Cognitive and Motivational Predictors of Narrative and Informational Text Comprehension

References

• Adams, M. J. (1990). Beginning to read: Thinking and learning about print. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
   Google Scholar
• Anderson, J. R. (1983). The architecture of cognition. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(4), 773–785. doi:10.1037/a0020084
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children's comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137–164. doi:10.1080/02702710801963951
   Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Rowe, M., Ozuru, Y., & McNamara, D. S. (2005). Deep-level comprehension of science texts: The role of the reader and the text. Topics in Language Disorders, 25(1), 65–83. doi:10.1097/00011363-20050100000007
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bozack, A. R., & Salvaggio, A. N. (2013). Relational effects of reading motivation and academic achievement among adolescent boys. Reading Psychology, 34(6), 507–522. doi:10.1080/02702711.2012.660302
   Google Scholar
• Cambria, J., & Guthrie, J. T. (2010). Motivating and engaging students in reading. New England Reading Association Journal, 46(1), 16–29.
   Google Scholar
• Cartwright, K. B., Marshall, T. R., & Wray, E. (2016). A longitudinal study of the role of reading motivation in primary students’ reading comprehension: Implications for a less simple view of reading. Reading Psychology, 37(1), 55–91. doi:10.1080/02702711.2014.991481
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Bravo, M. A., Hiebert, E. H., Pearson, P., & Jaynes, C. A. (2009). Text genre and science content: Ease of reading, comprehension, and reader preference. Reading Psychology, 30(6), 487–511. doi:10.1080/02702710902733550
   Google Scholar
• Conradi, K., Jang, B. G., & McKenna, M. C. (2014). Motivation terminology in reading research: A conceptual review. Educational Psychology Review, 26(1), 127–164. doi:10.1007/s10648-013-9245-z
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Coté, N., & Goldman, S. R. (1999). Building representations of informational text: Evidence from children’s think-aloud protocols. In H. Van Oostendorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The construction of mental representations during reading (pp. 151–174). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Deci, E. L. (1992). Article commentary: On the nature and functions of motivation theories. Psychological Science, 3(3), 167–171. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1992.tb00020.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dennis, D. V. (2013). Heterogeneity or homogeneity: What assessment data reveal about struggling adolescent readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 45(1), 3–21. doi:10.1177/1086296X12468431
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(2), 202–224. doi:10.1598/RRQ.35.2.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., & Kays, J. (1998). Can I say ‘Once upon a time’?”: Kindergarten children developing knowledge of information book language. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 13(2), 295–318. doi:10.1016/S0885-2006(99)80041-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dymock, S. (2005). Teaching expository text structure awareness. The Reading Teacher, 59(2), 177–181. doi:10.1598/RT.59.2.7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Eason, S. H., Goldberg, L. F., Young, K. M., Geist, M. C., & Cutting, L. E. (2012). Reader-text interactions: How differential text and question types influence cognitive skills needed for reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(3), 515–528. doi:10.1037/a0027182
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ehri, L. (1991). Development of the ability to read words. In R. Barr, M. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 384–417). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Fey, M. E., Catts, H. W., Proctor-Williams, K., Tomblin, J. B., & Zhang, X. (2004). Oral and written story composition skills of children with language impairment. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research: JSLHR, 47(6), 1301–1318. doi:10.1044/1092-4388(2004/098)
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fitzgerald, J., Elmore, J., Relyea, J. E., & Stenner, A. J. (2020). Domain-specific academic vocabulary network development in elementary grades core disciplinary textbooks. Journal of Educational Psychology, 112(5), 855–879. doi:10.1037/edu0000386
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gambrell, L. B. (2011). Motivation in the school reading curriculum. Journal of Reading Education, 37(1), 5–14.
   Google Scholar
• Gilson, C. M., Beach, K. D., & Cleaver, S. L. (2018). Reading motivation of adolescent struggling readers receiving general education support. Reading & Writing Quarterly, 34(6), 505–522. doi:10.1080/10573569.2018.1490672
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (1999). How motivation fits into a science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 3(3), 199–205. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr0303_1
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., & Wigfield, A. (2000). Engagement and motivation in reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Moscnthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (pp. 403–422). Mahwah: Erl.
   Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Hoa, A. L. W., Wigfield, A., Tonks, S. M., Humenick, N. M., & Littles, E. (2007). Reading motivation and reading comprehension growth in the later elementary years. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32(3), 282–313. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.05.004
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A., & Hasan, R. (1985). Language, text and context. Victoria: Derkin University.
   Google Scholar
• Hammill, D., & Newcomer, P. (2008). Test of language development, intermediate (4th ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H., & Cervetti, G. N. (2011). What differences in narrative and informational texts mean for the learning and instruction of vocabulary. Reading Research Report #11.01. Santa Cruz, CA: Text Project, Inc.
   Google Scholar
• Kavanagh, L. (2019). Relations between children's reading motivation, activity and performance at the end of primary school. Journal of Research in Reading, 42(3-4), 562–582. doi:10.1111/1467-9817.12284
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. New York: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2015). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading and Writing, 28(2), 239–269. doi:10.1007/s11145-014-9523-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., & Kieffer, M. J. (2010). Exploring sources of reading comprehension difficulties among language minority learners and their classmates in early adolescence. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 596–632. doi:10.3102/0002831209355469
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liebfreund, M. D., & Conradi, K. (2016). Component skills affecting elementary students’ informational text comprehension. Reading and Writing, 29(6), 1141–1160. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9629-9
   Google Scholar
• Logan, S., Medford, E., & Hughes, N. (2011). The importance of intrinsic motivation for high and low ability readers' reading comprehension performance. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(1), 124–128. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2010.09.011
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marinak, B. A., & Gambrell, L. B. (2010). Reading motivation: Exploring the elementary gender gap. Literacy Research and Instruction, 49(2), 129–141. doi:10.1080/19388070902803795
   Google Scholar
• McGeown, S., Goodwin, H., Henderson, N., & Wright, P. (2012). Gender differences in reading motivation: Does sex or gender identity provide a better account? Journal of Research in Reading, 35(3), 328–336. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9817.2010.01481.x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McGeown, S. P., Osborne, C., Warhurst, A., Norgate, R., & Duncan, L. G. (2016). Understanding children’s reading activities: Reading motivation, skill and child characteristics as predictors. Journal of Research in Reading, 39(1), 109–125. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.12060
   Google Scholar
• McKenna, M. C., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B. G., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a US survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47(3), 283–306. doi:10.1002/rrq.021
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., & Floyd, R. G. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers’ prior knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4, 229–258.
   Google Scholar
• National Assessment Governing Board & U. S. Department of Education. (2012). Reading framework for the 2013 national assessment of educational progress. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office. http://www.edpubs.gov/document/ed005373p.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (NGACBP & CSSO). (2010a). Common core state standards. Appendix A: Research supporting key elements of the standards. www.corestandards.org/assets/Appendix_A.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers (NGACBP & CSSO). (2010b). Common core state standards for english language arts. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers. Retrieved from http://www.corestandards.org/assets/CCSSI_ELAStandards.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Ness, M. (2011). Teachers’ use of and attitudes toward informational text in K–5 classrooms. Reading Psychology, 32(1), 28–53. doi:10.1080/02702710903241322
   Google Scholar
• Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Barros, R. (2012). The development of word recognition and its significance for comprehension and fluency. Journal of Educational Psychology, 104(4), 959–973. doi:10.1037/a0027412
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What's meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G., & Beers, A. (2010). A not-so-simple view of reading: How oral vocabulary and visual-word recognition complicate the story. Reading and Writing, 23(2), 189–208. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9159-1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ozuru, Y., Dempsey, K., & McNamara, D. S. (2009). Prior knowledge, reading skill, and text cohesion in the comprehension of science texts. Learning and Instruction, 19(3), 228–242. doi:10.1016/j.learninstruc.2008.04.003
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paris, S. G., & Stahl, S. A. (2005). Children's reading comprehension and assessment. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• Park, Y. (2011). How motivational constructs interact to predict students’ reading performance: Examples from attitudes and self-concept in reading. Learning and Individual Differences, 21(4), 347–358. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2011.02.009
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A. (1985). Reading ability. New York: Oxford University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(4), 667–686. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.95.4.667
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• RAND Reading Study Group. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1465.html.
   Google Scholar
• Recht, D. R., & Leslie, L. (1988). Effect of prior knowledge on good and poor readers' memory of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 16–20. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sáenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 31–41. doi:10.1177/074193250202300105
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2016). The contributions of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation to the development of reading competence over summer vacation. Reading Psychology, 37(6), 917–941. doi:10.1080/02702711.2015.1133465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U. (2009). Situational and individual interest. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 197–222). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U., & Löweke, S. (2018). The nature, development, and effects of elementary students’ reading motivation profiles. Reading Research Quarterly, 53(4), 405–421. doi:10.1002/rrq.201
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U., & Schaffner, E. (2016). Factorial and construct validity of a new instrument for the assessment of reading motivation. Reading Research Quarterly, 51(2), 221–237. doi:10.1002/rrq.134
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schiefele, U., Schaffner, E., Moller, J., & Wigfield, A. (2012). Dimensions of reading motivation and their relation to reading behavior and competence. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 427–463.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stetter, M. E., & Hughes, M. T. (2010). Using story grammar to assist students with learning disabilities and reading difficulties improve their comprehension. Education and Treatment of Children, 33, 115–151.
   Google Scholar
• Stutz, F., Schaffner, E., & Schiefele, U. (2016). Relations among reading motivation, reading amount, and reading comprehension in the early elementary grades. Learning and Individual Differences, 45, 101–113. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2015.11.022
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 22(1), 85–106. doi:10.1007/s11145-008-9133-y
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tannenbaum, K. R., Torgesen, J. K., & Wagner, R. K. (2006). Relationships between word knowledge and reading comprehension in third-grade children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10(4), 381–398. doi:10.1207/s1532799xssr1004_3
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thompson, S., Provasnik, S., Kastberg, D., Ferraro, D., Lemanski, N., Roey, S., & Jenkins, F. (2012). Highlights from PIRLS 2011: Reading achievement of U.S. fourth-grade students in an international context. Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/pubs2013/2013010rev.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Torgesen, J. K., Wagner, R. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (2012). Test of word reading efficiency–2. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
   Google Scholar
• U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. Retrieved from www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/pubs/nrp/documents/report.pdf.
   Google Scholar
• Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between US and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39(2), 162–186. doi:10.1598/RRQ.39.2.2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (1995). Dimensions of children’s motivations for reading: An initial study (Reading Research Rep. No. 34). Athens, GA: National Reading Research Center, University of Georgia and University of Maryland.
   Google Scholar
• Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.
   Google Scholar