Non-additive effects of water availability and litter quality on decomposition of litter mixtures

References

• Aerts R, Chapin FS. 2000. The mineral nutrition of wild plants revisited: a re-evaluation of processes and patterns. Adv Ecol Res. 30:1–67.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berglund SL, Ågren GI. 2012. When will litter mixtures decompose faster or slower than individual litters? A model for two litters. Oikos. 121:1112–1120.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Briones MJI, Ineson P. 1996. Decomposition of eucalyptus leaves in litter mixtures. Soil Biol Biochem. 28:1381–1388.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Chen XS, Deng ZM, Xie YH, Li F, Hou ZY, Li X, Li YF. 2014. Effects of sediment burial disturbance on the vegetative propagation of Phalaris arundinacea with different shoot statuses. Aquat Ecol. 48:409–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Clein JS, Schimel JP. 1994. Reduction in microbial activity in birch litter due to repeated drying and rewetting events. Soil Biol Biochem. 26:403–406.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Duan JC, Wang SP, Zhang ZH, Xu GP, Luo CY, Chang XF, Zhu XX, Cui SJ, Zhao XQ, Wang WY, Du MY. 2013. Non-additive effect of species diversity and temperature sensitivity of mixed litter decomposition in the alpine meadow on Tibetan Plateau. Soil Biol Biochem. 57:841–847.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gessner MO, Swan CM, Dang CK, McKie BG, Bardgett RD, Wall DH, Hättenschwiler S. 2010. Diversity meets decomposition. Trends Ecol Evol. 25:372–380.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gingerich RT, Merovich W, Anderson JT. 2014. Influence of environmental parameters on litter decomposition in wetlands in West Virginia, USA. J Freshw Ecol. 29:535–549.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gonçalves AL, Canhoto C. 2009. Decomposition of eucalypt and alder mixtures: responses to variation in evenness. Fund Appl Limnol. 173:293–303.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Graça MA, Bälocher F, Gessner MO, editors. 2005. Methods to study litter decomposition: a practical Guide. New York (NY): Springer-Verlag New York Inc. Press; p. 53–121.
   Google Scholar
• Hättenschwiler S, Tiunov AV, Scheu S. 2005. Biodiversity and litter decomposition in terrestrial ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 36:191–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hoorens B, Aerts R, Stroetenga M. 2003. Does initial litter chemistry explain litter mixture effects on decomposition? Oecologia. 137:578–586.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Jiang YF, Yin XQ, Wang FB. 2013. The influence of litter mixing on decomposition and soil fauna assemblages in a Pinus koraiensis mixed broad-leaved forest of the Changbai Mountains, China. Eur J Soil Biol. 55:28–39.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Langhans SD, Tiegs SD, Gessner MO, Tockner K. 2008. Leaf-decomposition heterogeneity across a riverine floodplain mosaic. Aquat Sci. 70:337–346.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Li DJ, Peng SL, Chen BM. 2013. The effects of leaf litter evenness on decomposition depend on which plant functional group is dominant. Plant Soil. 365:255–266.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Huang JH, Han XG, Sun OJ, Zhou ZY. 2006. Differential responses of litter decomposition to increased soil nutrients and water between two contrasting grassland plant species of Inner Mongolia, China. Appl Soil Ecol. 34:266–275.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Liu P, Sun OJ, Huang JH, Li LH, Han XG. 2007. Nonadditive effects of litter mixtures on decomposition and correlation with initial litter N and P concentrations in grassland plant species of northern China. Biol Fert Soils. 44:211–216.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Olson JS. 1963. Energy storage and the balance of producers and decomposers in ecological systems. Ecology. 44:322–331.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Osono T, Ono Y, Takeda H. 2003. Fungal ingrowth on forest floor and decomposing needle litter of Chamaecyparis obtusa in relation to resource availability and moisture condition. Soil Biol Biochem. 35:1423–1431.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pan Y, Xie YH, Deng ZM, Tang Y, Pan DD. 2014. High water level impedes the adaptation of Polygonum hydropiper to deep burial: responses of biomass allocation and root morphology. Sci Rep UK. 4:e5612.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Parveen I, Wilson T, Donnison IS, Cookson AR, Hauck B, Threadgill MD. 2013. Potential sources of high value chemicals from leaves, stems and flowers of Miscanthus sinensis ‘Goliath’ and Miscanthus sacchariflorus. Phytochemistry. 92:160–167.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosemond AD, Swan CM, Kominoski SJ, Dye SE. 2010. Non-additive effects of litter mixing are suppressed in a nutrient-enriched stream. Oikos. 119:326–336.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schimel JP, Hättenschwiler S. 2007. Nitrogen transfer between decomposing leaves of different N status. Soil Biol Biochem. 39:1428–1436.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schweitzer JA, Bailey JK, Hart SC, Whitham TG. 2005. Nonadditive effects of mixing cottonwood genotypes on litter decomposition and nutrient dynamics. Ecology. 86:2834–2840.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sylvain C, Jean W, Olaf B, Damien B, Stephan H. 2011. Litter composition rather than plant presence affects decomposition of tropical litter mixtures. Plant Soil. 343:273–286.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Taylor BR, Mallaley C, Cairns JF. 2007. Limited evidence that mixing leaf litter accelerates decomposition or increases diversity of decomposers in streams of eastern Canada. Hydrobiologia. 592:405–422.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiunov AV. 2009. Particle size alters litter diversity effects on decomposition. Soil Biol Biochem. 41:176–178.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Xu GP, Hu YG, Wang SP, Zhang ZH, Chang XF, Duan JC, Luo CY, Chao ZG, Su AL, Lin QY, et al. 2010. Effects of litter quality and climate change along an elevation gradient on litter mass loss in an alpine meadow ecosystem on the Tibetan Plateau. Plant Ecol. 209:257–268.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar