Evaluating the Efficacy of Using a Digital Reading Environment to Improve Reading Comprehension within a Reading Clinic

References

• Allbritton, D. (2004, November). Strategic production of predictive inferences during comprehension. Discourse Processes, 38(3), 309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, R.C., & Pearson, P.D. (1984). A schema- theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 255–291). New York, NY : Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson-Inman, L., & Horney, M. (1997). Electronic books for secondary students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 40(6), 486–491.
   Google Scholar
• Armbruster, B.B. (2004). Considerate texts. In D. Lapp, J. Flood, & N. Farnan (Eds.), Content area reading and learning: Instructional strategies (pp. 47–57). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Bailey, D.H. (1996). Constructivism and multimedia: Theory and application; innovation and transformation. International Journal of Instructional Media, 23(2), 161–165.
   Google Scholar
• Bean, T.W. (1990). Learning concepts from biology text through pictorial analogies and an analogical study guide. Journal of Educational Research, 83, 233–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bearne, E. (2003). Rethinking literacy: Communication, representation and text. Reading Literacy and Language, 37(3), 98–103.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., Sandora, C., & Worthy, J. (1996). Questioning the author: A year long classroom implementation to engage students with text. The Elementary School Journal, 96, 385–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blachowicz, C., & Ogle, D. (2001). Reading comprehension: Strategies for independent learners. New York, NY : Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Bosco, J. (1986). An analysis of evaluations of interactive video. Educational Technology, 25, 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Boulware-Gooden, R., Carreker, S., Thornhill, A., & Joshi, R.M. (2007). Instruction of metacognitive strategies enhances reading comprehension and vocabulary achievement of third-grade students. LD Online. Retrieved from http://www.ldonline.org/article/Instruction_of_Metacognitive_Strategies_Enhances_Reading_Comprehension_and_Vocabulary_Achievement_of_Third-Grade_Students?theme=print
   Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C. & Leu, D. (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 1–21). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, A. (1991, September). The role of computer technology in restructuring schools. Phi Delta Kappan, 73, 28–36.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Crawford, P. (1995). Early literacy: Emerging perspectives. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 10(1), 71–86.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, B., & Proctor, C.P. (2007). Reading as thinking: Integrating strategy instruction in a universally designed digital literacy environment. In D.S. McNamara (Ed.), Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 423–442). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, B., & Proctor, C.P. (2008). The changing landscape of text and comprehension in the age of new literacies. In J. Coiro, M. Knoble, C. Lankshear, & D. Leu (Eds.), Handbook of research on new literacies (pp. 297–324). Mahwah, NJ : Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, B., Proctor, C.P., Uccelli, P., Mo. E., & Snow, C.E. (2011). Designing for diversity: The role of reading strategies and interactive vocabulary in a digital reading environment for fifth-grade monolingual English and bilingual students. Journal of Literacy Research, 43(1), 68–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dimitriadi, Y. (2001). Evaluating the use of multimedia authoring with dyslexia learners: A case study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32(3), 265–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N.K., & Pearson, D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A.E. Farstrup & S.J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed., pp. 205–242). Newark, DE : International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Dupuy, B., Tse, L., & Cook, T. (1996). Bringing books into the classroom: First steps in turning college-level ESL students into readers. TESOL Journal, 5(4), 10–15.
   Google Scholar
• Edyburn, D. L. (2001). Models, theories, and frameworks: Contributions to understanding special education technology. Special Education Technology Practice, 4(2), 16–24.
   Google Scholar
• Eilers, L., & Pinkley, C. (2006). Metacognitive strategies help students to comprehend all text. Reading Improvement, 43(1), 13–29.
   Google Scholar
• Elley, W. B. (1991). Acquiring literacy in a second language: The effect of book-based programs. Language Learning, 41(3), 375–411.
   Google Scholar
• Facer, K., Furlong, J., Furlong, R., & Sutherland, R. (2003). ScreenPlay: Children and computing in the home. London, UK: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Fletcher, D. (1989). The effectiveness and cost of interactive videodisc instruction. Machine-Mediated Learning, 3, 361–385.
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J.P. (1996). Social linguistics and literacies: Ideology in discourses (2nd ed.). London, UK: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Goodfellow, R. (2004). The literacies of online learning: A linguistic-ethnographic approach to research on virtual learning communities. Proceedings from the Networked Learning Conference. Retrieved from http://www.networkedlearningconference.org.uk/past/nlc2004/proceedings/symposia/symposium7/goodfellow.htm
   Google Scholar
• Haystead, M.W., & Marzano, R.J. (2009). Meta-analytic synthesis of studies conducted at Marzano Research Laboratory on instructional strategies. Englewood, CO : Marzano Research Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Heimann, M., Nelson, K.E., Tjus, T., & Gillberg, C. (1995). Increasing reading and communication skills in children with autism through an interactive multimedia computer program. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 25(5), 459–480.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heinze, J. (2004, November/December). Supporting English language learners with technology. Instructor. . Retrieved from http://www2.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp?id=10516.
   Google Scholar
• Hetzroni, O., Rubin, C., & Konkol, O. (2002). The use of assistive technology for symbol identification by children with Rett syndrome. Journal of Intellectual and Development Disability, 27(1), 57–71.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Higbee, K.L. (1988), Practical aspects of mnemonics. In M.M. Gruneberg, P.E. Morris, & R.N. Sykes (Eds.), Practical aspects of memory: Current research and issues, (Vol. II., pp. 403–408). Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Hofstetter, F.T. (1994). Is multimedia the next literacy? Educators’ Tech Exchange, 2(3), 6–13.
   Google Scholar
• Holliday, W.G., Brunner, L.L., & Donais, E.L. (1977). Differential cognitive and affective responses to flow diagrams in science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 14, 129–138.
   Google Scholar
• Holloway, W., & Valentine, G. (2003). Cyberkids: Children in the information age. London, England: RoutledgeFalmer.
   Google Scholar
• Jewitt, C. (2009). Handbook for multimodal analysis. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kalaitzakis, E., Dafoulas, G., & Macaulay, L. (2003, June). Designing online communities: Community-centered development for intensively focused user groups. 10th HCI International Conference, . Heraklion, Greece (HCII 2003).
   Google Scholar
• Khalili, A., & Shashaani, L. (1994). The effectiveness of computer applications: A meta -analysis. Journal of Research on Computing in Education, 27, 48–61.
   Google Scholar
• Klingner, J.K., Urbach, J., Golos, D., Brownell, M., & Menon, S. (2010). Teaching reading in the 21st century: A glimpse at how special education teachers promote reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 33(2), 59–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kozma, R.B. (1991). Learning with media. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 179–212.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. D. (1993). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (1997). Visual and verbal modes of representation in electronically mediated communication: The potentials of new forms of text. In I. Snyder (Ed.), Page to screen (pp. 53–79). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. New York, NY : Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, J.A., Bangert, R.L., & Williams, G.W. (1983). Effects of computer-based teaching on secondary school students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75, 19–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulik, J.A., Kulik, C.C., & Bangert-Drowns, R.L. (1985). Effectiveness of computer-based education in elementary schools. Computers in Human Behavior, 1, 59–74.
   Google Scholar
• Kulik, J. A., Kulik, C. L. C., & Cohen, P. A. (1980). Effectiveness of computer-based college teaching: A meta-analysis of findings. Review of Educational Research, 50(4), 525–544.
   Google Scholar
• Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2003). New literacies: Changing knowledge and classroom learning. Philadelphia, PA : Open University.
   Google Scholar
• Lebow, D. (1993). Constructivist values for instructional systems design: Five principles toward a new mindset. Educational Technology Research and Development, 41(3), 4–16.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social media and mobile Internet use among teens and young adults. Washington, DC : Pew Internet and American Life Project.
   Google Scholar
• Leu, D.J. , Jr., Kinzer, C.K., Coiro, J.L., & Cammack, D.W. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies: Emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R.B. Ruddell & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1570–1613). Newark, DE : International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Levy, R. (2008). Becoming a reader in a digital age: Children's self-perceptions as they start School. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of Cambridge, Cambridge, UK.
   Google Scholar
• Lewis, C., & Fabos, B. (2005, October/November/December). Instant messaging, literacies, and social identities. Reading Research Quarterly, 40(4), 470–501. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.4.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lin, H., & Chen, T. (2007). Reading authentic EFL text using visualization and advance organizers in a multimedia learning environment. Language Learning & Technology, 11(3), 83–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Macaulay, M. (2002). Embedding computer-based learning with learning aids: A preliminary study. International Journal of Instructional Media, 29(3, 305–315.
   Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. (2001). Multimedia learning. New York, NY : Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McKenzie, J. (2010). The 21st century skills bookmark a dozen I-words trump the 4-r's. From Now On: The Educational Technology Journal, 19(3), 1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, C.C., & Bosman, J. (2011, May 20). E-books outsell print books at Amazon. The New York Times. . Retrieved from http://www.nytimes.com/2011/05/20/technology/20amazon.html?_r=1
   Google Scholar
• Moran, J., Ferdig, R. E., Pearson, P. D., Wardrop, J., & Blomeyer, R. L. (2008). Technology and reading performance in the middle-school grades: A meta-analysis with recommendations for policy and practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 40(1), 6–58.
   Google Scholar
• Morris, D. (2003). Of Studebakers and reading clinicians. Proceedings from the 2003 American Reading Forum Yearbook. Retrieved from http://www.americanreadingforum.org/yearbook//yearbooks/03_yearbook/volume03toc.Htm
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics. (2009). The nation's report card: Reading 2009 (NCES 2010–458). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• New London Group. (1996). A pedagogy of multiliteracies: Designing social futures. Harvard Educational Review, 66(1), 60–92.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York, NY : Holt, Rinehart, Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Parker, J.F., Brownston, L., & Ruiz, I. (1993). Does imagery impede or facilitate transfer of learning? Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society, 31(6), 557–559.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parker, M., & Hurry, J. (2007, August). Teachers’ use of questioning and modelling comprehension skills in primary classrooms. Educational Review, 59(3), 299–314. doi: 10.1080/00131910701427298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317–344.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, P.D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 545–561). Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Proctor, C.P., Uccelli, P., Dalton, B., & Snow, C.E. (2009). Understanding depth of vocabulary online with bilingual and monolingual children. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 25(4), 311–333.
   Google Scholar
• Puchalski, M.M., Morra, M.J., & von Wandruszka, R. (1992). Fluorescence quenching of synthetic organic compounds by humic materials. Environmental Science and Technology, 26, 1787–1792.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Radcliffe, R., Caverly, D., Hand, J., & Franke, D. (2008). Improving reading in a middle school science classroom. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(5), 398–408.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reinking, D., Labbo, L., McKenna, M., & Kiefer, R. (Eds.). (1998). Handbook of literacy and technology. Hillsdale, NJ : Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rigney, J.W., & Lutz, K.A. (1976). Effect of graphic analogies of concepts in chemistry on learning and attitude. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 305–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Royer, J.M., & Cable, G.W. (1976). Illustrations, analogies and facilitative transfer in prose learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 205–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuels, S.J., Biesbrock, E., & Terry, P.R. (1974). The effect of pictures on children's attitudes toward presented stories. Journal of Educational Research, 67, 243–246.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schmidt, M., Weinstein, T., Niemic, R., & Walberg, H.J. (1985). Computer-assisted instruction with exceptional children. Journal of Special Education, 9, 493–502.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sewell, E.H. , Jr., & Moore, R.L. (1980). Cartoon embellishments in informative presentations. Educational Communication and Technology Journal, 28, 39–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smith, L. A. (2006). Think-aloud mysteries: Using structured, sentence-by-sentence text passages to teach comprehension strategies. The Reading Teacher, 59(8), 764–773.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S.J., & Meyen, E.L. (2003, February). Applications of online instruction: An overview for teachers, students with mild disabilities, and their parents. Focus on Exceptional Children. Retrieved from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3813/is_200302/ai_n9188029/
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., Kuhn, M. R., & Pickle, J. M. (1999). An educational model of assessment and targeted instruction for children with reading problems. In D. H. Evensen & P. B. Mosenthal (Eds.), Advances in reading/language research: Reconsidering the role of the reading clinic in a new age of literacy (pp. 249–272). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Street, B. (1995). Social literacies: Critical approaches to literacy development, ethnography, and education. London, UK: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Svantesson, I. (1998). Learning maps and memory skills. London, UK: Kogan Page.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1999). Instructional design. Melbourne, Australia: ACER Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tjortjis, C., Dafoulas, G., Layzell, P., & Macaulay, L.A. (2002, August). Model for selecting CSCW technologies for distributed software maintenance teams in virtual organisations, IEEE Workshop on Cooperative Supports for Distributed Software Engineering Processes (CSSE 02) in 26th Annual International Computer Software and Applications Conference, Oxford, UK (pp. 1104–1108). IEEE Computer Social Press.
   Google Scholar
• Tjus, T., Heimann, M., & Nelson, K.E. (2001). Interaction patterns between children and their teachers when using a specific multimedia and communication strategy: Observations from children with autism and mixed intellectual disabilities. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 5(2), 175–187.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Trinkle, D. (2007). Program to prepare students for digital world. Retrieved from http://www.valpo.edu/news/news.php?releaseId=3095
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Education. (2001). No Child Left Behind. Retrieved from http://www2.ed.gov/nclb/landing.jhtml
   Google Scholar
• Wade, B. (Ed.). (1990). Reading for real. Milton Keynes, UK: Open University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Walsh, C.S. (2009). The multimodal redesign of school texts. The Journal of Research in Reading, 32(1), 126–136.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilber, D.J. (2010). Special themed issue: Beyond “new” literacies. Digital Culture & Education, 2(1), 1–6.
   Google Scholar
• Williamson, G. L., Koons, H., Sandvik, T., & Sanford-Moore, E. (2012). The text complexity continuum in grades 1–12 (MetaMetrics Research Brief). Durham, NC: MetaMetrics.
   Google Scholar
• Wissick, C.A., & Gardner, J.E. (2002). Multimedia or Not to Multimedia? Teaching Exceptional Children, 52(4), 34–43.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, S., & Lehman, J. (2001). Effects of learner control and learning strategies on English as a foreign language (EFL) learning from interactive hypermedia lessons. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 10(2), 141–159.
   Google Scholar