Student’s Self-Efficacy in Reading – Connecting Theory to Practice

References

• Ball, C., & Gettinger, M. (2009). Monitoring children’s growth in early literacy skills: Effects of feedback on performance and classroom environments. Education and Treatment of Children, 32(2), 189–212. 10.1353/etc.0.0055.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–191215. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Prentice Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A. (1993). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Worth.
   Google Scholar
• Bandura, A., & Schunk, D. H. (1981). Cultivating competence, self-efficacy, and intrinsic interest through proximal self-motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 41(3), 586–598. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.41.3.586
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Blackwell, L. S., Trzesniewski, K. H., & Dweck, C. S. (2007). Implicit theories of intelligence predict achievement across an adolescent transition: A longitudinal study and an intervention. Child Development, 78(1), 246–263. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2007.00995.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boaler, J. (2019). Limitless mind. Harper Collins.
   Google Scholar
• Botsas, G., & Padeliadu, S. (2003). Goal orientation and reading comprehension strategy use among students with and without reading difficulties. International Journal of Educational Research, 39(4-5), 477–495. https://doi.org10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.010. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2004.06.010
   Google Scholar
• Brozo, W. G., Shiel, G., & Topping, K. (2007). Engagement in reading: Lessons learned from three PISA countries. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 51(4), 304–315. https://doi.org/10.1598/JAAL.51.4.2
   Google Scholar
• Brownfield, K., & Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2018). Examining the impact of scaffolding on literacy learning: A critical examination of research and guidelines to advance inquiry. International Journal of Educational Research, 90, 177–190. doi:10.1016/j.ijer.2018.01.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carroll, J. M., & Fox, A. C. (2017). Reading self-efficacy predicts word reading but not comprehension in both girls and boys. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1–9. Retrieved from https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02056/full doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2016.02056
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cassidy, J., Grote-Garcia, S., & Ortlieb, E. (2020). What’s hot in 2019: Expanded and interconnected notions of literacy. Literacy Research and Instruction, 59(1), 39–52. doi:10.1080/19388071.2019.1665786
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clark, S. R., Enriquez, G., & Calce, J. D. (2018). Inspiring agency: Teaching a growth mindset through children’s literature. Literacy Today, 35(6), 28–29.
   Google Scholar
• Clearly, T. J., & Zimmerman, B. J. (2004). Self-regulation empowerment program: A school-based program to enhance self-regulated and self-motivated cycles of student learning. Psychology in the Schools, 41(5), 537–550. 10.1002/pits.10177.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Colvin, C., & Schlosser, L. K. (1997/1998). Developing academic confidence to build literacy: What teachers can do. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 41(4), 272–281.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cross, J. (2009). Effects of listening strategy instruction on news videotext comprehension. Language Teaching Research, 13(2), 151–176. https://doi.org/10.1177%2F1362168809103446. doi:10.1177/1362168809103446
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cummins, J. (2014). Beyond language: Academic communication and student success. Linguistics and Education, 26, 145–154. doi:10.1016/j.linged.2014.01.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Deng, Q., & Trainin, G. (2020). Self-efficacy and attitudes for vocabulary strategies among English learners and native speakers. Reading Horizons, 59, 141–169.
   Google Scholar
• Denner, J., Valdes, O., Dickson, D. J., & Laursen, B. (2019). Math interest and self-concept among Latino/a students: Reciprocal influences across the transition to middle school. Journal of Adolescence, 75, 22–36. doi:10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.06.015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N., Purcell-Gates, V., Hall, L. A., & Tower, C. (2006). Authentic literacy activities for developing comprehension and writing. The Reading Teacher, 60(4), 344–355. doi:10.1598/RT.60.4.4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eccles, J. S. (2004). Schools, academic motivation, and stage-environment fit. In R. M. Lerner & L. D. Steinberg (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent psychology (2nd ed., pp. 125–153). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., & Frey, N. (2008). Better learning through structured teaching: A framework for the gradual release of responsibility. ASCD.
   Google Scholar
• Fisher, D., Frey, N., Amador, O., & Assof, J. (2019). The teacher clarity playbook. Corwin.
   Google Scholar
• Fluckiger, J. (2010). Single point rubric: A tool for responsible student self-assessment. Delta Kappa Gamma Bulletin, 76(4), 18–25.
   Google Scholar
• Frey, N., Fisher, D., & Hattie, J. (2017). Surface, deep, and transfer? Considering the role of content literacy instructional strategies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 60(5), 567–575. 10.1002/jaal.576.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2009). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2012). Visible learning for teachers. Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hattie, J. (2017). Global research database. Retrieved from http://www.visiblelearningmetax.com/Influences
   Google Scholar
• Harter, S. (1998). The development of self-representations. In W. Damon & N. Eisenberg (Eds.), Handbook of child psychology (pp. 553–617). Wiley.
   Google Scholar
• Helman, L. A., & Burns, M. K. (2008). What does oral language have to do with it? Helping young English-language learners acquire a sight word vocabulary. The Reading Teacher, 62(1), 14–19. doi:10.1598/RT.62.1.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoch, M. L., McCarty, R., Gurvitz, D., & Sitkoski, I. (2019). Five key principles: Guided inquiry with multimodal text sets. The Reading Teacher, 72(6), 701–710. doi:10.1002/trtr.1781
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hurford, D. P., Fender, A. C., Swigart, C. C., Hurford, T. E., Hoover, B. B., Butts, S. R., … Wilber, L. M. (2016). Pre-service teachers are competent in phonological processing skills: How to teach the science of reading. Reading Psychology, 37(6), 885–916. doi:10.1080/02702711.2015.1133464
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jonassen, D. H. (2006). On the role of concepts in learning and instructional design. Educational Technology Research and Development, 54(2), 177–196. doi:10.1007/s11423-006-8253-9
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kern, D. (2010). Is there a Pygmalion in the classroom: Motivating disenfranchised readers. New England Reading Association Journal, 45(2), 91–93.
   Google Scholar
• Khong, J. Z. N., Liem, G. A. D., & Klassen, R. M. (2017). Task performance in small group settings: The role of group members’ self-efficacy and collective efficacy and group’s characteristics. Educational Psychology, 37(9), 1082–1105. doi:10.1080/01443410.2017.1342767
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kirsch, I., Jong, J., de, Lafontaine, D., McQueen, J., Mendelovits, J., & Monseur, C. (2002). Reading for change: Performance and engagement across countries: Results from PISA 2000. OECD. 10.1787/9789264099289-en.
   Google Scholar
• Konold, K. E., Miller, S. P., & Konold, K. B. (2004). Using teacher feedback to enhance student learning. Teaching Exceptional Children, 36(6), 64–69. doi:10.1177/004005990403600608
   Google Scholar
• Kracl, C. L. (2012). Managing small group instruction through the implementation of literacy work stations. International Journal of Psychology: A Biopsychosocial Approach, 10, 27–46.
   Google Scholar
• Lam, R. (2010). A peer review training workshop: Coaching students to give and evaluate peer feedback. TESL Canada Journal, 27(2), 114–127. doi:10.18806/tesl.v27i2.1052
   Google Scholar
• Lee, V. J., Meloche, A., Grant, A., Neuman, D., & DeCarlo, M. J. T. (2019). “My thoughts on gun violence”: An urban adolescent’s display of agency and multimodal literacies. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 63(2), 157–168. 10.1002/jaal.944.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lupo, S. M., Berry, A., Thacker, E., Sawyer, A., & Merritt, J. (2020). Rethinking text sets to support knowledge building and interdisciplinary learning. The Reading Teacher, 73(4), 513–524. doi:10.1002/trtr.1869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Maddux, J. E., Sherer, M., & Rogers, R. W. (1982). Self-efficacy expectancy and outcome expectancy: Their relationship and their effects on behavioral intentions. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 6(2), 207–211. doi:10.1007/BF01183893
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2010). Reading motivation: Exploring the elementary gender gap. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(2), 129–141. doi:10.1080/19388070902803795
   Google Scholar
• Mercer, S. H., Nellis, L. M., Martinez, R. S., & Kirk, M. (2011). Supporting the students most in need: Academic self-efficacy and perceived teacher support in relation to within-year academic growth. Journal of School Psychology, 49(3), 323–338. doi:10.1016/j.jsp.2011.03.006
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mizumoto, A. (2013). Effects of self-regulated vocabulary learning process on self-efficacy. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 253–265. doi:10.1080/17501229.2013.836206
   Google Scholar
• National Council of Teachers of English (NCTE). (2005). Supporting linguistically and culturally diverse learners in English education. Position statement. Retrieved from https://ncte.org/statement/diverselearnersinee/
   Google Scholar
• Neuhaus, G. F., Roldan, L. W., Boulware-Gooden, R., & Swank, P. R. (2006). Parsimonious reading models: Identifying teachable subskills. Reading Psychology, 27(1), 37–58. doi:10.1080/02702710500468724
   Google Scholar
• Nicol, D. J., & Macfarlane-Dick, D. (2006). Formative assessment and self-regulated learning: A model and seven principles of good feedback practice. Studies in Higher Education, 31(2), 199–218. doi:10.1080/03075070600572090
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E. (2014). Theoretical models of learning and language development. Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., & Schatz, S., (2019). “Passing the pen: A gradual release model of the recursive writing process”, In M.B. McVee, E. Ortlieb, J.S. Reichenberg, & P.D. Pearson (Eds.) The gradual release of responsibility in literacy research and practice (Literacy Research, Practice and Evaluation, Vol. 10), Emerald Publishing Limited, pp. 205–215. https://doi.org/10.1108/S2048-045820190000010013.
   Google Scholar
• Ortlieb, E., Verlaan, W., Cheek, E., & DiMarco, D. (2016). Rethinking writing products and processes in a digital age. In E. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheek, Jr. (Eds.), Writing instruction to support literacy success (pp. 1–17). Emerald Group. 10.1108/S2048-045820160000007001.
   Google Scholar
• Pajares, F. (2003). Self-efficacy beliefs, motivation, and achievement in writing: A review of the literature. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 139–158. 10.1080/10573560308222.
   Google Scholar
• Parr, M. (2012). The future of text-to-speech technology: How long before it’s just one more thing we do when teaching reading? Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 69, 1420–1429. doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.12.081
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., McVee, M. B., & Shanahan, L. E. (2019). In the beginning: The historical and conceptual genesis of the gradual release of responsibility. In M. McVee, E. Ortlieb, J. Reichenberg, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), The gradual release of responsibility in literacy research and practice (pp. 1–21). Emerald Group. 10.1108/S2048-045820190000010001.
   Google Scholar
• Peura, P., Aro, T., Viholainen, H., Raikkonen, E., Usher, E., Sorvo, R., & Aro, M. (2019). Reading self-efficacy and reading fluency development among primary school children: Does specificity of self-efficacy matter? Learning and Individual Differences, 73, 67–78. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.05.007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2000). Multiple goals, multiple pathways. The role of goal orientation in learning and achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92(3), 544–555. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.92.3.544
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rennie, J., & Ortlieb, E. (2013). Diverse literacy learners: Deficit versus productive pedagogies. In E. Ortlieb & E. H. Cheek, Jr. (Eds.), Literacy research, practice and evaluation: Vol. 3. School-based interventions for struggling readers, K-8 (pp. 203–218). Emerald Group.
   Google Scholar
• Roorda, D. L., Koomen, H. M. Y., Spilt, J. L., & Oort, F. J. (2011). The influence of affective teacher–student relationships on students’ school engagement and achievement: A meta-analytic approach. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 493–529. doi:10.3102/0034654311421793
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ruegg, R. (2018). The effect of peer and teacher feedback on changes in EFL students’ writing self-efficacy. The Language Learning Journal, 46(2), 87–102. doi:10.1080/09571736.2014.958190
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H. (2003). Self-efficacy for reading and writing: Influence of modeling, goal setting, and self-evaluation. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 19(2), 159–172. https://doi.org10.1080/10573560308219.
   Google Scholar
• Schunk, D. H., & Swartz, C. W. (1993). Goals and progress feedback: Effects on self-efficacy and writing achievement. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 18(3), 337–354. doi:10.1006/ceps.1993.1024
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shell, D. F., Murphy, C. C., & Bruning, R. H. (1989). Self-efficacy and outcome expectancy mechanisms in reading and writing achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 81(1), 91–100. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.81.1.91
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shubitz, S. (2016). Craft moves lesson sets for teaching writing with mentor texts. Stenhouse Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Simmons, R. G., & Blyth, D. A. (1987). Moving into adolescence: The impact of pubertal change and school context. Aldine de Gruyter.
   Google Scholar
• Solheim, J. (2011). The impact of reading self- efficacy and task value on reading comprehension scores in different item formats. Reading Psychology, 32(1), 1–27. doi:10.1080/02702710903256601
   Google Scholar
• Sung, Y. T., Chang, K. E., & Liu, T. C. (2016). The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students’ learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis. Computers & Education, 94, 252–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sweeny, S. M. (2010). Writing for the instant messaging and text messaging generation: Using new literacies to support writing instruction. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 54(2), 121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tan, F. D. H., Whipp, P. R., Gagné, M., & Quaquebeke, N. V. (2019). Students’ perception of teachers’ two-way feedback interactions that impact learning. Social Psychology of Education, 22(1), 169–187. doi:10.1007/s11218-018-9473-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Titsworth, S., Mazer, J. P., Goodboy, A. K., Bolkan, S., & Myers, S. A. (2015). Two meta-analyses exploring the relationship between teacher clarity and student learning. Communication Education, 64(4), 385–418. doi:10.1080/03634523.2015.1041998
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tschannen-Moran, M., & McMaster, P. (2009). Sources of self-efficacy: Four professional development formats and their relationship to self-efficacy and implementation of a new teaching strategy. The Elementary School Journal, 110(2), 228–245. 10.1086/605771.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Turner, J. C. (1997). Starting right: Strategies for engaging young literacy learners. In J. T. Guthrie & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Reading engagement: Motivating readers through integrated instruction (pp. 183–204). International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Uribe, S. N., & Vaughan, M. (2017). Facilitating student learning in distance education: A case study on the development and implementation of a multifaceted feedback system. Distance Education, 38(3), 288–301. doi:10.1080/01587919.2017.1369005
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vaughn, M. (2018). Making sense of student agency in the early grades. Phi Delta Kappan, 99(7), 62–62. doi:10.1177/0031721718767864
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Verhoeven, L. (2011). Language development and reading disabilities. In A. McGill-Franzen & R. L. Allington (Eds.), Handbook of reading disability research (pp. 36–44). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Walker, B. J. (2003). The cultivation of student self-efficacy in reading and writing. Reading & Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 19(2), 173–187. 10.1080/10573560308217.
   Google Scholar
• Watt, H. M. G. (2004). Development of adolescents' self-perceptions, values, and task perceptions according to gender and domain in 7th- through 11th-grade Australian students. Child Development, 75(5), 1556–1574. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00757.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wertheim, C., & Leyser, Y. (2002). Efficacy beliefs, background variables, and differentiated instruction of Israeli prospective teachers. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 54–63. doi:10.1080/00220670209598791
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wharton-McDonald, R. (2011). Expert classroom instruction for students with reading disabilities. In A. McGill-Franzen & R. L. Allington (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading disabilities (pp. 265–272). Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Eccles, J., Mac Iver, D., Reuman, D., & Midgley, C. (1991). Transitions at early adolescence: Changes in children’s domain-specific self-perceptions and general self-esteem across the transition to junior high school. Developmental Psychology, 27(4), 552–565. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.27.4.552
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., Eccles, J. S., & Pintrich, P. (1996). Development between the ages of 11 and 25. In D. Berliner & R. Calfee (Eds.), Handbook of educational psychology (pp. 148–185). Macmillan.
   Google Scholar
• Wiliam, D. (2009). Assessment for learning: Why, what and how? Institute of Education, University of London.
   Google Scholar
• Wingate, U. (2012). Using academic literacies and genre-based models for academic writing instruction: A “literacy” journey. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 11(1), 26–37. doi:10.1016/j.jeap.2011.11.006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zimmerman, B. J., Bandura, A., & Martinez-Pons, M. (1992). Self-motivation for academic attainment: The role of self-efficacy beliefs and personal goal setting. American Educational Research Journal, 29(3), 663–676. doi:10.3102/00028312029003663
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar