Profiling Students’ Multiple Source Use by Question Type

References

• Andre, T. (1979). Does answering higher-level questions while reading facilitate productive learning? Review of Educational Research, 49(2), 280–318.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anmarkrud, Ø., McCrudden, M.T., Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2013). Task-oriented reading of multiple documents: online comprehension processes and offline products. Instructional Science, 41(5), 1–22.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bacher, J., Wenzig, K., & Vogler, M. (2004). SPSS two-step cluster: A first evaluation. Nürnberg, Germany: Lehrstuhl Soziol. Retrieved from: http://www.statisticalinnovations.com/products/twostep.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Biggs, J.B., & Collins, K.F. (1982). Evaluating the quality of learning: The Solo Taxonomy: Structure of the Observed Learning Outcome. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Braasch, J. L., Bråten, I., Strømsø, H. I., Anmarkrud, Ø., & Ferguson, L. E. (2013). Promoting secondary school students' evaluation of source features of multiple documents. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(3), 180–195.
   Google Scholar
• Braasch, J.L., Lawless, K.A., Goldman, S.R., Manning, F.H., Gomez, K.W., & MacLeod, S.M. (2009). Evaluating search results: An empirical analysis of middle school students’ use of source attributes to select useful sources. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 41(1), 63–82.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand-Gruwel, S., & Stadtler, M. (2011). Solving information-based problems: Evaluating sources and information. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 175–179. doi: 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2010.02.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21(3), 487–508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Britt, M.A., Strømsø, H.I., & Rouet, J.F. (2011). The role of epistemic beliefs in the comprehension of multiple expository texts: Toward an integrated model. Educational Psychologist, 46(1), 48–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H.I. (2003). A longitudinal think-aloud study of spontaneous strategic processing during the reading of multiple expository texts. Reading and Writing, 16(3), 195–218.
   Google Scholar
• Bråten, I., Strømsø, H.I., & Britt, M.A. (2009). Trust matters: Examining the role of source evaluation in students’ construction of meaning within and across multiple texts. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(1), 6–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., & Aglinskas, C. (2002). Improving students’ ability to identify and use source information. Cognition and Instruction, 20(4), 485–522.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., Rouet, J.F., & Braasch, J.L. G. (2013). Documents as entities: Extending the situation model theory of comprehension. In M.A. Britt, S.R. Goldman, & J.F. Rouet (Eds.), Reading: From words to multiple texts (pp. 160–180). New York: Routledge, Taylor & Francis Group.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., Rouet, J.F., & Perfetti, C.A. (1996). Using hypertext to study and reason about historical evidence. In J.F. Rouet, J.J. Levonen, A. Dillon, & R.J. Spiro (Eds.), Hypertext and cognition (pp. 43–72). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Britt, M.A., & Sommer, J. (2004). Facilitating textual integration with macro-structure focusing tasks. Reading Psychology, 25(4), 313–339.
   Google Scholar
• Cerdán, R., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2008). The effects of tasks on integrating information from multiple documents. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 209–222.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerdán, R., Vidal-Abarca, E., Martínez, T., Gilabert, R., & Gil, L. (2009). Impact of question-answering tasks on search processes and reading comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 19(1), 13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J. (2003). Exploring literacy on the Internet: reading comprehension on the Internet: expanding our understanding of reading comprehension to encompass new literacies. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 458–464.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., & Dobler, E. (2007). Exploring the online reading comprehension strategies used by sixth-grade skilled readers to search for and locate information on the Internet. Reading Research Quarterly, 42(2), 214–257.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coiro, J., & Kennedy, C. (2011). The Online Reading Comprehension Assessment (ORCA) project: Preparing students for Common Core Standards and 21st century literacies. Retrieved from http://www.orca.uconn.edu/orca/assets/File/Research%20Reports/CCSS%20ORCA%20Alignment%20June%202011.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common Core state standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Council of Chief State School Officers and the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices.
   Google Scholar
• Dreher, M. J., & Guthrie, J. T. (1990). Cognitive processes in textbook chapter search tasks. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(4), 323–339.
   Google Scholar
• Eveland, W.P. , Jr., & Dunwoody, S. (2000). Examining information processing on the World Wide Web using think aloud protocols. Media Psychology, 2(3), 219–244.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ferguson, L.E., & Bråten, I. (2013). Student profiles of knowledge and epistemic beliefs: Changes and relations to multiple-text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 25, 49–61.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flesch, R. (1979). How to write in plain English: A book for lawyers and consumers. New York: Harper.
   Google Scholar
• Ford, N., & Chen, S.Y. (2000). Individual differences, hypermedia navigation, and learning: An empirical study. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 9(4), 281–311.
   Google Scholar
• Gerjets, P., Kammerer, Y., & Werner, B. (2011). Measuring spontaneous and instructed evaluation processes during Web search: Integrating concurrent thinking-aloud protocols and eye-tracking data. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 220–231.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gil, L., Bråten, I., Vidal-Abarca, E., & Strømsø, H.I. (2010). Understanding and integrating multiple science texts: Summary tasks are sometimes better than argument tasks. Reading Psychology, 31(1), 30–68. doi: 10.1080/02702710902733600
   Google Scholar
• Goldman, S.R. (2011). Choosing and using multiple information sources: Some new findings and emergent issues. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 238–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Goldman, S.R., & Scardamalia, M. (2013). Preface for the special issue multiple document comprehension. Cognition and Instruction, 31(2), 121–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graesser, A., Rus, V., & Cai, Z. (2008). Question classification schemes. Proceedings from WS on the QGSTEC: 1st Workshop on Intelligent Tutoring Systems. Retrieved from http://qg.cs.memphis.edu/papers/QG2008/PDFs/16-GraesserEtAl-QG08.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J.T. (1988). Locating information in documents: Examination of a cognitive model. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(2), 178–199.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hofman, R., & Van Oostendorp, H. (1999). Cognitive effects of a structural overview in a hypertext. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30(2), 129–140.
   Google Scholar
• Kammerer, Y., & Gerjets, P. (2012). Effects of search interface and Internet-specific epistemic beliefs on source evaluations during Web search for medical information: an eye-tracking study. Behavior and Information Technology, 31(1), 83–97.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kincaid, J. P., Fishburne, R., Rogers, R. L, & Chissom, B. S. (1975). Derivation of new readability formulas (Automated Readability Index, Fog Count, and Flesch Reading Ease formula) for Navy enlisted personnel (Branch Report 8-75). Millington, TN: Chief of Naval Training.
   Google Scholar
• Le Bigot, L., & Rouet, J.F. (2007). The impact of presentation format, task assignment, and prior knowledge on students’ comprehension of multiple online documents. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(4), 445–470.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• List, A., & Alexander, P. A. (2015). Examining response confidence in multiple text tasks. Metacognition and Learning, 10(3) 407–436.
   Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Boldrin, A., & Ariasi, N. (2010). Searching the Web to learn about a controversial topic: Are students epistemically active? Instructional Science, 38(6), 607–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McCrudden, M.T., & Schraw, G. (2009). The effects of relevance instructions and verbal ability on text processing. The Journal of Experimental Education, 78(1), 96–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Metzger, M.J., Flanagin, A.J., & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education, 41(3), 271–290.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Milligan, G.W. (1996). Clustering validation: Results and implications for applied analyses. In P. Arabie, L.J. Hubert, & G.De Soete (Eds.), Clustering and classification (pp. 341–376). River Edge, NJ: World Scientific Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Milligan, G.W., & Hirtle, S.C. (2013). Clustering and classification methods. In I.B. Weiner, J.A. Schinka, & W.F. Vellicer (Eds.), Handbook of psychology, Volume 2: Research methods in psychology (pp. 189–210). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar
• Mooi, E.A., & Sarstedt, M. (2011). Cluster analysis. In E.A. Mooi & M. Sarstedt (Eds.), A concise guide to market research: The process, data, and methods using IBM SPSS statistics (pp. 237–84). New York: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar
• Norušis, M.J. (2005). SPSS 13.0 guide to data analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Pastor, D.A. (2010). Cluster analysis. In G.R. Hancock & R.O. Mueller (Eds.), The reviewer's guide to quantitative methods in the social sciences (pp. 41–54). New York: Taylor & Francis.
   Google Scholar
• Payne, S.J., & Reader, W.R. (2006). Constructing structure maps of multiple on-line texts. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 64(5), 461–474.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pieschl, S., Stahl, E., & Bromme, R. (2008). Epistemological beliefs and self-regulated learning with hypertext. Metacognition and Learning, 3(1), 17–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purcell, K., Rainie, L., Heaps, A., Buchanan, J., Friedrich, L., Jacklin, A.,…Zickuhr, K. (2012). How teens do research in the digital world. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://www.pewinternet.org/∼/media//Files/Reports/2012/PIP_TeacherSurveyReportWithMethodology110112.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Raine, L., & Purcell, K. (2010). The economics of online news. Pew Internet & American Life Project. Retrieved from http://pewinternet.org/Reports/2010/5–The-economics-of-online-news/Media.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Reader, W.R., & Payne, S.J. (2007). Allocating time across multiple texts: Sampling and satisficing. Human Computer Interaction, 22(3), 263–298.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rokach, L., & Maimon, O. (2005) Clustering methods. In O. Maimon & L. Rokach (Eds.), Data mining and knowledge discovery handbook (pp. 321–352). New York: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Rothkopf, E. Z., & Bisbicos, E. E. (1967). Selective facilitative effects of interspersed questions on learning from written materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 58(1), 56–61.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.F. (2003). What was I looking for? The influence of task specificity and prior knowledge on students’ search strategies in hypertext. Interacting with Computers, 15(3), 409–428.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.F. (2006). The skills of document use: From text comprehension to Web-based learning. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.F., & Britt, M.A. (2011). Relevance processes in multiple document comprehension. In M.T. McCrudden, J.P. Magliano, & G. Schraw (Eds.), Text relevance and learning from text (pp.19–52). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.F., Britt, M.A., Mason, R.A., & Perfetti, C.A. (1996). Using multiple sources of evidence to reason about history. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(3), 478–493.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.F., Ros, C., Goumi, A., Macedo-Rouet, M., & Dinet, J. (2011). The influence of surface and deep cues on primary and secondary school students’ assessment of relevance in Web menus. Learning and Instruction, 21(2), 205–219.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.F., & Vidal-Abarca, E. (2002). Mining for meaning: Cognitive effects of inserted questions in learning from scientific text. The psychology of science text comprehension, (pp.417–436). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Rouet, J.-F., Vidal-Abarca, E., Erboul, A.B., & Millogo, V. (2001). Effects of information search tasks on the comprehension of instructional text. Discourse Processes, 31(2), 163–186. doi: 10.1207/S15326950DP3102_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., & Kammerer, Y. (2012). Selecting pages from Google to learn about a controversial topic: The role of epistemic beliefs. In de Vries, E. & Scheiter, K. (Eds.), Proceedings from EARLI Sig 2: Staging knowledge and experience: How to take advantage of representational technologies in education and training? (pp. 181–183). Grenoble, France: EARLI.
   Google Scholar
• Salmerón, L., Kintsch, W., & Cañas, J.J. (2006). Coherence or interest as basis for improving hypertext comprehension. Information Design Journal, 14(1), 45–55.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S., Hynd, C., Britton, B., McNish, M., & Bosquet, D. (1996). What happens when students read multiple source documents in history? Reading Research Quarterly, 31(4), 430–456.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Britt, M. A. (2010). Reading multiple texts about climate change: The relationship between memory for sources and text comprehension. Learning and Instruction, 20(3), 192–204.
   Google Scholar
• Strømsø, H.I., Bråten, I., Britt, M.A., & Ferguson, L.E. (2013). Spontaneous sourcing among students reading multiple documents. Cognition and Instruction, 31, 176–203.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., Mañá, A., & Gil, L. (2010). Individual differences for self-regulating task-oriented reading activities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 817–826.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., Martinez, T., Salmerón, L., Cerdán, R., Gilabert, R., Gil, L.,... & Ferris, R. (2011). Recording online processes in task-oriented reading with Read&Answer. Behavior Research Methods, 43(1), 179–192.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., Mengual, V., Sanjose, V., & Rouet, J. F. (1996, September). Levels of comprehension of scientific prose: The role of text and task variables. Paper presented at the International Seminar on Using Complex Information Systems, Poitiers, France.
   Google Scholar
• Vidal-Abarca, E., & Sanjose, V. (1998). Levels of comprehension of scientific prose: The role of text variables. Learning and Instruction, 8(3), 215–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Voss, J.F., & Wiley, J. (1997). Developing understanding while writing essays in history. International Journal of Educational Research, 27(3), 255–265.
   Google Scholar
• Wallace, R.M. C., Kupperman, J., Krajcik, J., & Soloway, E. (2000). Science on the Web: Students online in a sixth-grade classroom. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 9(1), 75–104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, Y.M., & Artero, M. (2005). Caught in the Web: University student use of Web resources. Educational Media International, 42(1), 71–82.
   Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., Goldman, S.R., Graesser, A.C., Sanchez, C.A., Ash, I.K., & Hemmerich, J.A. (2009). Source evaluation, comprehension, and learning in Internet science inquiry tasks. American Educational Research Journal, 46(4), 1060–1106. doi: 10.3102/0002831209333183
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wiley, J., & Voss, J.E. (1999). Constructing arguments from multiple sources: Tasks that promote understanding and not just memory for text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), 301–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S., & Payne, S. (2006, September). Eye tracking to identify strategies used by readers seeking information from on-line texts. Proceedings of the 13th European conference on cognitive ergonomics: Trust and control in complex socio-technical systems (pp. 115–116). New York: Association for Computing Machinery.
   Google Scholar
• Wilkinson, S.C., Reader, W., & Payne, S.J. (2012). Adaptive browsing: Sensitivity to time pressure and task difficulty. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 70(1), 14–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wixson, K.K. (1983). Postreading question–answer interactions and children's learning from text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(3), 413–423.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar