Testing continuity in a Michigan (USA) river using the organic biomass of adult Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera

References

• Allan JD. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of land use on stream ecosystems. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 35(1):257–284.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Beauchard O, Veríssimo H, Queirós AM, Herman PMJ. 2017. The use of multiple biological traits in marine community ecology and its potential in ecological indicator development. Ecol Indicators. 76:81–96.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Brakel K, Wassink LR, Houghton DC. 2015. Nocturnal flight periodicity of the caddisflies (Trichoptera) in forest and meadow habitats of a first order Michigan stream. Great Lakes Entomol. 48:33–44.
   Google Scholar
• Burian SK. 2019. Chapter 13, Ephemeroptera. In: Merritt, RW, Cummins KW, and Berg MB, editors. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 5th ed. Dubuque (IA): Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Hawkins CP. 2011. The comparability of bioassessments: a review of conceptual and methodological issues. J North American Benthol Society. 30(3):680–701.
   Google Scholar
• Cao Y, Larsen DP, Hughes RM, Angermeier PL, Patton TM. 2002. Sampling effort affects multivariate comparisons of stream assemblages. J N Am Benthol Soc 21:701–714.
   Google Scholar
• Chessman B, Williams S, Besley C. 2007. Bioassessment of streams with macroinvertebrates: effect of sampled habitat and taxonomic resolution. J N Am Benthol Soc 26:546–565.
   Google Scholar
• Chevene F, Doleadec S, Chessel D. 1994. A fuzzy coding approach for the analysis of long-term ecological data. Freshwater Biol. 31(3):295–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Collins SE, Matter SM, Buffam I, Flotemersch JE. 2018. A patchy continuum? Stream processes show varied responses to patch- and continuum-based analyses. Ecosphere. 9(11):e02481.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Curtis WJ, Gebhard AE, Perkin JS. 2018. The river continuum concept predicts prey assemblage structure for an insectivorous fish along a temperate riverscape. Freshwater Sci. 37(3):618–630.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• DeWalt RE, Kondratieff BC. 2019. Chapter 16, Plecoptera. In: Merritt, RW, Cummins KW, and Berg MB, editors. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 5th ed. Dubuque (IA): Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Dexter E, Rollwagen-Bollens G, Bollens SM. 2018. The trouble with stress: a flexible method for the evaluation of nonmetric multidimensional scaling. Limnol Oceanogr Method. 16(7):434–443.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dohet A. 2002. Are caddisflies an ideal group for the biological assessment of water quality in streams? Proceedings of the 10th International Symposium on Trichoptera – Nova Supplementa Entomologica. Keltern, Germany; p. 507–520.
   Google Scholar
• Dolédec S, Olivier JM, Statzner B. 2000. Accurate description of the abundance of taxa and their biological traits in stream invertebrate communities: effects of taxonomic and spatial resolution. FAL. 148(1):25–43.
   Google Scholar
• Doretto A, Piano E, Larson CE. 2020. The river continuum concept: lessons from the past and perspectives for the future. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 77(11):1853–1864.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gayraud S, Statzner B, Bady P, Haybachp A, Scholl F, Usseglio-Polatera P, Bacchi M. 2003. Invertebrate traits for the biomonitoring of large European rivers: an initial assessment of alternative metrics. Freshwater Biol. 48(11):2020–2045.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gerth W, Herily AT. 2006. Effect of sampling different habitat types in regional macroinvertebrate bioassessment surveys. J N Am Benthol Soc 25:501–512.
   Google Scholar
• Grubaugh JW, Wallace JB, Houston ES. 1996. Longitudinal changes of macroinvertebrate communities along an Appalachian stream continuum. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 53(4):896–909.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hill RA, Weber MA, Leibowitz SG, Olsen AR, Thornbrugh DJ. 2016. The Stream Catchment (StreamCat) Dataset: a database of watershed metrics for the conterminous United States. J Am Water Resour Assoc. 52(1):120–128.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton DC, Albers BA, Fitch WT, Smith EG, Smith MC, Steger EM. 2018. Serial discontinuity in naturally alternating forest and floodplain habitats of a Michigan (USA) stream based on physicochemistry, benthic metabolism, and organismal assemblages. J Freshwater Ecol. 33(1):139–155.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton DC, Berry EA, Gilchrist A, Thompson J, Nussbaum MA. 2011. Biological changes along the continuum of an agricultural stream: influence of a small terrestrial preserve and use of adult caddisflies in biomonitoring. J Freshwater Ecol. 26(3):381–397.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton DC, DeWalt RE. 2021. If a tree falls in the forest: terrestrial habitat loss predicts caddisfly (Insecta: Trichoptera) assemblages and functional feeding group biomass throughout rivers of the North-central United States. Landscape Ecol. 36(10):3018–3061.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton DC, Lardner R. 2020. Ash-free dry mass values for northcentral USA caddisflies (Insecta, Trichoptera). ZooKeys. 951:37–46.
   PubMedGoogle Scholar
• Houghton DC. 2004. Biodiversity of Minnesota caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera): delineation and characterization of regions. Environ Monit Assess. 95(1–3):153–181.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton DC. 2012. Biological diversity of Minnesota caddisflies. ZK. 189:1–389.
   Google Scholar
• Houghton DC. 2018. When to sample adult caddisflies: data from a five-year study of a first-order Michigan (USA) stream. Journal of Freshwater Ecology. 33(1):211–221.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton DC. 2021a. A tale of two habitats: whole-watershed comparison of disturbed and undisturbed river systems in northern Michigan (USA), based on adult Ephemeroptera, Plecoptera, and Trichoptera assemblages and functional feeding group biomass. Hydrobiologia. 848(15):3429–3446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Houghton DC. 2021b. Assessment of stream conditions and anthropogenic disturbance of the northcentral United States. J Freshwater Ecol. 36(1):1–12.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kitchin PL. 2005. Measuring the amount of statistical information in the EPT index. Environmetrics. 16(1):51–59.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larsen S, Bruno MC, Vaughan IP, Zolezzi G. 2019. Testing the River Continuum Concept with geostatistical stream-network models. Ecological Complexity. 39:100773.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Legendre P, Legendre L. 2012. Ordination in reduced space. In: Legendre P, Legendre L, editors. Numerical Ecology. 3rd edition. Amsterdam (NL): Elsevier; p. 425–520.
   Google Scholar
• Maasri A, Thorp JH, Kotlinski N, Kiesel J, Erdenee B, Jähnig SC. 2021. Variation in macroinvertebrate community structure of functional process zones along the river continuum: New elements for the interpretation of the river ecosystem synthesis. River Res Applic. 37(4):665–674.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Masese FO, Raburu PO. 2017. Improving the performance of the EPT index to accommodate multiple stressors in Afrotropical streams. African J Aquatic Sci. 42(3):219–233.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Merritt RW, Cummins KW, Berg MB. 2019. An introduction to the aquatic insects of North America. 5th ed. Dubuque (IA): Kendall/Hunt.
   Google Scholar
• Peck J. 2016. Multivariate analysis for ecologists. Step-by-step. MJM Software, Gleneden Beach, Oregon; p. 192.
   Google Scholar
• Pereira R, Rodrigues GG, Calor AR, Vasconcelos SD. 2021. Field assessment of the efficiency of two sampling techniques for adult caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera). Int J Trop Insect Sci. 41(1):903–908.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Petersen I, Winterbottom JH, Orton S, Friberg N, Hildrew AG, Spiers DC, Gurney† WSC. 1999. Emergence and lateral dispersal of adult Plecoptera and Trichoptera from Broadstone Stream, U.K. Freshwater Biol. 42(3):401–416.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Pollice A, Jona-Lasinio G, Gaglio M, Blanchet FG, Fano EA. 2020. Modelling the effect of directional spatial ecological processes for a river network in Northern Italy. Ecol Indicators. 112:106144.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Rosi-Marshall EJ, Vallis KL, Baxter CV, Davis JM. 2016. Retesting a prediction of the river continuum concept: atochthonous versus allochthonous resources in the diets of invertebrates. Freshwater Sci. 35(2):534–543.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sode A, Wiberg-Larsen P. 1993. Dispersal of adult Trichoptera at a Danish forest brook. Freshwater Biol. 30(3):439–446.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sommerhäuser M, Koch P, Robert B, Schumacher H. 1999. Caddisflies as indicators for the classification of riparian systems along lowland streams. In Malicky H, Chantaramongkol, editors. Proceedings of the 9th International Symposium on Trichoptera; Jan 5–10 1998; Chiang Mai: Faculty of Science, Chiang Mai University; p. 337–348.
   Google Scholar
• Strahler AN. 1957. Quantitative analysis of watershed geomorphology. Trans AGU. 38(6):913–920.
   Google Scholar
• South EJ, DeWalt RE, Cao Y. 2018. Relative importance of Conservation Reserve Programs to aquatic insect biodiversity in an agricultural watershed in the Midwest, USA. Hydrobiologia 829:323–340.
   Google Scholar
• Svensson BW. 1975. Morphometric variation of adult Potamophylax cingulatus (Trichoptera) reflecting environmental heterogeneity in a south Swedish stream. Oikos. 26(3):365–377.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Thorp JH, Thoms MC, Delong MD. 2006. The riverine ecosystem synthesis: biocomplexity in river networks across space and time. River Res Applic. 22(2):123–147.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tomanova S, Tedesco PA, Campero M, Van Damme PA, Moya N, Oberdorff T. 2007. Longitudinal and altitudinal changes of macroinvertebrate functional feeding groups in neotropical streams: a test of the river continuum concept. FAL. 170(3):233–241.
   Google Scholar
• Vannote RL, Minshall GW, Cummins KW, Sedell JR, Cushing CE. 1980. The river continuum concept. Can J Fish Aquat Sci. 37(1):130–137.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Venarsky MP, Stewart-Koster B, Hunt RJ, Jardine TD, Bunn SE. 2020. Spatial and temporal variation of fish community biomass and energy flow throughout a tropical river network. Freshwater Biology 65: 1781–1792.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner R. 2002. The influence of temperature and food on size and weight of adult Chaetopteryx vilosa (Fabricius) (Insecta: Trichoptera). FAL. 154(3):393–411.
   Google Scholar
• Wagner R. 2005. The influence of stream water temperature on size and weight of caddisflies (Insecta, Trichoptera) along the Breitenbach 1983–1991. archiv_hydrobiologie. 163(1):65–79.
   Google Scholar
• Warton DI, Hui FKC. 2011. The arcsine is asinine: the analysis of proportions in ecology. Ecology. 92(1):3–10.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wright DR, Jr., Pytel AJ, Houghton DC. 2013. Nocturnal flight periodicity of the caddisflies (Insecta: Trichoptera) in a large Michigan river. J Freshwater Ecol. 28(4):463–476.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Zuellig RE, Schmidt TS. 2012. Characterizing invertebrate traits in wadeable streams of the contiguous US: differences among ecoregions and land uses. Freshwater Sci. 31(4):1042–1056.
   Google Scholar