Digging Deeper: Understanding the Reading and Motivational Profiles of Students Who Do Not Demonstrate Proficiency on State-Mandated Reading Assessments

References

• Afflerbach, P. (2004). Assessing adolescent reading. In T. L. Jetton & J. A. Dole (Eds.), Adolescent literacy research and practice (pp.369–391). New York: Guilford.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (2001). What really matters for struggling readers. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (2009). Literacy policies that are needed: Thinking beyond No Child Left Behind. In Y. Goodman & J. Hoffman (Eds.), Changing literacies, changing times: A historical perspective on the future of reading research, public policy, and classroom practices. (pp. 266-281). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L., & McGill-Franzen, A. (1992). Unintended effects of educational reform in New York. Educational Policy, 6(4),397–414.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Wigfield, A. (1999). Dimensions of children’s motivation for reading and their relations to reading activity and reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(4),452–477. doi:10.1598/RRQ.34.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bobbitt Nolen, S., Ward, C. J., & Seidel Horn, I. (2011). Motivation, engagement, and identity: Opening a conservation. In D. M. McInerney, R. A. Walker, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: Looking back, looking forward, volume 10 in research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp.109–136). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Brown-Jeffy, S., & Cooper, J. E. (2011). Toward a conceptual framework of culturally relevant pedagogy: An overview of the conceptual and theoretical literature. Teacher Education Quarterly, 38,65–84.
   Google Scholar
• Buly, M. R., & Valencia, S. W. (2002). Below the bar: Profiles of students who fail state reading assessments. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 24(3),219–239. doi:10.3102/01623737024003219
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cambria, J., & Guthrie, J. T. (2010). Motivating and engaging students in reading. New England Reading Association Journal, 46,16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cattell, R. B. (1966). The SCREE test for the number of factors. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 1(2),245–276. doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr0102_10
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Common Core State Standards Initiative. (2010). Common core state standards for ELA. Retrieved from http://corestandards.org
   Google Scholar
• Crowley, S. L., & Fan, X. (1997). Structural equation modeling: Basic concepts and applications in personality assessment research. Journal of Personality Assessment, 68(3),508–531. doi:10.1207/s15327752jpa6803_4
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, D. V. (2013). Heterogeneity or homogeneity: What assessment data reveal about struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1),3–21. doi:10.1177/1086296X12468431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunn, L. M., & Dunn, L. M. (2007). Peabody picture vocabulary test (4th ed.). Circle Pines, MN: American Guidance Service.
   Google Scholar
• Every Student Succeeds Act (ESSA) of (2015). Pub.L. 114-95.
   Google Scholar
• Eccles J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., & Midgley, C. (1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. In J. T. Spence (Ed.), Achievement and achievement motivation (pp. 75–146). San Francisco, CA: W. H. Freeman.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Ivey, G. (2006). Evaluating the interventions for struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 50, 180–189.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (Eds.). (2002). Dynamic indicators of early basic literacy skills (6th ed.). Eugene, OR: Institute for the Development of Educational Achievement.
   Google Scholar
• Good, R. H., & Kaminski, R. A. (2011). DIBELS next assessment manual. Longmont, CO: Sopris.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3),282–313. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., You, W., (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. L. Christenson (Ed.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp.610–634). Springer Science & Business Media. doi:10.1007/978-1-4614-2018-7_29.
   Google Scholar
• Henson, R. K., & Roberts, J. K. (2006). Use of exploratory factor analysis in published research common errors and some comment on improved practice. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(3),393–416. doi:10.1177/0013164405282485
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hickey, D. (2011). Participation by design: Improving individual motivation by looking beyond it. In D. M. McInerney, R. A. Walker, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: Looking back, looking forward. Research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp.137–161). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Ivey, G., & Johnston, P. H. (2013). Engagement with young adults’ literature: Outcomes and processes. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(3),255–275. doi:10.1002/rrq.46
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ivey, G., & Johnston, P. H. (2015). Engaged reading as a collaborative transformative practice. Journal of Literacy Research, 47(3),297–327. doi:10.1177/1086296X15619731
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (2015). LISREL 9.20 for windows [Computer software]. Skokie, IL: Scientific Software International, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kaiser, H. F. (1958). The varimax criterion for analytic rotation in factor analysis. Psychometrika, 23(3),187–200. doi:10.1007/BF02289233
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kline, R. B. (2010). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Leach, J. M., Scarborough, H. S., & Rescorla, L. (2003). Late-emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2),211. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.2.211
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., & Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties among language minority learners and their classmates in early adolescence. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3),596–632. doi:10.3102/0002831209355469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leslie, L., & Caldwell, J. S. (2006). Qualitative reading inventory (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
   Google Scholar
• Linn, R. L. (2000). Assessments and accountability. Educational Researcher, 29,4–16. doi:10.3102/0013189X029002004
   Google Scholar
• McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. H. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7(1),64. doi:10.1037//1082-989X.7.1.64
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meyer, C. K., Trathen, W., Morris, D., McGee, J., Stewart, T. T., Vines, N. A., & Gill, T. (2013). Reading profiles of struggling middle-school readers: What does it mean in the era of the Common Core State Standards. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Literacy Researchers Association, Dallas, Texas. Abstract retrieved from https://secure.literacyresearchassociation.org/papers/lra2013123204531.doc
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
   Google Scholar
• No Child Left Behind Act of 2001, Pub. L. No. 107-110.
   Google Scholar
• Pierce, M. E., Katzir, T., Wolf, M., & Noam, G. G. (2007). Clusters of second and third grade dysfluent urban readers. Reading and Writing, 20,885–907. doi:10.1007/s11145-007-9058-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rupp, A. A., & Lesaux, N. K. (2006). Meeting expectations? An empirical investigation of a standards-based assessment of reading comprehension. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 28(4),315–333. doi:10.3102/01623737028004315
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• SAS Institute Inc. (2013). SAS 9.4 Help and documentation. Cary, NC.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (1999). Interest and learning from text. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3),257–279.
   Google Scholar
• Sharma, S. (1996). Applied Multivariate Techniques. New York: John Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Shepard, L. (2000). The role of classroom assessment in teaching and learning (CSE Technical Report 517). Los Angeles, CA: National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
   Google Scholar
• Slavin, R. E., Cheung, A., Holmes, G. C., Madden, N. A., & Chamberlain, A. (2013). Effects of a data-driven district reform model on state assessment outcomes. American Educational Research Journal, 50(2),371–396.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Solis, M., Miciak, J., Vaughn, S., & Fletcher, J. M. (2014). Why intensive interventions matter: Longitudinal studies of adolescents with reading disabilities and poor reading comprehension. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(4),218–229.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Timm, N. (2002). Applied multivariate statistics. Secaucus, NJ: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Unrau, N., & Quirk, M. (2014). Reading motivation and reading engagement: Clarifying commingled conceptions. Reading Psychology, 35(3),260–284.
   Google Scholar
• Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 100(2),81–101.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vadeboncoeur, J. A., Vellos, R. E., & Gosseli, K. P. (2011). Learning as (one part) of identity construction: Educational implications of a sociocultural perspective. In D. M. McInerney, R. A. Walker, & G. A. D. Liem (Eds.), Sociocultural theories of learning and motivation: Looking back, looking forward, volume 10 in research on sociocultural influences on motivation and learning (pp.223–251). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Valencia, S. W., & Buly, M. R. (2004). Behind test scores: What struggling readers really need. Reading Teacher, 57,520–533.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. T., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). The comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. H., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2),162–186.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Gladstone, J. R., & Turci, L. (2016). Beyond cognition: Reading motivation and reading comprehension. Child Development Perspectives, 10(3),190–195. doi: 10.1111/cdep.12184
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1995). Dimensions of children’s motivations for reading: An initial study (Reading Research Report No. 34). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center, Universities of Georgia and Maryland College Park.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1997). Relations of children’s motivation for reading to the amount and breadth of their reading. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89,430–432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yuan, K. H. (2005). Fit indices versus test statistics. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 40(1),115–148.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar