Composition of algae assemblages in middle Tennessee streams and correlations of composition to trophic state

References

• Allan JD, Castillo MM. 2009. Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Rotterdam: Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Anagnostidis K, Komárek J. 1988. Modern approach to the classification system of cyanophytes 3 - Oscillatoriales. Arch Hydrobiol Suppl. 80:327–472.
   Google Scholar
• Bahls LL. 1993. Periphyton bioassessment methods for Montana streams. Helana (MT): Water Quality Bureau, Department of Health and Environmental Sciences.
   Google Scholar
• Biggs BJF. 2000. Eutrophication of streams and rivers: dissolved nutrient-chlorophyll relationships for benthic algae. J N Am Benthol Soc. 19:17–31.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brown LR, May JT, Hunsaker CT. 2008. Species composition and habitat associations on benthic algae assemblages in headwater streams of the Sierra Nevada, California. West N Am Naturalist. 68:194–209.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carlisle DM, Hawkins CP, Meader MR, Potapova M, Falcone J. 2008. Biological assessments of Appalachian streams based on predictive models for fish, macroinvertebrates and diatom assemblages. J N Am Benthol Soc. 27:16–37.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carr JM, Hergenrader JL, Troelstrup NH Jr. 1986. A simple, inexpensive method for cleaning diatoms. Trans Am Micro Soc. 105:152–157.
   Google Scholar
• Cocke EC. 1967. The Myxophyceae of North Carolina. Ann Arbor (MI): Edwards Brothers.
   Google Scholar
• Danielson TJ, Loftin CS, Tsomides L, DiFranco JL, Connors B. 2011. Algal bioassessment metrics for wadeable streams and rivers of Maine, USA. J N Am Benthol Soc. 30:1033–1048.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeNicola DM. 1996 Periphyton responses to temperature at different ecological levels. In: Stevenson RJ, Bothwell ML, Lowe RL, editors. Algal ecology: freshwater benthic ecosystems. San Deigo (CA): Academic Press; p. 149–181.
   Google Scholar
• Dodds WK. 2006. Eutrophication and trophic state in rivers and streams. Limnol Oceanogr. 51:671–680.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dodds WK, Jones JR, Welch EB. 1998. Suggested classification of stream trophic state: distributions of temperate stream types by chlorophyll, total nitrogen, and phosphorous. Water Resour. 32:1455–1462.
   Google Scholar
• Eaton AD, Clesceri LS, Rice EW, Greenberg AE. 2005. Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater. 21st ed. Washington (DC): American Public Health Association.
   Google Scholar
• Fetscher AE, Stancheva RS, Kociolek JP, Sheath RG, Stein ED, Mazor RD, Ode PR. 2014. Development and comparisons of stream indices of biotic integrity using diatoms vs. non diatom algae vs. a combination. J Appl Phychol. 26:433–450.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Griffith GE, Omernik JM, Azevedo SH. 1997. Ecoregions of Tennessee. EPA/600/R97/022. NHREEL. Corvallis (OR): United States Environmental Protection Agency, Western Ecological Division.
   Google Scholar
• Gutowski A, Foerster J, Schaumburg J. 2004. The use of benthic algae, excluding diatoms and Charales, for the assessment of the ecological status of running fresh waters: a case history from Germany. Oceanol Hydrobiol St. 33:3–15.
   Google Scholar
• Hauer R, Lamberti GA. 2006. Methods in stream ecology. 2nd ed. Maryland Heights (MO): Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• John DM, Whitton BM, Brook AJ. 2011. The freshwater algal flora of the British Isles. An identification guide to freshwater and terrestrial algae. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• Kentucky Department of Water (KDOW). 2002. Methods for assessing biological integrity of surface waters in Kentucky. Frankfort (KY): Department for Environmental Protection, Division of Water. Available from: http://water.ky.gov/Pages/SurfaceWaterSOP.aspx
   Google Scholar
• Kelly MG. 1998. Use of the diatom trophic index to monitor eutrophication in rivers. Water Res. 32:236–242.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kelly MG, Whitton BA. 1995. The trophic diatom index: a new index for monitoring eutrophication in rivers. J Appl Phycol. 7:433–444.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Krammer K, Lange-Bertalot H. 1998. Bacillariophyceae. 2. Teil: Bacillariaceae, Epithemiaceae, Surirellaceae. In: Ettl H, Gerloff J, Heynig H, Mollenhauer D, editors. Süsswasserflora von Mitteleuropa, Band 2/2. Jena: VEB Gustav Fischer Verlag; p. 596.
   Google Scholar
• Kurle CM, Cardinale BJ. 2011. Ecological factors associated with the strength of trophic cascades. Oikos. 120:1897–1908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebkuecher JG, Rainey SM, Williams CB, Hall AJ. 2011. Impacts of nonpoint-source pollution on the structure of diatom assemblages, whole-stream oxygen metabolism, and growth of Selenastrum capricornutum in the Red River Watershed of North-Central Tennessee. Castanea. 76:279–292.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lebkuecher JG, Tuttle EN, Johnson JL,Willis NKS. 2015. Use of algae to assess the trophic state of a stream in middle Tennessee. J Freshw Ecol. 30:346–379.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Leland HV, Porter SV. 2000. Distribution of benthic algae in the upper Illinois River basin in relation to geology and land use. Freshw Biol. 44:279–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mackie GL. 2013. Applied aquatic ecosystem concepts. Dubuque (IA): Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Moss B, Jeppesen E, Sondergaard M, Lauridsen TL, Liu ZW. 2013. Nitrogen, macrophytes, shallow lakes and nutrient limitation: resolution of a current controversy? Hydrobiologia. 710:3–21.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Munn MD, Black RW, Gruber SG. 2002. Response of benthic algae to environmental gradients in an agriculturally dominated landscape. J N Benthol Soc. 21:221–237.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• NAWQA. 2005. Relationships of soft-bodied algae to water-quality and habitat characteristics in U.S. rivers: analysis of the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program data set. Report No. 05-08. Benjamin Franklin Parkway (PA): The Academy of natural Science. Patrick Center for Environmental Research, Phycology Section; p. 19103—1195.
   Google Scholar
• Passy SI, Larson CA. 2011. Succession in stream biofilms is an environmentally driven gradient of stress tolerance. Microb Ecol. 62:414–424.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Patrick R, Reimer CW. 1966. The diatoms of the United States. Volume 1. Monographs Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia. 13:1–688.
   Google Scholar
• Patrick R, Reimer CW. 1975. The diatoms of the United States. Volume 2. Monographs Acad Nat Sci Philadelphia. 13:1–213.
   Google Scholar
• Ponader KC, Potapova MG. 2007. Diatoms from the genus Achnanthidium in flowing waters of the Appalachian Mountains (North America): ecology, distribution and taxonomic status. Limnologica. 37:227–241.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Porter SD. 2008. Algal attributes: an autecological classification of algal taxa collected by the national water-quality assessment program. US Geological Survey Data Series 329. Available from: http://pubs.usgs.gov/ds/ds329/
   Google Scholar
• Prescott GW. 1982. Algae of the western great lakes area. Koenigstein: Otto Koeltz Science Publishers.
   Google Scholar
• Rimet F. 2012. Recent views on river pollution and diatoms. Hydrobiologia. 683:1–24.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rott E, Schneider SC. 2014. A comparison of ecological optima of soft-bodied benthic algae in Norwegian and Austrian rivers and consequences for river monitoring in Europe. Sci Total Environ. 475:180–186.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schaumburg J, Schranz C, Foerster J, Gutowski A, Hofmann G, Meilinger P, Schneider S, Schmedtje U. 2004. Ecological classification of macrophytes and phtobenthos for rivers in Germany according to Water Framework Directive. Limnologica. 34:283–301.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schneider S, Lindstrøm EA. 2011. The periphyton index of trophic status PIT: a new eutrophication metric based on non-diatomaceous benthic algae in Nordic rivers. Hydrobiologia. 665:143–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Schoen S. 1988. Cell counting. In: Lobban CS, Chapman DJ, Kremer BP, editors. Experimental phycology. a laboratory manual. Cambridge (MA): Cambridge University Press; p. 16–22.
   Google Scholar
• Shannon CE, Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. Urbana (IL): University of Illinois Press.
   Google Scholar
• Smucker NJ, Vis ML. 2009. Use of diatoms to assess agricultural and coal mining impacts on streams and a multiassembage case study. J N Am Benthol Soc. 28:659–675.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stancheva R, Fetcher AE, Sheath RG. 2012. A novel quantification method for stream- inhabiting, non-diatom benthic algae, and its application in bioassessment. Hydrobiologia. 684:225–239.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Stancheva R, Sheath RG. 2016. Benthic soft-bodied algae as bioindicators of stream water quality. Knowl Manag Aquat Ecosyst. 414:1–16.
   Google Scholar
• TDEC. 2009. Habitat quality of least-impacted streams in Tennessee. Nashville (TN): Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Division of Water Pollution Control. Available from: http://www.tennessee.gov/assets/entities/environment/attachments/Habitat_Guidelines.pdf
   Google Scholar
• TDEC. 2016. The status of water quality in Tennessee. Nashville (TN): Tennessee Department of Environment and Conservation, Division of Water Pollution Control. Available from: http://tn.gov/environment/article/wr-wq-water-quality-reports-publications
   Google Scholar
• USEPA. 2016. Tennessee impaired waters. Washington (DC): Environmental Protection Agency. Available from: https://iaspub.epa.gov/tmdl_waters10/attains_impaired_waters.control?p_state=TN
   Google Scholar
• USGS. 2016. Interior plateau. Reston (VA): United States Geological Survey. Available from: https://landcovertrends.usgs.gov/east/eco71Report.html
   Google Scholar
• Whitford LA, Schumacher GJ. 1984. A manual of fresh-water algae. Raleigh (NC): Sparks Press.
   Google Scholar
• Whitton BA. 2012. Ecology of Cyanobacteria II. Their diversity in space and time. New York (NY): Springer.
   Google Scholar
• Whitton BA. 2013. Use of benthic algae and bryophytes for monitoring rivers. J Ecol Environ. 36:95–100.
   Google Scholar
• Woelkerling WJ, Kowal RR, Gough SB. 1976. Sedgwick-rafter cell counts: a procedural analysis. Hydrobiologia. 48:95–107.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zar JH. 2007. Biostatistical analysis. 5th ed. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Printice Hall.
   Google Scholar