Development of an Evidence-Based Reading Fluency Program for Adult Literacy Learners

References

• Alamprese, J.A. (2001). Teaching reading to first-level adults: Emerging trends in research and practice. Focus on Basics, 5. Retrieved from http://www.ncsall.net/index.php?id=274
   Google Scholar
• Alber-Morgan, S.R., Ramp, E.M., Anderson, L.L., & Martin, C.M. (2007). Effects of repeated readings, error correction, and performance feedback on the fluency and comprehension of middle school students with behavior problems. The Journal of Special Education, 41, 17–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allington, R.L. (1983). Fluency: The neglected reading goal. The Reading Teacher, 36, 556–561.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, I.L., McKeown, M.G., & Kucan, L. (2002). Bringing words to life. New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Begeny, J.C., & Silber, J.M. (2006). An examination of group-based treatment packages for increasing elementary-aged students’ reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 43, 183–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackowicz, C., & Fisher, P.J. (2002). Teaching vocabulary in all classrooms. Columbus, OH: Merrill.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, J. (2009). Opportunities for natural language processing in education. In A. Gelbulkh (Ed.), Springer lecture notes in computer science: Computational linguistics and intelligent text processing (vol. 5449, pp. 6–27). Berlin, Germany: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, J., Sabatini, J., & Shore, J. (in press). Developing NLP applications for educational problem spaces. InR. Mitkov (Ed.), Oxford handbook of computational linguistics. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Burstein, J., Shore, J., Sabatini, J., Lee, Y., & Ventura, M. (2007). Developing a text support tool for English language learners. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Artificial Intelligence in Education (pp. 542–544). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press.
   Google Scholar
• Center for Applied Linguistics. (2001). BEST Plus. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Chard, D.J., Vaughn, S., & Tyler, B.J. (2002). A synthesis of research on effective interventions for building reading fluency with elementary students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 386–406.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Comings, J., Parrella, A., & Soricone, L. (1999). Persistence among adult basic education students in pre-GED classes (NCSALL Rep. No. 12). Cambridge, MA: NSCALL.
   Google Scholar
• Cromley, J.G. (2005). Metacognition, cognitive strategy instruction, and reading in adult literacy. Review of Adult Learning and Literacy, 5, 187–204.
   Google Scholar
• Daane, M.C., Campbell, J.R., Grigg, W.S., Goodman, M.J., & Oranje, A. (2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institution of Education Sciences, National Center for Educational Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N.K., Pressley, M., & Hilden, K. (2004). Difficulties with reading comprehension. In C.A. Stone, E.R. Silliman, B.J. Ehren, & K. Apel (Eds.), Handbook of language and literacy development and disorder (pp. 501–520). New York, NY: Guildford.
   Google Scholar
• Greenberg, D., Wise, J.C., Morris, R., Fredrick, L.D., Rodrigo, V., Nanda, A.O., & Pae, H.K. (2011). A randomized control study of instructional approaches for struggling adult readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 101–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hawkins, R.O., Hale, A.D., Sheeley, W., & Ling, S. (2011). Repeated reading and vocabulary-previewing interventions to improve fluency and comprehension for struggling high-school readers [Special issue: Reading comprehension: Assessment and intervention for understanding]. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 59–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hudson, R.F., Isakson, C., Richman, T., Lane, H.B., & Arriaza-Allen, S. (2011). An examination of a small-group decoding intervention for struggling readers: Comparing accuracy and automaticity criteria. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 26, 15–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J., Samson, J., Fitzgerald, R., & Hartry, A. (2010). A randomized experiment of a mixed-methods literacy intervention for struggling readers in grades 4–6: Effects on word reading efficiency, reading comprehension and vocabulary, and oral reading fluency. Reading & Writing, 23, 1109–1129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne, R.P., Rogers, R.L., & Chissom, B.S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel (Research Branch Report 8-75). Memphis, TN: Naval Air Station.
   Google Scholar
• King, L.A., & Hicks, J.A. (2007). Lost and found possible selves: Goals, development, and well-being. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 114, 27–37.
   Google Scholar
• Kruidenier, J. (2002). Research-based principles for adult basic education reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy, Partnership for Reading.
   Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M.R. (2004). Helping students become accurate, expressive readers: Fluency instruction for small groups. The Reading Teacher, 58, 338–344.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M.R., Schwanenflugel, P.J., Morrow, L.M., Woo, D.G., Meisinger, E.B., Sevcik, R.A., …, Stahl, S.A. (2006). Teaching children to become fluent and automatic readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 38, 357–387.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuhn, M.R., & Stahl, S.A. (2000). Fluency: A review of developmental and remedial practices. Ann Arbor, MI: Center for the Improvement of Early Reading Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Kutner, M., Greenberg, E., Jin, Y., Boyle, B., Hsu, Y., & Paulsen, C. (2007). Literacy in everyday life: Results from the 2003 National Assessment of Adult Literacy (NCES 2007-480). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education, Institute for Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• Labov, W. (1984). Field methods of the project on linguistic change and variation. In J. Baugh & J. Sherzer (Eds.), Language in use: Reading in sociolinguistics (pp. 43–70). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Lo, Y., Cooke, N.L., & Starling, A.L. P. (2011). Using a repeated reading program to improve generalization of oral reading fluency. Education and Treatment of Children, 34, 115–140.
   Google Scholar
• Massengill, D. (2003). Guided reading—An instructional framework for adults. Adult Basic Education, 13, 168–188.
   Google Scholar
• Meader, P. (2000). The effects of continuing goal-setting on persistence in a math classroom. Focus on Basics, 4. Cambridge, MA: National Center for the Study of Adult Learning and Literacy. Retrieved from http://www.ncsall.net/?id=331
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S.B. (2001). Andragogy and self-directed learning: Pillars of adult learning theory. New Directions for Adult & Continuing Education, 89, 3–14.
   Google Scholar
• Merriam, S.B., & Caffarella, R.S. (1999). Learning in adulthood: A comprehensive guide. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Mezirow, J. (1981). A critical theory of adult learning and education. Adult Education, 32, 3–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Musti-Rao, S., Hawkins, R.O., & Barkley, E.A. (2009). Effects of repeated readings on the oral reading fluency of urban fourth-grade students: Implications for practice. Preventing School Failure, 54, 12–23.
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction, reports of the subgroups. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• Neddenriep, C.E., Fritz, A.M., & Carrier, M.E. (2011). Assessing for generalized improvements in reading comprehension by intervening to improve reading fluency. Psychology in the Schools, 48, 14–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nichols, W.D., Rupley, W.H., & Rasinski, T. (2009). Fluency in learning to read for meaning: Going beyond repeated readings. Literacy Research and Instruction, 48, 1–13.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, E., Black, M., Carley-Baxter, L., & Simon, T. (2003). Sensitive topics, survey nonresponse, and considerations for interviewer training. American Journal of Preventative Medicine, 31, 419–426.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Connor, R.E., White, A., & Swanson, H.L. (2007). Repeated reading vs continuous reading: Influences on reading fluency and comprehension. Exceptional Children, 74, 31–46.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paige, D.D., Rasinski, T.V., & Magpuri-Lavell, T. (2012). Is fluent, expressive reading important for high school readers? Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56, 67–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. (1992). The representation problem in reading acquisition. In P.B. Gough, L.C. Ehri, & R. Treiman (Eds.), Reading acquisition (pp. 145–174). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C., & Hart, L. (2002). The lexical quality hypothesis. In L. Vehoeven, C. Elbro, & P. Reitsma (Eds.), Precursors of functional literacy (pp. 189–213). Amsterdam, Netherlands: John Benjamin.
   Google Scholar
• Pikulski, J., & Chard, D. (2005). Fluency: Bridge between decoding and reading comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 58, 510–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T.V. (1999). Exploring a method for estimating independent, instructional, and frustration reading rates. Reading Psychology, 20, 61–69.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T.V. (2006). Fluency: An oft-neglected goal of the reading program. In C. Cummins (Ed.), Understanding and implementing reading first initiatives (pp. 60–71). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T.V., & Hoffman, J.V. (2003). Theory and research into practice: Oral reading in the school literacy curriculum. Reading Research Quarterly, 38, 510–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T.V., & Padak, N.D. (1998). How elementary students referred for compensatory reading instruction perform on school-based measures of work recognition, fluency, and comprehension. Reading Psychology: An International Quarterly, 19, 185–216.
   Google Scholar
• Reder, S. (2000). Adult literacy and postsecondary education students: Overlapping populations and learning trajectories. In J. Comings, B. Garner, & C. Smith (Eds.), The annual review of adult learning and literacy (Vol. 1, pp. 111–157). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Sabatini, J.P., Shore, J., Holtzman, S., & Scarborough, H.S. (2011). Relative effectiveness of reading interventions for adults with low literacy. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 4, 118–133.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Scarborough, H.S., Hannah, D., Charity, A.H., & Shore, J. (2004). Distinguishing dialect differences from reading errors in oral text reading by speakers of African-American Vernacular English (AAVE). In A. Pincus (Ed.), Tips from the experts: A compendium of advice on literacy instruction from educators and researchers (pp. 113–117). Long Valley, NJ: International Dyslexia Association.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D.H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modelling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 159–172.
   Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E.S. (1992). Using Gingling's model of curriculum-based assessment in reading in elementary age students. School Psychology Review, 21, 168–176.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shapiro, E.S., & Ager, C.L. (1992). Assessment of special education students in regular education programs: Linking assessment in instruction. Elementary School Journal, 92, 283–296.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shore, J., Lentini, J., Hutcheson, S., & Sabatini, J. (2008, March). Teaching adults to read: A demonstration of teaching methods and measurement and monitoring tools. Demonstration presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, J., Sabatini, J., Lentini, J., & Holtzman, S. (2013). Changes in reading practices and perceptions in low-literacy level adult learners. Journal of Reading Psychology, 34, 550–568.
   Google Scholar
• Shore, J., Sprachman, S., Buek, K., & Lentini, J. (2010, May). Quality assurance when assessments are conducted in many languages or dialects: When is it okay to call an H “ehsh,” “heche,” or “aych”? Presentation to the American Association of Public Opinion Research, Chicago, IL.
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C.E., Burns, M.S., & Griffin, P. (Eds.). (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S.A., & Heubach, K.M. (2005). Fluency-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Literacy Research, 37, 25–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strong, A.C., Wehby, J.H., Falk, K.B., & Lane, K.L. (2004). The impact of a structured reading curriculum and repeated reading on the performance of junior high students with emotional and behavior disorders. School Psychology Review, 33, 561–581.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thypin, M. (1979). Selection of books of high interest and low literacy level. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 12, 75–77.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J.K., Wagner, R.K., & Rashotte, C.A. (1999). Tests of Word Reading Efficiency (TOWRE). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Treptow, M.A., Burns, M.K., & McComas, J.J. (2007). Reading at the frustration, instructional and independent levels: Effects on student time on task and comprehension. School Psychology Review, 36, 159–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valleley, R.J., & Shriver, M.D. (2003). An examination of the effects of repeated readings with secondary students. Journal of Behavioral Education, 12, 55–76.
   Google Scholar
• Vandenberg, A.C., Boon, R.T., Fore, C., III, & Bender, W.N. (2008). The effects of repeated readings on the reading fluency and comprehension for high school students with specific learning disabilities. Learning Disabilities: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15, 11–20.
   Google Scholar
• Venezky, R.L., Oney, B., Sabatini, J., & Jain, R. (1998). Teaching adults to read and write: A research synthesis. Bethesda, MD: Abt Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, G.S. (1993) Wide Range Achievement Test–Revision 3.Wilmington, DE: Jastak Association.
   Google Scholar
• Winn, B.D., Skinner, C.H., Oliver, R., Hale, A.D., & Ziegler, M. (2006). The effects of listening while reading and repeated reading on the reading fluency of adult learners. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50, 196–205.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R.W., McGrew, K.S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III Tests of Achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Young, A., & Bowers, P.G. (1995). Individual difference and text difficult determinants of reading fluency expressiveness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 60, 428–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar