3,696
Views
40
CrossRef citations to date
0
Altmetric
Original Articles

A Longitudinal Study of the Role of Reading Motivation in Primary Students’ Reading Comprehension: Implications for a Less Simple View of Reading

, &

References

  • Adams, M.J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Alexander, P.A., Jetton, T.L., & Kulikowich, J.M. (1995). Interrelationship of knowledge, interest, and recall: Assessing a model of domain learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 559–575.
  • Alexander, P.A., & Murphy, P.K. (1998). Profiling the differences in students’ knowledge, interest, and strategic processing. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 435–447.
  • Allen, L., Cipielewski, J., & Stanovich, K.E. (1992). Multiple indicators of children's reading habits and attitudes: Construct validity and cognitive correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84, 489–503.
  • Altemeier, L.E., Abbott, R.D., & Berninger, V.W. (2008). Executive functions for reading and writing in typical literacy development and dyslexia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 588–606.
  • Anmarkrud, Ø., & Bråten, I. (2009). Motivation for reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 19(2), 252–256.
  • Archambault, I., Eccles, J.S., & Vida, M.N. (2010). Ability self-concepts and subjective value in literacy: Joint trajectories from Grades 1 through 12. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 804–816. doi: 10.1037/a0021075
  • Baker, L., & Scher, D. (2002). Beginning readers' motivation for reading in relation to parental beliefs and home reading experiences. Reading Psychology, 23(4), 239–269.
  • Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children's motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 452–477.
  • Berg, E.A. (1948). A simple objective technique for measuring flexibility in thinking. Journal of General Psychology, 39, 15–22.
  • Best, J.R., & Miller, P.H. (2010). A developmental perspective on executive function. Child Development, 81, 1641–1660.
  • Bidell, T.R., & Fisher, K.W. (1992). Beyond the stage debate: Action, structure, and variability in Piagetian theory and research. In R.J. Sternberg & C.A. Berg (Eds.) Intellectual development (pp. 100–140). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Bozack, A.R., & Salvaggio, A.N. (2013). Relational effects of reading motivation and academic achievement among adolescent boys. Reading Psychology, 34, 507–522.
  • Cartwright, K. B. (2002). Cognitive development and reading: The relation of reading-specific multiple classification skill to reading comprehension in elementary school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 56–63.
  • Cartwright, K. B. (2007). The contribution of graphophonological-semantic flexibility to reading comprehension in college students: Implications for a less simple view of reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 39, 173–193.
  • Cartwright, K. B. (2009). The role of cognitive flexibility in reading comprehension: Past, present, and future. In S. E. Israel & G. Duffy (Eds.) Handbook of Research on Reading Comprehension (pp. 115–139). . NY: Routledge.
  • Cartwright, K. B., Marshall, T. R., Dandy, K., & Isaac, M. C. (2010). The development of graphophonological-semantic cognitive flexibility and its contribution to reading comprehension in beginning readers. Journal of Cognition and Development, 11, 61–85.
  • Cartwright, K. B. (2010). Word callers: Small-group and one-to-one interventions for children who “read” but don't comprehend. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann Educational Books.
  • Cartwright, K. B. (2012). Insights from cognitive neuroscience: The importance of executive function for early reading development and education. Early Education and Development, 23, 24–36.
  • Case, R. (1992). Neo-Piagetian theories of child development. In R.J. Sternberg & C.A. Berg (Eds.) Intellectual development (pp. 161–196). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chapman, J.W., & Tunmer, W.E. (1995). Development of young children's reading self-concepts: An examination of emerging subcomponents and their relationship with reading achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 87, 154–167.
  • Chapman, J.W., Tunmer, W.E., & Prochnow, J.E. (2000). Early reading-related skills and performance, reading self-concept, and academic self-concept: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 703–708. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.92.4.703
  • Coddington, C.S., & Guthrie, J.T. (2009). Teacher and student perceptions of boys’ and girls’ reading motivation. Reading Psychology, 30, 225–249. doi: 10.1080/02702710802275371
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Academic Press.
  • Conlon, E.G., Zimmer-Gembeck, M.J., Creed, P.A., & Tucker, M. (2006). Family history, self-perceptions, attitudes and cognitive abilities are associated with early adolescent reading skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 11–32.
  • Conners, F.A. (2009). Attentional control and the Simple View of reading. Reading and Writing, 22, 591–613. doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9126-x
  • Cunningham, A.E., & Stanovich, K.E. (1990). Assessing print exposure and orthographic processing skill in children: A quick measure of reading experience. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82, 733–740.
  • Dawson, P., & Guare, R. (2010). Executive skills in children and adolescents: A practical guide to assessment and intervention ( 2nd ed.). New York: The Guilford Press.
  • Davidson, M.C., Amso, D., Anderson, L.C., & Diamond, A. (2006). Development of cognitive control and executive functions from 4 to 13 years: Evidence from manipulations of memory, inhibition, and task switching. Neuropsychologia, 44, 2037–2078.
  • Diamond, A. (2013). Executive functions. Annual Review of Psychology, 64, 135–168
  • Eccles, J.S., & Wigfield, A. (2002). Motivational beliefs, values, and goals. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 109–132.
  • Eccles, J.S., Wigfield, A., Harold, R.D., & Blumenfeld, P. (1993). Age and gender differences in children's self- and task perceptions during elementary school. Child Development, 64, 830–847.
  • Echols, L.D., West, R.F., Stanovich, K.E., & Zehr, K.S. (1996). Using children's literacy activities to predict growth in verbal cognitive skills: A longitudinal investigation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 296–304.
  • Fleiss, J.L. (1981). Statistical methods for rates and proportions (2nd ed.). New York: John Wiley.
  • Floyd, F.J., & Widaman, K.F. (1995) Factor analysis in the development and refinement of clinical assessment instruments. Psychological Assessment, 7, 286–299.
  • Friedman, N. P., Miyake, A., Corley, R. P., Young, S. E., DeFries, J. C., & Hewitt, J. K. (2006). Not all executive functions are related to intelligence. Psychological Science, 17(2), 172–179.
  • Gambrell, L.B., Palmer, B.M., Codling, R.M., & Mazzoni, S.A. (1996). Assessing motivation to read. The Reading Teacher, 49, 518–533.
  • Gough, P.B., & Tunmer, W.E. (1986). Decoding, reading and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.
  • Gough, P.B., Hoover, W.A., & Peterson, C.L. (1996). Some observations on a simple view of reading. In C. Cornoldi & J. Oakhill (Eds.), Reading comprehension difficulties: Processes and intervention (pp. 1–13). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • Graesser, A.C. (2009). Inaugural editorial for Journal of Educational Psychology. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 259–261. doi: 10.1037/a0014883
  • Graesser, A.C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101, 371–395.
  • Guthrie, J.T., Hoa, L.W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S.M., Humenick, N.M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 282–313. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004
  • Guthrie, J.T., & Humenick, N.M. (2004). Motivating students to read: Evidence for classroom practices that increase reading motivation and achievement. In. P. McCardle & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 329–354). Baltimore: Brookes.
  • Guthrie, J.T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). How motivation fits into a science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3, 199–205.
  • Guthrie, J.T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K.C., Taboada, A., Davis, M.H., ,…Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept-oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403–423. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
  • Guthrie, J., Wigfield, A., Humenick, N., Perencevich, K., Taboada, A., & Barbosa, P. (2006). Influences of stimulating tasks on reading motivation and comprehension. Journal of Educational Research, 99(4), 232–245.
  • Harrison, C. (2010). Why do policy makers find the “Simple View of Reading” so attractive, and why do I find it so morally repugnant? In K. Hall, U. Goswami, C. Harrison, S. Ellis, & J. Soler (Eds.), Interdisciplinary perspectives on learning to read: Culture, cognition, and pedagogy (pp. 207–218). New York, NY: Routledge.
  • Ho, A.N., & Guthrie, J.T. (2013). Patterns of association among multiple motivations and aspects of achievement in reading. Reading Psychology, 34, 101–147.
  • Hoffman, J.V. (2009). In search of the “simple view” of reading comprehension. In S.E. Israel & G.G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 54–66). New York: Routledge.
  • Hoover, W.A. (1997). The simple decomposition of reading. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
  • Hoover, W.A., & Gough, P.B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 2, 127–160.
  • Horowitz, F.D. (2000). Child development and the PITS: Simple questions, complex answers, and developmental theory. Child Development, 71, 1–10.
  • Johnston, T.C., & Kirby, J.R. (2006). The contribution of naming speed to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 19, 339–361. doi: 10.1007/s11145-005-4644-2
  • Joshi, M. & Aaron, P.G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97. doi: 10.1080/02702710050084428
  • Kasperski, R., & Katzir, T. (2013). Are confidence ratings test- or trait-driven? Individual differences among high, average, and low comprehenders in fourth grade. Reading Psychology, 34, 59–84.
  • Katzir, T., Lesaux, N., & Kim, Y. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22, 261–276.
  • Kaufman, A.S., & Kaufman, N.L. (1990). Kaufman brief intelligence test. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Kendeou, P., van den Broek, P., White, M.J., & Lynch, J.S. (2009). Predicting reading comprehension in early elementary school: The independent contributions of oral language and decoding skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101, 765–778. doi: 10.1037/a0015956
  • Kendeou, P., Savage, R., & van den Broek, P. (2009). Revisiting the simple view of reading. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 79, 353–370. doi: 10.1348/978185408×369020
  • Kieffer, M. J., Vukovic, R. K., & Berry, D. (2013). Roles of attention shifting and inhibitory control in fourth-grade reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 333–348.
  • Labouvie-Vief, G. (2006). Emerging structures of adult thought. In J.J. Arnett, & J.L. Tanner (Eds.) Emerging adults in America: Coming of age in the 21st century (pp. 59–84). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • Labouvie-Vief, G., & Diehl, M. (2000). Cognitive complexity and cognitive-affective integration: Related or separate domains of adult development. Psychology and Aging, 15, 490–504. doi: 10.1037//0882-7974.15.3.490
  • Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
  • Lin, D., Wong, K.K., & McBride-Chang, C. (2012). Reading motivation and reading comprehension in Chinese and English among bilingual students. Reading and Writing, 25, 717–737. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9297-8
  • Locascio, G., Mahone, E. M., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E. (2010). Executive dysfunction among children with reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43(5), 441–454.
  • MacCallum, R.C., Widaman, K.F., Zhang, S., & Hong, S. (1999). Sample size in factor analysis. Psychological Methods, 4, 84–99.
  • McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children's attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934–956.
  • Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49, 270–291.
  • Miyake, A., Friedman, N.P., Emerson, M.J., Witzki, A.H., & Howerter, A. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100.
  • Monteiro, V. (2013). Promoting reading motivation by reading together. Reading Psychology, 34, 301–335.
  • Morgan, P.L., & Fuchs, D. (2007). Is there a bidirectional relationship between children's reading skills and Reading Motivation? Exceptional Children, 73, 165–183.
  • National Center for Education Statistics. (2011). National Assessment of Educational Progress. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://nationsreportcard.gov/
  • Onatsu-Arvilommi, T., & Nurmi, J. (2000). The role of task-avoidant and task-focused behavior in the development of reading and mathematical skills during the first school year: A cross-lagged longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 478–491. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.92.3.478
  • Oulette, G., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23, 189–208. doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1
  • Pressley, M., Duke, N.K., Gaskins, I.W., Fingeret, L., Halladay, J., Hilden, K., & Collins, S. (2009). Working with struggling readers: Why we must get beyond the Simple View of Reading and visions of how it might be done. In T.B. Gutkin & C.R. Reynolds (Eds.), The handbook of school psychology ( 4th ed., pp. 522–546). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Towards an R&D program in reading comprehension. Retrieved from http://www.rand.org/content/dam/rand/pubs/monograph_reports/2005/MR1465.pdf
  • Richardson, J.T. E. (2011). Eta squared and partial eta squared as measures of effect size in educational research. Educational Research Review, 6, 135–147.
  • Rose, J. (2006). Independent review of the teaching of early reading: Final report (DfES Publication No. 0201-2006DOC-EN). Nottingham, UK: Department of Education and Skills. Retrieved from http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20100526143644/http:/standards.dcsf.gov.uk/phonics/report.pdf
  • Sabatini, J.P., Sawaki, Y., Shore, J.R., & Scarborough, H.S. (2010). Relationships among reading skills of adults with low literacy. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 122–138. doi: 10.1177/0022219409359343
  • Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Möller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427–463.
  • Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E. (2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15(3), 232–246.
  • Stanovich, K.E. (1986). Matthew effects in reading: Some consequences of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 21, 360–407.
  • Taboada, A., Tonks, S., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 85–106. doi: 10.1007/s11145-008-9133-y
  • Trautwein, U., Marsh, H.W., Nagengast, B., Lüdke, O., Nagy, G., & Jonkmann, K. (2012). Probing for the multiplicative term in modern expectancy-value theory: A latent interaction modeling study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 763–777.
  • United States Census Bureau. (2000). United States census. Retrieved from http://censtats.census.gov/pub/Profiles.shtml
  • Valeski, T.N., & Stipek, D.J. (2001). Young children's feelings about school. Child Development, 72, 1198–1213.
  • Wang, J., & Guthrie, J. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162–186.
  • Wigfield, A., & Eccles, J. (2000). Expectancy-value theory of achievement motivation. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 68–81.
  • Wigfield, A., Eccles, J.S., Yoon, K.S., Harold, R.D., Arbreton, A.J. A., Freedman-Doan, C., Blumenfeld, P.C. (1997). Change in children's competence beliefs and subjective task values across the elementary school years: A 3-year study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 451–469.
  • Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J.T. (1997). Relations of children's motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89, 420–432.
  • Woodcock, R.W. (1987). Woodcock reading mastery tests—Revised. Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
  • Zelazo, P.D., Müller, U., Frye, D., & Marcovitch, S. (2003). The development of executive function in early childhood. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 68(3, Serial No. 274).

Reprints and Corporate Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

To request a reprint or corporate permissions for this article, please click on the relevant link below:

Academic Permissions

Please note: Selecting permissions does not provide access to the full text of the article, please see our help page How do I view content?

Obtain permissions instantly via Rightslink by clicking on the button below:

If you are unable to obtain permissions via Rightslink, please complete and submit this Permissions form. For more information, please visit our Permissions help page.