The view from here: Emergence of graphical literacy

References

• Abel, R. R., & Kulhavy, R. W. (1986). Maps, mode of text presentation, and children's prose learning. American Educational Research Journal, 23, 263–274.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albers, P. (2008). Theorizing visual representation in children's literature. Journal of Literacy Research, 40, 163–200. doi: 10.1080/10862960802411901
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anthony, J. L., Lonigan, C. J., Driscoll, K., Phillips, B. M., & Burgess, S. R. (2003). Phonological sensititivity: A quasi-parallel progression of word structure units and cognitive operations. Reading Research Quarterly, 38(4), 470–487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applegate, M. D., Quinn, K. B., & Applegate, A. J. (2006). Profiles in comprehension. The Reading Teacher, 60, 48–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Avgerinou, M. D. (2009). Re-viewing visual literacy in the “bain d'images” era. TechTrends, 53(2), 28–34.
   Google Scholar
• Bain, R. (2006). Rounding up unusual suspects: Facing the authority hidden in the history classroom. Teachers College Record, 108, 2080–2114.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C. (2001). A sociocultural perspective on children's understanding of historical change: Comparative findings in Northern Ireland and the United States. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 881–913.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Barton, K. C. & Levstik, L. S. (1996). Back when God was around and everything: Elementary children's understanding of historical time. American Educational Research Journal, 33(2), 419–454.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children's comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29, 137–164.
   Google Scholar
• Brugar, K. A., & Roberts, K. L. (2017). Seeing is believing: Promoting visual literacy in elementary social studies. Journal of Teacher Education. 68, 262–279.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carney, R. N., & Levin, J. R. (2002). Pictorial illustrations still improve students' learning from text. Educational Psychology Review, 14(1), 5–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Center for Educational Performance Information. (2016). MIDashboard. Retrieved from http://www.michigan.gov/cepi
   Google Scholar
• Chandler, D. (1996). Engagement with media: Shaping and being shaped. Retrieved from http://visual-memory.co.uk/daniel/Documents/short/determ.html
   Google Scholar
• Chandler-Olcott, K., Doerr, H. M., Hinchman, K. A., & Masingila, J. O. (2015). Bypass, augment, or integrate: How secondary mathematics teachers address the literacy demands of standards-based curriculum materials. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(4), 439–472.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clay, M. (1993, 2005). An observation survey of early literacy achievement. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Council of Chief State School Officers & the National Governors Association Center for Best Practices. (2010). Common Core state standards for English language arts. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELAStandards.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., Roberts, K. L., & Norman, R. R. (2011, May). Young children's understanding of specific graphical devices in informational text. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the International Reading Association, Orlando, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Eco, U. (1976). A theory of semiotics. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z. (1996). Illustrations, text, and the child reader: What are pictures in children's storybooks for? Reading Horizons, 37, 130–142.
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., & Coatoam, S. (2013). Disciplinary literacy: What you want to know about it. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56, 627–633.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fingeret, L. (2012). Graphics in children's informational texts: A content analysis (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Fitchett, P. G., & Heafner, T. L. (2010). A national perspective on the effects of high-stakes testing and standardization on elementary social studies marginalization. Theory and Research in Social Education, 38(1), 114–130.
   Google Scholar
• Fitchett, P. G., Heafner, T. L., & VanFossen, P. (2014). An analysis of time prioritization for social studies in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 8(2), 7–35.
   Google Scholar
• Foster, S. J., Hoge, J. D., & Rosch, R. H. (1999). Thinking aloud about history: Children's and adolescent's responses to historical photographs. Theory and Research in Social Education, 27(2), 179–214.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gersmehl, P. J., & Gersmehl, C. A. (2007). Spatial thinking and young children: Neurologic evidence for early development and “educability.” Journal of Geography, 106(5), 181–191.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gregg, M. (1997). Problem posing from maps: Utilizing understanding. Journal of Geography, 96(5), 250–256.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Haas, M. E., & Laughlin, M. A. (2001). A profile of elementary social studies teachers and their classrooms. Social Education, 65(2), 122–126.
   Google Scholar
• Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6(2), 65–70.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hung, Y. N. (2014). “What are you looking at?” An eye movement exploration in science text reading. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12, 241–260. doi: 10.1007/s10763-013-9406-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jian, Y. C. (2016). Fourth graders' cognitive processes and learning strategies for reading illustrated biology texts: Eye movement measurements. Reading Research Quarterly, 51, 93–109. doi: 10.1002/rrq.125
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kress, G., & van Leeuwen, T. (2006). Reading images: The grammar of visual design. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lehrer, R., & Schauble, L. (2000). Inventing data structures for presentation purposes: Elementary grade students' classification models. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 2(1 & 2), 51–74.
   Google Scholar
• Liebfreund, M. D., & Conradi, K. (2016). Component skills affecting elementary students' informational text comprehension. Reading and Writing, 29, 1141–1160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marti, E., Garcia-Mila, M., Gabucio, F., & Konstantinidou, K. (2011). The construction of a double-entry table: A study of primary and secondary school students' difficulties. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26, 215–234. doi: 10.1007/sl0212-010-0046-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masterman, E., & Rogers, Y. (2002). A framework for designing interactive multimedia to scaffold young children's understanding of historical chronology. Instructional Science, 30, 221–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayer, R. E., Bove, W., Bryman, A., Mars, R., & Tapangco, L. (1996). When less is more: Meaningful learning from visual and verbal summaries of science textbook lessonss. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 64–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., & Floyd, R. G. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers' prior knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 229–258.
   Google Scholar
• McTigue, E. M. (2008). Does multimedia learning theory extend to middle-school students? Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34, 143–153. doi: 10.1016/j.cedpsych.2008.12.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Education. (n.d.). MI school data: District/school information. Retrieved from https://www.mischooldata.org
   Google Scholar
• Michigan Department of Education Bureau of Assessment and Accountability. (n.d.). Fall 2013 statewide Michigan Educational Assessment Program (MEAP) results. Lansing, MI: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Myers, L. J., & Liben, L. S. (2012). Graphic symbols as the “mind on paper”: Links between children's interpretive theory of mind and symbol understanding. Child Development, 83, 186–202. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2011.01693.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Myers, L. J., & Liben, L. S. (2008). The role of intentionality and iconicity in children's developing comprehension and production of cartographic symbols. Child Development, 79(3), 668–684.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies (NCSS). (2013). The college, career, and civic life (C3) framework for social studies state standards: Guidance for enhancing the rigor of K-12 civics, economics, geography, and history. Silver Spring, MD: NCSS.
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of Mathematics. (2000). Math standards and expectations: Measurement. Retrieved from http://www.nctm.org/standards/content.aspx?id=316#apply
   Google Scholar
• National Geographic Society. (2005). Mapmaking guide (6–8). Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• Noll, R. B., Zeller, M. H., Vannatta, K., Bukowski, W. M., & Davies, W. H. (1997). Potential bias in classroom research: Comparison of children with permission and those who did not recieve permission to participate. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 26(1), 36–42.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Norman, R. R. (2012). Reading the graphics: What is the relationship between graphical reading processes and student comprehension? Reading and Writing, 25, 739–774. doi: 10.1007/s11145-011-9298-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nuthall, G., & Alton-Lee, A. (1995). Assessing classroom learning: How students use their knowledge and experience to answer classroom achievement test questions in science and social studies. American Educational Research Journal, 32, 185–223.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Otero, J. (2014). Noticing and fixing difficulties while understanding science texts. In J. Otero, J. A. Leon & A. C. Graesser (Eds.), The psychology of science text comprehension (pp. 281–308). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Otero, J. C., & Kintsch, W. (1992). Failures to detect contradictions in a text: What readers believe versus what they read. Psychological Science, 3, 229–235.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paivio, A. (1991). Dual coding theory: Retrospect and current status. Canadian Journal of Psychology, 45(3), 255–287.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Park, Y. (2008). Patterns in and predictors of elementary studetns' reading performance: Evidence from the data of the Progress in International Reading Literacy Study (PIRLS) (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Michigan State University, East Lansing, MI.
   Google Scholar
• Peeck, J. (1993). Increasing picture effects in learning from illustrated text. Learning and Instruction, 3, 227–238. doi:10.1016/0959-4752(93)90006-L
   Google Scholar
• Perie, M., Grigg, W., & Donahue, P. (2005). The nation's report card: Reading 2005 (NCES 2006-451). U.S. department of education, national center for education statistics. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• Pozzer-Ardenghi, L., & Roth, W. M. (2004). Making sense of photographs. Science Education, 89(2), 219–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal protocols of reading. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Raphael, T. E., & Au, K. H. (2005). QAR: Enhancing comprehension and test taking scross grades and content areas. The Reading Teacher, 59(3), 206–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. L., & Brugar, K. (2014). Navigating maps to support comprehension: When textbooks don't have GPS. Geography Teacher, 11, 149–163.
   Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. L., Norman, R. R., & Cocco, J. (2015). Relationship between graphical device comprehension and overall text comprehension for third-grade children. Reading Psychology, 36, 389–420. doi:10.1080/02702711.2013.865693
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roberts, K. L., Norman, R. R., Morsink, P., Duke, N. K., Martin, N. M., & Knight, J. A. (2013). Diagrams, timelines, and tables—Oh, my! Twelve strategies for developing children's concepts of graphics and comprehension of graphical devices in informational text. Reading Teacher, 67, 12–23. doi:10.1002/TRTR.1174
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Roth, W. M., Bowen, G. M., & McGinn, M. K. (1999). Differences in graph-related practices between high school biology textbooks and scientific ecology journals. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 977–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1938). Literature as exploration. London, UK: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (1969). Towards a transactional theory of reading. Journal of Reading Behavior, 1(1), 31–51.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. M. (2004). The transactional theory of reading and writing. In R. B. Ruddell & N. J. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (pp. 1363–1398). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Segall, A. (2003). Maps as stories about the world. Social Studies and the Young Learner, 16(1), 21–25.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. (2012). Expanding the four resources model: Reading visual and multi-modal texts. Pedagogies: An International Journal, 7, 150–164.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., & Shanahan, C. (2008). Teaching disciplinary literacy to adolescents: Rethinking content-area literacy. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 40–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sierschynski, J., Louie, B., & Pughe, B. (2014). Complexity in picture books. Reading Teacher, 68, 287–295.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Street, B. (2009). Ethnography of writing and reading. In D. R. Olson & N. Torrance (Eds.), The Cambridge handbook of literacy (pp. 329–345). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• VanSledright, B. A. (2002). In search of America's past: Learning to read in elementary school. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Werner, W. (2004). “What does this picture say?” Reading the intertextuality of visual images. International Journal of Social Education, 19(1), 64–77.
   Google Scholar
• Whitehurst, G. J., & Lonigan, C. J. (1998). Child development and emergent literacy. Child Development, 69(3), 848–872.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (1991). On the reading of historical texts: Notes on the breach between school and academy. American Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 495–519.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (2001). Historical thinking and other unnatural acts: Charting the future of teaching the past. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Wineburg, S. S. (2003). Teaching the mind good habits. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 49(31), B20.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, H. K., & Krajcik, J. S. (2006). Inscriptional practices in two inquiry-based classrooms: A case study of seventh graders' use of data tables and graphs. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43, 63–95. doi:10.1002/tea.20092
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yaden, D. B., Jr., Rowe, D. W., & MacGillivray, L. (2000). Emergent literacy: A matter of (polyphony) of perspectives. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 425–454). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Yeh, Y., & McTigue, E. M. (2009). The frequency, variation, and function of graphical representations within standardized state science tests. School Science and Mathematics, 109, 435–450. doi:10.1080/02702711.2013.865693
   Google Scholar
• Yenawine, P. (2013). Visual thinking strategies: Using art to deepen learning across school disciplines. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar