Examining Associations Between Reading Motivation and Inference Generation Beyond Reading Comprehension Skill

References

• Aarnoutse, C., & Schellings, G. (2003). Learning reading strategies by triggering reading motivation. Educational Studies, 29(4), 387–409.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ainley, M. (2006). Connecting with learning: Motivation, affect and cognition in interest processes. Educational Psychology Review, 18(4), 391–405. doi: 10.1007/s10648–006–9033–0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Andreassen, R., & Bråten, I. (2010). Examining the prediction of reading comprehension on different multiple-choice tests. Journal of Research in Reading, 33(3), 263–283. doi: 10.1111/j.1467–9817.2009.01413.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anmarkrud, Ø., & Bråten, I. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 252–256. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2008.09.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4), 452–477. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barron, K.E., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2001). Achievement goals and optimal motivation: Testing multiple goal models. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(5), 706–722. doi: 10.1037/0022–3514.80.5.706
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773–785. doi: 10.1037/a0020084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benware, C.A., & Deci, E.L. (1984). Quality of learning with an active versus passive motivational set. American Educational Research Journal, 21(4), 755–765. doi: 10.3102/00028312021004755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bowyer-Crane, C., & Snowling, M.J. (2005). Assessing children's inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 189–201. doi: 10.1348/000709904×22674.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown, J.I., Fishco, V.V., & Hanna, G. (1993). Nelson-Denny reading test: Manual for scoring and interpretation, forms G & H. Riverside, CA: Riverside Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J.V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11(5–6), 489–503. doi: 10.1023/A:1008084120205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J.V., Barnes, M.A., & Bryant, P.E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850–859. doi: 10.3758/BF03196414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children's reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(1), 31–42. doi: 10.1037/0022–0663.96.1.31
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Christianson, K., Williams, C.C., Zacks, R.T., & Ferreira, F. (2006). Younger and older adults “good-enough” interpretations of garden-path sentences. Discourse Processes, 42(2), 205–238. doi: 10.1207/s15326950dp4202_6
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clinton, V. (2014). The relationship between approaches to learning and the process of learning: An examination of the 3P model. Instructional Science, 42(5), 817–837. doi: 10.1007/s11251-013-9308-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Conti, R., Amabile, T.M., & Pollak, S. (1995). The positive impact of creative activity: Effects of creative task engagement and motivational focus on college students’ learning. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 21(10), 1107–1116. doi: 10.1177/01461672952110011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coté, N., & Goldman, S.R. (2004). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children's think aloud protocols. In R.B. Ruddel & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical Models and Processes of Reading (pp. 660–683). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Covington, M.V., & Müeller, K.J. (2001). Intrinsic versus extrinsic motivation: An approach/avoidance reformulation. Educational Psychology Review, 13(2), 157–176. doi: 10.1023/A:1009009219144
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cox, K.E., & Guthrie, J.T. (2001). Motivational and cognitive contributions to students’ amount of reading. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 116–131.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cromley, J.G., & Azevedo, R. (2007). Testing and refining the direct and inferential model of reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 99(2), 311–325. doi: 10.1037/0022–0663.99.2.311
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E.L., Vallerand, R.J., Pelletier, L.G., & Ryan, R.M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational Psychologist, 26, 325–346. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1044
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Durik, A.M., Vida, M., & Eccles, J.S. (2006). Task values and ability beliefs as predictors of high school literacy choices: A developmental analysis. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 382–393. doi: 10.1037/0022–0663.98.2.382
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53(1), 109–132. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135153
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilabert, R., Martínez, G., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2005). Some good texts are always better: Text revision to foster inferences of readers with high and low prior background knowledge. Learning and Instruction, 15(1), 45–68. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2004.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A.C, Bertus, E.L., & Magliano, J.P. (1995). Inference generation during the comprehension of narrative text. In R.F. Lorch & E.J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 295–320). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A.C., Millis, K.K., & Zwaan, R.A. (1997). Discourse comprehension. Annual Review of Psychology, 48(1), 163–189. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.48.1.163
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A.C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371–395. doi: 10.1037/0033–295X.101.3.371
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graham, S., & Golan, S. (1991). Motivational influences on cognition: Task involvement, ego involvement, and depth of information processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 83(2), 187–194. doi: 10.1037/0022–0663.83.2.187
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gottfried, A.E. (1990). Academic intrinsic motivation in young elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(3), 525–538. doi: 10.1037/0022–0663.82.3.525
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grolnick, W.S., & Ryan, R.M. (1987). Autonomy in children's learning: An experimental and individual difference investigation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(5 doi10.1037/0022-3514.52.5.890
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J.R., Wigfield, A., & Von Secker, C. (2000). Effects of integrated instruction on motivation and strategy use in reading. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 331–341. doi: 10.1037/0022–0663.92.2.331
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J.T., & Alvermann, D.E. (1999). Engaged reading. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J.T., Meter, P., McCann, A.D., Wigfield, A., Bennett, L., Poundstone, C.C., …, & Mitchell, A.M. (1996). Growth of literacy engagement: Changes in motivations and strategies during concept-oriented reading instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 31(3), 306–332. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.31.3.5
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N.M., Perencevich, K.C., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. The Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 232–246. doi: 10.3200/JOER.99.4.232–246
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Metsala, J.L., & Cox, K.E. (1999). Motivational and cognitive predictors of text comprehension and reading amount. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 231–256. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_3
   Google Scholar
• Hidi, S. (2000). An interest researcher's perspective: The effects of extrinsic and intrinsic factors on motivation. In C. Sansone & J.M. Harackiewicz (Eds.), Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation (pp. 309–339). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kamas, E.N., & Reder, L.M. (1995). The role of familiarity in cognitive processing. In R.F. Lorch & E.J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 177–202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2005). The effects of readers’ misconceptions on comprehension of scientific text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 235–245. doi: 10.1037/0022–0663.97.2.235
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577. doi: 10.3758/BF03193491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, E. (2005). Comprehension theory as a guide for the design of thoughtful questions. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 51–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1986). Learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 3(2), 87–108. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci0302_1
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1994). Text comprehension, memory, and learning. American Psychologist, 49(4), 294–303. doi: 10.1037/0003–066X.49.4.294
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2004). The construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In R.B. Ruddlel & N.J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1270–1380). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T.A. (1978). Toward a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. doi: 10.1037/0033–295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Konheim-Kalkstein, Y.L., & van den Broek, P. (2008). The effect of incentives on cognitive processing of text. Discourse Processes, 45(2), 180–194. doi: 10.1080/01638530701792883
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lau, K.L., & Chan, D.W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading, 26(2), 177–190. doi: 10.1111/1467–9817.00195
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lehman, S. & Schraw, G. (2002). Effects of coherence and relevance on shallow and deep text processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 738–750. doi: 10.1037/0022–0663.94.4.738
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linderholm, T., & van den Broek, P. (2002). The effects of reading purpose and working memory capacity on the processing of expository text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(4), 778–784. doi: 10.1037/0022–0663.94.4.778
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Long, D.L., Oppy, B.J., & Seely, M.R. (1997). Individual differences in readers’ sentence- and text-level representations. Journal of Memory and Language, 36, 129–145. doi: 10.1006/jmla.1996.2485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeown, S.P., Norgate, R., & Warhurst, A. (2012). Exploring intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation among very good and very poor readers. Educational Research, 54(3), 309–322. doi: 10.1080/00131881.2012.710089
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMaster, K.L., den Broek, P.V., A Espin, C., White, M.J., Rapp, D.N., Kendeou, P., …, & Carlson, S. (2012). Making the right connections: Differential effects of reading intervention for subgroups of comprehenders. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(1), 100–111. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2011.11.017
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D.S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N.B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. doi: 10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morgan, P.L., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and reading motivation?. Exceptional Children, 73(2), 242–255.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mucherah, W., & Yoder, A. (2008). Motivation for reading and middle school students’ performance on standardized testing in read. Reading Psychology, 29, 214–235. doi: 10.1080/02702710801982159.
   Google Scholar
• Narvaez, D., van den Broek, P., & Ruiz, A.B. (1999). The influence of reading purpose on inference generation and comprehension in reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(3), 488–496. doi: 10.1037/0022–0663.91.3.488
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pekrun, R. (1993). Facets of adolescents’ academic motivation: A longitudinal expectancy–value approach. In M.L. Maehr & P.R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement (vol. 8, pp. 139–189). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal reports of reading: The nature of constructively responsive reading. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Rapp, D.N., van den Broek, P.V. D., McMaster, K.L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C.A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 289–312. doi: 10.1080/10888430701530417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R.M., & Deci, E.L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67. doi: 10.1006/ceps.1999.1020
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sansone C, & Harackiewicz J.M. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The search for optimal motivation and performance. New York, NY: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2013). The prediction of reading comprehension by cognitive and motivational factors: Does text accessibility during comprehension testing make a difference? Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 42–54. doi: 10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffner, E., Schiefele, U., & Ulferts, H. (in press). Reading amount as a mediator of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 369–385. doi: 10.1002/rrq.52
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K.R. Wentzel, & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(4), 427–463. doi: 10.1002/RRQ.030
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schutte, N.S., & Malouff, J.M. (2007). Dimensions of reading motivation: Development of an adult reading motivation scale. Reading Psychology, 28(5), 469–489. doi: 10.1080/02702710701568991
   Google Scholar
• Senko, C., Hulleman, C.S., & Harackiewicz, J.M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 26–47. doi: 10.1080/00461520.2011.538646
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Singer, M. (1994). Discourse inference processes. In M.A. Gernsbacher (Ed.) Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 479–515). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sundermeier, B.A., van der Broek, P., & Zwaan, R.A. (2005). Causal coherence and the availability of locations and objects during narrative comprehension. Memory & Cognition, 33(3), 462–470. doi: 10.3758/BF03193063
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada, A., Tonks, S.M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 85–106. doi: 10.1007/s11145–008–9133-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, G.J. (1994). The scientific legacy of Apollo. Scientific American, 271, 40–47.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Terborgh, J. (1992). Why American songbirds are vanishing. Scientific American, 266, 98–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thurlow, R., & van den Broek, P. (1997). Automaticity and inference generation during reading comprehension. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 13(2), 165–181. doi: 10.1080/1057356970130205
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P. (1990). The causal inference maker: Towards a process model of inference generation in text comprehension. In D.A. Balota, G.B. Flores d’Arcais, & K. Rayner (Eds.), Comprehension processes in reading (pp. 423–445). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Bohn-Gettler, C.M., Kendeou, P., Carlson, S., & White, M.J. (2011). When a reader meets a text: The role of standards of coherence in reading comprehension. In M.T. McCrudden, J. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.) Relevance instructions and goal-focusing in text learning. Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Lorch, R.F., Linderholm, T., & Gustafson, M. (2001). The effects of readers’ goals on inference generation and memory for texts. Memory & Cognition, 29(8), 1081–1087. doi: 10.3758/BF03206376
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• van den Broek, P., Risden, K., & Husebye-Hartmann, E. (1995). The role of readers’ standards for coherence in the generation of inferences during reading. In R.F. Lorch & E.J. O’Brien (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 353–373). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T.A., & Kintsch, W. Strategies of discourse comprehension, 1983. New York, NY: Academic.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J.H. Y., & Guthrie, J.T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between US and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162–186. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A. (1997). Children's motivation for reading and reading engagement. In J.T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement (pp. 14–33). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Asher, S.R. (1984). Social and motivational influences on reading. In P.D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 423–452). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–432. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.89.3.420
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zwaan, R.A. (1999). Situation models: The mental leap into imagined worlds. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8(1), 15–18. doi: 10.1111/1467–8721.00004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar