Using a continuous riverscape survey to examine the effects of the spatial structure of functional habitats on fish distribution

References

• Angermeier PL, Krueger KL, Dolloff CA. 2002. Discontinuity in stream-fish distributions: implications for assessing and predicting species occurrences. In Scott JM, Heglund PJ, Morrison ML, Haufler JB, Raphael MG, Wall WA, Samson FB, editors. Predicting species occurrences: issues of accuracy and scale. Washington (DC): Island Press; p. 519–527.
   Google Scholar
• Angermeier PL, Smogor RA. 1995. Estimating number of species and relative abundances in stream-fish communities: effects of sampling effort and discontinuous spatial distributions. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 52:936–949.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Austin MP. 2002. Spatial prediction of species distribution: an interface between ecological theory and statistical modelling. Ecol Model. 157:101–118.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baras E. 1992. A study of time and space utilisation strategies in the common barbel Barbus barbus (L.). Cahiers d'Ethologie. 12:125–442.
   Google Scholar
• Baras E. 1997. Environment determinants of residence area selection by Barbus barbus in the River Ourthe. Aquat Living Resour. 10:195–206.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baras E, Cherry B. 1990. Seasonal activities of female barbel Barbus barbus (L.) in the River Ourthe (southern Belgium), as revealed by radio tracking. Aquat Living Resour. 3:283–294.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baudry J, Boussard H, Schermann N. 2005. Chloe 3.1: freeware of multi-scales analyses on ASCII raster files. Rennes: INRA, SAD-Armorique.
   Google Scholar
• Baxter CV. 2002. Fish movement and assemblage dynamics in a pacific northwest riverscape [PhD dissertation]. Corvallis (OR): Oregon State University.
   Google Scholar
• Bender DJ, Tischendorf L, Fahrig L. 2003. Using patch isolation metrics to predict animal movement in binary landscapes. Landsc Ecol. 18:17–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Benjamin JR, Dunham JB, Dare MR. 2007. Invasion by nonnative brook trout in panther creek, Idaho: roles of local habitat quality, biotic resistance, and connectivity to source habitats. Trans Am Fish Soc. 136:875–888.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boët P, Belliard J, Berrebi-dit-Thomas R, Tales E. 1999. Multiple human impacts by the City of Paris on fish communities in the Seine river basin, France. Hydrobiologia. 410:59–68.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bond NR, Lake PS. 2003. Local habitat restoration in streams: constraints on the effectiveness of restoration for stream biota. Ecol Manag Restor. 4:193–198.
   Google Scholar
• Bouchard J, Boisclair D. 2008. The relative importance of local, lateral, and longitudinal variables on the development of habitat quality models for a river. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 65:61–73.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Boyce MS, Vernier PR, Nielsen SE, Schmiegelow FKA. 2002. Evaluating resource selection functions. Ecol Model. 157:281–300.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brennan JM, Bender DJ, Contreras TA, Fahrig L. 2002. Focal patch landscape studies for wildlife management: optimizing sampling effort across scales. In Liu J, Taylor WW, editors. Integrating landscape ecology into natural resource management. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; p. 68–91.
   Google Scholar
• Burnham KP, Anderson DR. 2002. Model selection and multimodel inferences: a practical information-theoretic approach. 2nd ed. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Choquenot D, Ruscoe WA. 2003. Landscape complementation and food limitation of large herbivores: habitat-related constraints on the foraging efficiency of wild pigs. J Anim Ecol. 72:14–26.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Copp GH. 1989. Electrofishing for fish larvae and 0+ juveniles: equipment modifications for increased efficiency with short fishes. Aquac Fish Manag. 20:453–462.
   Google Scholar
• Cowx IG, Welcomme RL. 1998. Rehabilitation of rivers for fish. Oxford: Fishing News Books.
   Google Scholar
• Downes BJ, Lake PS, Schreiber ESG. 1993. Spatial variation in the distribution of stream invertebrates: implications of patchiness for models of community organization. Freshw Biol. 30:119–132.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunham JB, Rieman BE. 1999. Metapopulation structure of bull trout: influences of physical, biotic, and geometrical landscape characteristics. Ecol Appl. 9:642–655.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dunning JB, Danielson BJ, Pulliam HR. 1992. Ecological processes that affect populations in complex landscapes. Oikos. 65:169–175.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Falke JA, Dunham JB, Jordan CE, McNyset KM, Reeves GH. 2013. Spatial ecological processes and local factors predict the distribution and abundance of spawning by steelhead (Oncorhynchus mykiss) across a complex riverscape. PLoS One. 8:e79232.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fausch KD, Torgersen CE, Baxter CV, Li HW. 2002. Landscapes to riverscapes: bridging the gap between research and conservation of stream fishes. BioScience. 52:483–498.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flitcroft R, Burnett K, Snyder J, Reeves G, Ganio L. 2014. Riverscape patterns among years of juvenile coho salmon in midcoastal Oregon: implications for conservation. Trans Am Fish Soc. 143:26–38.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flitcroft RL, Burnett KM, Reeves GH, Ganio LM. 2012. Do network relationships matter? Comparing network and instream habitat variables to explain densities of juvenile coho salmon (Oncorhynchus kisutch) in mid-coastal Oregon, USA. Aquat Conserv. 22:288–302.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Freeman MC, Grossman GD. 1993. Effects of habitat availability on dispersion of a stream cyprinid. Environ Biol Fish. 37:121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Fullerton AH, Burnett KM, Steel EA, Flitcroft RL, Pess GR, Feist BE, Torgersen CE, Miller DJ, Sanderson BL. 2010. Hydrological connectivity for riverine fish: measurement challenges and research opportunities. Freshw Biol. 55:2215–2237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ganio LM, Torgersen CE, Gresswell RE. 2005. A geostatistical approach for describing spatial pattern in stream networks. Front Ecol Environ. 3:138–144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gresswell RE, Torgersen CE, Bateman DS, Guy TJ, Hendricks SR, Wofford JEB. 2006. A spatially explicit approach for evaluating relationships among coastal cutthroat trout, habitat, and disturbance in small Oregon streams. In Hughes RM, Wang L, Seelbach PW, editors. Proceedings of the Symposium on Influences of Landscapes on Stream Habitats and Biological Assemblages. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; p. 457–471.
   Google Scholar
• Guisan A, Edwards TC, Hastie T. 2002. Generalized linear and generalized additive models in studies of species distributions: setting the scene. Ecol Model. 157:89–100.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gustafson EJ, Parker GR. 1994. Using an index of habitat patch proximity for landscape design. Landsc Urban Plan. 29:117–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Harig AL, Fausch KD. 2002. Minimum habitat requirements for establishing translocated cutthroat trout populations. Ecol Appl. 12:535–551.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hayes JW, Hughes NF, Kelly LH. 2007. Process-based modelling of invertebrate drift transport, net energy intake and reach carrying capacity for drift-feeding salmonids. Ecol Model. 207:171–188.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber M, Kirchhofer A. 1997. Habitat use of radiotagged adult nase (Chondrostoma nasus) in a regulated river. Folia Zool. 46:67–77.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Huber M, Kirchhofer A. 1998. Radio telemetry as a tool to study habitat use of nase (Chondrostoma nasus L.) in medium-sized rivers. Hydrobiologia. 372:309–319.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Isaak DJ, Thurow RF, Rieman BE, Dunham JB. 2007. Chinook salmon use of spawning patches: relative roles of habitat quality, size, and connectivity. Ecol Appl. 17:352–364.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kappus BM, Jansen W, Bohmer J, Rahmann H. 1997. Historical and present distribution and recent habitat use of nase, Chondrostoma nasus, in the lower Jagst River (Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany). Folia Zool. 46:51–60.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kocik JF, Ferreri CP. 1998. Juvenile production variation in salmonids: population dynamics, habitat, and the role of spatial relationships. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 55:191–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Labbe TR, Fausch KD. 2000. Dynamics of intermittent stream habitat regulate persistence of a threatened fish at multiple scales. Ecol Appl. 10:1774–1791.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pichon C, Gorges G, Baudry J, Goreaud F, Boët P. 2009. Spatial metrics and methods for riverscapes: quantifying variability in riverine fish habitat patterns. Environmetrics. 20:512–526.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pichon C, Gorges G, Boët P, Baudry J, Goreaud F, Faure T. 2006. A spatially explicit resource-based approach for managing stream fishes in riverscapes. Environ Manag. 37:322–335.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Le Pichon C, Gorges G, Faure T, Boussard H. 2006. Anaqualand 2.0: freeware of distances calculations with frictions on a corridor. Version 2.0. Antony: Cemagref. Available from: https://www6.rennes.inra.fr/sad/Outils-Produits/Outils-informatiques/Anaqualand
   Google Scholar
• Maier K-J. 1997. On the nase, Chondrostoma nasus, spawning area situation in Switzerland. Folia Zool. 46:79–88.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Matthews W. 1998. Patterns in freshwater ecology. New York (NY): Chapman & Hall.
   Google Scholar
• Moilanen A, Nieminen M. 2002. Simple connectivity measures in spatial ecology. Ecology. 83:1131–1145.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• O'Brien PC. 1976. A test for randomness. Biometrics. 32:391–401.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Ouin A, Aviron S, Doverc J, Burel F. 2004. Complementation/supplementation of resources for butterflies in agricultural landscapes. Agric Ecosyst Environ. 103:473–479.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovidio M, Parkinson D, Philippart JC, Baras E. 2007. Multiyear homing and fidelity to residence areas by individual barbel (Barbus barbus). Belg J Zool. 137:183–190.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ovidio M, Philippart JC. 2008. Movement patterns and spawning activity of individual nase (Chondrostoma nasus L.) in flow-regulated and weir-fragmented rivers. J Appl Ichthyol. 24:256–262.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pedroli B, de Blust G, van Looy K, van Rooij S. 2002. Setting targets in strategies for river restoration. Landsc Ecol. 17:5–18.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Penczak T, Kruk A. 2000. Threatened obligatory riverine fishes in human-modified Polish rivers. Ecol Freshw Fish. 9:109–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Persat H, Copp GH. 1990. Electric fishing and point abundance sampling for the ichthyology of large rivers. In Cowx IG, editor. Developments in electric fishing. Proceedings of an International Symposium on Fishing with Electricity. Oxford: Fishing News Books, Blackwell Scientific Publications; p. 197–210.
   Google Scholar
• Pope SE, Fahrig L, Merriam NG. 2000. Landscape complementation and metapopulation effects on leopard frog populations. Ecology. 81:2498–2508.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R: a language and environment for statistical computing. 2005. Vienna: R Foundation for Statistical Computing.
   Google Scholar
• Rieman BE, Dunham JB. 2000. Metapopulations and salmonids: a synthesis of life history patterns and empirical observations. Ecol Freshw Fish. 9:51–64.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld J. 2003. Assessing the habitat requirements of stream fishes: an overview and evaluation of different approaches. Trans Am Fish Soc. 132:953–968.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosenfeld JS, Hatfield T. 2006. Information needs for assessing critical habitat of freshwater fish. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 63:683–698.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rushton SP, Ormerod SJ, Kerby G. 2004. New paradigms for modelling species distributions? J Appl Ecol. 41:193–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schilling NS. 2005. Survival of the fittest: fish in patchy environments show ideal free distribution. Eukaryon. 1:11–16.
   Google Scholar
• Schlosser IJ. 1995. Critical landscape attributes that influence fish population dynamics in headwater streams. Hydrobiologia. 303:71–81.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Strahler AN. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans Am Geophys Union. 38:913–920.
   Google Scholar
• Thompson AR, Petty JT, Grossman GD. 2001. Multi-scale effects of resource patchiness on foraging behaviour and habitat use by longnose dace, Rhinichthys cataractae. Freshw Biol. 46:145–160.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiffan KF, Garland RD, Rondorf DW. 2002. Quantifying flow-dependent changes in subyearling fall Chinook salmon rearing habitat using two-dimensional spatially explicit modelling. N Am J Fish Manag. 22:713–726.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomanova S, Tedesco PA, Roset N, Thomas RBD, Belliard J. 2013. Systematic point sampling of fish communities in medium- and large-sized rivers: sampling procedure and effort. Fish Manag Ecol. 20:533–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Torgersen CE, Baxter CV, Li HW, McIntosh BA. 2006. Landscape influences on longitudinal patterns of river fishes: spatially continuous analysis of fish-habitat relationships. In Hughes RM, Wang L, Seelbach PW, editors. Proceedings of the Symposium on Influences of Landscapes on Stream Habitats and Biological Assemblages. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; p. 473–492.
   Google Scholar
• Torgersen CE, Close DA. 2004. Influence of habitat heterogeneity on the distribution of larval Pacific lamprey (Lampetra tridentata) at two spatial scales. Freshw Biol. 49:614–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venables WN, Dichmont CM. 2004. GLMs, GAMs and GLMMs: an overview of theory for applications in fisheries research. Fish Res. 70:319–337.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Welsh AH, Cunningham R, Donnelly C, Lindenmayer D. 1996. Modelling the abundance of rare species: statistical models for counts with extra zeros. Ecol Model. 88:297–308.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• White SM, Giannico G, Li H. 2014. A behaviorscape perspective on stream fish ecology and conservation: linking fish behavior to riverscapes. Wiley Interdiscip Rev. 1:385–400.
   Google Scholar
• White SM, Rahel FJ. 2008. Complementation of habitats for Bonneville cutthroat trout in watersheds influenced by beavers, livestock, and drought. Trans Am Fish Soc. 137:881–894.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar