References
- Abdollahipour, R., Nieto, M. P., Psotta, R., & Wulf, G. (2017). External focus of attention and autonomy support have additive benefits for motor performance in children. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 32, 17–24. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2017.05.004
- Adams, J. A. (1971). A closed-loop theory of motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 3(2), 111–150. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.1971.10734898
- Breslin, G., Hodges, N. J., Steenson, A., & Williams, A. M. (2012). Constant or variable practice: Recreating the especial skill effect. Acta Psychologica, 140(2), 154–157. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2012.04.002
- Carter, M. J., & Ste-Marie, D. M. (2017). Not all choices are created equal: Task-relevant choices enhance motor learning compared to task-irrelevant choices. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 24(6), 1879–1888. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-017-1250-7
- Chua, L. K., Dimapilis, M. K., Iwatsuki, T., Abdollahipour, R., Lewthwaite, R., & Wulf, G. (2019). Practice variability promotes an external focus of attention and enhances motor skill learning. Human Movement Science, 64, 307–319. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2019.02.015
- Chua, L. K., Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2018). Onward and upward: Optimizing motor performance. Human Movement Science, 60, 107–114. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2018.05.006
- Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The” what” and” why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
- Ericsson, K. A., Krampe, R. T., & Tesch-Römer, C. (1993). The role of deliberate practice in the acquisition of expert performance. Psychological Review, 100(3), 363–406. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.100.3.363
- Grand, K. F., Daou, M., Lohse, K. R., & Miller, M. W. (2017). Investigating the mechanisms underlying the effects of an incidental choice on motor learning. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 5(2), 207–226. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2016-0041
- Guadagnoli, M. A., & Lee, T. D. (2004). Challenge point: A framework for conceptualizing the effects of various practice conditions in motor learning. Journal of Motor Behavior, 36(2), 212–224. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3200/JMBR.36.2.212-224
- Hedges, L. V., & Vevea, J. L. (1996). Estimating effect size under publication bias: Small sample properties and robustness of a random effects selection model. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 21(4), 299–332. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986021004299
- Janelle, C. M., Barba, D. A., Frehlich, S. G., Tennant, L. K., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Maximizing performance feedback effectiveness through videotape replay and a self-controlled learning environment. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 68(4), 269–279. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1997.10608008
- Kantak, S. S., & Winstein, C. J. (2012). Learning–performance distinction and memory processes for motor skills: A focused review and perspective. Behavioural Brain Research, 228(1), 219–231. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bbr.2011.11.028
- Kelso, J. S., & Norman, P. E. (1978). Motor schema formation in children. Developmental Psychology, 14(2), 153–155. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0012-1649.14.2.153
- Lakens, D. (2017). Equivalence tests: A practical primer for t tests, correlations, and meta-analyses. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 8(4), 355–362. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/1948550617697177
- Lee, T. D., & Magill, R. A. (1985). Can forgetting facilitate skill acquisition? In D. Goodman, R. B. Wilberg, & I. M. Franks (Eds.), Differing perspectives in motor learning, memory, and control (pp. 3–22). North-Holland.
- Lewthwaite, R., Chiviacowsky, S., Drews, R., & Wulf, G. (2015). Choose to move: The motivational impact of autonomy support on motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 22(5), 1383–1388. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0814-7
- Lohse, K., Buchanan, T., & Miller, M. (2016). Underpowered and overworked: Problems with data analysis in motor learning studies. Journal of Motor Learning and Development, 4(1), 37–58. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/jmld.2015-0010
- McKay, B., Carter, M. J., & Ste-Marie, D. (2014, June). Self-controlled learning: A meta-analysis. Journal of Sport & Exercise Psychology, 36(Suppl. 1), S43–S43. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1123/jsep.36.s1.s17
- McKay, B., & Ste-Marie, D. (2020). Autonomy support and reduced feedback frequency have trivial effects on learning and performance of a golf putting task. Human Movement Science, 71, Article 102612. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2020.102612
- Ng, J. Y., Lonsdale, C., & Hodge, K. (2011). The basic needs satisfaction in sport scale (BNSSS): Instrument development and initial validity evidence. Psychology of Sport and Exercise, 12(3), 257–264. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psychsport.2010.10.006
- Open Science Collaboration. (2015). Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science. Science, 349(6251), aac4716–aac4716. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aac4716
- Patall, E. A., Cooper, H., & Robinson, J. C. (2008). The effects of choice on intrinsic motivation and related outcomes: A meta-analysis of research findings. Psychological Bulletin, 134(2), 270–300. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.134.2.270
- Ranganathan, R., & Newell, K. M. (2013). Changing up the routine: Intervention-induced variability in motor learning. Exercise and Sport Sciences Reviews, 41(1), 64–70. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1097/JES.0b013e318259beb5
- Safir, O., Williams, C. K., Dubrowski, A., Backstein, D., & Carnahan, H. (2013). Self-directed practice schedule enhances learning of suturing skills. Canadian Journal of Surgery, 56(6), E142. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1503/cjs.019512
- Salmoni, A. W., Schmidt, R. A., & Walter, C. B. (1984). Knowledge of results and motor learning: A review and critical reappraisal. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 355–386. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.95.3.355
- Schmidt, R. A. (1975). A schema theory of discrete motor skill learning. Psychological Review, 82(4), 225–260. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/h0076770
- Schmidt, R. A., Lee, T. D., Winstein, C., Wulf, G., & Zelaznik, H. N. (2018). Motor control and learning: A behavioral emphasis. Human Kinetics.
- Schneider, B. A., Avivi-Reich, M., & Mozuraitis, M. (2015). A cautionary note on the use of the analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) in classification designs with and without within-subject factors. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, Article 474. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00474
- Shea, J. B., & Morgan, R. L. (1979). Contextual interference effects on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of a motor skill. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Learning and Memory, 5(2), 179–187. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.5.2.179
- Simonsohn, U. (2015). Small telescopes: Detectability and the evaluation of replication results. Psychological Science, 26(5), 559–569. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614567341
- Simonsohn, U., Nelson, L. D., & Simmons, J. P. (2014). P-curve: A key to the file-drawer. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 534–547. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1037/a0033242
- Sternberg, S. (1969). The discovery of processing stages: Extensions of Donders’ method. Acta psychologica, 30(11), 276–315. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0001-6918(69)90055-9
- Van Rossum, J. H. (1990). Schmidt’s schema theory: The empirical base of the variability of practice hypothesis: A critical analysis. Human Movement Science, 9(3–5), 387–435. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(90)90010-B
- Wu, W. F. W., & Magill, R. A. (2011). Allowing learners to choose: Self-controlled practice schedules for learning multiple movement patterns. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 82(3), 449–457. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.2011.10599777
- Wulf, G. (1991). The effect of type of practice on motor learning in children. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 5(2), 123–134. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1002/acp.2350050206
- Wulf, G., Chiviacowsky, S., & Cardozo, P. L. (2014). Additive benefits of autonomy support and enhanced expectancies for motor learning. Human Movement Science, 37, 12–20. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2014.06.004
- Wulf, G., Iwatsuki, T., Machin, B., Kellogg, J., Copeland, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2018). Lassoing skill through learner choice. Journal of Motor Behavior, 50(3), 285–292. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/00222895.2017.1341378
- Wulf, G., & Lewthwaite, R. (2016). Optimizing performance through intrinsic motivation and attention for learning: The OPTIMAL theory of motor learning. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23(5), 1382–1414. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.3758/s13423-015-0999-9
- Wulf, G., Shea, C., & Lewthwaite, R. (2010). Motor skill learning and performance: A review of influential factors. Medical Education, 44(1), 75–84. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2923.2009.03421.x
- Wulf, G., & Toole, T. (1999). Physical assistance devices in complex motor skill learning: Benefits of a self-controlled practice schedule. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 70(3), 265–272. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1080/02701367.1999.10608045