The Reading Development of Swedish L2 Middle School Students and Its Relation to Reading Strategy Use

References

• Afflerbach, P., Pearson, P. D., & Paris, S. G. (2008). Clarifying differences between reading skills and reading strategies. The Reading Teacher, 61(5), 364–373. doi:10.1598/rt.61.5.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aivazoglou, E., & Griva, E. (2014). Reading skills and strategies: Assessing primary school students’ awareness in L1 and EFL strategy use. International Journal of Applied Linguistics and English Literature, 3(5), 239–250. doi:10.7575/aiac.ijalel.v.3n.5p.239
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, N. J. (2005). L2 Learning strategies. In E. Hinkel (Ed.), Handbook of research in second language teaching and learning (pp. 757–771). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L. (2002). Metacognition in comprehension instruction. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 77–95). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Metacognitive skills and reading. In R. Barr & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 353–394). New York, NY: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Baker, L., DeWyngaert, L. U., & Zeliger-Kandasamy, A. (2015). Metacognition in comprehension instruction: New directions. In S. R. Parris & K. Headley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction research-based best practices (pp. 72–87). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. B. (2005). Progress and procrastination in second language reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 133–150. doi:10.1017/S0267190505000073
   Google Scholar
• Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Understanding advanced second-language reading. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Block, E. L. (1992). See how they read: Comprehension monitoring of L1 and L2 readers. Tesol Quarterly, 26(2), 319–343. doi:10.2307/3587008
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Block, C. C., & Duffy, G. G. (2008). Research on teaching comprehension. In C. C. Block & S. R. Parris (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 19–37). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchamma, Y., Poulin, V., & Ruel, C. (2014). Impact of reading strategy use on girls’ and boys’ achievement. Reading Psychology, 35(4), 312–331. doi:10.1080/02702711.2012.724043
   Google Scholar
• Böhlmark, A., Holmlund, H., & Lindahl, M. (2016). Parental choice, neighborhood segregation or cream skimming? An analysis of school segregation after a generalized choice reform. Journal of Population Economics, 29(4), 1155–1190. doi:10.1007/s00148-016-0595-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brevik, L. M., & Hellekjaer, G. O. (2018). Outliers: Upper secondary school students who read better in the L2 than in L1. International Journal of Educational Research, 89, 80–91. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2017.10.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carrell, P. L., Pharis, B. G., & Liberto, J. C. (1989). Metacognitive strategy training for ESL reading. Tesol Quarterly, 23(4), 647–678. doi:10.2307/3587536
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cerna, L., Andersson, H., Bannon, M., & Borgonovi, F. (2019). Strength through diversity’s Spotlight Report for Sweden (OECD Education Working Papers No. 194). Retrieved from doi:10.1787/059ce467-en
   Google Scholar
• Coe, R. (2002). It's the effect size, stupid: What effect size is and why it is important. Paper presented at the Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the British Educational Research Association, University of Exeter, England.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. S. (2010). A meta-analysis of comprehension strategy instruction for upper elementary and middle school students. (Doctoral Dissertation). Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN.
   Google Scholar
• Denton, C. A., Wolters, C. A., York, M. J., Swanson, E., Kulesz, P. A., & Francis, D. J. (2015). Adolescents’ use of reading comprehension strategies: Differences related to reading proficiency, grade level, and gender. Learning and Individual Differences, 37, 81–95. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2014.11.016
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Carlisle, J. (2010). The development of comprehension. In M. L. Kamil, D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 199–228). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Fung, I. Y. Y., Wilkinson, I. A. G., & Moore, D. W. (2003). L1-assisted reciprocal teaching to improve ESL students’ comprehension of English expository text. Learning and Instruction, 13(1), 1–31. doi:10.1016/S0959-4752(01)00033-0
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabrielsen, E., Hovig, J. H., Rongved, E., Strand, O., Støle, H., & Toft, T. E. (2017). Godt nytt!: Norske resultater fra PIRLS 2016. Stavanger: Lesesenteret, Universitetet i Stavanger.
   Google Scholar
• Ghavamnia, M., Ketabi, S., & Tavakoli, M. (2013). L2 reading strategies used by Iranian EFL learners: A think-aloud study. Reading Psychology, 34(4), 355–378. doi:10.1080/02702711.2011.640097
   Google Scholar
• Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language: Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Griva, E., Alevriadou, A., & Semoglou, K. (2012). Reading preferences and strategies employed by primary school students: Gender, socio-cognitive and citizenship issues. International Education Studies, 5(2), 24–34. doi:10.5539/ies.v5n2p24
   Google Scholar
• Hong-Nam, K., & Page, L. (2014). Investigating metacognitive awareness and reading strategy use of EFL Korean university students. Reading Psychology, 35(3), 195–220. doi:10.1080/02702711.2012.675418
   Google Scholar
• Israel, S. E., Block, C. C., Bauserman, K., & Kinnucan-Welsch, K. (2005). Metacognition in literacy learning: Theory, assessment, instruction and professional development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Järpsten, B., & Taube, K. (2010). DLS: För skolår 4-6: Handledning. Stockholm: Hogrefe Psykologiförlaget.
   Google Scholar
• Jiménez, R. T., García, G. E., & Pearson, P. D. (1995). Three children, two languages, and strategic reading: Case studies in bilingual/monolingual reading. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 67–97. doi:10.3102/00028312032001067
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Klingner, J. K., Vaughn, S., & Schumm, J. S. (1998). Collaborative strategic reading during social studies in heterogeneous fourth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 99(1), 3–22. doi:10.1086/461914
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kulbrandstad, L. I. (1998). Lesing på et andrespråk: En studie av fire innvandrerungdommers lesing av laereboktekster på norsk (Doctoral Dissertation). Scandinavian University Press, Oslo.
   Google Scholar
• Magnusson, C., Roe, A., & Blikstad-Balas, M. (2018). To what extent and how are reading comprehension strategies part of language arts instruction? A study of lower secondary classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 9(3), 1–26. doi:10.1002/rrq.231
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Miller, L. A., McIntire, S. A., & Lovler, R. L. (2012). Foundations of psychological testing: A practical approach (4 ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Reichard, C. A. (2002). Assessing students’ metacognitive awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94(2), 249–259. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.94.2.249
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokhtari, K., & Sheorey, R. (2002). Measuring ESL students’ awareness of reading strategies. Journal of Developmental Education, 25(3), 2–10.
   Google Scholar
• Muszyński, M., & Jakubowski, M. (2015). Learning strategies and reading performance: PISA 2009 results for Poland. EDUKACJA Quarterly, 134(3), 5–25.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. (2012). PIRLS 2011: Läsförmågan hos svenska elever i årskurs 4 i ett internationellt perspektiv. Stockholm: National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. (2016). PISA 2015: 15-åringars kunskaper i naturvetenskap, läsförståelse och matematik. Stockholm: National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. (2017). PIRLS 2016: Läsförmågan hos svenska elever i årskurs 4 i ett internationellt perspektiv. Stockholm: National Agency for Education.
   Google Scholar
• National Agency for Education. (2018). SIRIS. Kvalitet och resultat i skolan. Retrieved from www.siris.skolverket.se
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2006). Where immigrant students succeed: A comparative review of performance and engagement in PISA 2003. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2009). PISA 2009. Assessment framework: Key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Retrieved from http://www.oecd.org
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2012). PIRLS 2011: International results in reading. Chestnut Hill, MA: TIMSS & PIRLS International Study Center.
   Google Scholar
• OECD. (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and equity in education. Paris: OECD Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, C. B., & Land, R. (2007). A cognitive strategies approach to reading and writing instruction for English language learners in secondary school. Research in the Teaching of English, 41(3), 269–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Malley, J. M., & Chamot, A. U. (1990). Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1(2), 117–175. doi:10.1207/s1532690xci0102_1
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Cervetti, G. N. (2017). The roots of reading comprehension instruction. In S. E. Israel (Ed.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (2nd ed., pp. 12–56). New York, NY: Guilford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Phakiti, A. (2003). A closer look at gender and strategy use in L2 reading. Language Learning, 53(4), 649–702. doi:10.1046/j.1467-9922.2003.00239.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poole, A. (2005). Gender differences in reading strategy use among ESL college students. Journal of College Reading and Learning, 36(1), 7–20. doi:10.1080/10790195.2005.10850177
   Google Scholar
• Poole, A. (2009). The reading strategies used by male and female Colombian university students. Profile: Issues in Teachers’ Professional Development, 11(1), 29–40.
   Google Scholar
• Pressley, M. (2002). Comprehension strategies instruction: A turn-of-the-century status report. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 11–27). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2001). Differences in the metacognitive awareness of reading strategies among native and non-native readers. System, 29(4), 431–449. doi:10.1016/S0346-251X(01)00039-2
   Google Scholar
• Sheorey, R., & Mokhtari, K. (2008). Differing perceptions of reading strategy use between native and non-native college students. In K. Mokhtari & R. Sheorey (Eds.), Reading strategies of first- and second language learners: See how they read (pp. 131–141). Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, R. D., Proctor, C. P., Harring, J. R., Doyle, B., Mitchell, M. A., & Meyer, A. G. (2014). Teachers' instruction and students' vocabulary and comprehension: An exploratory study with English monolingual and Spanish–English bilingual students in grades 3–5. Reading Research Quarterly, 49(1), 31–60. doi:10.1002/rrq.63
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Skutnabb-Kangas, T. (1981). Tvåspråkighet. Lund: Liber Läromedel.
   Google Scholar
• Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the acquisition of literacy. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71. doi:10.2307/747348
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sparks, R., Patton, J., Ganschow, L., & Humbach, N. (2009). Long‐term crosslinguistic transfer of skills from L1 to L2. Language Learning, 59(1), 203–243. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9922.2009.00504.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Steinkellner, A. (2013). Innvandrere og norskfødte med innvandrerforeldre i grunnskolen: En analyse av karakterdata og resultater fra nasjonale prøver i 2012. Oslo: Statistisk Sentralbyrå.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M., Pearson, P. D., Peterson, D. S., & Rodriguez, M. C. (2003). Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. The Elementary School Journal, 104(1), 3–28. doi:10.1086/499740
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor, A., Stevens, J. R., & Asher, J. W. (2006). The effects of explicit reading strategy training on L2 reading comprehension. In J. M. Norris & L. Ortega (Eds.), Synthesizing research on language learning and teaching (pp. 213–244). Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 3, pp. 403–422). Mahwah, N.J: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Yüksel, İ., & Yüksel, İ. (2012). Metacognitive awareness of academic reading strategies. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 31(Supplement C), 894–898. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.12.164
   Google Scholar
• Zhang, L. J., Yongqi Gu, P., & Hu, G. (2008). A cognitive perspective on Singaporean primary school pupils' use of reading strategies in learning to read in English. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 245–271. doi:10.1348/000709907X218179
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar