Getting to the Core of Close Reading: What do we Really Know and What Remains to be Seen?

References

• Aukerman, M., & Schuldt, L. C. (2016). Closely reading "Reading Closely". Language Arts, 93(4), 286–299.
   Google Scholar
• Beers, K., & Probst. R. E. (2013). Notice and note: Strategies for close reading. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Beltramo, J. L., & Stillman, J. (2015). Why should students want to do a close reading?. Voices from the Middle, 22(4), 9–14.
   Google Scholar
• Bressler, C. (2007). Literary criticism: An introduction to theory and practice. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J., & Grote-Garcia, S. (2013). Common Core State Standards top the 2014 What’s Hot What’s Not survey. Reading Today, 31(1), 12–16.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J., Grote-Garcia, S. (2014). What’s hot…& what’s not. Reading Today, 32(2), 8–12.
   Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J., Grote-Garcia, S., & Ortlieb, E. (2015). What’s hot in 2016: Recognizing new trends and celebrating 20 years of data. Literacy Today, 33(2), 12–15.
   Google Scholar
• Dalton, B. (2013). Engaging children in close reading: Multimodal commentaries and illustration remix. The Reading Teacher, 66(8), 642–649. doi:10.1002/trtr.1172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dollins, C. A. (2016). Crafting creative nonfiction: From close reading to close writing. The Reading Teacher, 70(1), 49–58. doi:10.1002/trtr.1465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elliott-Johns, S. E., & Puig, E. A. (2015). Collaborative read-alouds: Engaging middle school students in thoughtful reading. Voices from the Middle, 22(4), 26.
   Google Scholar
• Eppley, K. (2015). Seven traps of the Common Core State Standards. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 59(2), 207–216. doi:10.1002/jaal.431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., & Pace, B. G. (2013). Teaching with challenging texts in the disciplines: Text complexity and close reading. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(2), 104–108. doi:10.1002/JAAL.229
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2012). Close reading in elementary schools. The Reading Teacher, 66(3), 179–188. doi:10.1002/TRTR.01117
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014a). Closely reading informational texts in the primary grades. The Reading Teacher, 68(3), 222–227. doi:10.1002/trtr.1317
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014b). Close reading as2 an intervention for struggling middle school readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 57(5), 367–376. doi:10.1002/jaal.266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014c). Contingency teaching during close reading. The Reading Teacher, 68(4), 277–286. doi:10.1002/trtr.1298
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014d). Scaffolded reading instruction of content-area texts. The Reading Teacher, 67(5), 347–351. doi:10.1002/trtr.1234
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2014e). Student and teacher perspectives on close reading protocol. Literacy Research and Instruction, 53(1), 25–49. doi:10.1080/19388071.2013.818175
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2016). Systems for teaching complex texts: A proof-of-concept investigation. The Reading Teacher, 69(4), 403–412. doi:10.1002/trtr.1409
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., Frey, N., & Lapp, D. (2015). That deepen students' interactions with text. Voices from the Middle, 22(4), 19.
   Google Scholar
• Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Chicago, IL: Aldine Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Gormley, K., & McDermott, P. (2015). Searching for evidence – teaching students to become effective readers by visualizing information in texts. The Clearing House, 88(6), 171–177. doi:10.1080/00098655.2015.1074878
   Google Scholar
• Hasty, M. M., & Schrodt, K. E. (2015). Using writing to support close reading: Engagement and evidence from the text. Voices from the Middle, 22(4), 20–25.
   Google Scholar
• Hinchman, K. A., & Moore, D. W. (2013). Close reading: A cautionary interpretation. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(6), 441–450. doi:10.1002/JAAL.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern-Isberner, G., Thimm, M., & Finthammer, M. (2008). Qualitative knowledge discovery. In K. D. Schewe, & B. Thalheim (Eds.), 3rd International Workshop on Semantics in Data and Knowledge Bases (SDKB), Lecture Notes in Computer Science (Vol. 4925, pp. 77–102). New York, NY: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Lapp, D., Grant, M., Moss, B., & Johnson, K. (2013). Students' close reading of science texts: What's now? What's next? Reading Teacher, 67(2), 109–119. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/1651843868?account id=13401
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1990). Literacies programs: Debates and demands in cultural context. Prospect: Australian Journal of TESOL, 5(7), 7–16.
   Google Scholar
• Luke, A., & Freebody, P. (1999). Further notes on the four roles model. www.readingonline.org. Retrieved from http://kingstonnetworknumandlitteam.wikispaces.com/file/view/Further±Notes±on±the±Four±Resources±Model-Allan±Luke.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Newkirk, T. (2016). Unbalanced literacy: Reflections on the Common Core. Language Arts, 93(4), 304–311.
   Google Scholar
• Pape, R. (2015). Preparing our close readers for the new literacies. English Journal, 105(2), 75–81.
   Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Elder, L. (2008). How to read a paragraph: The art of close reading. Dillon Beach, CA: The Foundation for Critical Thinking.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Gallagher, M. C. (1983). The instruction of reading comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 8(3), 317–344. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(83)90019-X
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M.L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.) Handbook of reading research, Volume III. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Richards, I. A. (1929). Practical criticism: A study of critical judgment. London: K. Paul, Trench, & Trubner.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenblatt, L. (1978). The reader, the text, the poem: The transactional theory of the literary work. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Serafini, F. (2013). Close reading and children’s literature. The Reading Teacher, 67(4), 299–301. doi:10.1002/trtr.1213
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sisson, D., & Sisson, B. (2014). The renaissance of close reading: A review of historical and contemporary perspectives. California Reader, 47(4), 8–16.
   Google Scholar
• Springer, S. E., Wilson, T. J., & Dole, J. A. (2014). Ready or not: Recognizing and preparing college-ready students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 58(4), 299–307. doi:10.1002/jaal.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L., & Corbin, J. M. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded Theory procedures and techniques. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Turner, J. D., & Danridge, J. C. (2014). Accelerating the college and career readiness of diverse k-5 literacy learners. Theory into Practice, 53(3), 212–219. doi:10.1080/00405841.2014.916963
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertz, J., & Saine, P. (2014). Using digital technology to complement close reading of complex texts. New England Reading Association Journal, 50(1), 78–81.
   Google Scholar
• Zucker, L. (2016). Under discussion: Teaching speaking and listening. English Journal, 105(5), 92–94.
   Google Scholar