References
- Livingston G, Sommerlad A, Orgeta V, et al. Dementia prevention, intervention, and care. The Lancet. 2017;390(10113):2673–2734. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(17)31363-6.
- Carrion C, Folkvord F, Anastasiadou D, Aymerich M. Cognitive therapy for dementia patients: A systematic review. Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2018;46(1–2):1–26. ():doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000490851.
- Fitzpatrick-Lewis D, Warren R, Ali MU, Sherifali D, Raina P. Treatment for mild cognitive impairment: a systematic review and meta-analysis. CMAJ Open. 2015;3(4):E419–27. doi:https://doi.org/10.9778/cmajo.20150057.
- Sherman DS, Mauser J, Nuno M, Sherzai D. The efficacy of cognitive intervention in mild cognitive impairment (MCI): a meta-analysis of outcomes on neuropsychological measures. Neuropsychol Rev. 2017;27(4):440–484. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/s11065-017-9363-3.
- Alzheimer Society of Canada. Guidelines for care: Person-centred care of people with dementia living in care homes. Framework. Guidelines for care. Person-centred care of people with dementia living in care homes: Executive summary. August 11, 2017. https://alzheimer.ca/en/Home/We-can-help/Resources/For-health-care-professionals/culture-change-towards-person-centred-care/guidelines-for-care. Accessed February 14, 2019.
- Yoshida K, Asakawa K, Yamauchi T, et al. The flow state scale for occupational tasks: Development, reliability, and validity. Hong Kong J Occup Therapy. 2013;23(2):54–61. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hkjot.2013.09.002.
- Fredricks JA, Filsecker M, Lawson MA. Student engagement, context, and adjustment: Addressing definitional, measurement, and methodological issues. Learn Instruct. 2016;43:1–4. doi:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.02.002.
- Watson D, Wiese D, Jatin V, Tellegen A. The two general activation systems of affect: Structural findings, evolutionary considerations, and psychobiological evidence. J Personal Soc Psychol. 1999;76(5):820–838. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.76.5.820.
- Csikszentmihalyi M, Abuhamdeh S, Nakamura J. Flow and the Foundations of Positive Psychology. Netherlands: Springer; 2014.
- Hoppes S, Wilcox T, Graham G. Meanings of play for older adults. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2001;18(3):57–68. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/J148v18n03_04.
- Wilkinson P. A Brief History of Serious Games. In: Dörner R., Göbel S., Kickmeier-Rust M., Masuch M., Zweig K. (eds) Entertainment Computing and Serious Games. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 9970. Springer, Cham; 2016. doi:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-46152-6_2.
- Jegers K. Elaborating eight elements of fun: supporting design of pervasive player enjoyment. Comput Entertain. 2009;7(2):1–3574. doi:https://doi.org/10.1145/1541895.1541905.
- Klimmt C, Hartmann T. Effectance, Self-Efficacy, and the Motivation to Play Video Games. Playing Video Games: Motives, Responses, and Consequences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers; 2006.
- Gates NJ, Vernooij RW, Di Nisio M, et al. Computerised cognitive training for preventing dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019;3(3):CD012279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012279.pub2.
- Nguyen L, Murphy K, Andrews G. Immediate and long-term efficacy of executive functions cognitive training in older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Psychol Bull. 2019;145(7):698–733. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/bul0000196.
- Gates NJ, Rutjes AWS, Di Nisio M, Cochrane Dementia and Cognitive Improvement Group, et al. Computerised cognitive training for maintaining cognitive function in cognitively healthy people in late life. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019; 1–94. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD012277.pub2.
- Lampit A, Hallock H, Valenzuela M. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: A systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med. 2014;11(11):e1001756. doi:https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756.
- Palumbo V, Paternò F. Serious games to cognitively stimulate older adults: a systematic literature review. Paper Presented at: Proceedings of the 13th ACM International Conference on PErvasive Technologies Related to Assistive Environments, 2020.
- Sood P, Kletzel SL, Krishnan S, et al. Nonimmersive brain gaming for older adults with cognitive impairment: a scoping review. Gerontologist. 2019;59(6):e764–e781. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gny164.
- Hill NTM, Mowszowski L, Naismith SL, Chadwick VL, Valenzuela M, Lampit A. Computerized cognitive training in older adults with mild cognitive impairment or dementia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Psychiatr. 2017;174(4):329–340. doi:https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.16030360.
- Lobo MA, Moeyaert M, Baraldi Cunha A, Babik I. Single-case design, analysis, and quality assessment for intervention research. J Neurol Phys Ther. 2017;41(3):187–197. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/NPT.0000000000000187.
- Daum C, Rios-Rincón A, Miguel-Cruz A, et al. Computer games for older adults: Findings of a usability study. Paper Presented at: Canadian Association of Occupational Therapists, 2018. Vancouver.
- Thomas H. Occupation-Based Activity Analysis. 2nd ed. Grove Road: Slack Inc; 2015.
- Rios-Rincon A, Miguel-Cruz A, Liu L, Stroulia E. Computer games for older adults – engagement as an outcome. Paper Presented at AGE-WELL 2018 Conference, 2018. Vancouver, BC.
- Rios Rincon A, Miguel-Cruz A, Liu L, Stroulia E. Engagement during computer serious games: A rapid literature review. Paper Presented at: Canadian Association on Gerentology Conference; October, 2017. Winipeg.
- Liu L, Rios Rincon A, Daum C, Miguel-Cruz A, Altura K, Stroulia E. Two measures of engagement developed for older adults living with dementia. October, 2018.
- Watson D, Clark L, Tellegen A. Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1988;54(6):1063–1070. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063.
- von Humboldt S, Monteiro A, Leal I. Validation of the PANAS: A measure of positive and negative affect for use with cross-national older adults. RES. 2017;9(2):10–19. doi:https://doi.org/10.5539/res.v9n2p10.
- Buz J, Pérez-Arechaederra D, Fernández-Pulido R, Urchaga D. Factorial structure and measurement invariance of the PANAS in Spanish order adults. Spanish J Psychol. 2015;18:1–11.
- Ostir GV, Smith P, Smith D, Ottenbacher KJ. Reliability of the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS) in medical rehabilitation. Clin Rehabil. 2005;19(7):767–769. doi:https://doi.org/10.1191/0269215505cr894oa.
- Nasreddine Z, Phillips N, Chertkow H. MoCA Version 3. MoCA. January 1, 2011. www.mocatest.org. Accessed November 8, 2016.
- Lam B, Middleton LE, Masellis M, et al. Criterion and convergent validity of the Montreal cognitive assessment with screening and standardized neuropsychological testing. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013;61(12):2181–2185. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.12541.
- Julayanont P, Tangwongchai S, Hemrungrojn S, et al. The montreal cognitive assessment_basic: a screening tool for mild cognitive impairment in illiterate and low-educated elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2015;63(12):2550–2554. doi:https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.13820.
- Gill DJ, Freshman A, Blender JA, Ravina B. The Montreal cognitive assessment as a screening tool for cognitive impairment in Parkinson’s disease. Mov Disord. 2008;23(7):1043–1046. doi:https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.22017.
- Koski L, Xie H, Finch L. Measuring cognition in a geriatric outpatient clinic: Rasch analysis of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2009;22(3):151–160. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/0891988709332944.
- Bowie CR, Harvey PD. Administration and interpretation of the Trail Making Test. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(5):2277–2281. doi:https://doi.org/10.1038/nprot.2006.390.
- Kortte KB, Horner MD, Windham WK. The trail making test, part B: cognitive flexibility or ability to maintain set? Appl Neuropsychol. 2002;9(2):106–109. doi:https://doi.org/10.1207/S15324826AN0902_5.
- Sánchez-Cubillo I, Periáñez J, Adrover-Roig D, et al. Construct validity of the Trail Making Test: Role of task-switching, working memory, inhibition/interference control, and visuomotor abilities. J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2009;15(3):438–450. doi:https://doi.org/10.1017/S1355617709090626.
- Fals-Stewart W. An interrater reliability study of the Trail Making Test (Parts A and B). Percept Mot Skills. 1992;74(1):39–42. doi:https://doi.org/10.2466/pms.1992.74.1.39.
- Barker-Collo S, Feigin V, Lawes C, Senior H, Parag V. Natural history of attention deficits and their influence on functional recovery from acute stages to 6 months after stroke. Neuroepidemiology. 2010;35(4):255–262. doi:https://doi.org/10.1159/000319894.
- Kratochwill TR, Hitchcock J, Horner RH, et al. Single-case design technical documentation Version 1.0 (Pilot). What Works Clearinghouse. 2010. http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/pdf/reference_resources/wwc_scd.pdf. Accessed December 12, 2013.
- Gresham FM. Treatment Integrity in the Single-Subject Research. Design and Analysis of Single-Case Research. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates; 1996.
- Subramaniam K, Kounios J, Parrish TB, Jung-Beeman M. A brain mechanism for facilitation of insight by positive affect. J Cognit Neurosci. 2008;3(21):415–432.
- Portney LG, Watkins MP. Foundations of Clinical Research: Application to Practice. 3rd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall. Inc; 2008.
- Ottenbacher K . Analysis of data in idiographic research. Issues and methodsAm J Phys Med Rehabil. 1992;71(4):202–208. doi:https://doi.org/10.1097/00002060-199208000-00002.
- Kazdin AE. Single-Case Research Designs. Methods for Clinical and Applied Settings. NY: Oxford University Press; 2011.
- Hsieh H, Shannon SE. Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(9):1277–1288. doi:https://doi.org/10.1177/1049732305276687.
- Astell A, Alm N, Dye R, Gowans G, Vaughan P, Ellis M. Digital video games for older adults with cognitive impairment. Paper Presented at: Computers Helping People with Special Needs. ICCHP 2014. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2014. Cham.
- Belchior P, Marsiske M, Sisco S, Yam A, Mann W. Older adults’ engagement with a video game training program. Act Adapt Aging. 2012;36(4):269–279. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01924788.2012.702307.
- Moyle W, Jones C, Dwan T, Petrovich T. Effectiveness of a virtual reality forest on people with dementia: A mixed methods pilot study. The Gerontol. 2018;58(3):478–487. doi:https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnw270.
- Tan J, Li N, Gao J, et al. Optimal cutoff scores for dementia and mild cognitive impairment of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment among elderly and oldest-old Chinese population. J Alzheimers Dis. 2015;43(4):1403–1412. doi:https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-141278.
- Roberts RO, Knopman DS, Mielke MM, et al. Higher risk of progression to dementia in mild cognitive impairment cases who revert to normal. Neurology. 2014;82(4):317–325. doi:https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0000000000000055.
- Toril P, Reales JM, Ballesteros S. Video game training enhances cognition of older adults: a meta-analytic study. Psychol Aging. 2014;29(3):706–716. doi:https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037507.
- Meltzer EP, Kapoor A, Fogel J, et al. Association of psychological, cognitive, and functional variables with self-reported executive functioning in a sample of nondemented community-dwelling older adults. Appl Neuropsychol: Adult. 2017;24(4):364–375. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23279095.2016.1185428.