Spawning schedule of the imperiled Bigeye Chub (Hybopsis amblops) in Illinois

References

• Akin DR, Geheber AD. 2020. Conforming to the status flow: the influence of altered habitat on fish body-shape characteristics. Freshw Biol. 65(11):1883–1893.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Albanese B, Angermeier PL, Peterson JT. 2009. Does mobility explain variation in colonisation and population recovery among stream fishes? Freshw Biol. 54(7):1444–1460.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Alexander GG, Allan JD. 2006. Stream restoration in the Upper Midwest, U.S.A. Restor Ecol. 14(4):595–604.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Baker FC. 1922. The molluscan fauna of the Big Vermilion River, Illinois, with special reference to its modification as a result of pollution by sewage and manufacturing wastes. Illinois Biol Monograph. 7:105–224. + 15 pls.
   Google Scholar
• Banner KM, Irvine KM, Rodhouse TJ. 2020. The use of Bayesian priors in ecology: the good, the bad, and the not great. Method Ecol Evol. 11(8):882–889.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Berendzen PB, Gamble T, Simons AM. 2008. Phylogeography of the Bigeye Chub, Hybopsis amblops (Teleostei: Cypriniformes): early Pleistocene diversification and post-glacial range expansion. J Fish Biol. 73(8):2021–2039.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bernhardt ES, Palmer MA, Allan JD, Alexander G, Barnas K, Brooks S, Carr J, Clayton S, Dahm C, Follstad-Shah J, et al. 2005. Ecology. Synthesizing U.S. river restoration efforts. Science. 308(5722):636–637.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bertrand WA, Hite RL, Day DM. 1996. Biological stream characterization (BSC): biological assessment of Illinois stream quality through 1993. Biological Streams Characterization Work Group, Springfield, Illinois. pp. 44.
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner PC. 2017. BRMS: an R Package for Bayesian Multilevel Models Using Stan. J Stat Soft. 80(1):1–28.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Bürkner PC. 2018. Advanced Bayesian Multilevel Modeling with the R Package brms. R J. 10(1):395–411.
   Google Scholar
• Bürkner PC. 2021. Bayesian Item Response Modeling in R with brms and Stan. J Stat Soft. 100(5):1–54.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Burr BM, Cook KM, Eisenhour DJ, Piller KR, Poly WJ, Sauer RW, et al. 1996. Selected Illinois fishes in jeopardy: new records and status evaluations. Transact Illinois State Academy Sci. 89:169–186.
   Google Scholar
• Cummins KW. 1962. An evaluation of some techniques for the collection and analysis of benthic samples, with special emphasis on lotic waters. American Midland Naturalist. 67(2):477–504.
   Google Scholar
• Detenbeck NE, DeVore PW, Niemi GJ, Lima A. 1992. Recovery of temperate-stream fish communities from disturbance: a review of case studies and synthesis of theory. Environ Manage. 16(1):33–53.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Dorazio RM. 2016. Bayesian data analysis in population ecology: motivations, methods, and benefits. Popul Ecol. 58(1):31–44.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Foster K, Bower L, Piller K. 2015. Getting in shape: habitat-based morphological divergence for two sympatric fishes. Biol J Linn Soc Lond. 114(1):152–162.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Frimpong EA, Angermeier PL. 2009. FishTraits: a database of ecological and life-history traits of freshwater fishes of the United States. Fisheries. 34(10):487–495.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabry J, Simpson D, Vehtari A, Betancourt M, Gelman A. 2019. Visualization in Bayesian workflow. J R Stat Soc A. 182(2):389–402.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Gabry J, Mahr T. 2021. "Bayesplot: Plotting for Bayesian Models." R package version 1.8.1, <URL: https://mc-stan.org/bayesplot/>.
   Google Scholar
• Gelman A, Goodrich B, Gabry J, Vehtari A. 2019. R-squared for Bayesian regression models. American Statistician. 73(3):307–309.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Hodgskins K, Greenleaf S, Hillman J, Stallsmith B. 2016. Reproductive schedule of the Silver Shiner (Notropis photogenis) in the Flint River of Alabama. Southeastern Fishes Council Proceed. 56:12–31.
   Google Scholar
• Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board (IESPB). 2015. Checklist of Endangered and Threatened Animals and Plants of Illinois. Illinois: Endangered Species Protection Board, Springfield; pp. 18.
   Google Scholar
• Illinois Endangered Species Protection Board (IESPB). 2020. Checklist of endangered and threatened animals and plants of Illinois. Illinois: Endangered Species Protection Board, Springfield; pp. 10.
   Google Scholar
• Johnston CE. 1999. The relationship of spawning mode to conservation of North American minnows (Cyprinidae). Environ Biol Fish. 55(1–2):21–30.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Kansas Fish Committee 2014. Kansas Fishes. Lawrence: University of Kansas Press; pp. 496.
   Google Scholar
• Kindsvater HK, Dulvy NK, Horswill C, Juan-Jordá M-J, Mangel M, Matthiopoulos J. 2018. Overcoming the data crisis in biodiversity conservation. Trends Ecol Evol. 33(9):676–688.
   PubMed Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Larimore RW, Bayley PB. 1996. The fishes of Champaign County, Illinois, during a century of alterations of a prairie ecosystem. INHS Bulletin. 35(1-5):53–183.
   Google Scholar
• Larimore RW, Smith PW. 1963. The fishes of Champaign County, Illinois, as affected by 60 years of stream changes. INHS Bulletin. 28(1-3):299–382.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy MA. 2007. Bayesian methods for ecology. United Kingdom: Cambridge University Press.
   Google Scholar
• McCarthy MA, Masters P. 2005. Profiting from prior information in Bayesian analyses of ecological data. J Appl Ecol. 42(6):1012–1019.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• McMahon TE, Zale AV, Orth DJ. 1996. Aquatic habitat measurements (pp. 83–120). In: Murphy DR, Willis DW, editors. Fisheries techniques. 2nd ed. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, Maryland; pp. 732.
   Google Scholar
• Mollenhauer R, Miller AD, Goff J, Brewer SK. 2020. The influence of groundwater on the population size and total length of warmwater stream fishes. Southeastern Naturalist. 19(2):308–324.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Mullner SA, Hubert WA, Wesche TA. 2000. Visually estimating substrate composition at potential spawning sites for trout in mountain streams. J Freshw Ecol. 15(2):199–207.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Page LM, Cummings Mayer CA, Post SL, Retzer ME. 1992. Biologically significant Illinois streams. An evaluation of the streams of Illinois based on aquatic biodiversity. Illinois Natural History Survey, Center for Biodiversity. Technical Report 1992(1). Champaign, Illinois; pp. 485
   Google Scholar
• Page LM, Retzer ME. 2002. The status of Illinois' rarest fishes and crustaceans. Transact Illinois State Academy Sci. 95:311–326.
   Google Scholar
• Pedersen TL. 2020. Patchwork: The Composer of Plots. R package version 1.1.1. https://CRAN.R-project.org/package=patchwork.
   Google Scholar
• Pflieger WL. 1997. The Fishes of Missouri. Jefferson City: Missouri Department of Conservation; pp. 371.
   Google Scholar
• Poirazidis K, Goutner V, Skartsi T, Stamou G. 2004. Modelling nesting habitat as a conservation tool for the Eurasian black vulture (Aegypius monachus) in Daidia Nature Reserve, northeastern Greece. Biol Conserv. 118(2):235–248.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• R Core Team. 2021. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing. https://www.R-project.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Roni P, Beechie TJ, Bilby RE, Leonetti FE, Pollock MM, Pess GR. 2002. A review of stream restoration techniques and a hierarchical strategy for prioritizing restoration in pacific northwest watersheds. North Am J Fish Manage. 22(1):1–20.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Sherwood JL, Wylie DB. 2015. Current status and historic range of one of Illinois' rarest fishes. Transact Illinois State Academy Sci. 108:43–46.
   Google Scholar
• Smith PW. 1968. An assessment of changes in the fish fauna of two Illinois rivers and its bearing on their future. Transact Illinois State Academy Sci. 61:31–45.
   Google Scholar
• Smith PW. 1971. Illinois streams: a classification based on their fishes and an analysis of factors responsible for disappearance of native species. Illinois Natural History Survey Bioll Note. 76:14. pp.
   Google Scholar
• Smith PW. 1979. The fishes of Illinois. Urbana: University of Illinois Press; pp. 314.
   Google Scholar
• Stan Development Team. 2021. RStan: the R interface to Stan. R package version 2.21.3. https://mc-stan.org/.
   Google Scholar
• Starrett WC. 1951. Some factors affecting the abundance of minnows in the Des Moines River, Iowa. Ecology. 32(1):13–27.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Tiemann JS. 2008. Distribution and life history characteristics of the state-endangered Bluebreast Darter Etheostoma camurum (Cope) in Illinois. Transact Illinois State Academy Sci. 101:235–246.
   Google Scholar
• Tiemann JS, Fisher BE, Thomas T, Adams J, Moody-Carpenter C, Jones A, Colombo RE. 2021. First occurrence of the Streamline Chub Erimystax dissimilis and Tippecanoe Darter Etheostoma tippecanoe in Illinois and within the Vermilion River basin (Wabash River drainage). Transact Illinois State Academy Sci. 114:35–38.
   Google Scholar
• Tiemann JS, Retzer ME, Tiemann BL. 2004. Range expansion of the state-endangered Bigeye Chub Hybopsis amblops (Rafinesque) in Illinois. Transact Illinois State Academy Sci. 97:255–257.
   Google Scholar
• Tiemann JS, Sherwood JL, Stites AJ. 2020. Population expansion of the state-threatened Eastern Sand Darter, Ammocrypta pellucida (Agassiz, 1863), within the Vermilion River basin (Wabash River drainage). Illinois Transact Illinois State Academy Sci. 113:1–4.
   Google Scholar
• Tiemann JS, Taylor CA, Lamer J, Willink PW, Veraldi FM, Pescitelli S, et al. 2015. Range expansions and new drainage records for select Illinois fishes. Transact Illinois State Academy Sci. 108:47–52.
   Google Scholar
• van Treeck R, Van Wichelen J, Wolter C. 2020. Fish species sensitivity classification for environmental impact assessment, conservation and restoration planning. Sci Total Environ. 708:135–173.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehtari A, Gelman A, Gabry J. 2017. Practical Bayesian model evaluation using leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC. Stat Comput. 27(5):1413–1432.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Vehtari A, Gabry J, Magnusson M, Yao Y, Bürkner P, Paananen T, Gelman A. 2020. "loo: Efficient leave-one-out cross-validation and WAIC for Bayesian models." R package version 2.4.1, <URL: https://mc-stan.org/loo/>.
   Google Scholar
• Wade PR. 2000. Bayesian methods in conservation biology. Conserv Biol. 14(5):1308–1316.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Warren ML, Jr., Burr BM. 1988. Reassessment of the Illinois ranges of the Bigeye Chub, Hybopsis amblops, and the Pallid Shiner, Notropis amnis. Ohio J Sci. 88:181–183.
   Web of Science ®Google Scholar
• Wickham H. 2019. Ggplot2: elegant graphics for data analysis. New York, NY: Springer-Verlag.
   Google Scholar