Profiles of Readers in a Digital Age

References

• Applegate, A. J., & Applegate, M. D. (2004). The Peter effect: Reading habits and attitudes of preservice teachers. The Reading Teacher, 57, 554–563. doi:10.2307/20205399
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Applegate, A. J., Applegate, M. D., Mercantini, M. A., McGeehan, C. M., Cobb, J. B., DeBoy, J. R., … Lewinski, K. E. (2014). The Peter effect revisited: Reading habits and attitudes of college students. Literacy Research and Instruction, 53, 188–204. doi:0.1080/19388071.2014.898719
   Google Scholar
• Baron, N. S. (2015). Words onscreen: The fate of reading in a digital world. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Berg, S. A., Hoffmann, K., & Dawson, D. (2010). Not on the same page: Undergraduates’ information retrieval in electronic and print books. The Journal of Academic Librarianship, 36, 518–525. doi:10.1016/j.acalib.2010.08.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernard, M., Liao, C. H., & Mills, M. (2001). The effects of font type and size on the legibility and reading time of online text by older adults. Paper presented at the CHI’01 Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Seattle, WA. March 31–April 05, 2001.
   Google Scholar
• Bibby, R. W., Russell, S., & Rolheiser, R. (2009). The emerging millennials: How Canada’s newest generation is responding to change & choice. Lethbridge, AB: Project Canada Books.
   Google Scholar
• Boyd, D. M., & Ellison, N. B. (2007). Social network sites: Definition, history, and scholarship. Journal of Computer: Mediated Communication, 13(1), 210–230. doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2007.00393.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• De Naeghel, J., Van Keer, H., Vansteenkiste, M., & Rosseel, Y. (2012). The relation between elementary students’ recreational and academic reading motivation, reading frequency, engagement, and comprehension: A self-determination theory perspective. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104, 1006. doi:10.1037/a0027800
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hooper, M. (2012). Who says print is dead. The Guardian. Retrieved from http://www.theguardian.com/media/2012/jun/03/who-says-print-is-dead
   Google Scholar
• Huang, S., Capps, M., Blacklock, J., & Garza, M. (2014). Reading habits of college students in the United States. Reading Psychology, 35, 437–467. doi:10.1080/02702711.2012.739593
   Google Scholar
• Hughes-Hassell, S., & Rodge, P. (2007). The leisure reading habits of urban adolescents. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(1), 22–33. doi:10.2307/40015543
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• ITU. (2016). Measuring the information society report. Geneva, Switzerland: International Telecommunication Union.
   Google Scholar
• Junco, R. (2012). Too much face and not enough books: The relationship between multiple indices of Facebook use and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 28(1), 187–198. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2011.08.026
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Karim, N. S. A., & Hasan, A. (2007). Reading habits and attitude in the digital age. The Electronic Library, 25, 285–298. doi:10.1108/02640470710754805
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kauffman, D. F., Zhao, R., & Yang, Y.-S. (2011). Effects of online note taking formats and self-monitoring prompts on learning from online text: Using technology to enhance self-regulated learning. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 36, 313–322. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2011.04.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirschner, P. A., & Karpinski, A. C. (2010). Facebook® and academic performance. Computers in Human Behavior, 26, 1237–1245. doi:10.1016/j.chb.2010.03.024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2005). Student engagement in the first year of college. In M. L. Upcraft, J. N. Gardner, & B. O. Barefoot (Eds.), Challenging and supporting the first-year student: A handbook for improving the first year of college (pp. 86–107). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
   Google Scholar
• Kuh, G. D. (2007). What student engagement data tell us about college readiness. Peer Review, 9, 4–8.
   Google Scholar
• Larson, K. (2007). The technology of text. IEEE Spectrum, 44(5), 26–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. (2005). Reading behavior in the digital environment: Changes in reading behavior over the past ten years. Journal of Documentation, 61, 700–712. doi:10.1108/00220410510632040
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu, Z. (2006). Print vs. electronic resources: A study of user perceptions, preferences, and use. Information Processing & Management, 42, 583–592. doi:10.1016/j.ipm.2004.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mangen, A., Walgermo, B. R., & Brønnick, K. (2013). Reading linear texts on paper versus computer screen: Effects on reading comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2012.12.002
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., Reichard, C. A., & Gardner, A. (2009). The impact of internet and television use on the reading habits and practices of college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 52, 609–619. doi:10.1598/JAAL.52.7.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moreno, M. A., Jelenchick, L., Koff, R., Eikoff, J., Diermyer, C., & Christakis, D. A. (2012). Internet use and multitasking among older adolescents: An experience sampling approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1097–1102.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullen, A. L., Goyette, K. A., & Soares, J. A. (2003). Who goes to graduate school? Social and academic correlates of educational continuation after college. Sociology of Education, 76(2), 143–169.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NEA. (2004). Reading At risk: A survey of literary reading in America (10632913). Retrieved from https://www.arts.gov/publications/reading-risk-survey-literary-reading-america-0
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2011). Education at a Glance: OECD Indicators. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). PISA digital skills. Retrieved from http://www.compareyourcountry.org/pisa-digital?cr=oecd&lg=en&page =0&visited =1#
   Google Scholar
• Pfost, M., Dörfler, T., & Artelt, C. (2013). Students’ extracurricular reading behavior and the development of vocabulary and reading comprehension. Learning and Individual Differences, 26, 89–102. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2013.04.008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Phillips, A. (2010). Kicking the habit: The decline of reading in Europe? LOGOS, 21(3), 31–36. doi:10.1163/095796511X559927
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius, E. J. (2002). Reading ability and academic performance in South Africa: Are we fiddling while Rome is burning? Language Matters, 33(1), 169–196. doi:10.1080/10228190208566183
   Google Scholar
• Pretorius, E. J., & Mampuru, D. M. (2007). Playing football without a ball: Language, reading and academic performance in a high‐poverty school. Journal of Research in Reading, 30(1), 38–58. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2006.00333.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Putro, N. H. P. S., & Lee, J. (2017). Reading interest in a digital age. Reading Psychology, 38(8), 778–807. doi:10.1080/02702711.2017.1341966
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sainsbury, M., & Schagen, I. (2004). Attitudes to reading at ages nine and eleven. Journal of Research in Reading, 27, 373–386. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2004.00240.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sandberg, K. (2011). College student academic online reading: A review of the current literature. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 42(1), 89–98. doi:10. 1089/10949310 41774613
   Google Scholar
• Smith, S. D., & Caruso, J. B. (2010). The ECAR study of undergraduate students and information technology, 2010. Boulder, CO: EDUCAUSE Center for Applied Research.
   Google Scholar
• Stolzenberg, R. M. (1994). Educational continuation by college graduates. American Journal of Sociology, 99, 1042–1077.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner, M. J. (2014). Digital vs. print: Reading comprehension and the future of the book. SLIS Student Research Journal, 4, 6.
   Google Scholar
• Van Rees, K., Vermunt, J., & Verboord, M. (1999). Cultural classifications under discussion latent class analysis of highbrow and lowbrow reading. Poetics, 26(5–6), 349–365. doi:10.1016/S0304-422X(99)00019-4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wang, J., & Wang, X. (2012). Structural equation modeling: Applications using Mplus. West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons.
   Google Scholar