Text Engagement & Reading Strategy Use: A Case Study of Four Early Adolescent Students

References

• Allen, K. D., & Hancock, T. E. (2008). Reading Comprehension Improvement with Individualized Cognitive Profiles and Metacognition. Literacy Research and Instruction, 47(2), 124–139. doi:10.1080/19388070801938320.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (1994). What’s special about special programs for children who find learning to read difficult? Journal of Reading Behavior, 26(1), 95–115. doi:10.1080/10862969409547838
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (2011). Reading intervention in the middle grades. Voices from the Middle, 19(2), 10–16.
   Google Scholar
• Allington, R. L. (2015). What really matters for middle school readers. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Educational, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Alvermann, D. E. (2001). Reading adolescents’ reading identities: Looking back to see ahead. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 44, 676–690.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does Text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository texts? Reading Research Quarterly, 22(3), 331–346. doi:10.2307/747972
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Aukerman, M. (2008). In praise of wiggle room: Locating comprehension in unlikely places. Language Arts, 86(1), 52–60.
   Google Scholar
• Aukerman, M. (2013). Rereading comprehension pedagogies: Toward a dialogic teaching ethic that honors student sensemaking. Dialogic Pedagogy: An International Online Journal, 1, 1–30. doi:10.5195/dpj.2013.9
   Google Scholar
• Aukerman, M., Brown, R., Mokhtari, K., Valencia, S., & Palincsar, A. (2015). Examining the relative contributions of content knowledge and strategic processing to comprehension. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 64(1), 73–91. doi:10.1177/2381336915617605
   Google Scholar
• Barber, A. T., Buehl, M. M., Beck, J. S., Ramirez, E. M., Gallagher, M., Richey Nuland, L. N., & Archer, C. J. (2018). Literacy in social studies: The influence of cognitive and motivational practices on the reading comprehension of English learners and non-English learners. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(1), 79–97. doi:10.1080/10573569.2017.1344942
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beers, K. (2006). Choosing not to read: Understanding why some middle schoolers just say no. In K. Beers and B. Samuels (Eds.) Into focus: Understanding and creating middle school readers (pp. 37–63).Norwood, MA: Christopher-Gordon.
   Google Scholar
• Bippert, K. & Elizondo, A. (2020). Technology, motivation, and early adolescent readers.  Manuscript submitted for publication.
   Google Scholar
• Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and symbolic power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Brown, R., Pressley, M., Van Meter, P., & Schuder, T. (1996). A quasi-experimental validation of transactional strategies instruction with low achieving second-grade readers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88(1), 18–37. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.88.1.18
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cer, E., & Sahin, E. (2016). The effect of quality books for children and the metacognitive strategy on student’ self-esteem levels. Journal of Education and Learning, 6(1), 72–80. doi:10.5539/jel.v6n1p72
   Google Scholar
• Chevalier, T. M., Parrila, R., Ritchie, K. C., & Deacon, S. H. (2017). The role of metacognitive reading strategies, metacognitive study and learning strategies, and behavioral study and learning strategies in predicting academic success in students with and without a history of reading difficulties. Journal of learning disabilities, 50(1), 34–48. doi:10.1177/0022219415588850
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coombs, D. (2012). Using Ricour’s mimetic process to examine identities of struggling adolescent readers. English Teaching: Practice and Critique, 11(1), 82–103.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative Inquiry and Research Design: Choosing Among Five Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Davis, D. S. (2013). Multiple comprehension strategies instruction in the intermediate grades: Three remarks about content and pedagogy in the intervention literature. Review of Education, 1(2), 194–224. doi:10.1002/rev3.3005
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_01
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self-determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology, 49(3), 182–185. doi:10.1037/a0012801
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deville, C., & Chalhoub-Deville, M. (2011). Accountability-assessment under No Child Left Behind: Agenda, practice, and future. Language Testing, 28(3), 307–321. doi:10.1177/0265532211400876
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., Duffy, G. G., Roehler, L. R., & Pearson, P. D. (1991). Moving from the old to the new: Research on reading comprehension instruction. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 239–264. doi:10.3102/00346543061002239
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., Valencia, S. W., Greer, E. A., & Wardrop, J. L. (1991). Effects of two types of prereading instruction on the comprehension of narrative and expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(2), 142–159. doi:10.2307/747979
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dudley-Marling, C. (2011). The trouble with “struggling readers. Talking Points, 23(1), 2–7.
   Google Scholar
• Duffy, G. G. (2002). The case for direct explanation of strategies. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 28–41).New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Durkin, D. (1978). What classroom observation reveals about reading comprehension instruction. Reading Research Quarterly, 14(4), 481–533. doi:10.1598/RRQ.14.4.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dyson, A. H., & Genishi, C. (2005). On the case (Vol. 76). New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Edmonds, M. S., Vaughn, S., Wexler, J., Reutebuch, C., Cable, A., Tackett, K. K., & Schnakenberg, J. W. (2009). A synthesis of reading interventions and effects on reading comprehension outcomes for older struggling readers. Review of educational research, 79(1), 262–300. doi:10.3102/0034654308325998
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Ivey, G. (2006). Evaluating the interventions for struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(3), 180–189. doi:10.1598/JAAL.50.3.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flavell, J. H. (1999). Cognitive development: children's knowledge about the mind. Annual review of psychology, 50(1), 21–45. doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.50.1.21
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2000). Identity as an analytic lens for research in education. Review of Research in Education, 25, 99–125. doi:10.2307/1167322
   Google Scholar
• Gee, J. P. (2004). Situated language and learning: A critique of traditional schooling. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. Handbook of Reading Research, 3, 403–422.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., Barbosa, P., Perencevich, K. C., Taboada, A., Davis, M. H., … Tonks, S. (2004). Increasing reading comprehension and engagement through concept- oriented reading instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 403–423. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.96.3.403
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, L. A. (2009). Struggling reader, struggling teacher: An examination of student-teacher transactions with reading instruction and text in social studies. Research in the Teaching of English, 43(3), 286–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hall, L. A. (2012). The role of reading identities and reading abilities in students’ discussions about texts and comprehension strategies. Journal of Literacy Research, 44(3), 239–272. doi:10.1177/1086296X12445370
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Handsfield, L. J., & Jimenez, R. T. (2009). Cognition and misrecognition: A Bourdieuian analysis of cognitive strategy instruction in a linguistically and culturally diverse classroom. Journal of Literacy Research, 41(2), 151–195. doi:10.1080/10862960802695172
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hays, D.G., & Singh, A.A. (2011). Qualitative inquiry in clinical and educational settings. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hitchcock, G., & Hughes, D. (1995). Research and the teacher: A qualitative introduction to school-based research. Routledge: London.
   Google Scholar
• Ivey, G. (1999). Teaching struggling middle school readers. The Education Digest, 65, 60–65.
   Google Scholar
• Klauda, S. L., Wigfield, A., & Cambria, J. (2012). Struggling readers’ information text comprehension and motivation in early adolescence. In J. T. Guthrie, A. Wigfield, and S. L. Klauda (Eds.) Adolescent Engagement in Academic Literacy (pp. 295–351). Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin. Retrieved from http://cori.umd.edu/research-publications/2012_adolescents_engagement_ebook.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2003). Literacy in the new media age. London, UK: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kress, G. (2010). Multimodality: A social semiotic approach to contemporary communication. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Lambirth, A. (2016). Exploring children’s discourses of writing. English in Education, 50(3), 215–232. doi:10.1111/eie.12111
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Learned, J. E. (2016). Feeling like I’m slow because I’m in this class”: Secondary contexts and the identification and construction of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(4), 367–371. doi:10.1002/rrq.157
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lenters, K. (2006). Resistance, struggle, and the adolescent reader. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 50(2), 136–146. doi:10.1598/JAAL.50.2.6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Newbury Park: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Maniates, H., & Pearson, P. D. (2008). The cirrucularization of comprehension strategies instruction: A conspiracy of good intentions. In Y. Kim, V. J. Risko, D. L. Compton, D. K. Dickinson, M. K. Hundley, R. T. Jimenez, M. M. Leander, & D. W. Rowe (Eds.), 57th Yearbook of the National Reading Conference (pp. 271–282). Oka Creek, WI.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthey, S. J., Woodard, R., & Kang, G. (2014). Elementary teachers negotiating discourses in writing instruction. Written Communication, 31(1), 58–90. doi:10.1177/0741088313510888
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mertens, D. M. (2010). Research and evaluation in educational psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage
   Google Scholar
• Miyamoto, A., Pfost, M., & Artelt, C. (2019). The relationship between intrinsic motivation and reading comprehension: Mediating effects of reading amount and metacognitive knowledge of strategy use. Scientific Studies of Reading, 23(6), 445–460. doi:10.1080/10888438.2019.1602836
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Moje, E. B., & Dillon, D. R. (2006). Adolescent identities as demanded by science classroom discourse communities. In D. E. Alvermann, K. A. Hinchman, D. W. Moore, S. F. Phelps, & D. R. Waff (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the Literacies in Adolescents’ Lives (3rd ed., pp. 85–106). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• National Center for Education Statistics (NCES). (2017). 2017 Reading grades 4 and 8 assessment report cards: Summary data tables for national and state average scores and achievement level results. Retrieved from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_2017/nation/achievement?grade=8
   Google Scholar
• National Reading Panel. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction: Reports of the subgroups (NIH Publication No. 00-4754). Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.
   Google Scholar
• O’Brien, D. (2006). Struggling” adolescents’ engagement in multimediating: Countering the institutional construction of incompetence. In D. Alvermann, K. A. Hinchman, Moore, D. W., Phelps, S. F., and Waff, D. R. (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the Literacies in Adolescents’ Lives: Bridging the Everyday/Academic Divide (3rd ed., pp. 29-46). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Palincsar, A. S., & Brown, A. L. (1984). Reciprocal teaching of comprehension-fostering and comprehension-monitoring activities. Cognition and Instruction, 1, 117–175.
   Google Scholar
• Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative research & evaluation methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• QSR International. (2014). Nvivo version 10. Retrieved from http://qsrinternational.com
   Google Scholar
• Rand Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: RAND.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenshine, B., Meister, C., & Chapman, S. (1996). Teaching students to generate questions: A review of the intervention studies. Review of Educational Research, 66(2), 181–122. doi:10.3102/00346543066002181
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rowsell, J. (2014).  Toward a phenomenology of contemporary reading. Australian Journal of Language and Literacy, 3(2), 117–127.
   Google Scholar
• Rubin, H. J. & Rubin, I.  (2004).  Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). The darker and brighter sides of human existence: Basic psychological needs as a unifying concept. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 319–338. doi:10.1207/S15327965PLI1104_03
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000b). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. The American psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2006). Self-regulation and the problem of human autonomy: Does psychological need choice, self-determination, and will? Journal of personality, 74(6), 1557–1586. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2006.00420.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.).  Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Silverman, D. (2006). Interpreting qualitative data: Methods for analyzing talk, text and interaction. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Souvignier, E., & Mokhlesgerami, J. (2006). Using self-regulation as a framework for implementing strategy-instruction to foster reading comprehension. Learning & Instruction, 16(1), 57–71. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2005.12.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stagg Peterson, S. (2012). An analysis of discourses of writing and writing instruction in curricula across Canada. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 260–284. doi:10.1111/j.1467-873X.2012.00589.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strauss, A. L. (1987). Qualitative analysis for social scientists. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Texas Education Agency. (2019). State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR). Texas Education Agency. Retrieved from https://tea.texas.gov/student.assessment/staar/
   Google Scholar
• Tripplett, C. F. (2007). The social construction of “struggle”: Influences of school literacy, contexts, curriculum, and relationships. Journal of Literacy Research, 39(1), 95–126.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White, J. P. (2017). The impact of graphic organizer use on the metacognitive skills of ten senior high school students in an English IV British literature class at seaside high school (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from https://scholarcommons.sc.edu/etd/4406.
   Google Scholar
• Yin, R. K. (2014). Case Study Research: Design and Methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
   Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2002). Becoming a self-regulated learner: An overview. Theory into Practice, 41(2), 64–70. doi:10.1207/s15430421tip4102_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ӧstby, J., & Berggren, K. (2004). Krut computer recorder [Software]. Retrieved from http://krut.sourceforge.net/.
   Google Scholar