Improving Iranian Graduate Students’ Performance in Reading Scientific Articles in English Through Explicit Strategy Instruction

References

• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. doi: 10.1598/RT.61.5.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen, L., Cipielewski, J., & Stanovich, K. E. (1992). Multiple indicators of children’s reading habits and attitudes: Construct validity and cognitive correlates. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(4), 489–503. doi: 10.1037//0022-0663.84.4.489
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. J. (1991). Individual differences in strategy use in second language reading and testing. The Modern Language Journal, 75(4), 460–472. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-4781.1991.tb05384.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. J. (2009). ACTIVE reading: The research base for a pedagogical approach in the reading classroom. In Z. Han & N. J. Anderson (Eds.), Second language reading research and instruction: Crossing the boundaries (pp. 117–143). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, R. C., Wilson, P. T., & Fielding, L. G. (1988). Growth in reading and how children spend their time outside of school. Reading Research Quarterly, 23(3), 285–303. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.23.3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Understanding advanced second-language reading. New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Block, E. (1986). The comprehension strategies of second language readers. TESOL Quarterly, 20(3), 463–491. doi: 10.2307/3586295
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L. (1998). Can reading strategies be successfully taught? Australian Review of Applied Linguistics, 21(1), 1–20. doi: 10.1075/aral.21.1.01car
   Google Scholar
• Caverly, D. (1997). Teaching reading in a learning assistance center. In S. Mioduski & G. Enright (Eds.), Proceedings of the 17th and 18th annual institutes for learning assistance professionals: 1996 and 1997. Arizona: University Learning Center, University of Arizona.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U. (1994). A model for learning strategies instruction in the foreign language classroom. In J. Alatis (Ed.), Georgetown University roundtable on linguistics and applied linguistics (pp. 323–326). Washington: Georgetown University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U. (2008). Learning strategies in my life. Unpublished manuscript.
   Google Scholar
• Chamot, A. U., & O'Malley, J. M. (1994). The CALLA handbook: Implementing the cognitive academic language learning approach. New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Chen, S. Y. (2007). Extracurricular reading habits of college students in Taiwan: Findings from two national surveys. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(8), 642–650. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.50.8.3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chou, M. (2013). Strategy use for reading English for general and specific academic purposes in testing and nontesting contexts. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(2), 175–197. doi: 10.1002/rrq.42
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. D. & Weaver, S. J. (1998). Strategies-based instruction for second language learners. In W. A. Renandya & G. M. Jacobs (Eds.), Learners and language learning (pp. 1–25). Anthology Series 39. Singapore: SEAMEO Regional Language Center.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, A. (2011). Second language learner strategies. In E. Hinkle (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 681–698). New York: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Eilers, L. H., & Pinkley, C. (2006). Metacognitive strategies help students to comprehend all text. Reading Improvement, 43(1), 13–29.
   Google Scholar
• El-Okda, M. (2005). EFL student teachers’ cognition about reading instruction. The Reading Matrix, 5(2), 43–60.
   Google Scholar
• Gallik, J. D. (1999). Do they read for pleasure? Recreational reading habits of college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(6), 480–488.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (1991) Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25(3), 375–406.
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Greenfell, M., & Macaro, E. (2007). Claims and critiques. In A. Cohen and E. Macaro (Eds.), Language learner strategies: Thirty years of research and practice (pp. 9–28). Oxford: Oxford University.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Davis, M. H. (2003). Motivating struggling readers in middle school through an engagement model of classroom practice. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 59–85. doi: 10.1080/10573560308203
   Google Scholar
• Harris, K. & Pressley, M. (1991). The nature of cognitive strategy instruction: Interactive strategy construction. Exceptional Children, 57(5), 392–404.
   Google Scholar
• Hedgcock, J., & Ferris, D. R. (2009). Teaching Readers of English: Students, Texts, and Contexts. UK: Routledge Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Ikeda, M., & Takeuchi, O. (2003). Can strategy instruction help EFL learners to improve their reading ability? An empirical study. JACET Bulletin, 37(4), 49–60.
   Google Scholar
• Jager, B. D. (2002). Teaching reading comprehension: The effects of direct Instruction and cognitive apprenticeship on comprehension skills and metacognition (PhD dissertation). University of Groningen, Groningen.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P. H. (1983). Reading comprehension assessment: A cognitive basis. New Jersey, NJ: IRA N. J.
   Google Scholar
• Kamhi-Stein, L. D. (2003). Reading in two languages: How attitudes toward home language and beliefs about reading affect the behaviors of ‘underprepared’ L2 college readers. TESOL Quarterly, 37(1), 35–71. doi: 10.2307/3588465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kellerman, E. (1991). Compensatory strategies in second language research: A critique, a revision and some non-implications for the classroom. In R Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L Selinker, M Sharwood-Smith, & M Swain (Eds.), Foreign and second language pedagogy research. Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
   Google Scholar
• Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading: A cross-linguistic approach. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (1993). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
   Google Scholar
• Krashen, S. (2004). The power of reading: Insights from the research. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Leaver, B. L. (2003). Individualized study plans for very advanced students of foreign languages. Salinas, CA: MSI Press.
   Google Scholar
• Levine, A., Ferenz, O., & Reves, T. (2000). EFL academic reading and modern technology: How can we turn our students into independent critical readers? TESL-EJ, 4, 1–9.
   Google Scholar
• Lin, L., & Yu, W. (2015). A think-aloud study of strategy use by EFL college readers Chinese and English texts. Journal of Research in Reading, 38(3), 286–306. doi: 10.1111/1467-9817.12012
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Linnenbrink, E. A., & Pintrich, P. R. (2003). The role of self-efficacy beliefs in student engagement and learning in the classroom. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(1), 119–137. doi: 10.1080/10573560308223
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., Reichard, C., & Gardner, A. (2009). The impact of Internet and television use on the reading habits and practices of college students. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 92(7), 609–619. doi: 10.1598/JAAL.52.7.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2005). The condition of education. Washington, DC: U. S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• National Endowment for the Arts (NEA). (2004). Reading at risk: A survey of literacy reading in America. Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston, MA: Heinle & Heinle.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (1996). Language learning strategies around the world: Cross-cultural perspectives. Manoa: University of Hawaii Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oxford, R. L. (2011). Teaching and researching language learning strategies. Great Britain: Pearson Education.
   Google Scholar
• Paris, S., Wasik, B., & Turner, J. (1996). The development of strategic readers. In R Barr, M Kamil, P Mosenthal, & D Parson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. II, pp. 609–640). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at the relationship of cognitive and metacognitive strategy use to EFL reading achievement test performance. Language Testing, 20(1), 26–56. doi: 10.1191/0265532203lt243oa
   Google Scholar
• Phakiti, A. (2008). Construct validation of Bachman and Palmer’s strategic competence model over time in EFL reading tests. Language Testing, 25(2), 237–272. doi: 10.1177/0265532207086783
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2002). Reading instruction that works: The case for balanced teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(4), 273–295. doi: 10.2307/747692
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Purpura, J. E. (1999). Learner strategy use and performance on language tests: A structural equation modeling approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Salataci, R., & Akyel, A. (2002). Possible effects of strategy instruction on LI and L2 reading. Reading in a Foreign Language, 14, 1–17.
   Google Scholar
• Scammacca, N. K., Roberts, G., Vaughn, S., & Stuebing, K. K. (2015). A meta- analysis of interventions for struggling readers in grades 4–12: 1980–2011. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 48(4), 369–390. doi: 10.1177/0022219413504995
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19, 159–172. doi: 10.1080/10573560308219
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T., Callison, K., Carriere, C., Duke, N. K., Pearson, P. D., Schatschneider, C., & Torgesen, J. (2010). Improving reading comprehension in kindergarten through 3rd grade: A practice guide (NCEE 2010-4038). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
   Google Scholar
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449. doi: 10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
   Google Scholar
• Sprainger, N., Sandral, D., & Ferrari, K. (2011). Student think aloud: A window into readers’ thinking. Practically Primary, 16(1), 33–36.
   Google Scholar
• Tapinta, P. (2006). Exploring Thai EFL university students' awareness of their knowledge, use, and control of strategies in reading and writing (PhD dissertation). University of North Texas, Denton, TX.
   Google Scholar
• Tercanlioglu, L. (2004). Postgraduate students’ use of reading strategies in L1 and ESL contexts: Link to success. International Education Journal, 5(4), 89–110.
   Google Scholar
• Wu, Y. C., & Samuels, S. J. (2004). Amount of time on independent reading affects reading achievement. Paper Presented at the 49th Annual Convention of the International Reading Association, Reno, Nevada.
   Google Scholar
• Yang, L. L. (2004). The development of a validated perceived self-efficacy scale on English reading strategies. Journal of Education & Psychology, 27(2), 377–398.
   Google Scholar
• Yigiter, K., Saricoban, A., & Gurses, A. (2005). Reading strategies employed by ELT learners at the advanced level. The Reading Matrix, 5(1), 124–139.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J. (2008). Constructivist pedagogy in strategic reading instruction: Exploring pathways to learner development in the English as a second language (ESL) classroom. Instructional Science, 36(2), 89–116. doi: 10.1007/s11251-007-9025-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zarrabi, S. (2015). Exploring metacognitive online reading strategies of non-native English-speaking translation students (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L., & Zhang, L. J. (2013). Relationships between Chinese college test takers’ strategy use and EFL reading test performance: A structural equation modeling approach. RELC Journal, 44(1), 35–57. doi: 10.1177/0033688212463272
   Google Scholar