Establishing Trustworthiness when Students Read Multiple Documents Containing Conflicting Scientific Evidence

References

• Andreassen, R., & Strømsø, H.I. (2012). Reading about health risks: Who and what to trust? A research review. In K.P. Knutsen, S. Kvam, P.H. Langemeyer, K. Solfjeld, & A. Parianou (Eds.), Narratives of risk: Interdisciplinary studies (pp. 255–274). Münster, Germany: Waxman.
   Google Scholar
• Anmarkrud, Ø., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2014). Multiple-documents literacy: Strategic processing, source awareness, and argumentation whan reading multiple conflicting documents. Learning and Individual Differences, 30, 64–76.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bazerman, C. (1985). Physicists reading physics: Schema-laden purposes and purpose-laden schema. Written Communication, 2, 3–23.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkenkotter, C., & Huckin, T.N. (1995). Genre knowledge in disciplinary communication: Cognition/culture/power. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Björnsson, C.H. (1968). Läsbarhet [Readability]. Stockholm, Sweden: Liber.
   Google Scholar
• Braasch, J.L. G., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Ferguson, L.E. (2013). Promoting secondary school students’ evaluation of source features of multiple documents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38, 180–195.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Braasch, J.L. G., Rouet, J.F., Vibert, N., & Britt, M.A. (2012). Readers’ use of source information in text comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 40, 450–465.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Britt, M.A., Strømsø, H.I., & Rouet, J.F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46, 48–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Ferguson, L.E., Strømsø, H.I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2014). Students working with multiple conflicting documents on a scientific issue: Relations between epistemic cognition while reading and sourcing and argumentation in essays. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 58–85.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., & Britt, M.A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44, 6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., & Salmerón, L. (2011). Trust and mistrust when students read multiple information sources about climate change. Learning and Instruction, 21, 180–192.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brem, S.K., Russell, J., & Weems, L. (2001). Science on the Web: Student evaluations of scientific arguments. Discourse Processes, 32, 191–213.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 485–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., & Gabrys, G.L. (2000). Teaching advanced literacy skills for the World Wide Web. In C.R. Wolfe (Ed.), Learning and teaching on the World Wide Web (pp. 73–90). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., & Gabrys, G.L. (2002). Implications of document-level literacy skills for Web site design. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 34, 170–176.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Britt, M.A., Perfetti, C.A., Sandak, R., & Rouet, J.F. (1999). Content integration and source separation in learning from multiple texts. In S.R. Goldman, A.C. Graesser, & P. van den Broek (Eds.), Narrative, comprehension, causality, and coherence: Essays in honor of Tom Trabasso (pp. 209–233). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., & Rouet, J.F. (2012). Learning with multiple documents: Component skills and their acquisition. In J.R. Kirby & M.J. Lawson (Eds.), Enhancing the quality of learning: Dispositions, instruction, and learning processes (pp. 276–314). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., Rouet, J.F., & Braasch, J.L. G. (2013). Documents experienced as entities: Extending the situation model theory of comprehension. In M.A. Britt, S.R. Goldman, & J.F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading from words to multiple texts (pp. 160–179). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., Wiemer-Hastings, P., Larson, A.A., & Perfetti, C.A. (2004). Using intelligent feedback to improve sourcing and integration in students’ essays. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 14, 359–374.
   Google Scholar
• Chaiken, S. (1987). The heuristic model of persuasion. In M.P. Zanna, J.M. Olson, & C.P. Herman (Eds.), Social influence: The Ontario Symposium (Vol. 5, pp. 3–39). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S., & Chaiken, S. (1999). The Heuristic-Systematic Model in its broader context. In S. Chaiken & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual-process theories in social psychology (pp. 73–96). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Dellorto, D. (2011, May 31). WHO: Cell phone use can increase possible cancer risk. CNN HEALTH. Retrieved from http://www.cnn.com/2011/HEALTH/05/31/who.cell.phones/
   Google Scholar
• Eysenbach, G. (2008). Credibility of health information and digital media: New perspectives and implications for youth. In M.J. Metzger & A.J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 123–154). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L.E., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2012). Epistemic cognition and change when students read multiple documents containing conflicting scientific evidence: A think-aloud study. Learning and Instruction, 22, 103–120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flanagin, A.J., & Metzger, M.J. (2008). Digital media and youth: Unparalleled opportunity and unprecedented responsibility. In M.J. Metzger & A.J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 5–27). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Gerjets, P., Kammerer, Y., & Werner, B. (2011). Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data. Learning and Instruction, 21, 220–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S.R. (2011). Choosing and using multiple information sources: Some new findings and emergent issues. Learning and Instruction, 21, 238–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S.R., Braasch, J.L. G., Wiley, J., Graesser, A.C., & Brodowinska, K. (2012). Comprehending and learning from internet sources: Processing patterns of better and poorer learners. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 356–381.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A.C., & McNamara, D.S. (2011). Computational analyses of multilevel discourse comprehension. Topics in Cognitive Science, 3, 371–398.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haberman, S.J. (1984). The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics, 29, 205–220.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC). (2011). IARC classifies radiofrequency electromagnetic fields as possibly carcinogenic to humans [Press release]. Retrieved from http://www.iarc.fr/en/media-centre/pr/2011/pdfs/pr208_E.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Jungermann, H., Pfister, H.R., & Fischer, K. (1996). Credibility, information preferences, and information interests. Risk Analysis, 16, 251–261.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kolstø, S.D. (2001). “To trust or not to trust, …”—Pupils’ ways of judging information encountered in a socio-scientific issue. International Journal of Science Education, 23, 877–901.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maggioni, L., & Fox, E. (2009, April). Adolescents’ reading of multiple history texts: An interdisciplinary investigation of historical thinking, intertextual reading, and domain-specific epistemic beliefs. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, San Diego, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J., & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education, 41, 271–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paxton, R.J. (2002). The influence of author visibility on high school students solving a historical problem. Cognition and Instruction, 20, 197–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C.A., Rouet, J.F., & Britt, M.A. (1999). Toward a theory of documents representation. In H. Van Oostendorp & S.R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representation during reading (pp. 99–122). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Petty, R.E., & Cacioppo, J.T. (1986). Communication and persuation: Central and peripheral routes to attitude change. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.F., Britt, M.A., Mason, R.A., & Perfetti, C.A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 478–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.F., Favart, M., Britt, M.A., & Perfetti, C.A. (1997). Studying and using multiple documents in history: Effects of discipline expertise. Cognition and Instruction, 15, 85–106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sanchez, C.A., Wiley, J., & Goldman, S.R. (2006). Teaching students to evaluate source reliability during Internet research tasks. In S.A. Barab, K.E. Hay, & D.T. Hickey (Eds.), Proceedings of the seventh international conference on the learning sciences (pp. 662–666). Bloomington, IN: International Society of the Learning Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., & Shanahan, T. (2008). Content-area reading/learning. In K.B. Cartright (Ed.), Literacy processes: Cognitive flexibility in learning and teaching (pp. 208–233). New York, NY: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., Shanahan, T., & Misischia, C. (2011). Analysis of expert readers in three disciplines: History, mathematics, and chemistry. Journal of Literacy Research, 43, 393–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stadtler, M., & Bromme, R. (2007). Dealing with multiple documents on the WWW: The role of metacognition in the formation of documents models. International Journal of Computer Supported Collaborative Learning, 2, 191–210.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stahl, S.A., Hynd, C.R., Britton, B.K., McNish, M.M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31, 430–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H.I., & Bråten, I. (2010). Learning from multiple information sources. In E. Baker, B. McGaw, & P. Peterson (Eds.), International encyclopedia of education ( 3rd ed.). Oxford, UK: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H.I., Bråten, I., Britt, M.A., & Ferguson, L.E. (2013). Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 176–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sundar, S.S. (2008). The MAIN model: A heuristic approach to understanding technology effects on credibility. In M.J. Metzger & A.J. Flanagin (Eds.), Digital media, youth, and credibility (pp. 73–100). Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• van Dijk, T.A. (1999). Context models in discourse processing. In H. van Oostendorp & S.R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 123–148). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• VanSledright, B., & Kelly, C. (1998). Reading American history: The influence on multiple sources on six fifth graders. The Elementary School Journal, 98, 239–265.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vinje, F.E. (1982). Journalistspråket [The journalist language]. Fredrikstad, Norway: Institute for Journalism.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., Goldman, S.R., Graesser, A.C., Sanchez, C.A., Ash, I.K., & Hemmerich, J. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in internet science tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46, 1060–1106.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. (1991). Historical problem solving: A study of the cognitive processes used in the evaluation of documentary and pictorial evidence. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 73–87.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wittwer, J., Bromme, R., & Jucks, R. (2004). Kann man dem Internet trauen wenn es um die Gesundheit geht? Die Glaubwürdigkeitsbeurteilung medizinischer Fachinformationen im Internet durch Laien [Is the Internet a reliable source of health-related information? Laypersons’ credibility judgments about medical information on the Internet]. Zeitschrift für Medienpsychologie, 2, 48–56.
   Google Scholar