Aesthetics Model Applied for Older Adults: Daily Life Assistive Device Study

References

• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. https://data.oecd.org/. Accessed Month DD, YYYY.
   Google Scholar
• Rubenstein LZ. Falls in older people: epidemiology, risk factors and strategies for prevention. Age Ageing. 2006;35(suppl_2):ii37–ii41. PMID: 16926202. doi:10.1093/ageing/afl084.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zaidi A, Gasior K, Zolyomi E, Schmidt A, Rodrigues R, Marin B. Measuring active and healthy aging in Europe. J Eur Soc Policy. 2017;27(2):138–157. doi:10.1177/0958928716676550.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stuck AE, Beck JC, Egger M. Preventing disability in elderly people. Lancet. 2004;364(9446):1641–1642. doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(04)17365-0.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• United Nations. https://www.un.org/en/. Accessed Month DD, YYYY.
   Google Scholar
• Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics, Executive Yuan, R.O.C. Classification of assistive devices (Accessory Resource Portal). https://newrepat.sfaa.gov.tw/. Accessed Month DD, YYYY.
   Google Scholar
• Tanning L, Tanning T. Analysis of quality life in central and Eastern European countries. Int J Acad Res Dev. 2016;1:34–42.
   Google Scholar
• Creek B. Simulating Ideal Assistive Devices to Reduce the Metabolic Cost of Walking in the Elderly [Doctoral dissertation]. Canada: Université ottava/University of Ottawa; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Inoue T, Kobayashi Y, Mori N, et al. Effect of combined bifidobacterial supplementation and resistance training on cognitive function, body composition and bowel habits of healthy elderly subjects. Benef Microbes. 2018;9(6):843–853. PMID: 30198326. doi:10.3920/BM2017.0193.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boerema ST, van Velsen L, Vollenbroek-Hutten MM, Hermens HJ. Value-based design for the elderly: an application in the field of mobility aids. Assist Technol. 2017;29(2):76–84. PMID: 27532436 doi:10.1080/10400435.2016.1208303.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mann WC, Hurren D, Tomita M. Assistive devices used by home-based elderly persons with arthritis. Am J Occup Ther. 1995;49(8):810–820. PMID: 8526227 doi:10.5014/ajot.49.8.810.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O’Sullivan L, Power V, Virk G, et al. End user needs elicitation for a full-body exoskeleton to assist the elderly. Procedia Manuf. 2015;3:1403–1409. doi:10.1016/j.promfg.2015.07.302.
   Google Scholar
• Alkadri J, Jutai J. Cognitive impairment and assistive devices: outcomes and adverse effects. J Rehabil Assist Technol Eng. 2016;3:2055668316668146. PMID: 31186907. doi:10.1177/2055668316668146.
   Google Scholar
• Scherer MJ, Sax C, Vanbiervliet A, Cushman LA, Scherer JV. Predictors of assistive technology use: the importance of personal and psychosocial factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2005;27(21):1321–1331. PMID: 16298935. doi:10.1080/09638280500164800.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin LN, Schemm RL, Landsberg L, Burgh D. Factors predicting assistive device use in the home by older people following rehabilitation. J Aging Health. 1996;8(4):554–575. PMID: 10182386. doi:10.1177/089826439600800405.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Correia de Barros A, Duarte C, Cruz JB. The influence of context on product judgment–Presenting assistive products as consumer goods. Int J Des. 2011;5:99–112.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Samuelsson K, Wressle E. User satisfaction with mobility assistive devices: an important element in the rehabilitation process. Disabil Rehabil. 2008;30(7):551–558. PMID: 17852301. doi:10.1080/09638280701355777.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Resnik L, Allen S, Isenstadt D, Wasserman M, Iezzoni L. Perspectives on use of mobility aids in a diverse population of seniors: implications for intervention. Disabil Health J. 2009;2(2):77–85. PMID: 20160951. doi:10.1016/j.dhjo.2008.12.002.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Næss IR, Øritsland TA. Inclusive, mainstream products Proceedings of the International Conference on Inclusive Design. 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Shinohara K. Investigating meaning in uses of assistive devices: Implications of social and professional contexts. In Proceedings of the 12th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Orlando, FL: Association for Computing Machinery, 2010. p. 319–320.
   Google Scholar
• Ministry of Interior. 2011. Taiwan population statistic report. http://www.moi.gov.tw/stat/index.aspx. Accessed Month DD, YYYY.
   Google Scholar
• Bureau of Standards, Metrology, Inspection and Quarantine of the Ministry of Economic Affairs 2010. National Standard of the Republic of China CNS 15390. Assistive Devices for People with Disabilities-Classification and Terminology.
   Google Scholar
• Jacobson S. Overcoming stigma associated with assistive devices. In 7th Int’l Conf. on Design and Emotion. Chicago, IL, 2010.
   Google Scholar
• Pape TLB, Kim J, Weiner B. The shaping of individual meanings assigned to assistive technology: a review of personal factors. Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1-3):5–20. PMID: 11827155. doi:10.1080/09638280110066235.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• de Jonge D, Aplin T, Larkin S, Ainsworth E. The esthetic appeal of assistive technology and the economic value baby boomers place on it: a pilot study. Aust Occup Ther J. 2016;63(6):415–423. PMID: 27390078. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12286.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• dos Santos ADP, Ferrari ALM, Medola FO, Sandnes FE. Aesthetics and the perceived stigma of assistive technology for visual impairment. Disabil Rehabil: Assist Technol. 2022;17(2):152–158. PMID: 32501732. doi:10.1080/17483107.2020.1768308.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Shinohara K, Wobbrock JO. In the shadow of misperception: Assistive technology use and social interactions. In: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. Vancouver, Canada, 2011. 705–714.
   Google Scholar
• Alakärppä I, Kovanen L. Evaluating the visual style of a product in the initial phase of product development with aged users, using visual examples. Paper Presented at: The Congress on Gerontechnology; 2002. Miami Beach, FL.
   Google Scholar
• Batavia AI, Hammer G. 1990. Developing consumer criteria for evaluating assistive devices. Rehabilitation R&D Progress Reports. Progress report from National Rehabilitation Research Center, Washington, DC.
   Google Scholar
• Forlizzi J, Hirsch T, Hyder E, Goetz J. 2001. Designing pleasurable technology for elders. Include Conference on Inclusive Design.
   Google Scholar
• Burton P. Consumer segmentation research yields a personalized way to select hearing aids. Hear J. 2009;62(10):24–26. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000361845.96713.e5.
   Google Scholar
• Hall ML, Orzada BT. Expressive prostheses: meaning and significance. Fash Pract. 2013;5(1):9–32. doi:10.2752/175693813X13559997788682.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Profita HP, Stangl A, Matuszewska L, Sky S, Kane SK. Nothing to hide: aesthetic customization of hearing aids and cochlear implants in an online community. In Proceedings of the 18th International ACM SIGACCESS Conference on Computers and Accessibility. Reno Nevada, USA: Association for Computing Machinery, 2016. 219–227.
   Google Scholar
• Kirkwood DH. Led by BTE, sales rise for fourth straight year surpass 2.3 million. Hear J. 2006;59(12):11–14. doi:10.1097/01.HJ.0000286304.76128.c2.
   Google Scholar
• Lamb JM, Kallal MJ. A conceptual framework for apparel design. Cloth Text Res J. 1992;10(2):42–47. doi:10.1177/0887302X9201000207.
   Google Scholar
• Orzada BT, Kallal MJ. FEA consumer needs model: 25 years later. Clothing and Textiles Research Journal. 2021;39(1):24–38.
   Google Scholar
• Quinn MD, Chase RW. Simplicity’s Design without Limits: Designing and Sewing for Special Needs. 1st ed. Philadelphia, PA: Drexel University, 1990.
   Google Scholar
• Watkins SM. Using the design process to teach functional apparel design. Cloth Text Res J. 1988;7(1):10–14. doi:10.1177/0887302X8800700103.
   Google Scholar
• Gregory RF. Managing in the 1990’s. In: Horridge PE, ed ACPTC Proceedings. Monument, CO: Associaticn of College Professors of Textiles and Clothing, Inc, 1989. p. 1–3.
   Google Scholar
• Guangnan H. 2000. How to Develop the Museum’s Social Resources. (vol. 5). The Cultural Development Committee of the Executive Yuan. Republic of China (Taiwan).
   Google Scholar
• Merino GSAD, Pichler RF, Domenech S, Rech Z, Merino EA. 2017. Design of assistive devices and occupational therapy: case study in a Brazilian psychatric hospital. In International Conference on Applied Human Factors and Ergonomics. Los Angeles, CA: Springer, 2017:p. 529–540. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-60582-1_53.
   Google Scholar