Does Cultivating Content Knowledge during Literacy Instruction Support Vocabulary and Comprehension in the Elementary School Years? A Systematic Review

References

• Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson, R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, & P. Mosenthal (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (1st ed., pp. 255–291). New York: Longman.
   Google Scholar
• Barber, J., & Cervetti, G. N. (2019). No more science kits or texts in isolation. Portmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Bereiter, C. (1991). Implications of connectionism for thinking about rules. Educational Researcher, 20(3), 10–16. doi:10.3102/0013189X020003010
   Google Scholar
• Cabell, S. Q., & Hwang, H. (2020). Building content Knowledge to boost comprehension in the primary grades. Reading Research Quarterly, 55(S1), S99–S107. doi:10.1002/rrq.338
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle, J. F., Fleming, J. E., & Gudbrandsen, B. (2000). Incidental word learning in science classes. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(2), 184–211. doi:10.1006/ceps.1998.1001
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Wright, T. S., & Hwang, H. (2016). Conceptual coherence, comprehension, and vocabulary acquisition: A knowledge effect? Reading and Writing, 29, 761–779. doi:10.1007/s11145-016-9628-x
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., Barber, J., Dorph, R., Pearson, P. D., & Goldschmidt, P. G. (2012). The impact of an integrated approach to science and literacy in elementary school classrooms. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(5), 631–658. doi:10.1002/tea.21015
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., & Hiebert, E. H. (2019). Knowledge at the center of English language arts instruction. The Reading Teacher, 72(4), 499–507. doi:10.1002/trtr.1758
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cervetti, G. N., & Wright, T. S. (2020). The role of knowledge in understanding and learning from text. In E. B. Moje, P. Afflerbach, P. Enciso, & N. K. Lesaux (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. V, pp. 237–260). New York, NY: Routledge.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Connor, C. M., Dombek, J., Crowe, E. C., Spencer, M., Tighe, E. L., Coffinger, S., Zargar, E., … Petscher, Y. (2017). Acquiring science and social studies knowledge in kindergarten through fourth grade: Conceptualization, design, implementation, and efficacy testing of content-area literacy instruction (CALI). Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(3), 301–320. doi:10.1037/edu0000128
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Cooper, H., Hedges, L. V., Jefferey, C., & Valentine, J. C. (2019). The handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Cox, S., Parmer, R., Strizek, G., & Thomas, T. (2016). Documentation for the 2011–12 schools and staffing survey (NCES 2016-817). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics.
   Google Scholar
• de Boer, H., Donker, A. S., & van der Werf, M. P. C. (2014). Effects of the attributes of educational interventions on students’ academic performance: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research, 84(4), 509–545. doi:10.3102/0034654314540006
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duke, N. K., Caughlan, S., Juzwik, M. M., & Martin, N. M. (2012). Reading and writing genre with purpose in K-8 classrooms. Portmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Duval, S., & Tweedie, R. (2000). A nonparametric “trim and fill” method of accounting for publication bias in meta-analysis. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95(449), 89–98. doi:10.1080/01621459.2000.10473905
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Egger, M., Smith, G. D., Schneider, M., & Minder, C. (1997). Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test. BMJ (Clinical Research ed.), 315(7109), 629–634. doi:10.1136/bmj.315.7109.629
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Elleman, A. M., Lindo, E. J., Morphy, P., & Compton, D. L. (2009). The impact of vocabulary instruction on passage-level comprehension of school-age children: A meta-analysis. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2(1), 1–44. doi:10.1080/19345740802539200
   Google Scholar
• Fang, Z., Lamme, L., Pringle, R., Patrick, J., Sanders, J., Zmach, C., … Henkel, M. (2008). Integrating reading into middle school science: What we did, found and learned. International Journal of Science Education, 30(15), 2067–2089. doi:10.1080/09500690701644266
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Galbraith, D., & Baaijen, V. M. (2018). The work of writing: Raiding the inarticulate. Educational Psychologist, 53(4), 238–257. doi:10.1080/00461520.2018.1505515
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guo, Y., Wang, S., Hall, A. H., Breit-Smith, A., & Busch, J. (2016). The effects of science instruction on young children’s vocabulary learning: A research synthesis. Early Childhood Education Journal, 44(4), 359–367. doi:10.1007/s10643-015-0721-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., Anderson, E., Alao, S., & Rinehart, J. (1999). Influences of Concept-Oriented Reading Instruction on strategy use and conceptual learning from text. The Elementary School Journal, 99(4), 343–366. doi:10.1086/461929
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Guthrie, J. T., McRae, A., Coddington, C. S., Lutz Klauda, S., Wigfield, A., & Barbosa, P. (2009). Impacts of comprehensive reading instruction on diverse outcomes of low- and high-achieving readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(3), 195–214. doi:10.1177/0022219408331039
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hale, S. L. (2010). Efficacy of thematic units on language and literacy: A collaborative study of a shelter unit intervention with struggling first graders (Publication No. 3441936) [Doctoral dissertation, Sam Houston State University]. ProQuest Dissertations Publishing.
   Google Scholar
• Halvorsen, A., Alleman, J., & Brugar, K. A. (2013). Integration of literacy and social studies. In B. M. Taylor & N. K. Duke (Eds.), Handbook of effective literacy instruction: Research-based practice K-8 (pp. 394–416). New York: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hedges, L. V., & Hedberg, E. C. (2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(1), 60–87. doi:10.3102/0162373707299706
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hiebert, E. H. (2019). Teaching words and how they work: Small changes for big vocabulary results. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
   Google Scholar
• Hinde, E. R., Popp, S. E. O., Dorn, R. I., Ekiss, G. O., Mater, M., Smith, C. B., & Libbee, M. (2007). The integration of literacy and geography: The Arizona GeoLiteracy program’s effect on reading comprehension. Theory & Research in Social Education, 35(3), 343–365. doi:10.1080/00933104.2007.10473340
   Google Scholar
• Hwang, H. (2019). The role of science domain knowledge and reading motivation in predicting informational and narrative reading comprehension in L1 and L2: An international study. Learning and Individual Differences, 76, 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.lindif.2019.101782
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hwang, H., Lupo, S. M., Cabell, S. Q., & Wang, S. (2021). What research says about leveraging the literacy block for learning. Reading in Virginia, 42, 35–47.
   Google Scholar
• Institute of Education Sciences (IES). (2017). What Works Clearinghouse standards handbook (Version 4.0). Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved from https://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/Docs/referenceresources/wwc_standards_handbook_v4.pdf
   Google Scholar
• Jeong, J., Gaffney, J. S., & Choi, J. -O. (2010). Availability and use of informational texts in second-, third-, and fourth-grade classrooms. Research in the Teaching of English, 44(4), 435–456. Retrieved from doi:10.2307/25704889
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kaefer, T., Neuman, S. B., & Pinkham, A. M. (2015). Pre-existing background knowledge influences socioeconomic differences in preschoolers’ word learning and comprehension. Reading Psychology, 36(3), 203–231. doi:10.1080/02702711.2013.843064
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim, J. S., Relyea, J. E., Burkhauser, M. A., Scherer, E., & Rich, P. (2021). Improving elementary grade students’ science and social studies vocabulary knowledge depth, reading comprehension, and argumentative writing: A conceptual replication. Educational Psychology Review, 33(4), 1935–1964. doi:10.1007/s10648-021-09609-6
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kintsch, W. (2013). Revisiting the construction-integration model of text comprehension and its implications for instruction. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 807–839). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
   Google Scholar
• Kong, S. (2014). Collaboration between content and language specialists in late immersion. The Canadian Modern Language Review, 70(1), 103–122. doi:10.3138/cmlr.1607
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kraft, M. A. (2020). Interpreting effect sizes of education interventions. Educational Researcher, 49(4), 241–253. doi:10.3102/0013189X20912798
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langer, J., & Applebee, A. (1987). How writing shapes thinking: A study of teaching and learning. NCTE Research Report no. 22.
   Google Scholar
• Lesaux, N. K., & Harris, J. R. (2015). Cultivating knowledge, building language. Portmouth, NH: Heinemann.
   Google Scholar
• Lupo, S. M., Berry, A., Thacker, E., Sawyer, A., & Merritt, J. (2020). Rethinking text sets to support knowledge building and interdisciplinary learning. The Reading Teacher, 73(4), 513–524. doi:10.1002/trtr.1869
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mason, L., Zaccoletti, S., Carretti, B., Scrimin, S., & Diakidoy, I. A. N. (2019). The role of inhibition in conceptual learning from refutation and standard expository texts. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 17(3), 483–501. doi:10.1007/s10763-017-9874-7
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McKeown, M. G., Deane, P. D., Scott, J. D., Krovetz, R., & Lawless, R. R. (2017). Vocabulary assessment to support instruction: Building rich word-learning experiences. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
   Google Scholar
• Mezynski, K. (1983). Issues concerning the acquisition of knowledge: Effects of vocabulary training on reading comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 53(2), 253–279. doi:10.3102/00346543053002253
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• National Council for the Social Studies. (1994). Curriculum standards for social studies: Expectations of excellence. Washington, DC: Author.
   Google Scholar
• National Governors Association Center for Best Practices & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2010). Common Core State Standards for English language arts and literacy in history/social studies, science, and technical subjects. Washington, DC: Authors.
   Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B., & Kaefer, T. (2018). Developing low-income children’s vocabulary and content knowledge through a shared book reading program. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 52, 15–24. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2017.12.001
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Neuman, S. B., Kaefer, T., & Pinkham, A. (2014). Building background knowledge. The Reading Teacher, 68(2), 145–148. doi:10.1002/trtr.1314
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NGSS Lead States. (2013). Next Generation Science Standards: For states, by states. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.
   Google Scholar
• Ouellette, G. P. (2006). What’s meaning got to do with it: The role of vocabulary in word reading and reading comprehension. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(3), 554–566. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.554
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pappas, C. C., Varelas, M., Barry, A., & Rife, A. (2002). Dialogic inquiry around information texts: The role of intertextuality in constructing scientific understandings in urban primary classrooms. Linguistics and Education, 13(4), 435–482. doi:10.1016/S0898-5898(03)00004-4
   Google Scholar
• Peters, J. L., Sutton, A. J., Jones, D. R., Abrams, K. R., & Rushton, L. (2007). Performance of the trim and fill method in the presence of publication bias and between-study heterogeneity. Statistics in Medicine, 26(25), 4544–4562. doi:10.1002/sim.2889
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pladevall-Ballester, E. (2016). CLIL subject selection and young learners’ listening and reading comprehension skills. International Journal of Applied Linguistics, 26(1), 52–74. doi:10.1111/ijal.12079
   Google Scholar
• Pulido, D. (2003). Modeling the role of second language proficiency and topic familiarity in second language incidental vocabulary acquisition through reading. Language Learning, 53(2), 233–284. doi:10.1111/1467-9922.00217
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pulido, D. (2007). The effects of topic familiarity and passage sight vocabulary on L2 lexical inferencing and retention through reading. Applied Linguistics, 28(1), 66–86. doi:10.1093/applin/aml049
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Recht, D. R., & Leslie, L. (1988). Effect of prior knowledge on good and poor readers’ memory of text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(1), 16–20. doi:10.1037/0022-0663.80.1.16
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Romance, N. R., & Vitale, M. R. (2012). Expanding the role of K-5 science instruction in educational reform: Implications of an interdisciplinary model for integrating science and reading. School Science and Mathematics, 112(8), 506–515. doi:10.1111/ssm.12000
   Google Scholar
• See, B. H., Gorard, S., & Siddiqui, N. (2017). Can explicit teaching of knowledge improve reading attainment? An evaluation of the Core Knowledge curriculum. British Educational Research Journal, 43(2), 372–393. doi:10.1002/berj.3278
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shanahan, C., & Shanahan, T. (2014). Does disciplinary literacy have a place in elementary school? The Reading Teacher, 67(8), 636–639. doi:10.1002/trtr.1257
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Silva, M., & Limongi, R. (2019). Writing to learn increases long-term memory consolidation: A mental-chronometry and computational model study of “epistemic writing. Journal of Writing Research, 11(1), 211–243. doi:10.17239/jowr-2019.11.01.07
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Spiro, R. J., Feltovich, P. J., Jacobson, M. J., & Coulson, R. L. (1991). Cognitive flexibility, constructivism, and hypertext: Random access instruction for advanced knowledge acquisition in ill-structured domains. Educational Technology, 31(5), 24–33.
   Google Scholar
• Stahl, S. A., Hare, V. C., Sinatra, R., & Gregory, J. F. (1991). Defining the role of prior knowledge and vocabulary in reading comprehension: The retiring of number 41. Journal of Reading Behavior, 23(4), 487–508. doi:10.1080/10862969109547755
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sterne, J. A. C., Sutton, A. J., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Terrin, N., Jones, D. R., Lau, J., … Higgins, J. P. T. (2011). Recommendations for examining and interpreting funnel plot asymmetry in meta-analyses of randomised controlled trials. BMJ (Online), 343(1), d4002–d4002. doi:10.1136/bmj.d4002
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tanner-Smith, E. E., & Tipton, E. (2014). Robust variance estimation with dependent effect sizes: Practical considerations including a software tutorial in Stata and SPSS. Research Synthesis Methods, 5(1), 13–30. doi:10.1002/jrsm.1091
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Valentine, J. C., Aloe, A., & Wilson, S. (2019). Interpreting effect sizes. In H. Cooper, L. Hedges, & J. C. Valentine (Eds.), The Handbook of research synthesis and meta-analysis (3rd ed., pp. 433–452). New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, M. R., & Romance, N. R. (2011). Adaptation of a knowledge-based instructional intervention to accelerate student learning in science and early literacy in grades 1 and 2. Journal of Curriculum and Instruction, 5(2), 79–93. doi:10.3776/joci.2011.v5n2p79-93
   Google Scholar
• Vitale, M. R., & Romance, N. R. (2012). Using in-depth science instruction to accelerate student achievement in science and reading comprehension in grades 1–2. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(2), 457–472. doi:10.1007/s10763-011-9326-8
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Von Hippel, P. T. (2015). The heterogeneity statistic I2 can be biased in small meta-analyses. BMC Medical Research Methodology, 15(1), 1–8. doi:10.1186/s12874-015-0024-z
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., Hall, K. M., & Lauer, K. D. (2004). Teaching expository text structure to young at-risk learners: Building the basics of comprehension instruction. Exceptionality, 12(3), 129–144. doi:10.1207/s15327035ex1203
   Google Scholar
• Williams, J. P., Pollini, S., Nubla-Kung, A. M., Snyder, A. E., Garcia, A., Ordynans, J. G., & Grant Atkins, J. (2014). An intervention to improve comprehension of cause/effect through expository text structure instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106(1), 1–17. doi:10.1037/a0033215
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright, T. S., & Cervetti, G. N. (2017). A systematic review of the research on vocabulary instruction that impacts text comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 52(2), 203–226. doi:10.1002/rrq.163
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yopp, R. H., & Yopp, H. K. (2006). Informational texts as read-alouds at school and home. Journal of Literacy Research, 38(1), 37–51. doi:10.1207/s15548430jlr3801_2
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zahorik, J. A. (1996). Elementary and secondary teachers’ reports of how they make learning interesting. Elementary School Journal, 96(5), 562–564.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar