Interrater Reliability of the Home Assessment of Person-Environment Interaction (HoPE) – Cognitive Version

References

• Alzheimer Society of Canada. Navigating the Path Forward for Dementia in Canada. Toronto: Alzheimer Society of Canada; 2022. https://alzheimer.ca/en/research/reports-dementia/landmark-study-report-1-path-forward.
   Google Scholar
• Prince M, Guerchet M, Prina M, et al. Policy Brief for Heads of Government: The Global Impact of Dementia 2013–2050. London: Alzheimer’s Disease International; 2013. https://www.alzint.org/resource/policy-brief-the-global-impact-of-dementia-2013-2050/.
   Google Scholar
• Emmady PD, Schoo C, Tadi P. Major Neurocognitive Disorder (Dementia). Treasure Island, FL: StatPearls Publishing LLC; 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Alzheimer Society of Canada. Using person-centred language. https://alzheimer.ca/en/take-action/become-dementia-friendly/using-person-centred-language. Updated April 20, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• American Psychological Association. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th ed. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013.
   Google Scholar
• Statistics Canada. Family Characteristics of Seniors by Total Income Statistics: Canada, Provinces and Territories, Census Metropolitan Areas and Census Agglomerations. Ottawa: Statistics Canada; 2022. https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/cv.action?pid=9810025101&request_locale=en.
   Google Scholar
• Burgdorf JG, Amjad H, Bowles KH. Cognitive impairment associated with greater care intensity during home health care. Alzheimers Dement. 2022;18(6):1100–1108. doi:10.1002/alz.12438.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mayo CD, Kenny R, Scarapicchia V, et al. Aging in place: challenges of older adults with self-reported cognitive decline. Can Geriatr J. 2021;24(2):138–143. doi:10.5770/cgj.24.456.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Weisman de Mamani A, Weintraub MJ, Maura J, et al. Stigma, expressed emotion, and quality of life in caregivers of individuals with dementia. Fam Process. 2018;57(3):694–706. doi:10.1111/famp.12325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Allen F, Cain R, Meyer C. How people with dementia and their carers adapt their homes: A Qualitative Study. Dementia (London). 2019;18(3):1199–1215. doi:10.1177/1471301217712294.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Gitlin LN. Conducting research on home environments: lessons learned and new directions. Gerontologist. 2003;43(5):628–637. doi:10.1093/geront/43.5.628.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leverton M, Burton A, Beresford-Dent J, et al. Supporting independence at home for people living with dementia: a qualitative ethnographic study of homecare. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2021;56(12):2323–2336. doi:10.1007/s00127-021-02084-y.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Marquardt G, Johnston D, Black BS, et al. A descriptive study of home modifications for people with dementia and barriers to implementation. J Hous Elderly. 2011;25(3):258–273. doi:10.1080/02763893.2011.595612.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Soilemezi D, Drahota A, Crossland J, et al. The role of the home environment in dementia care and support: Systematic review of qualitative research. Dementia (London). 2019;18(4):1237–1272. doi:10.1177/1471301217692130.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Sturge J, Nordin S, Sussana Patil D, et al. Features of the social and built environment that contribute to the well-being of people with dementia who live at home: a scoping review. Health Place. 2021;67:102483. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2020.102483.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fawcett AJL. Principles of Assessment and Outcome Measurement for Occupational Therapists and Physiotherapists: Theory, Skills and Application. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons Ltd; 2007.
   Google Scholar
• Meyer ME. Power of Place: Understanding and Advocating for Occupational Therapy’s Role in Home Modification [Dissertation]. Boston, MA: Boston University; 2020.
   Google Scholar
• Struckmeyer L, Morgan-Daniel J, Ahrentzen S, et al. Home modification assessments for accessibility and aesthetics: a rapid review. Health Env Res Des J. 2021;14(2):313–327. doi:10.1177/1937586720960704.
   Google Scholar
• Struckmeyer LR, Pickens ND. Home modifications for people with Alzheimer’s disease: A scoping review. Am J Occup Ther. 2016;70(1):7001270020p1–7001270020p9. doi:10.5014/ajot.2015.016089.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Louis-Delsoin C, Rousseau J. Vivre à domicile: Une revue de la portée sur les instruments d’évaluation du contexte des aîné-e-s présentant une démence [Living at home: A scoping review of context assessment instruments for older adults with dementia, French]. Poster #17 Presented at: 5e Congrès Québécois Sur la Maladie D’Alzheimer, November 9–11, 2022. Quebec.
   Google Scholar
• Louis-Delsoin C, Ruiz-Rodrigo A, Rousseau J. Understanding the home environment of older adults living with dementia: a scoping review of assessment tools. Home Health Care Serv Q. 2024;43(1):54–86. doi:10.1080/01621424.2023.2290708.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briskie-Semeniuk P, Bier N, Couture M, et al. Describing occupational therapy practice for evaluating older adults with cognitive impairments. Phys Occup Ther Geriatr. 2022;41(2):308–329. doi:10.1080/02703181.2022.2138676.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes S, Murray CM, McMullen-Roach S, et al. A profile of practice: the occupational therapy process in community aged care in Australia. Aust Occup Ther J. 2023;70(3):366–379. doi:10.1111/1440-1630.12860.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kim S, Liu W. Psychometric properties of instruments measuring dyadic communication and environment in dementia care: a systematic review. Gerontologist. 2023;63(1):52–70. doi:10.1093/geront/gnab178.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rousseau J, Potvin L, Dutil E, et al. Understanding the issue of home adaptation: searching for a conceptual framework. Occup Ther Health Care. 2002;14(1):27–37. doi:10.1080/J003v14n01_03.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Woodbridge R, Sullivan MP, Harding E, et al. Use of the physical environment to support everyday activities for people with dementia: a systematic review. Dementia (London). 2016;17(5):533–572. doi:10.1177/1471301216648670.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rousseau J, Ska B, St-Arnaud A. Guide d’utilisation de l’Évaluation à domicile de l’interaction personne-environnement (ÉDIPE) – version cognitive, version préliminaire [Administration guide for the Home Assessment of Person-Environment Interaction (HoPE) – Cognitive Version, preliminary version, French]. Montreal: Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal; 2005.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau J, St-Arnaud A, Farley N. Evaluating the cognitively impaired elderly at home: A new assessment tool. Poster #1387 Presented at: 15th Congress of the World Federation of Occupational Therapists: Sharing the World of Occupation from Latin America, May 4–7, 2010. Santiago, CHL.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau J, St-Arnaud A, Ska B, et al. Évaluation à domicile de l’interaction personne-environnement version cognitive (ÉDIPE-version cognitive): version 1.7.3 (2022-04-01) [Home Assessment of Person-Environment Interaction – Cognitive Version (HoPE-Cognitive Version): version 1.7.3 (2022-04-01), French]. Montreal: Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal; 2022.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau J. Modèles généraux en ergothérapie: Le Modèle de compétence [General models in occupational therapy: The Model of Competence, French]. In: Morel-Bracq M-C, eds. Les modèles conceptuels en ergothérapie: Introduction aux concepts fondamentaux. 2nd ed. Paris: De Boeck Supérieur; 2017:107–119.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau J, Potvin L, Dutil E, et al. Model of competence: a conceptual framework for understanding the person-environment interaction for persons with motor disabilities. Occup Ther Health Care. 2002;16(1):15–36. doi:10.1080/J003v16n01_02.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rousseau J. Formation à l’ÉDIPE-version cognitive (Partie 2), Évaluation à domicile de l’interaction personne-environnement – version cognitive v.1.5. [Training to the HoPE-Cognitive Version (Part 2), at-Home Assessment of Person-Environment Interaction - Cognitive Version v.1.5, French]. Montreal: Centre de recherche de l’Institut universitaire de gériatrie de Montréal; 2019.
   Google Scholar
• Rousseau J, Potvin L, Dutil É, et al. Home assessment of person-environment interaction (HoPE): content validation process. Occup Ther Health Care. 2013;27(4):289–307. doi:10.3109/07380577.2013.843114.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Louis-Delsoin C. Fidélité interexaminateurs de l’Évaluation à domicile de l’interaction personne-environnement (ÉDIPE) – version cognitive. [Interrater Reliability Study of the “Home Assessment of Person-Environment Interaction (HoPE) – Cognitive Version French] [master’s thesis]. Montreal: Université de Montréal; 2023. https://papyrus.bib.umontreal.ca/xmlui/handle/1866/32109.
   Google Scholar
• IBM Corporation. IBM® SPSS® Statistics. International Business Machines Corporation. https://www.ibm.com/support/pages/node/6509170. Updated November 9, 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educ Psychol Meas. 1960;20(1):37–46. doi:10.1177/001316446002000104.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Feinstein AR, Cicchetti DV. High agreement but low kappa: I. the problems of two paradoxes. J Clin Epidemiol. 1990;43(6):543–549. doi:10.1016/0895-4356(90)90158-L.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flack V, Afifi A, Lachenbruch P, et al. Sample size determinations for the two rater kappa statistic. Psychometrika. 1988;53(3):321–325. doi:10.1007/BF02294215.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Landis JR, Koch GG. The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics. 1977;33(1):159–174. doi:10.2307/2529310.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gwet KL. Handbook of Inter-Rater Reliability: The Definitive Guide to Measuring the Extent of Agreement among Raters. 5th ed. Gaithersburg, MD: Advanced Analytics, LLC; 2021.
   Google Scholar
• Crocker LM, Algina J. Introduction to Classical and Modern Test Theory. Mason, OH: Cengage Learning; 2008.
   Google Scholar
• Hogan TP. Introduction à la psychométrie [Introduction to psychometrics, French]. 2nd ed. Nathalie Parent, Randolph Stephenson, trans. Montreal: Chenelière-éducation; 2017.
   Google Scholar
• Streiner DL, Norman GR, Cairney J. Health Measurement Scales: A Practical Guide to Their Development and Use. Oxford: Oxford University Press, Inc.; 2015.
   Google Scholar
• World Health Organization. Global Action Plan on the Public Health Response to Dementia 2017–2025. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2017. https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/global-action-plan-on-the-public-health-response-to-dementia-2017–-2025. Published April 19, 2023.
   Google Scholar
• Dutil E, Forget A, Vanier M, et al. Development of the ADL Profile. Occup Ther Health Care. 1990;7(1):7–22. doi:10.1080/J003v07n01_03.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Rousseau J, Dutil É, Lambert J. Fidélité inter-examinateurs du “Profil des AVQ-Mise en situation” chez la personne traumatisée cranio-encéphalique Partie 1: Étude sur la cote globale. Can J Occup Ther. 1994;61(3):149–158. doi:10.1177/000841749406100304.
   Google Scholar
• Kim S, Liu W, Daack-Hirsch S, et al. Development and psychometric testing of the dyadic communication observational coding scheme in DEmentia care (DCODE): Family dyadic communication in dementia. Aging Ment Health. 2023;27(9):1770–1779. doi:10.1080/13607863.2022.2126819.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Anastasi A. Introduction à la psychométrie [Psychological testing, French]. Françoys Gagné, trans. Montreal, Guérin universitaire; 1994.
   Google Scholar
• Wang Y, Li L, Tian S, et al. Development and psychometrics test of Home Environment Assessment Checklist for community-dwelling older adults with dementia. J Alzheimers Dis. 2020;77(4):1389–1396. doi:10.3233/JAD-200241.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Koo TK, Li MY. A guideline of selecting and reporting intraclass correlation coefficients for reliability research. J Chiropr Med. 2016;15(2):155–163. doi:10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pani-Harreman KE, Bours GJJW, Zander I, et al. Definitions, key themes and aspects of ‘ageing in place’: a scoping review. Ageing Soc. 2021;41(9):2026–2059. doi:10.1017/S0144686X20000094.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Banerjee M, Capozzoli M, McSweeney L, et al. Beyond kappa: a review of interrater agreement measures. Can J Stat. 1999;27(1):3–23. doi:10.2307/3315487.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gitlin LN, Schinfeld S, Winter L, et al. Evaluating home environments of persons with dementia: interrater reliability and validity of the home environmental assessment protocol (HEAP). Disabil Rehabil. 2002;24(1–3):59–71. doi:10.1080/09638280110066325.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hébert M, Brasset-Latulippe A, Bourgault-Côté S, et al. Protocole d’Évaluation de la Sécurité à Domicile (PESAD): Version francophone du SAFER-HOME v.3. fa. 2010;(28):213–233. doi:10.7202/044990ar.
   Google Scholar
• Struckmeyer LR. Reliability and validity of the home environmental assessment protocol-revised [Dissertation]. Denton: Texas Woman’s University; 2016.
   Google Scholar
• Struckmeyer LR, Pickens N, Brown D, et al. Home environmental assessment protocol–revised initial psychometrics: a pilot study. OTJR (Thorofare N J). 2020;40(3):175–182. doi:10.1177/1539449220912186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Viera AJ, Garrett JM. Understanding interobserver agreement: the kappa statistic. Fam Med. 2005;37(5):360–363. doi: not available.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Poulin de Courval L, Gélinas I, Gauthier S, et al. Reliability and validity of the safety assessment scale for people with dementia living at home. Can J Occup Ther. 2006;73(2):67–75. doi:10.1177/000841740607300201.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Bourget A. Étude de fidélité interexaminateurs de “l’Évaluation à domicile de l’interaction personne-environnement (ÉDIPE)” [Interrater Reliability Study of the “Home Assessment of Person-Environment Interaction (HoPE)”, French] [master’s thesis]. Quebec: Université Laval; 2002.
   Google Scholar
• Cohen J. Weighted kappa: nominal scale agreement provision for scaled disagreement or partial credit. Psychol Bull. 1968;70(4):213–220. doi:10.1037/h0026256.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mokkink LB, Terwee CB, Patrick DL, et al. The COSMIN checklist for assessing the methodological quality of studies on measurement properties of health status measurement instruments: an international Delphi study. Qual Life Res. 2010;19(4):539–549. doi:10.1007/s11136-010-9606-8.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar