The Role of Background Knowledge in Reading Comprehension: A Critical Review

References

• Adams, B. C., Bell, L. C., & Perfetti, C. A. (1995). A trading relationship between reading skill and domain knowledge in children's text comprehension. Discourse Processes, 20(3), 307–323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01638539509544943
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Adcock, D., & Davies, S. (2012). Comprehensive assessment of reading strategies. Cheltenham, VIC: Haer Hawker Brownlow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Adcock, D., & Krensky, J. (2012). Strategies to achieve reading success. Cheltenham, VIC: Hawker Brownlow Education.
   Google Scholar
• Alexander, P. A., & Jetton, T. L. (2000). Learning from text: A multidimensional and developmental perspective. Handbook of Reading Research, 3(1), 285–310.
   Google Scholar
• Baddeley, A. D., & Hitch, G. (1974). Working memory. In Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 8, pp. 47–89). Stirling, Scotland: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Barnes, M. A., Dennis, M., & Haefele-Kalvaitis, J. (1996). The effects of knowledge availability and knowledge accessibility on coherence and elaborative inferencing in children from six to fifteen years of age. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 61(3), 216–241. doi:https://doi.org/10.1006/jecp.1996.0015
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (1991). Research directions: Social studies texts are hard to understand: Mediating some of the difficulties. Language Arts, 68(6), 482–490.
   Google Scholar
• Beck, I. L., Omanson, R. C., & McKeown, M. G. (1982). An instructional redesign of reading lessons: Effects on comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(4), 462–481. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/747566
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berkowitz, S., & Taylor, B. (1981). The effects of text type and familiarity on the nature of information recalled by readers. In M. Kamil (Ed.), Directions in reading: Research and instruction (pp. 157–161). Washington, DC: National reading Conference.
   Google Scholar
• Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & McNamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children's comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137–164. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/02702710801963951
   Google Scholar
• Borges, A. T. (1999). Como evoluem os modelos mentais. Ensaio Pesquisa em Educação em Ciências (Belo Horizonte), 1(1), 66–92. doi:https://doi.org/10.1590/1983-21171999010107
   Google Scholar
• Bowyer‐Crane, C., & Snowling, M. J. (2005). Assessing children's inference generation: What do tests of reading comprehension measure? British Journal of Educational Psychology, 75(2), 189–201. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/000709904X22674
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brandão, A. C. P., & Oakhill, J. (2005). How do you know this answer?”– Children’s use of text data and general knowledge in story comprehension. Reading and Writing, 18(7–9), 687–713. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-005-5600-x
   Google Scholar
• Cain, K., & Oakhill, J. V. (1999). Inference making ability and its relation to comprehension failure in young children. Reading and Writing, 11(5/6), 489–503. doi:https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008084120205
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cain, K., Oakhill, J. V., Barnes, M. A., & Bryant, P. E. (2001). Comprehension skill, inference-making ability, and their relation to knowledge. Memory & Cognition, 29(6), 850–859. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03196414
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Callahan, D., & Drum, P. A. (1984). Reading ability and prior knowledge as predictors of eleven and twelve year olds' text comprehension. Reading Psychology, 5(1–2), 145–154. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271840050117
   Google Scholar
• Castles, A., Rastle, K., & Nation, K. (2018). Ending the reading wars: Reading acquisition from novice to expert. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 19(1), 5–51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1529100618772271
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., & Wright, T. S. (2020). The role of knowledge in understanding and learning from text. Handbook of Reading Research, 5, 237–260.
   Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Wright, T. S., & Hwang, H. (2016). Conceptual coherence, comprehension, and vocabulary acquisition: A knowledge effect? Reading and Writing. An Interdisciplinary Journal, 29(4), 761–779.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chiesi, H. L., Spilich, G. J., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Acquisition of domain-related information in relation to high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 18(3), 257–273. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-5371(79)90146-4
   Google Scholar
• Connor, M. C. ,Dombek, J., Crowe, E. C., Spencer, M., Tighe, E. L., Coffinger, S., Zargar, E., … Petscher, Y. (2017). Acquiring science and social studies knowledge in kindergarten through fourth grade: Conceptualization, design, implementation, and efficacy testing of content-area literacy instruction (CALI). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 301–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cunningham, A. E., & Stanovich, K. E. (1997). Early reading acquisition and its relation to reading experience and ability 10 years later. Developmental Psychology, 33(6), 934–935. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037//0012-1649.33.6.934
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dewitz, P.,Carr, E., &Patberg, J. (1987). Effects of inference training on comprehension and comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 22(1), 99–121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dochy, F., Segers, M., & Buehl, M. M. (1999). The relation between assessment practices and outcomes of studies: The case of research on prior knowledge. Review of Educational Research, 69(2), 145–186. doi:https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543069002145
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dole, J. A., Nokes, J. D., & Drits, D. (2009). Cognitive strategy instruction. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension. New York: Routledge New York.
   Google Scholar
• Elleman, A. M. (2017). Examining the impact of inference instruction on the literal and inferential comprehension of skilled and less skilled readers: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(6), 761–781. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000180
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ericsson, K. A., & Kintsch, W. (1995). Long-term working memory. Psychological Review, 102(2), 211–245. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.102.2.211
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freebody, P., & Anderson, R. C. (1983). Effects of vocabulary difficulty, text cohesion, and schema availability on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(3), 277–294. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/747389
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Garner, R., & Gillingham, M. G. (1991). Topic knowledge, cognitive interest, and text recall: A microanalysis. The Journal of Experimental Education, 59(4), 310–319. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220973.1991.10806569
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gilkerson, J., Richards, J. A., Warren, S. F., Montgomery, J. K., Greenwood, C. R., Kimbrough Oller, D., … Paul, T. D. (2017). Mapping the early language environment using all-day recordings and automated analysis. American Journal of Speech-Language Pathology, 26(2), 248–265. doi:https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_AJSLP-15-0169
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7(1), 6–10. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/074193258600700104
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., & Bertus, E. L. (1998). The construction of causal inferences while reading expository texts on science and technology. Scientific Studies of Reading, 2(3), 247–269. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0203_4
   Google Scholar
• Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Louwerse, M. M. (2003). What do readers need to learn in order to process coherence relations in narrative and expository text. In A. P. Sweet & C. Snow (Eds.), Rethinking reading comprehension (pp. 82–98). New York: Guildford Publications.
   Google Scholar
• Grant, M. J., & Booth, A. (2009). A typology of reviews: An analysis of 14 review types and associated methodologies. Health Information and Libraries Journal, 26(2), 91–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-1842.2009.00848.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith, D., & Duffett, A. M. (Producer). (2018). Reading and Writing Instruction in American Schools. Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
   Google Scholar
• Halliday, M. A. K., & Hasan, R. (2014). Cohesion in English. London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (1995). Meaningful differences in the everyday life of America’s children. Baltimore, MD: Paul Brookes.
   Google Scholar
• Hart, B., & Risley, T. R. (2003). The early catastrophe: The 30 million word gap by age 3. American Educator, 27(1), 4–9.
   Google Scholar
• Hirsch, E. D. (2019). Why knowledge matters: Rescuing our children from failed educational theories. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Education Press.
   Google Scholar
• Holmes, B. C. (1983). The effect of prior knowledge on the question answering of good and poor readers. Journal of Reading Behavior, 15(4), 1–18. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968309547493
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoover, H., Dunbar, S., & Frisbie, D. (2001). Iowa tests of basic skills (ITBS) forms A, B, and C. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing Company.
   Google Scholar
• Hua, A. N., & Keenan, J. M. (2017). Interpreting reading comprehension test results: Quantile regression shows that explanatory factors can vary with performance level. Scientific Studies of Reading, 21(3), 225–238. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10888438.2017.1280675
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hunt, K. W. (1965). A synopsis of clause-to-sentence length factors. The English Journal, 54(4), 300–309. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/811114
   Google Scholar
• Johnston, P., & Pearson, P. D. (1982). Prior Knowledge, Connectivity, and the Assessment of Reading Comprehension. Technical Report. No. 245. Retrieved from Urbana-Champaign.
   Google Scholar
• Juel, C. (1988). Learning to read and write: A longitudinal study of 54 children from first through fourth grades. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 437–447. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.4.437
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., Rapp, D. N., & van den Broek, P. (2003). The influence of reader’s prior knowledge on text comprehension and learning from text. Progress in Education, 13, 189–209.
   Google Scholar
• Kendeou, P., & Van Den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & Cognition, 35(7), 1567–1577. doi:https://doi.org/10.3758/bf03193491
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S., Burkhauser, M. A., Mesite, L. M., Asher, C. A., Relyea, J. E., Fitzgerald, J., & Elmore, J. (2021). Improving reading comprehension, science domain knowledge, and reading engagement through a first-grade content literacy intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology, 113(1), 3–26. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/edu0000465
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A paradigm for cognition. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge university press.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2009). Learning and constructivism. In S. Tobias & T. M. Duffy (Eds.), Constructivist Instruction: Success or failure? New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1978). Towards a model of text comprehension and production. Psychological Review, 85(5), 363–394. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.85.5.363
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kostons, D., & van der Werf, G. (2015). The effects of activating prior topic and metacognitive knowledge on text comprehension scores. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 85(3), 264–275. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/bjep.12069
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraal, A., Koornneef, A. W., Saab, N., & van den Broek, P. W. (2018). Processing of expository and narrative texts by low- and high-comprehending children . Reading and Writing, 31(9), 2017–2040. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9789-2
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langdon Sjostrom, C., & Chou Hare, V. (1984). Teaching high school students to identify main ideas in expository text. The Journal of Educational Research, 78(2), 114–118. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1984.10885584
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, J. A. (1984). Examining background knowledge and text comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(4), 468–481. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/747918
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lipson, M. Y. (1982). Learning New Information from Text: The Role of Prior Knowledge and Reading Ability. Journal of Reading Behavior, 14(3), 243–261. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968209547453.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• MacGinitie, W. H., & MacGinitie, R. K. (1992). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. Toronto, ON: Nelson.
   Google Scholar
• Marr, M. B., & Gormley, K. (1982). Children's recall of familiar and unfamiliar text. Reading Research Quarterly, 18(1), 89–104. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/747539
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., & Blake, R. G. K. (2009). Rethinking reading comprehension instruction: A comparison of instruction for strategies and content approaches. Reading Research Quarterly, 44(3), 218–253. doi:https://doi.org/10.1598/RRQ.44.3.1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. G., Beck, I. L., Sinatra, G. M., & Loxterman, J. A. (1992). The contribution of prior knowledge and coherent text to comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 27(1), 78–93. doi:https://doi.org/10.2307/747834
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Kintsch, E., Songer, N. B., & Kintsch, W. (1996). Are good texts always better? Interactions of text coherence, background knowledge, and levels of understanding in learning from text. Cognition and Instruction, 14(1), 1–43. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci1401_1
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & Magliano, J. (2009). Toward a comprehensive model of comprehension. Psychology of Learning Motivation, 51, 297–384.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., & McDaniel, M. A. (2004). Suppressing irrelevant information: Knowledge activation or inhibition? Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30(2), 465–482. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0278-7393.30.2.465
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McNamara, D. S., Ozuru, Y., & Floyd, R. G. (2011). Comprehension challenges in the fourth grade: The roles of text cohesion, text genre, and readers' prior knowledge. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(1), 229–257.
   Google Scholar
• Moats, L. C. (2000). Speech to print: Language essentials for teachers. Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.
   Google Scholar
• Morrison, J. M., Sullivan, F., Murray, E., & Jolly, B. (1999). Evidence-based education: Development of an instrument to critically appraise reports of educational interventions. Medical Education, 33(12), 890–893. doi:https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2923.1999.00479.x
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Muijselaar, M., Swart, N., Steenbeek-Planting, E., Droop, M., Verhoeven, L., & de Jong, P. (2018). The effect of a strategy training on reading comprehension in fourth-grade students. The Journal of Educational Research, 111(6), 690–703.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson, K. (1998). Language in cognitive development: The emergence of the mediated mind. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Oakhill, J., & Cain, K. (2007). Issues of causality in children’s reading comprehension. In Reading comprehension strategies: Theories, interventions, and technologies (pp. 47–72). New York: Erlbaum.
   Google Scholar
• O'Brien, E. J., & Cook, A. E. (2015). Passive activation and instantiation of inferences during reading. In E. J. O'Brien, A. E. Cook, & R. F. Lorch Jr (Eds.), Inferences during reading. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Olson, M. W. (1985). Text type and reader ability: The effects on paraphrase and text-based inference questions. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17(3), 199–214. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968509547540
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Reilly, T., & McNamara, D. S. (2007). Reversing the reverse cohesion effect: Good texts can be better for strategic, high-knowledge readers. Discourse Processes, 43(2), 121–152. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01638530709336895
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paul, R., & Norbury, C. F. (2012). Language disorders from infancy through adolescence. San Diego, CA: Elsevier.
   Google Scholar
• Pearson, P. D., & Johnson, D. D. (1972). Teaching reading comprehension. New York, NY: Holt, Reinhart and Winston.
   Google Scholar
• Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Milton: Blackwell Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Pinnell, G. S., & Fountas, I. C. (2007). The continuum of literacy learning, grades K-8: Behaviors and understandings to notice, teach, and support. Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Ramsay, C. M., Sperling, R. A., & Dornisch, M. M. (2010). A comparison of the effects of students’ expository text comprehension strategies. Instructional Science, 38(6), 551–570. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11251-008-9081-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rapp, D. N., Broek, P. v. d., McMaster, K. L., Kendeou, P., & Espin, C. A. (2007). Higher-order comprehension processes in struggling readers: A perspective for research and intervention. Scientific Studies of Reading, 11(4), 289–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10888430701530417
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recht, D. R., & Leslie, L. (1988). Effect of prior knowledge on good and poor readers' memory of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 16–20. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.80.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Reutzel, D. R., & Morgan, B. C. (1990). Effects of prior knowledge, explicitness, and clause order on children's comprehension of causal relationships. Reading Psychology, 11(2), 93–114. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/0270271900110202
   Google Scholar
• Rumelhart, D. E. (2017). Schemata: The building blocks of cognition. In R. J. Spiro, B. C. Bruce, & W. F. Brewer (Eds.), Theoretical issues in reading comprehension (pp. 33–58). London: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Schleicher, A. (2018). Educating students for their future, not our past. Teacher Magazine.
   Google Scholar
• Shanahan, T. (2018). Comprehension Skills or Strategies: Is there a difference and does it matter? [Blog post] Retrieved from https://shanahanonliteracy.com/blog/comprehension-skills-or-strategies-is-there-a-difference-and-does-it-matter
   Google Scholar
• Snow, C. (2002). Reading for understanding: Toward an R&D program in reading comprehension. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
   Google Scholar
• Spilich, G., Vesonder, G. T., Chiesi, H. L., & Voss, J. F. (1979). Test processing of domain-related information for individuals with high and low domain knowledge. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behaviour, 80, 275–290.
   Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J., & Taylor, B. M. (1987). On investigating children's transition from narrative to expository discourse: The multidimensional nature of psychological text classification. In J. Tierney, P. L. Anders, & J. N. Mitchell (Eds.), Understanding readers' understanding: Theory and practice (pp. 77–93). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., & Jacobson, M. G. (1986). Vocabulary difficulty, prior knowledge, and text comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 18(4), 309–323. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968609547578
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stein, N. L., & Glenn, C. G. (1979). An analysis of story comprehension in elementary school children: A test of a schema. In R. Freedle (Ed.), New directions in discourse processing (Vol. 2, pp. 53–120). Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
   Google Scholar
• Stevens, E. A., Park, S., & Vaughn, S. (2019). A review of summarizing and main idea interventions for struggling readers in grades 3 through 12: 1978–2016. Remedial and Special Education, 40(3), 131–149. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0741932517749940
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strutt, L. (2011). Teacher understandings of responsibilities for reading instruction in stage one and two English courses of study in Western Australian schools. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Edith Cowan University, Perth.
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J. (1994). Cognitive load theory, learning difficulty, and instructional design. Learning and Instruction, 4(4), 295–312. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/0959-4752(94)90003-5
   Google Scholar
• Sweller, J., van Merriënboer, J. J., & Paas, F. (2019). Cognitive architecture and instructional design: 20 years later. Educational Psychology Review, 10, 1–32.
   Google Scholar
• Taft, M. L., & Leslie, L. (1985). The effects of prior knowledge and oral reading accuracy on miscues and comprehension. Journal of Reading Behavior, 17(2), 163–179. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10862968509547537
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tapiero, I. (2007). Situation models and levels of coherence: Toward a definition of comprehension. New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Taylor, B. M. (1979). Good and poor readers' recall of familiar and unfamiliar text. Journal of Reading Behavior, 11(4), 375–380. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10862967909547343
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Van Dijk, T. A., Kintsch, W., & Van Dijk, T. A. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Vosniadou, S., & Brewer, W. F. (1994). Mental models of the day/night cycle. Cognitive Science, 18(1), 123–183. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15516709cog1801_4
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Walker, C. H. (1987). Relative importance of domain knowledge and overall aptitude on acquisition of domain-related information. Cognition and Instruction, 4(1), 25–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532690xci0401_2
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., & Lauer, K. D. (2004). Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners: Building the basics of comprehension instruction. Exceptionality, 12(3), 129–144. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327035ex1203_2
   Google Scholar
• Willingham, D. T. (2006). The usefulness of brief instruction in reading comprehension strategies. American Educator, 30(4), 39–50.
   Google Scholar
• Wolfe, M. B., & Woodwyk, J. M. (2010). Processing and memory of information presented in narrative or expository texts. The British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(Pt 3), 341–362. doi:https://doi.org/10.1348/000709910X485700
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wren, S. (2000). The cognitive foundations of learning to read: A framework. Austin: Southwest Educational Development Laboratory.
   Google Scholar
• Yekovich, F. R., Walker, C. H., Ogle, L. T., & Thompson, M. A. (1990). The influence of domain knowledge on inferencing in low-aptitude individuals. In A. C. Graesser & G. H. Bower (Eds.), Psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 25, pp. 259–278). New York, NY: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Yochum, N. (1991). Children's learning from informational text: The relationship between prior knowledge and text structure. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23(1), 87–108. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/10862969109547728
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar