

References

• Alhadeff-Jones, M. (2008). Three generations of complexity theories: Nuances and ambiguities. In M. Mason (Ed.), Complexity theory and the philosophy of education (pp. 62–78). Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
   Google Scholar
• Arias, J. L., & Castejón, F. J. (2012). Review of the instruments most frequently employed to assess tactics in physical education and youth sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 31, 381–391.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Arias-Estero, J., & Castejón, F. (2014). Using instruments for tactical assessment in physical education and extra-curricular sports. European Physical Education Review, 20, 525–535.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baca, A. (2008). Tracking motion in sport—trends and limitations. In J. Hammond (Ed.), Proceedings of the 9th Australasian Conference on Mathematics and Computers in Sport, MathSport (pp. 1–7). Tweed Heads, NSW, Australia: The Australian & New Zealand Industrial and Applied Mathematics Journal (formerly, The Journal of the Australian Mathematical Society).
   Google Scholar
• Baca, A., Dabnichki, P., Heller, M., & Kornfeind, P. (2009). Ubiquitous computing in sports: A review and analysis. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 1335–1346.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. (2007). Working memory, thought, and action. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Barris, S., & Button, C. (2008). A review of vision-based motion analysis in sport. Sports Medicine, 38, 1025–1043.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bohler, H. R. (2006). Spielen lernen durch Taktik lernen—Beispiel Netz- und Wandspiele. [Learning how to play through tactics]. Sportunterricht, 55, 260–266.
   Google Scholar
• Borggrefe, C., & Cachay, K. (2015). Kommunikation als Herausforderung. Eine theoretisch-empirische Studie zur Trainer-Athlet-Kommunikation im Spitzensport [Communication as challenge. A theoretic-empirical study on coach–athlete communication in high-performance sports]. Schorndorf, Germany: Hofmann.
   Google Scholar
• Bunker, D., & Thorpe, R. (1982). A model for the teaching of games in secondary schools. Bulletin of Physical Education, 18, 5–8.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (1997). How would Socrates teach games? A constructivist approach to teaching games. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 68(9), 42–47.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2012). Reconceptualizing physical education through teaching games for understanding. Morrisville, NC: Lulu.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2013). Stages for children inventing games. Journal of Physical Education, Recreation & Dance, 84(4), 48–53.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. (2014). TGfU—would you know it if you saw it? Benchmarks from the tacit knowledge of the founders. European Physical Education Review, 20, 465–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Butler, J., & Griffin, L. L. (2010). More teaching games for understanding: Moving globally. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J. I., Griffin, L. L., Lombardo, B., & Nastasi, R. (2003). Teaching games for understanding in physical education and sport: An international perspective. Oxon Hill, MD: American Alliance for Health, Physical Education, Recreation and Dance Publication.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., & Ovens, A. (2015). The TGfU governance networks: From conception to special interest group. Agora for Physical Education and Sport, 17, 77–92.
   Google Scholar
• Butler, J., Storey, B., & Robson, C. (2014). Emergent learning focused teachers and their ecological complexity worldview. Sport, Education and Society, 19, 451–471.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Byrne, D. (2005). Complexity, configurations and cases. Theory, Culture & Society, 22, 95–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carling, C., Reilly, T., & Williams, A. (Eds.). (2009). Performance assessment for field sports. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, W., & Rovegno, I. (2000). Examination of expert and novice teachers’ constructivist-oriented teaching practices using a movement approach to elementary physical education. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71, 357–372.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J. Y., Davids, K., Button, C., Shuttleworth, R., Renshaw, I., & Araújo, D. (2007). The role of nonlinear pedagogy in physical education. Review of Educational Research, 77, 251–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chow, J. Y., Tan, C. W. K., Lee, M. C. Y., & Button, C. (2014). Possibilities and implications of using a motion-tracking system in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20, 444–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cleeremans, A., Destrebecqz, A., & Boyer, M. (1998). Implicit learning: News from the front. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 406–416.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Corcoran, T. C. (1995). Transforming professional development for teachers: A guide for state policymakers. Washington, DC: National Governors’ Association.
   Google Scholar
• Curriculum Planning and Development Division. (1999). physical education syllabus for primary, secondary, pre-university levels. Singapore: Ministry of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Davids, K., Button, C., & Bennett, S. J. (2008). Dynamics of skill acquisition: A constraints-led approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Sumara, D. (2003). Why aren't they getting this? Working through the regressive myths of constructivist pedagogy. Teaching Education, 14, 123–140.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, B., & Sumara, D. J. (2006). Complexity and education: Inquiries into learning, teaching, and research. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• den Duyn, N. (1997). Game sense: Developing thinking players. Belconnen, ACT, Australia: Australian Sports Commission.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds, P., Griffin, L. L., & Placek, J. H. (2001). A selected review of the literature on development of learners’ domain-specific knowledge. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 20, 301–313.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Drust, B., Atkinson, G., & Reilly, T. (2007). Future perspectives in the evaluation of the physiological demands of soccer. Sports Medicine, 37, 783–805.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, B., Griffin, L. L., & Hastie, P. (2004). Sport education, tactical games, and cooperative learning: Theoretical and pedagogical considerations. Quest, 56, 226–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ennis, C. D. (1992). Reconceptualising learning as a dynamical system. Journal of Curriculum and Supervision, 7, 115–130.
   Google Scholar
• Fisette, J. L. (2006). Spielverständnis lehren durch das ‘Taktik-Spiel_Modell’—Beispiel basketball [Learning understanding of the game through the ‘tactic-game-model’—example basketball]. Sportunterricht, 55, 267–273.
   Google Scholar
• Friedman, R. S., & Förster, J. (2001). The effects of promotion and prevention cues on creativity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 1001–1013.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Furley, P., & Memmert, D. (2013). ‘To whom should I pass?’ The more options the more attentional guidance from working. PLoS One, 8, e62278. 10.1371/journal.pone.0062278.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldstein, B. (2011). Cognitive psychology: Connecting mind, research and everyday experience. Independence, KY: Cengage Learning.
   Google Scholar
• Gréhaigne, J. F., Godbout, P., & Bouthier, D. (1997). Performance assessment in team sports. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 16, 500–516.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gréhaigne, J. F., Richard, J.-F., & Griffin, L. L. (2005). Teaching and learning team sports and games. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Grehaigne, J. F., Wallian, N., & Godbout, P. (2005). Tactical-decision learning model and students’ practices. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 10, 255–269.
   Google Scholar
• Greve, S. (2013). Lernen durch Reflektieren im Sportspiel. Möglichkeiten im Vermittlungsprozess im Rahmen des Sportunterrichts am Beispiel Handball. [Learning by reflecting in sports game. Possibilities in the mediation process within physical education at the example of handball]. Berlin, Germany: Logos.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, L., & Butler, J. (2005). Teaching games for understanding: Theory, research, and practice. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, L. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Oslin, J. L. (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Griffin, L. L., & Richard, J. -F. (2003). Using authentic assessment to improve students’ net/wall game play. Teaching Elementary Physical Education, 3, 23–27.
   Google Scholar
• Grunz, A., Memmert, D., & Perl, J. (2012). Tactical pattern recognition in soccer games by means of special self-organizing maps. Human Movement Science, 31, 334–343.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guilford, J. P. (1967). The nature of human intelligence. New York, NY: McGraw Hill.
   Google Scholar
• Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8, 381–391.
   Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., Cushion, C. J., Wegis, H. M., & Massa-Gonzales, A. N. (2010). Teaching games for understanding in American high-school soccer: A quantitative data analysis using the Game Performance Assessment Instrument. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15, 29–54. 10.1080/17408980902729354.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harvey, S., & Jarrett, K. (2014). A review of the game-centered approaches to teaching and coaching literature since 2006. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 19, 278–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hastie, P. (2010). Student-designed games: Strategies for promoting creativity, cooperation, and skill development. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280–1300.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill-Haas, S. V., Dawson, B., Impellizzeri, F. M., & Coutts, A. J. (2011). Physiology of small-sided games training in football: A systematic review. Sports Medicine, 41, 199–220.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoff, J., Wisløff, U., Engen, L. C., Kemi, O. J., & Helgerud, J. (2002). Soccer specific aerobic endurance training. British Journal of Sports Medicine, 36, 218–221.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hohmann, A., & Brack, R. (1983). Theoretische Aspekte der Leistungsdiagnostik im Sportspiel [Theoretical aspects of performance analysis in team and racket sports]. Leistungssport, 13, 5–10.
   Google Scholar
• Hopper, T., Butler, J., & Storey, B. (Eds.). (2009). TGfU—Simply good pedagogy: Understanding a complex challenge. Ottawa, Ontario: Physical & Health Education, Canada.
   Google Scholar
• Jackson, R. C., & Farrow, D. (2005). Implicit perceptual training: How, when and why? Human Movement Science, 24, 308–325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kasof, J. (1997). Creativity and breadth of attention. Creativity Research Journal, 10, 303–315.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2002). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 21, 177–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirk, D., & MacPhail, A. (2009). Teaching games for understanding and situated learning: Rethinking the Bunker-Thorpe model. In R. Bailey & D. Kirk (Eds.), The Routledge physical education reader (pp. 269–283). Oxford, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• König, S. (2014a). ‘Killing two birds with one stone’—on the effectiveness of implicit training processes in physical education. International Journal of Physical Education, 15, 15–28.
   Google Scholar
• König, S. (2014b). Physical education: Implementation of empirical research into teacher education. In P.-M. Rabensteiner & G. Rabensteiner (Eds.), Education: Vol. 3. Internationalization in teacher education (pp. 154–166). Baltmannsweiler, Germany: Schneider Verlag Hohengehren.
   Google Scholar
• König, S., & Singrün, P. (2013). Wirkungen und Festigkeit von motorischen Lern- und Trainingsprozessen im Sportunterricht [Effect and consistency of motor learning and training processes in physical education]. Spectrum der Sportwissenschaften, 25, 4–31.
   Google Scholar
• Lames, M. (1998). Leistungsfähigkeit, Leistung und Erfolg—ein Beitrag zur Theorie der Sportspiele [Ability to perform, performance and success—A contribution to the theory of sport games]. Sportwissenschaft, 28, 137–152.
   Google Scholar
• Launder, A. G. (2001). Play practice: The games approach to teaching and coaching sports. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. (2004). Coaches’ experiences of games sense: Opportunities and challenges. Physical Education & Sport Pedagogy, 9, 115–131.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R. (2008). Complex learning theory—Its epistemology and its assumptions about learning: Implications for physical education. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 21–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R., & Fawns, R. (2003). Knowing the game: Integrating speech and action in games teaching through TGfU. Quest, 55, 161–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R., Quay, J., Harvey, S., & Mooney, A. (2014). Contemporary developments in games teaching. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Light, R., & Tan, S. (2006). Culture, embodied experience and teachers’ development of TGfU in Australia and Singapore. European Physical Education Review, 12, 99–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Light, R., Webb, P., Piltz, W., Georgakis, A., & Brooker, R. (Eds.). (2006). Proceedings for the Asia Pacific Conference on Teaching Sport and Physical Education for Understanding. Sydney, Australia: University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Liu, R., Li, C., & Cruz, A. (Eds.). (2006). Teaching games for understanding in the Asia-Pacific region. Hong Kong: Department of Creative Arts and Physical Education, The Hong Kong Institute of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Loibl, J. (2001). Basketball. Genetisches Lehren und Lernen. Spielen—erfinden—erleben—verstehen [Basketball. Genetic teaching and learning. Playing—inventing—experiencing—understanding]. Schorndorf, Germany: Hofmann.
   Google Scholar
• Mandigo, J., & Corlett, J. (2010). Teaching games for understanding of what? TGfU's role in the development of physical literacy. In J. I. Butler & L. L. Griffin (Eds.), More teaching games for understanding. Moving globally (pp. 69–78). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, M. (2008). What is complexity theory and what are its implications for educational change? Educational Philosophy and Theory, 40, 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Memmert, D. (2007). Can creativity be improved by an attention-broadening training program? An exploratory study focusing on team sports. Creativity Research Journal, 19, 281–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memmert, D. (2015). Teaching tactical creativity in team and racket sports: Research and practice. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Memmert, D., & Harvey, S. (2008). The Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI): Some concerns and solutions for further development. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 27, 220–240.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memmert, D., & Harvey, S. (2010). Identification of non-specific tactical problems in invasion games. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 15, 287–305.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memmert, D., Hüttermann, S., & Orliczek, J. (2013). Decide like Lionel Messi! The impact of regulatory focus on divergent thinking in sports. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2163–2167.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Memmert, D., & König, S. (2007). Teaching games at elementary schools. International Journal of Physical Education, 44, 54–67.
   Google Scholar
• Memmert, D., & Roth, K. (2007). The effects of non-specific and specific concepts on tactical creativity in team ball sports. Journal of Sport Science, 25, 1423–1432.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzler, M. W. (2000). Instructional models for physical education. Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A., Oslin, J. L., & Griffin, L. L. (1997). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach (Vol. 1). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A., Oslin, J. L., & Griffin, L. L. (2003). Sport foundations for elementary physical education: A tactical games approach. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A., Oslin, J. L., & Griffin, L. L. (2006). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach (2nd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Mitchell, S. A., Oslin, J. L., & Griffin, L. L. (2013). Teaching sport concepts and skills: A tactical games approach (3rd ed.). Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Nadeau, L., Richard, J. -F., & Godbout, P. (2008). The validity and reliability of a performance assessment procedure in ice hockey. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 13, 65–83.
   Google Scholar
• Ng, W. X., & Chow, J. Y. (2012, June). Performance analysis of netball players as a function of position and skill: Sports technology in action. Paper presented at the second Association of Southeast Asian Nations Universities Conference on Physical Education and Sport Science, Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia.
   Google Scholar
• Oslin, J. L., & Mitchell, S. A. (2006). Game-centred approaches to teaching physical education. In D. Kirk, D. MacDonald, & M. O'Sullivan (Eds.), The handbook of physical education (pp. 627–651). London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Oslin, J. L., Mitchell, S. A., & Griffin, L. L. (1998). The Game Performance Assessment Instrument (GPAI): Development and preliminary validation. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 17, 231–243.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovens, A., Hopper, T., & Butler, J. (2013). Complexity thinking in physical education. Reframing curriculum, pedagogy and research. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Parry, K. A. (2014). Supporting teachers to implement TGfU: A needs based approach to professional learning. In University of Sydney Papers in HMHCE: Special Games Sense Edition (pp. 127–149). Retrieved from http://sydney.edu.au/education_social_work/research/centres_and_networks/ADPN/HMHCE-papers/resources/HMHCE_GS_Ed_Article_08_2014.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Perl, J., Grunz, A. & Memmert, D. (2013). Tactics in soccer: an advanced approach. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 12, 33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Perl, J., & Memmert, D. (2011). Net-based game analysis by means of the software tool SOCCER. International Journal of Computer Science in Sport, 10, 77–84.
   Google Scholar
• Perš, S., & KovaČiČ, S. (2000). A system for tracking players in sports games by computer vision. Electrotechnical Review, 67, 281–288.
   Google Scholar
• Pill, S. A. (2012). Play with Purpose: Developing game sense in AFL footballers. HindmarshSA, Australia: Australian Council for Health, Physical Education and Recreation.
   Google Scholar
• Pill, S. A. (2013). Play with Purpose for fundamental movement skill teaching. Kent Town, SA, Australia: Australian Council for Health, Physical Education and Recreation.
   Google Scholar
• Pill, S. A. (2014). Play with Purpose: Developing netball game sense. Hindmarsh, SA, Australia: Australian Council for Health, Physical Education and Recreation.
   Google Scholar
• Pinar, W. (2012). What is curriculum theory? New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, T., Hawkins, A., & Wiegand, R. (2008). Effects of two instructional approaches on skill development, knowledge, and game performance. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 12, 219–236.
   Google Scholar
• Randers, M. B., Mujika, I., Hewitt, A., Santisteban, J., Bischoff, R., Solano, R., … Mohr, M. (2010). Application of four different football match analysis systems: A comparative study. Journal of Sports Sciences, 28, 171–182.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reber, A. S. (1993). Implicit learning and tacit knowledge: An essay on the cognitive unconscious. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Richard, J.-F., Godbout, P., Tousignant, M., & Gréhaigne, J. F. (1999). The try-out of a team sport assessment procedure in elementary and junior high school physical education classes. Journal of Teaching in Physical Education, 18, 336–356.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Richardson, K., & Cilliers, P. (2001). What is complexity science? A view from different directions. Emergence, 3, 5–23.
   Google Scholar
• Rossi, T., Fry, J. M., McNeill, M., & Tan, C. W. K. (2007). The games concept approach (GCA) as a mandated practice: Views of Singaporean teachers. Sport, Education and Society, 12, 93–111.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, K., & Kröger, C. (2011). Ballschule. Ein ABC für Spielanfänger [Ballschool—An ABC for beginners]. Schorndorf, Germany: Hofmann.
   Google Scholar
• Rovegno, I., & Kirk, D. (1995). Articulations and silences in socially critical work on physical education: Towards a broader agenda. Quest, 47, 447–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sarmento, H., Marcelino, R., Anguera, M. T., Campaniço, J., Matos, N., & Leitão, J. C. (2014). Match analysis in football: A systematic review. Journal of Sports Sciences, 32, 1831–1843.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silverman, S. (1997). Technology and physical education: Present, possibilities, and potential problems. Quest, 49, 306–314.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Slade, D. (2010). Transforming play: Teaching tactics and game sense. Champaign, IL: Human Kinetics.
   Google Scholar
• Snijders, T. A., & Bosker, R. J. (1999). Multilevel analysis: An introduction to basic and advanced multilevel modeling. London, UK: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Soto, D., & Humphreys, G. W. (2007). Automatic guidance of visual attention from verbal working memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception & Performance, 33, 730–737.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stacey, R. (2001). Complex responsive processes in organisations: Learning and knowledge creation. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1995). Defying the crowd. New York, NY: Free Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stolz, S. A., & Pill, S. (2014a). A narrative approach to exploring TGfU-GS. Sport, Education and Society. Advance online publication. 10.1080/13573322.2014.890930.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stolz, S., & Pill, S. (2014b). Teaching games and sport for understanding: Exploring and reconsidering its relevance in physical education. European Physical Education Review, 20, 36–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tallir, I. B., Lenoir, M., Valcke, M., & Musch, E. (2007). Do alternative instructional approaches result in different game performance learning outcomes? Authentic assessment in varying game conditions. International Journal of Sport Psychology, 38, 263–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, C. W. K., Chow, J. Y., & Davids, K. (2012). ‘How does TGfU work?’: Examining the relationship between learning design in TGfU and a nonlinear pedagogy. Physical Education and Sport Pedagogy, 17, 331–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas, A., & Stratton, G. (2006). What we are really doing with ICT in physical education: A national audit of equipment, use, teacher attitudes, support, and training. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37, 617–632.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorpe, R.  Teaching games for understanding: Does it meet your needs? Paper presented at the Second International Conference: Teaching Sport and Education for Understanding, Melbourne, Australia (2003, December)
   Google Scholar
• Thorpe, R., Bunker, D., & Almond, L. (1986). Rethinking games teaching. Loughborough, England: Department of Physical Education and Sports Science, University of Technology.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner, H., Finkenzeller, T., Würth, S., & von Duvillard, S. P. (2014). Individual and team performance in team-handball: A review. Journal of Sports Science and Medicine, 13, 808–816.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Willis, J. (2012). Adapting the 2008 NETS-T Standards for use in teacher education: Part II. International Journal of Technology in Teaching and Learning, 8, 78–97.
   Google Scholar
• Woods, M. L., Karp, G. G., & Miao, H. (2008). Physical educators’ technology competencies and usage. Physical Educator, 65, 82–99.
   Google Scholar