A Comparison of Reading Rates, Comprehension, and Stamina in Oral and Silent Reading of Fourth-Grade Students

References

• ACT. (2006). Reading between the lines: What the ACT reveals about college readiness in reading. Iowa City, IA: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Afflerbach, P., Blachowicz, C.L. Z., Boyd, C.D., Izquierdo, E., Juel, C., Kame’enui, E.J., … Wixson, K.K. (2013). Reading Street. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson I.H., & Dearborn, W.F. (1952). The psychology of teaching reading. New York: Ronald Press Co.
   Google Scholar
• Brenner, D., & Hiebert, E.H. (2010). If I follow the teacher's edition, isn't that enough? Analyzing reading volume in six core reading programs. Elementary School Journal, 110 (3), 347–363.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brenner, D., Hiebert, E.H., & Tompkins, R. (2009). How much and what are third graders reading? E.H. Hiebert (Ed.), Reading more, reading better (pp. 118–140). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Carver, R.P. (1989). Silent reading rates in grade equivalents. Journal of Literacy Research, 21(2), 155–166.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chall, J.S., Jacobs, V.A., & Baldwin, L.E. (1990). The reading crisis: Why poor children fall behind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Collins, R. (1961). The comprehension of prose material by college freshman when read silently and when read aloud. Journal of Educational Research, 52, 79–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Daane, M.C., Campbell, J.R., Grigg, W.S., Goodman, M.J., & Oranje, A. (2005). Fourth-grade students reading aloud: NAEP 2002 special study of oral reading (NCES 2006-469). U.S. Department of Education. Institute of Education Sciences, National Center for Education Statistics. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Daniel, M.H. (2014, Feb. 18). A new measure of silent reading fluency with comprehension. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the National Association of School Psychologists, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Deno, S.L., Fuchs, L.S., Marston, D., & Shin, J. (2001). Using curriculum-based measurement to establish growth standards for students with learning disabilities. School Psychology Review, 30(4), 507–524.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duffy, G., & Durrell, D. (1935– 6). Third grade difficulties in oral reading. Education, 56, 37–40.
   Google Scholar
• Ekwall, E.E., & Shanker, J.L. (2000). Ekwall/Shanker Reading Inventory (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn and Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Elgart, D.B. (1978). Oral reading, silent reading, and listening comprehension: A comparative study. Journal of Literacy Research, 10(2), 203–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. (1948). A new readability yardstick. Journal of Applied Psychology, 32, 221–233.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeland, J.T., Skinner, C.H., Jackson, B., McDaniel, C.E., & Smith, S. (2000). Measuring and increasing silent reading comprehension rates: Empirically validating a repeated readings intervention. Psychology in the Schools, 37(5), 415–429.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fuchs, L.S., Fuchs, D., Hosp, M.K., & Jenkins, J.R. (2001). Oral reading fluency as an indicator of reading competence: A theoretical, empirical, and historical analysis. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 239–256.
   Google Scholar
• Gray, W.S. (1956). The teaching of reading and writing: An international survey. New York: UNESCO.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J.T., Schafer, W.D., & Huang, C.W. (2001). Benefits of opportunity to read and balanced instruction on the NAEP. The Journal of Educational Research, 94(3), 145–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, A.D., Hawkins, R.O., Sheeley, W., Reynolds, J.R., Jenkins, S., Schmitt, A.J., & Martin, D.A. (2011). An investigation of silent versus aloud reading comprehension of elementary students using Maze assessment procedures. Psychology in the Schools, 48(1), 4–13.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E.H. (2005). In pursuit of an effective, efficient vocabulary curriculum for the elementary grades. In E.H. Hiebert & M. Kamil (Eds.), The teaching and learning of vocabulary: Bringing scientific research to practice (pp. 243–263). Mahwah, NJ: LEA.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E.H., Wilson, K.M., & Trainin, G. (2011). Are students really reading in independent reading contexts? An examination of comprehension-based silent reading rate. In E.H. Hiebert & D. R. Reutzel (Eds.), Revisiting silent reading: New directions for teachers and researchers. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E.H., Wilson, K.M., & Trainin, G. (2010). Are students really reading in independent reading contexts? An examination of comprehension-based silent reading rate. In E.H. Hiebert & D. Ray Reutzel (Eds.), Revisiting silent reading: New directions for teachers and researchers. Newark, DE: IRA.
   Google Scholar
• Judd, C.H., & Buswell, G.T. (1922). Silent reading: A study of the various types. Supplementary Educational Monographs. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
   Google Scholar
• Juel, C., & Holmes, B. (1981). Oral and silent reading of sentences. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 545–568.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, Y.S., Wagner, R.K., & Foster, E. (2011). Relations among oral reading fluency, silent reading fluency, and reading comprehension: A latent variable study of first-grade readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(4), 338–362.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J.P., Fishburne, R.P. , Jr., Rogers, R.L., & Chissom, B.S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Research Branch Report 8-75). Millington, TN: U.S. Naval Technical Training.
   Google Scholar
• Kragler, S. (1995). The transition from oral to silent reading. Reading Psychology, 16, 395–408.
   Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W.H., MacGinitie, R.K., Maria, K., & Dreyer, L.G. (2007). Gates-MacGinitie Reading Tests (4th ed., Form T). Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside.
   Google Scholar
• Mead, C.D. (1915). Results in silent versus oral reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 8, 367–368.
   Google Scholar
• Mesmer, H.A. M., & Hiebert, E.H. ( April 2011). How far can third graders be stretched? Paper presented at the annual conference of the American Educational Research Association, New Orleans, LA.
   Google Scholar
• Miller, S.D., & Smith, D.E. (1985). Differences in literal and inferential comprehension after reading orally and silently. Journal of Educational Psychology, 77(3), 341–348.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, S.D., & Smith, D.E. P. (1990). Relations among oral reading, silent reading and listening comprehension of students at differing competency levels. Reading Research and Instruction, 29, 73–84.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (2013). The Nation's Report Card: A First Look: 2013 Mathematics and Reading (NCES 2014-451). Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association (NGA) Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (CCSSO). (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors. Retrieved from www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELA%20Standards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & CCSSO. (2012). Supplemental information for Appendix A of the Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy: New research on text complexity. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from Common Core State Standards Initiative website: http://www.corestandards.org/resources
   Google Scholar
• National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD). (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel. Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers. (2013). Blueprints and test specs. Retrieved from: https://www.parcconline.org/assessment-blueprints-test-specs
   Google Scholar
• Petscher, Y., & Kim, Y.S. (2011). The utility and accuracy of oral reading fluency score types in predicting reading comprehension. Journal of School Psychology, 49(1), 107–129.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintner, R. (1913). Oral and silent reading of fourth grade pupils. Journal of Educational Psychology, 4(6), 333.
   Google Scholar
• Poulton, E.C., & Brown, C.H. (1967). Memory after reading aloud and reading silently. British Journal of Psychology, 58, 219–222.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Prior, S.M., Fenwick, K.D., Saunders, K.S., Ouellette, R., O’Quinn, C., & Harvey, S. (2011). Comprehension after oral and silent reading: Does grade level matter?. Literacy Research and Instruction, 50(3), 183–194.
   Google Scholar
• Prior, S.M., & Welling, K.A. (2001). “Read in Your Head”: A Vygotskian analysis of the transition from oral to silent reading. Reading Psychology, 22(1), 1–15. doi 1080/02702710151130l72
   Google Scholar
• Qualifications and Curriculum Authority. (2005). English: Annual report on curriculum and assessment. London, UK: Author. Retrieved July 10, 2009 from http://www.ttrb.ac.uk/viewArticle2.aspx?contentId=12145
   Google Scholar
• Rasinski, T., Samuels, S.J., Hiebert, E., Petscher, Y., & Feller, K. (2011). The relationship between a silent reading fluency instructional protocol on students’ reading comprehension and achievement in an urban school setting. Reading Psychology, 34(1), 76–93.
   Google Scholar
• Reutzel, D.R., Fawson, P.C., & Smith, J.A. (2008). Reconsidering silent sustained reading (SSR): An exploratory study of scaffolded silent reading (ScRC). Journal of Educational Research, 102(1), 37–50.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutzel, D.R., Petscher, Y., & Spichtig, A.N. (2012). Exploring the value added of a guided, silent reading intervention: Effects on struggling third-grade readers’ achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(6), 404–415.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roehrig, A.D., Petscher, Y., Nettles, S.M., Hudson, R.F., & Torgesen, J.K. (2008). Accuracy of the DIBELS oral reading fluency measure for predicting third grade reading comprehension outcomes. Journal of School Psychology, 46(3), 343–366.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rogers, M.V. (1937). Comprehension in oral and silent reading. Journal of General Psychology, 17, 394–397.
   Google Scholar
• Rowell, E.H. (1976). Do elementary students read better orally or silently? Reading Teacher, 29(4), 367–370.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Santi, K., & Vaughn, S.R. (2007). Progress monitoring: An integral part of instruction. Reading and Writing Quarterly, 20, 535–537.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. (2012, April 13). ELA General Item and Task Specifications. SBAC. . Retrieved from http://www.smarterbalanced.org/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2012/05/TaskItemSpecifications/EnglishLanguageArtsLiteracy/ELAGeneralItemandTaskSpecifications.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Smith, D., Stenner, A.J., Horabin, I., & Smith, M. (1989). The Lexile scale in theory and practice (Final report). Washington, DC: MetaMetrics. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 307 577).
   Google Scholar
• Swalm, J.E. (1972). A comparison of oral reading, silent reading, and listening comprehension. Education, 92, 111–115.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, S.E. (1965). Eye movements in reading: Facts and fallacies. American Educational Research Journal, 2, 187–202.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S., Provasnik, S., Kastberg, D., Ferraro, D., Lemanski, N., Roey, S., & Jenkins, F. (2012). Highlights from PIRLS 2011: Reading achievement of U.S. fourth-grade students in an international context. Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, S.W., & Riddle Buly, M.R. (2004). Behind test scores: What struggling readers really need. The Reading Teacher, 57(6), 520–531.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valencia, S.W., Smith, A.T., Reece, A.M., Li, M., Wixson, K.K., & Newman, H. (2010). Oral reading fluency assessment: Issues of construct, criterion, and consequential validity. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 270–291.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vorstius, C., Radach, R., & Lonigan, C.J. (2014). Eye movements in developing readers: A comparison of silent and oral sentence reading. Visual Cognition, 22(3), 458–485.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, I.A., & Anderson, R.C. (1995). Sociocognitive processes in guided silent reading: A microanalysis of small-group lessons. Reading Research Quarterly, 710–740.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zeno, S.M., Ivens, S.H., Millard, R.T., & Duvvuri, R. (1995). The educator's word frequency guide. Brewster, MA: Touchstone Applied Science Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar