Korean stream types based on benthic macroinvertebrate communities according to stream size and altitude

References

• Allan JD, Castillo MM. 2007. Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• AQEM CONSORTIUM. 2002. Manual for the application of the AQEM system. A comprehensive method to assess European streams using benthic macroinvertebrates, developed for the purpose of the water framework directive, version, 1. Contract No: EVK1-CT1999-00027, EU Projects.
   Google Scholar
• Arle J, Blondzik K, Claussen U, Duffek A, Grimm S, Hilliges F, Hoffmann A, Leujak W, Mohaupt V, Naumann S, et al. 2014. Environmental policy, water resources management in Germany. Part 2. Water quality, federal ministry of environment, nature conservation, building and nuclear safety, 53048 Bonn. Bonn: Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Construction and Nuclear Safety; p. 37–58.
   Google Scholar
• Barbour MT, Gerritsen J, Snyder B, Stribling J. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers. Washington (DC): USEPA.
   Google Scholar
• Bingchuan X. 1987. Biogeographical provincialism and biomigratory barriers during the permo-carboniferous in China. GeoJournal. 14:429–434.
   Google Scholar
• Bray JR, Curtis JT. 1957. An ordination of the upland forest communities of Southern Wisconsin. Ecol Monogr. 27:325–349.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Carter JL, Fend SV. 2001. Inter-annual changes in the benthic community structure of riffles and pools in reaches of contrasting gradient. Hydrobiologia. 459:187–200.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dufrene M, Legendre P. 1997. Species assemblages and indicator species: the need for a flexible asymmetrical approach. Ecol Monogr. 67:345–366.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Edsall TA, Behrendt TE, Cholwek G, Frey JW, Kennedy GW, Smith SB. 1997. Use of remote-sensing techniques to survey the physical habitat of large rivers. Ann Arbor (MI): US Geological Survey, Great Lakes Science Center.
   Google Scholar
• EPA. 2013. National rivers and streams assessment 2008-2009 a collaborative survey. Washington (DC): Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Faustini JM, Kaufmann PR, Herlihy AT. 2009. Downstream variation in bankfull width of wadeable streams across the conterminous United States. Geomorphology. 108:292–311.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Flotemersch JE, Stribling JB, Paul MJ. 2006. Concepts and approaches for the bioassessment of non-wadeable streams and rivers. Washington (DC): US Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development.
   Google Scholar
• Goldstein RM, Lorenz D, Niemela S. 2000. Development of a stream habitat index for use with an index of biotic integrity in the St. Croix River Basin, Minnesota. Mounds View (MN): US Department of the Interior, US Geological Survey, Branch of Information Services; p. 2000 [ distributor].
   Google Scholar
• Harper MP, Peckarsky BL. 2006. Emergence cues of a mayfly in a high-altitude stream ecosystem: potential response to climate change. Ecol Appl. 16:612–621.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Heino J, Parviainen J, Paavola R, Jehle M, Louhi P, Muotka T. 2005. Characterizing macroinvertebrate assemblage structure in relation to stream size and tributary position. Hydrobiologia. 539:121–130.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hering D, Moog O, Sandin L, Verdonschot PFM. 2004. Overview and application of the AQEM assessment system. Hydrobiologia. 516:1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes RM, Peck DV. 2008. Acquiring data for large aquatic resource surveys: the art of compromise among science, logistics, and reality. J N Am Benthol Soc. 27:837–859.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Humphries P, Growns JE, Serafina LG, Hawking JH, Chick AJ, Lake PS. 1997. Macroinvertebrate sampling methods for lowland Australian rivers. Hydrobiologia. 364:209–218.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR, Weber M. 2011. National and regional comparisons between Strahler order and stream size. J N Am Benthol Soc. 30:103–121.
   Google Scholar
• Illies J and Lazare B. 1963. Problems and methods of the classification and ecological zonation of running water, considered mainly from a faunistic point of view [Problèmes et méthodes de la classification et de la-zonation écologique des eaux courantes, considérées surtout-du point de vue faunistique]. French. Stuttgart: E. Schweizerbart.
   Google Scholar
• Jiang XM, Xiong J, Qiu JW, Wu JM, Wang JW, Xie ZC. 2010. Structure of macroinvertebrate communities in relation to environmental variables in a subtropical Asian river system. Int Rev Hydrobiol. 95:42–57.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Johnson SC. 1967. Hierarchical clustering schemes. Psychometrika. 32:241–254.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Judy Jr RD, Seeley PN, Murray TM, Svirsky SC, Whitworth MR. 1984. 1982 National fisheries survey. Volume I. Technical report: Initial findings, DTIC Document. Washington (DC): Department of the Interior, US Fish and Wildlife Service.
   Google Scholar
• Junk WJ, Bayley PB, Sparks RE. 1989. The flood pulse concept in river-floodplain systems. Can Spec Publ Fish Aquat Sci. 106:110–127.
   Google Scholar
• Jun Y-C, Kim N-Y, Kim S-H, Park Y-S, Kong D-S, Hwang S-J. 2016. Spatial distribution of benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in relation to environmental variables in Korean nationwide streams. Water. 8:27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kantor S, Naiman R, Bilby RE. 2001. River ecology and management: lessons from the pacific coastal ecoregion. Ann Arbor (MI): Springer Science & Business Media.
   Google Scholar
• Kong D, Kim JY. 2016. [Development of benthic macroinvertebrates streambed index (BMSI) for bioassessment of stream physical habitat]. J Korean Soc Water Environ. 32:1–14. Korean.
   Google Scholar
• Kong D, Kim JY, Son SH, Oh MW, Choi AR, Byeon MS. 2013. Development and application of Korean thermality index (KTI) for biological assessment on climate change. J Korean Soc Water Environ. 29:114–126. Korean.
   Google Scholar
• Kong D, Son SH, Kim JY, Won DH, Kim MC, Park JH, Chon TS, Lee JE, Park JH, Kwak IS, et al. 2012. In Development and application of Korean benthic macroinvertebrates index for biological assessment on stream environment, 2012 Spring Conference and water environmental forum of Yeongsan River; South Korea. Korean J Ecol Environ. p. 114–126. Korean.
   Google Scholar
• Lee S-W, Hwang S-J, Lee J-K, Jung D-I, Park Y-J, Kim J-T. 2011. Overview and application of the national aquatic ecological monitoring program (NAEMP) in Korea. Ann Limnol - Int J Lim. 47:S3–S14.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Lorenz CM, Van Dijk GM, Van Hattum AGM, Cofino WP. 1997. Concepts in river ecology: implications for indicator development. Regul Rivers: Res Mgmt. 13:501–516.
   Google Scholar
• McQuitty LL. 1966. Similarity analysis by reciprocal pairs for discrete and continuous data. Educ Psychol Meas. 26:825–831.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Meador MT, Hupp CR, Cuffney TF, Gurtz ME. 1993. Methods for characterizing stream habitat as part of the national water-quality assessment program. Open-file report 93-408. Reston, Va.
   Google Scholar
• Merritt RW, Cummins KW. 1996. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. Dubuque (IA): Kendall Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Merz JE, Ochikubo Chan LK. 2005. Effects of gravel augmentation on macroinvertebrate assemblages in a regulated California river. River Res App. 21:61–74.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Minshall GW, Petersen RC, Cummins KW, Bott TL, Sedell JR, Cushing CE, Vannote RL. 1983. Interbiome comparison of stream ecosystem dynamics. Ecol Monogr. 53:1–25.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Morrill JC, Bales RC, Conklin MH. 2005. Estimating stream temperature from air temperature: implications for future water quality. J Environ Eng. 131:139–146.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Nelson SM, Lieberman DM. 2002. The influence of flow and other environmental factors on benthic invertebrates in the Sacramento river, USA. Hydrobiologia. 489:117–129.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ohio EPA. 1989. Biological criteria for the protection of aquatic life. Columbus (OH): Ohio Environmental Protection Agency, Division of Water Quality Monitoring and Assessment. Vol. III.
   Google Scholar
• Ormerod SJ, Rundle SD, Wilkinson SM, Daly GP, Dale KM, Juttner I. 1994. Altitudinal trends in the diatoms, bryophytes, macroinvertebrates and fish of a Nepalese river system. Freshwater Biol. 32:309–322.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Paulsen SG, Mayio A, Peck DV, Stoddard JL, Tarquinio E, Holdsworth SM, Van Sickle J, Yuan LL, Hawkins CP, Herlihy AT, et al. 2008. Condition of stream ecosystems in the US: an overview of the first national assessment. J N Am Benthological Soc. 27:812–821.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Peck DV, Averill DK, Herlihy AT, Hughes RM, Kaufmann PR, Klemm DJ, Lazorchak JM, McCormick FH, Peterson SA, Cappaert MR, et al. 2005. Environmental monitoring and assessment program – surface waters western pilot study: Field Operations Manual for Non-Wadeable Rivers and Streams. EPA/620/R-06/003, 2006.Washington (DC): US Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Pilgrim JM, Fang X, Stefan HG. 1998. Stream temperature correlations with air temperatures in Minnesota: implications for climate warming. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 34:1109–1121.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Plafkin JL, Barbour MT, Porter KD, Gross SK, Hughers RM. 1989. Rapid bioassessment protocols. Washington(DC): US Environmental Protection Agency.
   Google Scholar
• Reash R. 1999. Considerations for characterizing Midwestern large river habitats: assessing the sustainability and biological integrity of water resources using fish communities. Boca Raton (FL): CRC Press; p. 463–474.
   Google Scholar
• Rosenberg DM, Danks H, Lehmkuhl DM. 1986. Importance of insects in environmental impact assessment. Environ Manage. 10:773–783.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sheehan RJ, Rasmussen JL. 1999. Large rivers. In: Kohler C, WAH, Editors Inland fisheries management in North America. 2nd ed. Bethesda (MD): American Fisheries Society; p. 529–559.
   Google Scholar
• Shubert LE. 1984. Algae as ecological indicators. In: Algae as ecological indicators. New York: Academic Press.
   Google Scholar
• Simonson TD, Lyons J, Kanehl PD. 1994. Guidelines for evaluation of fish habitat in Wisconsin streams. St. Paul (MN): General Technical Report NC-164, USDA Forest Service.
   Google Scholar
• Smith MJ, Kay WR, Edward DHD, Papas PJ, Richardson KSJ, Simpson JC, Pinder AM, Cale DJ, Horwitz PHJ, Davis JA. 1999. AUSRIVAS: using macroinvertebrates to assess ecological condition of rivers in Western Australia. Freshwater Biol. 41:269–282.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sokal RR. 1958. A statistical method for evaluating systematic relationships. Univ Kans Sci Bull. 38:1409–1438.
   Google Scholar
• Stalnaker CB, Milhous RT, Bovee KD. 1989. In: Hydrology and hydraulics applied to fishery management in large rivers. International Large River Symposium Ottawa (ON): Department of Fisheries and Oceans.
   Google Scholar
• Strahler AN. 1952. Hypsometric (area-altitude) analysis of erosional topography. Geol Soc Am Bull. 63:1117–1142.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ter Braak CJ. 1986. Canonical correspondence analysis: a new eigenvector technique for multivariate direct gradient analysis. Ecology. 67:1167–1179.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thomas WA. 1972. Indicators of environmental quality: an overview. In: Thomas WA, Editor Indicators of environmental quality. New York: Springer: Plenum Press; p. 1–5.
   Google Scholar
• Thorp JH, Delong MD. 1994. The riverine productivity model: an heuristic view of carbon sources and organic processing in large river ecosystems. Hoboken (NJ): Wiley; p. 305–308.
   Google Scholar
• Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 37:130–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward J. 1998. Riverine landscapes: biodiversity patterns, disturbance regimes, and aquatic conservation. Biol Conserv. 83:269–278.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward JV, Stanford JA. 1982. Thermal responses in the evolutionary ecology of aquatic insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 27:97–117.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Ward JV, Stanford JA. 1995. The serial discontinuity concept: extending the model to floodplain rivers. Regul Rivers: Res Mgmt. 10:159–168.
   Google Scholar
• WFD. 2000. E.U. Directive 2000/60/EC of the European parliament and of the council establishing a framework for the community action in the field of water policy. Brussels: The European Parliament and the Council of the European Union.
   Google Scholar
• Wilhelm JG, Allan JD, Wessell KJ, Merritt RW, Cummins KW. 2005. Habitat assessment of non-wadeable rivers in Michigan. Environ Manage. 36:592–609.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Won DH, Jun YC, Kwon SJ, Hwang SJ, Ahn KG, Lee JK. 2006. Development of Korean saprobic index using benthic macroinvertebrates and its application to biological stream environment assessment. J Kor Soc Water Quality. 22:768–783. Korean.
   Google Scholar
• Wright JF, Sutcliffe DW, Furse MT. 2000. Assessing the biological quality of fresh waters: RIVPACS and other techniques. Freshwater biological association. Ambleside: The RIVPACS International Workshop.
   Google Scholar
• Xuehua D, Zhaoyin W, Mengzhen X, Zhang K. 2009. Effect of streambed sediment on benthic ecology. Int J Sediment Res. 24:325–338.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Yoon IB, Kong DS, Ryu JK. 1992a. Studies on the biological evaluation of water quality by benthic macroinvertebrates (1) - Saprobic valency and indicative value. Korean J Environ Biol. 10:24–49. Korean.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon IB, Kong DS, Ryu JK. 1992b. Studies on the biological evaluation of water quality by benthic macroinvertebrates (2) – effects of environmental factors to community. Korean J Environ Biol. 10:40–55. Korean.
   Google Scholar
• Yoon IB, Kong DS, Ryu JK. 1992c. Studies on the biological evaluation of water quality by benthic macroinvertebrates (3) – macroscopic simple water quality evaluation. Korean J Environ Biol. 10:77–84. Korean.
   Google Scholar
• Zonneveld I. 1983. Principles of bio-indication. In: Bes EPH, Haeck J, Editors. Ecological indicators for the assessment of the quality of air, water, soil, and ecosystems. Enschede: Springer; p. 207–217.
   Google Scholar