Nurturing gerontology students’ intrinsic motivation to cocreate: The design of a powerful learning environment

References

• AI Commons. (2017). AI Commons – View all resources. Retrieved from https://appreciativeinquiry.champlain.edu/learn/resources-all/
   Google Scholar
• Association for Gerontology in Higher Education. (2014). Gerontology competencies for undergraduate & graduate education. Retrieved from http://www.aghe.org/images/aghe/competencies/gerontology_competencies.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Barnett, K., & Dean, M. (2012). Identifying the evidence base for the concept ‘what is a good life’? Final report: Matching research evidence to the good lives model. Adelaide, Australia: The University of Adelaide. Australian Workplace Innovation and Social Research Centre.
   Google Scholar
• Bergvall-Kåreborn, B., & Ståhlbröst, A. (2009). Living Lab: an open and citizen-centric approach for innovation. Int. J. Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4), 356–370.
   Google Scholar
• Cooperrider, D. L., & Whitney, D. (2005). Appreciative inquiry: A positive revolution in change. San Francisco CA: CA Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L. (1975). Intrinsic motivation. New York, NY: Plenum.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11, 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• European Commission. (2015). Growing the European silver economy. Background paper. Retrieved from http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/active-healthy-ageing/silvereco.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Greve, K., Martinez, V., Jonas, J., Neely, A., & Möslein, K. (2016). Facilitating co-creation in living labs: The JOSEPHS study. Cambridge, England: University of Cambridge, Cambridge Service Alliance.
   Google Scholar
• Güldenpfennig, F., Nunes, F., Ganglbauer, E., & Fitzpatrick, G. (2016). Making space to engage: An open-ended exploration of technology design with older adults. International Journal of Mobile Human Computer Interaction, 8, 1–19. doi:10.4018/IJMHCI.2016040101
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15, 1277–1288. doi:10.1177/1049732305276687
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• IDEO.org. (2017). Design Kit. Retrieved from http://www.designkit.org
   Google Scholar
• Jukema, J. S. (2017). Interdependence revised: Co-creation as new pathway. Retrieved from http://ethicsofcare.org/interdependence-revised-co-creation-new-pathway/
   Google Scholar
• Kareborn, B., & Stahlbrost, A. (2009). Living lab: An open and citizen-centric approach for innovation. International Journal of Innovation and Regional Development, 1(4), 356–370. doi:10.1504/IJIRD.2009.022727
   Google Scholar
• Keehnen, E. (2015). Grey ocean strategy. Agewise marketing for the mature consumer. Utrecht: Still Novi Publishing, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Design Kit. (2017). Retrieved from www.designkit.org.
   Google Scholar
• Kohlbacher, F., & Herstatt, C. (Eds.). (2011). Silver market phenomenon. Marketing and Innovation in the aging society. Heidelberg-Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Noffke, S. E., & Somekh, B. (Eds.). (2009). The Sage handbook of educational action research. London, England: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 33–40. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.82.1.33
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plattner, H., Meinel, C., & Leifer, L. (Eds.). (2015). Design thinking research. Building innovators. Cham: Springer International Publishing, Switzerland.
   Google Scholar
• Prahalad, C. K., & Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creating unique value with customers. Strategy & Leadership, 32, 4–9. doi:10.1108/10878570410699249
   Google Scholar
• Reeve, J. (2009). Why teachers adopt a controlling motivating style toward students and how they can become more autonomy supportive. Educational Psychologist, 44, 159–175. doi:10.1080/00461520903028990
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychology need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of Personality, 74, 1557–1586. doi:10.1111/jopy.2006.74.issue-6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenmakers, E., Damron-Rodriquez, J., Frank, J. C., Pianosi, B., & Jukema, J. S. (2017). Competencies in European gerontological higher education. An explorative study on core elements. Gerontology & Geriatrics Education, 38, 5–16. doi:10.1080/02701960.2016.1188812
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoenmakers, E., Harps-Timmerman, A. E., & Van Duuren, H. (2017). Leeftijdsvriendelijke dienstverlening in co-creatie met oudere mensen. Landelijk opleidingsprofiel van de bachelor toegepaste gerontologie [Age-friendly services in co-creation with older adults. National Educational profile of the bachelor in applied gerontology]. Eindhoven, Zwolle:. Fontys Hogescholen/Windesheim, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Sierens, E., Vansteenkiste, M., Goossens, L., Soenens, B., & Dochy, F. J. R. C. (2009). The synergistic relationship of perceived autonomy support and structure in the prediction of self-regulated learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 57–68. doi:10.1348/000709908X304398
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sturm, M. (2013). Co-creatie: Collectief innoveren en organiseren [Co-creation: collectively innovating and organising]. M&O, 1, 43–53, The Netherlands.
   Google Scholar
• Van Eijl, P. J., Pilot, A., & Wolfensberger, M. V. C. (Eds.). (2010). Talent voor morgen [Talent for tomorrow]. Groningen: Noordhoff.
   Google Scholar
• Van Merriënboer, J. J. G., & Paas, T. (2003). Powerful learning and the many faces of instructional design: Toward a framework for the design of powerful learning environments. In E. De Corte, L. Verschaffel, N. J. Entwistle, & J. J. G. Van Merriënboer (Eds.), Powerful learning environments: Unravelling basic components and dimensions (pp. 3–22). Oxford, England: Elsevier Science Ltd.
   Google Scholar
• Waycott, J., Vetere, F., Pedell, S., Kulik, L., Ozanne, E., Gruner, A., & Downs, J. (2013). Older adults as digital content producers. W.E. Mackay, S. Brewster, S. Bødker. In Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 39–48). New York, NY: ACM.
   Google Scholar